Guide on how to configure UltimateDefrag 2008 properly

April 29, 2008

How to configure UltimateDefrag(UD) 2008 properly

[/br]

[/br]

[/br]

[/br]First of all: Don't try to be smart and skip the notes or other parts of the guide.

[/br]

[/br]

[/br]

[/br]Clickable! Table of contents:

[/br]<ul></li><li> <a href="#Notes">Notes</a>

[/br]</li><li> <a href="#LAT">Last Access Timestamps</a>

[/br]<ul></li><li> <a href="#Enable">Enable Last Access Timestamps</a>

[/br]</li><li> <a href="#Programs">Programs that mess with Last Access Timestamps</a></li></ul>

[/br]</li><li> <a href="#Setup">Setting up</a>

[/br]<ul></li><li> <a href="#A">Archive</a>

[/br]</li><li> <a href="#HP">High Performance</a></li></ul>

[/br]</li><li> <a href="#otheroptions">Other options</a>

[/br]<ul></li><li> <a href="#Excluded">Using the 'Excluded Files' option</a>

[/br]</li><li> <a href="#MFT">Put directories close to MFT</a>

[/br]</li><li> <a href="#layoutini">Respect layout.ini</a>

[/br]</li><li> <a href="#Resource">Resource usage</a>

[/br]</li><li> <a href="#Often">How often should I defrag?</a></li></ul>

[/br]</li><li> <a href="#Two">Two or more HD's</a>

[/br]</li><li> <a href="#Credits">Credits</a> </li></ul>

[/br]

[/br]

[/br]

[/br]<a name="Notes"></a>Notes:

[/br]

[/br]<ul><li>I would ask anyone to first read the included Help file(Read pages 5 through 22 and 34 through 39) that comes with UD 2008 before making his own configuration based on my guide written here, this Help file will give you a far greater understanding about how HD's operate and what will give an increase/decrease in their performance. Read the Help file, read my guide, add a little common sense and there you go: you're own 'perfect' defragmentation job configuration.

[/br]

[/br]

[/br]

[/br]<a href="http://www.disktrix.com/downloads/UltimateDefragHelpFile.pdf" target="_blank">Download UD 2008 Help File</a> (Read pages 5 through 22 and 34 through 39)

[/br]

[/br]

[/br]

[/br]</li<li>Works best with Windows XP, will work with any version of Windows as many of the files are the same, but this probably won't be useful for a Mac or Linux PC.

[/br]

[/br]

[/br]

[/br]</li<li>This guide is not to be taken as something that applies to every HD/Computer setup. This is due to the fact that everyone has a different HD size and some have more data on it then others do, these differences can affect on how my proposed settings affect your computer's performance. Something I can guarantee is that using this guide in combination with UD 2008 will give you a performance increase, how much? That's up to your interpretation and how much your HD looks like mine in size and number of GB's used.

[/br]

[/br]

[/br]

[/br]</li<li>If anyone has any suggestions, additions or comments please do post them! Also: There are no dumb questions, so if you don't understand something don't be afraid to ask!

[/br]

[/br]

[/br]

[/br]However, don't come in and ask 'What is the best configuration for my PC', without even reading the Help file, my guide and adding some common sense.</li></ul>

[/br]

[/br]<a name="LAT"></a>Last Access Timestamps

[/br]

[/br]It is very important to check if the Last Access Timestamps (from now on "LAT") are enabled, UD needs LAT to specify which files it will put in High Performance and which in Archive when Auto option(Explained later on) is selected, if not enabled you will lose some, if not most, of UltimateDefrag's functionality. If you do not wish to use Auto option then you can disregard this.

[/br]

[/br]

[/br]

[/br]<a name="Enable"></a>Enable Last Acces Timestamps:

[/br]

[/br]To check if LAT are enabled do the following:

[/br]

[/br]<ul></li><li>Go to the Command Prompt (Start &rarr All Programs &rarr Accessories &rarr Command Prompt) and type the following (without quotes):

[/br]

[/br]

[/br]

[/br]</li><li>'FSUTIL BEHAVIOR QUERY DISABLELASTACCESS' and then hit Enter

[/br]

[/br]

[/br]

[/br]</li><li>If it returns a value of ''0'' or "not set" then you do are done, LAT are already turned on.

[/br]

[/br]

[/br]

[/br]</li><li>If it returns a value of ''1'' then you need to type the following to enable LAT (without quotes):

[/br]

[/br]

[/br]

[/br]</li><li>'FSUTIL BEHAVIOR SET DISABLELASTACCESS 0' and then hit Enter. </li></ul>

[/br]

[/br]

[/br]

[/br]<a name="Programs"></a>Programs that mess with Last Acces Timestamps:

[/br]

[/br]Now you probably think you're done, but some programs(like some AV) change the LAT of your files when they scan them. At first glance this doesn't seem a problem, but yet it is. When Windows makes it LAT statistics it will see that every file that is scanned is not unused. This might cause UD to place them in the HP section, which is something we don't want for files that we almost never use, only when scanned by an AV. This will cause degraded performance, and that is something we do not want. The above does not apply to the on-access scanning of an AV, since the LAT will be changed anyway by the program accessing the file.

[/br]

[/br]

[/br]

[/br]To find these programs and enable an option that will make them preserve LAT (or stop using it) spasserfan has started <a href="http://www.nsaneforums.com/index.php?showtopic=11079" target="_blank">this thread</a>.

[/br]

[/br]

[/br]

[/br]Note: If you must use a program that does not preserve LAT, you should search for an alternative or if you really need the program you could disable LAT, reboot before using a program that changes them and afterwards enable the LAT and reboot again.

[/br]

[/br]

[/br]

[/br]Above about LAT is written by spasserfan and edited by me.

[/br]

[/br]

[/br]

[/br]<a name="Defragmethod"></a>Defragmentation Method

[/br]

[/br]All of this is done with the 'Folder/File name' defragmentation method('Respect high performance', 'Respect archive', 'Put directories close to MFT'(You can find these setting under Folder/File name > Options) options selected). If you don't want to spend half an hour (or more) configuring your defragmentation application you can leave this and just select the 'Auto' defragmentation method('Put directories close to MFT' selected), which will give you improved performance, but not as much as when you follow this guide.

[/br]

[/br]<a name="Setup"></a>Setting up

[/br]

[/br]I will specify which files you should put in the Archive section and which files you should put in the High Performance section now (You can get there by pressing Tools > Options> 'Select your HD' (If you just have one it is selected by default) and there you can find Archive(Wildcards, Auto and Custom), High Performance(Wildcards, Auto and Custom) and Excluded Files(* replaces any number of characters and the ? will replace one):

[/br]

[/br]<ul><a name="A"></a>Archive(A):

[/br]

[/br]Wildcards:

[/br]

[/br]</li><li>*.rar files(Believe it or not, but these files are 'Archives', wonder where they belong...)

[/br]

[/br]</li><li>*.zip files(''Same as above'')

[/br]

[/br]</li><li>*.r0?, *.r1? and following up to *.r9? (Don't add these if you don't use split archives) (* stands for any number of characters and ? stand for one, UD recognizes this)

[/br]

[/br]</li><li>*.00?, *.01? and following up to *.09? should be enough, but you could also add *.0??, *.1?? up to *.9?? but that would include any file with an extension with a digit at the start, so I recommend the first methodology (''Same as above, about the split archives, the * and the ? signs'')

[/br]

[/br]</li><li>*.iso files(CD backup files, used to distribute CD content over the net or to backup a CD, Warning sign: Don't use this option when you have game .iso files which you use to play those games. If you just used them for installing and applied a no-CD crack you can use this option though.)

[/br]

[/br]</li><li>*.cab files(Same as above, with the difference these are much used as Installer Archives)

[/br]

[/br]</li><li>*.avi(Personal preference, I download A LOT of movies and mostly I just keep them on my HD until and after I burn them. I've got RW DVD's so I might delete the some time and have to burn them again or there might be something wrong with the subtitles, so I always keep the .avI files until i've watched the movie(s))

[/br]

[/br]</li><li>*.mpeg(''Same as above'')

[/br]

[/br]</li><li>*.mpg(''Same as above'')

[/br]

[/br]</li><li>*.wmv(''Same as above'')

[/br]

[/br]</li><li>*.mov(''Same as above'')

[/br]

[/br]</li><li>*.vob(These are special, these are files created when I convert a video file into a dvd. Most of the time they aren't on my PC for very long because I watch most movies right after I converted them, but sometimes they are and then I want them to be out of the way)

[/br]

[/br]</li><li>*.mp3(Large music collections, I only use this option when I run out of space. Because I listen to my music very much so I don't want it to be slow)

[/br]

[/br]</li><li>*.wma(''Same as above'')

[/br]

[/br]</li><li>*.aac(I don't use this, but you might)

[/br]

[/br]</li><li>*.bak(Backup files, will probably never be used)

[/br]

[/br]</li><li>All other Archive files like .rar and .zip you use, I won't list them all since there are too many.

[/br]

[/br]</li><li>All other .iso like files (Virtual CD's) you use, I won't list them all since there are too many.

[/br]

[/br]

[/br]

[/br]Automatic:

[/br]

[/br]I don't select anything here... Because I might not have used some of my programs (In Program Files) and they would be placed in the lower performing areas that way.. Where we don't want to have them. In any case this value would depend on the available and used HD space. My HD is pretty empty so I put it to 0, but it's your pick. If your HD is more filled up, mines about 25 %, then you could try to pick a value like 5, 10, 20 or even 40 depending on how full your HD is. There isn't a 'best', there's millions of bests, for each PC it's own.

[/br]

[/br]

[/br]

[/br]If you could give me some more information about your HD capacity and usage I would be glad to give you some tips on how to set these values. I think it's best to just select all the files you want out of the way in the next step, this'll give you much more control.

[/br]

[/br]

[/br]

[/br]Custom:

[/br]

[/br]'C' can be any drive letter here.

[/br]

[/br]</li><li>In case you use MS Office, you can select C:/MSOCache/ here, these are the installer files for MS Office, which you probably won't be needing any time soon.

[/br]

[/br]</li><li>C:/System Volume Information/ (Place where System Restore information is stored(if activated). You probably never use this data, and when you do you won't be worrying about speed, believe me. On smaller systems I recommend setting this option on for once, creating one restore point, making a .rar file out of this, putting that somewhere safe and deactivating it. This way you can always extract the .rar file into the previously mentioned folder and activate System Restore again)

[/br]

[/br]</li><li>C:/Windows/Driver Cache/ (Name says all... Place where possibly needed drivers are stored, but you probably won't need them after you installed your system. (Except for when adding new hardware of course))

[/br]

[/br]</li><li>C:/Windows/Installer/ (Installer database, used when you uninstall a program. In my case this is an event that won't happen very often, so it pick these files)

[/br]

[/br]</li><li>C:/Windows/$...... (Mostly uninstaller backups, all folder in C:/Windows with an $ in it can be put with Archive)

[/br]

[/br]</li><li>C:/Windows/pchealth(Help subjects. If you need a lot of 'Help' don't add this...)

[/br]

[/br]</li><li>C:/Windows/Help('Same as above')

[/br]

[/br]</li><li>C:/RECYCLER/ (Trashbin...)

[/br]

[/br]</li><li>C:/Windows/IE7Updates (Old IE7 update files)

[/br]

[/br]</li><li>C:/Windows/ServicePackFiles/ (Old SP installation files)

[/br]

[/br]</li><li>C:/Windows/SoftwareDistribution (Used when updating Windows)

[/br]

[/br]</li><li>C:/Windows/system32/dllcache/ (Shadow-copy of important system files)

[/br]

[/br]</li><li>Any folder named i386 (It can be C:/i386 or C:/Windows/i386 or anything else) can be added to the Archive.

[/br]

[/br]</li><li>If you have a folder in which you store all your downloaded files (such as installers etc.) select that too, since these files only are used once (the programs run from another folder in C:/Program Files/ which is High Performance)

[/br]

[/br]</li><li>If you have large photo, video or music collections put them with Archive too.

[/br]

[/br]</li><li>Any other files you can think of you will never use... </li></ul>

[/br]

[/br]

[/br]

[/br]<ul><a name="HP"></a>High Performance(HP):

[/br]

[/br]Wildcards:

[/br]

[/br]</li><li>Outlook and/or Lotus users can select *.pst and/or *.ntf files to boost the performance of their email applications.

[/br]

[/br]</li><li>*.exe All .exe files(I have never used this option myself, but UD recommends it. It is quite logic, all executables should be high performance)

[/br]

[/br]</li><li>*.dll All .dll files(''Same as above'')

[/br]

[/br]

[/br]

[/br]Automatic:

[/br]

[/br]Same story as with Archive and Automatic... I use 10 % here, but that's just because otherwise UD will place some of my selected Archive files within high performance... Leaving gaps in the inner tracks... So not recommend for any of you, just so you know. You should decide which value fits your needs best, I recommend setting it to 5-30 % depending on the capacity of your HD and how much data is on it. If you pick your High Performance files very carefully in the next step you don't even really need this value, but I recommend never putting it under 5% because you can always miss something.

[/br]

[/br]

[/br]

[/br]Custom:

[/br]

[/br]</li><li>Any game you play should be High Performance... It'll make a big difference when you're on a slow computer, but fast computers profit a little from this too.

[/br]

[/br]</li><li>C:/Windows/Prefetch/ (This folder contains data that will automatically be loaded into the RAM at boot, programs you use much etc.)

[/br]

[/br]</li><li>C:/Windows/system32/ (All important system files. You can just select this folder in High Performance and leave C:/Windows/system32/dllcache in Archive, as Archive will overwrite High Performance)

[/br]

[/br]</li><li>C:/Windows/assembly/ (.NET Reference Assemblies, and no I don't know what that means, but it's important nevertheless...)

[/br]

[/br]</li><li>C:/Windows/Microsoft.NET/ (Microsoft .NET service)

[/br]

[/br]</li><li>C:/Windows/ime/ (Windows text services)

[/br]

[/br]</li><li>C:/Windows/inf (Important, has something to do with drivers)

[/br]

[/br]</li><li>C:/Windows/system/ (Need for explanation, I don't think so)

[/br]

[/br]</li><li>C:/Windows/WinSxS (Important system files)

[/br]

[/br]</li><li>C:/Windows/RegisteredPackages

[/br]

[/br]</li><li>C:/Windows/AppPatch/ (Important system files, at least they look important to me)

[/br]

[/br]</li><li>C:/Windows/..... (Don't select the whole folder, but all the important files in it, like explorer.exe, taskman.exe and such. (These files should probably be within the 5% I put with Automatic, but just to be sure select them here))

[/br]

[/br]</li><li>C:/Program Files (Program files... More explanation needed? Go ask your dad or ask the IT people at your school and laugh at them when they don't know...)

[/br]

[/br]</li><li>C:/Documents and Settings/ (Select all folders here except for the folders that contain those large video, mp3 or photo collections you want out of the way.

[/br]

[/br]</li><li>Any other files you use frequently. </li></ul>

[/br]

[/br]

[/br]

[/br]<a name="otheroptions"></a>Other options:

[/br]

[/br]<ul></li><li><a name="Excluded"></a>Using the 'Excluded files' option

[/br]

[/br]Excluded files won't be processed during the defragmentation job. They will be left alone, no matter to what category(Archive, High Performance or Other) they belong. This might seem like a useless option to the untrained eye, but it's not. It might come in very handy some time. For example: When i've got some files, that UD marks as part of the 5% most frequently used data I selected for high performance, which is want to put into the archive region for a very long time because I won't be using them anymore then I can use this option. First you select the files in the Archive section and run deragmentation(in which you only select the option 'Respect archive', so do not select 'Respect high performance'). Now these files will reside in the Archive region. After you did this you probably want to optimize the placement of your High Performance files too, but you can't do that because then the file you just put inside the Archive region will be replaced to the High Performance region again... So after you ran a defragmentation(in which you only selected the option 'Respect archive') you just put those files into the 'Excluded files' section and they will be left alone. Now you can go ahead and run a consolidate defragmentation with 'Respect high performance' selected too. (Remember to always have 'Respect archive' selected, otherwise all your archive files will be consolidated to the outer bands of your HD, and that is something you don't want because then you'll have to place them back to the inner bands again, which is a waste of your valuable time.

[/br]

[/br]

[/br]

[/br]</li><li><a name="MFT"></a>Put directories close to MFT

[/br]

[/br]Whatever defragmentation job you're running (except for 'Fragmented files only') always select Put directories close to MFT. I don't know exactly why, but the MFT and the directories are always accessed at the same time or right after each other. So they should be close to each other for improved performance. This way the HD won't have to search this much. It also helps SystemBoosterXP(by Disktrix) do it's job, dramatically. SystemBoosterXP is a RAM utility which loads your frequently used files in RAM before they are even asked for, this way the HD(slower than RAM) doesn't first have to find them and load them. For a guide on SystemBoosterXP, which has a much better layout than my guide does, <a href="http://www.nsaneforums.com/index.php?showtopic=11946" target="_blank">go here.</a>

[/br]

[/br]

[/br]

[/br]</li><li><a name="layoutini"></a>Respect layout.ini

[/br]

[/br]I don't recommend using layout.inI at this moment. Since UD seems to have a hard time handling it correctly, I will try it out every new release and see when it gets better...

[/br]

[/br]

[/br]

[/br]</li><li><a name="Resource"></a>Resource usage

[/br]

[/br]Unless you're multitasking a lot, I recommend setting it to 100%. When you're running a defragmentation job overnight or whilst you're away you should set it to 100% too. If you set it to Auto, it'll use less resources but will take much longer for the defrag to complete, even when you're not using your computer.

[/br]

[/br]

[/br]

[/br]</li><li><a name="Often"></a>How often should I defrag?

[/br]

[/br]I recommend doing a Folder/File name defrag with Strict Placement for HP and Fast Placement for A once every month(if you do not install much programs in a month, more than 5) and running a Folder/File name defrag with Fast Placement for HP and Fast Placement for A or a Fragmented files only defrag once every 1/2 week(s). </li></ul>

[/br]

[/br]

[/br]

[/br]<a name="Two"></a>Two or more HD's:

[/br]

[/br]At this point I don't think I will be making a guide for people with two HD's or more. I don't have two HD's myself so I can not test this. It's even more complicated due to the fact that I don't know how big your HD's are and that problem is minor when just using one, but when using two or more HD's this problem is much bigger. I also don't know the 'preselection' you guys made, most people have a HD containing Windows, Program Files and Games and another one with Movies, MP3's and images, but not all of you do. This makes it even harder to make an universal, works for everyone guide for two or more HD's. If you do own two HD's try to read the Help file, my guide and the note below and add some own input to make a configuration that's best for your HD's. If you use them in RAID(0, 1 or 0+1) and see two or more drives as just one you can just apply my guide for one HD. If you didn't make a preselection when using 2 HD's you could try to place Windows on the outer tracks of the first drive and Program Files on the outer tracks of the second drive and place all Data on the inner sections of both drivers, or Consolidate all Data(when it's not much) right after you HP files. This would be better and give higher performance than using my note below and making a preselection. So method before is preferable, but method below is much easier to accomplish when you already did make a preselection.

[/br]

[/br]

[/br]

[/br]Short configuration note for two HD's(With preselection 'Data' and 'Main'): On your 'Data HD' you should use Folder/File name method and select all files in High Performance, actually they are all Archive, but since the whole HD consists of Archive files you should put them to the outer tracks for faster access. On your main HD(Windows, Programs and Games) you should select all files I mentioned in high performance for High Performance and you should put all files that are on the main HD and are mentioned in Archive in this guide in Archive.

[/br]

[/br]

[/br]

[/br]<a name="Credits"></a>Special thanks to spasserfan, Sonar, eBait, Noddy (at Nsaneforums) and deXter (at Softexia) for adding some things I forgot or didn't know about.

[/br]

[/br]

[/br]

[/br]This guide was created at <a href="http://www.nsaneforums.com/" target="_new">nsane.forums</a> by shought.

[/br]

[/br]

[/br]

[/br]This guide has been updated last to post <a href="http://www.nsaneforums.com/index.php?showtopic=11480&view=findpost&p=59100" target="_blank">#106</a> on July 10 2008.

[/br]

[/br]

[/br]Useful Link: Programs not preserving last access timestamps

April 29, 2008

. . . . . . good effort, man - quite painstakingingly compiled, too :mellow:

April 29, 2008

. . . . . . good effort, man - quite painstakingingly compiled, too :mellow:

Thanks :) But what does 'painstakingingly' exactly mean?

ps. no one has any comments/suggestions/additions??? :blink:

April 29, 2008

ps. no one has any comments/suggestions/additions??? :)

nope, unless you can make it sprout burgers... I'm starving here :mellow: (found a new toy to play with hehe)

April 30, 2008

Thanks :mellow: But what does 'painstakingingly' exactly mean?

Simply put - it just means that you've taken a lot of trouble for this post. :)

BTW, feedback will come soon - I'm testing out this release.

April 30, 2008

Good job and thanks for this how to :mellow:

April 30, 2008

Thanks :mellow: But what does 'painstakingingly' exactly mean?
Simply put - it just means that you've taken a lot of trouble for this post. :)
BTW, feedback will come soon - I'm testing out this release.

K, that's great :blink: I hope someone with a bit more full HD will test my settings, because i just tested those settings on a 20 % and 30% full HD ;)

If anyone knows some more files that would be qualified for the Archive or High Performance region, please do tell me :)

@LoKz thanks :D

April 30, 2008

. . . . . . good effort, man - quite painstakingingly compiled, too :rolleyes:
Thanks :( But what does 'painstakingingly' exactly mean?
ps. no one has any comments/suggestions/additions??? :blink:

he means you put a lot of extemporaneous effort into the post.

April 30, 2008

. . . . . . good effort, man - quite painstakingingly compiled, too ;)
Thanks ;) But what does 'painstakingingly' exactly mean?
ps. no one has any comments/suggestions/additions??? :blink:
he means you put a lot of extemporaneous effort into the post.

Yeah, he told me :) But thanks anyway :D

May 1, 2008

High Performance:
Wildcards:
- *.exe All .exe files(I have never used this option myself, but UD recommends it. It is quite logic, all executables should be high performance)
- *.dll All .dll files(''Same as above'')

I have always used the above ' Consolidate' and it was reccomended to

me one time that I might want to add .cab files also, so I did.....

Unsure if it really helped but I could see it doing so.

*.cab

BTW:.. You will find with this MiNT release as with all the others

that you can not set a schedule..I have had many test this...the only

release that you could was CORE and FFF.... hopefully they grab this one.

Edit!::.. typ0

May 1, 2008

High Performance:
Wildcards:
- *.exe All .exe files(I have never used this option myself, but UD recommends it. It is quite logic, all executables should be high performance)
- *.dll All .dll files(''Same as above'')
I have always used the above ' Consolidate' and it was reccomended to
me one time that I might want to add .cab files also, so I did.....
Unsure if it really helped but I could see it doing do.
*.cab
BTW:.. You will find with this MiNT release as with all the others
that you can not set a schedule..I have had many test this...the only
release that you could was CORE and FFF.... hopefully they grab this one.

Add .cab to high performance...? You sure? That's in the Archive section here, thanks for telling me something about this. I'll investigate this :wtf: ;)

May 2, 2008

Well my guess is because a cabinet (.cab) file is a library of

compressed files stored as a single file. Cabinet files are used to organize

installation files that are copied to the user's system. Installation files contain

.exe and .dll files (and others ) but I could see it being good to have them

alongside one another.

As I said, I am unsure what good it does, but I do it anyway and have since UD came out.

May 2, 2008

You might as well point out that the auto methods (auto defrag method, and automatic in high performance and archive) uses last access timestamps, and therefore only works if you do not use a program that modifies these, even though it is not a true file usage. This type of programs is for example anti virus, anti spyware, desktop search and indexing tools etc.

From disktrix:

Some antivirus programs and desktop search and indexing
programs update the Last Access times of files that they scan and index.
Technically this contravenes Microsoft’s suggested practice for updating
Last Access time stamps since it is not a true “normal use” access. In this
instance we suggest that you lobby the maker of your antivirus program or
search program to have their products not alter the last access time stamp
when doing their scans of your files.

I have started this thread to help identify these programs, that way one could look for alternatives or just stop using the auto methods, otherwise archive files will be placed in high performance.

May 2, 2008

In high performance I would recommend putting the entire documents and settings folder (exept subfolders put in archive), since the folder "all users" also is used by some programs.

In archive tick all folders in windir starting with "$" that way you don't have to add any future folders in the archive section of your thread, if you chose not to, the I have an addition: windows\$MSI31uninstall*

Archive

You might also add C:\RECYCLER, to archive, since those files in the recycle bin won't be used, otherwise they are restored :blink:

windows\I386 (correct me if I am wrong, but this is a backup of the same dir on the wincd, won't be used on a daily basis)

windows\ie7updates (containing updates not the browser, that is stored in windows\ie7)

windows\ServicePackFiles (same as I386)

windows\SoftwareDistribution (used when updating, not used afterwards)

windows\system32\dllcache (name says it all :P backup folder in which Windows XP stores protected system files)

If you have a folder in which you store all your downloaded files (such as installers etc.) place that in archive also, since these files only are used once (the programs run from another folder)

You could also place your temp folders in archive, ideally these should be be emptied every now and then, but if that is not done, this get filled with a lot of files that is no longer used (newly created files in these folders are those files that are used, and they will be placed outside archive until next defrag):

windows\temp

C:\documents and settings\%username%\local settings\temporary internet files

C:\documents and settings\%username%\local settings\temp

C:\documents and settings\default user\temp

May 2, 2008

You might as well point out that the auto methods (auto defrag method, and automatic in high performance and archive) uses last access timestamps, and therefore only works if you do not use a program that modifies these, even though it is not a true file usage. This type of programs is for example anti virus, anti spyware, desktop search and indexing tools etc.
From disktrix:
Some antivirus programs and desktop search and indexing
programs update the Last Access times of files that they scan and index.
Technically this contravenes Microsoft’s suggested practice for updating
Last Access time stamps since it is not a true “normal use” access. In this
instance we suggest that you lobby the maker of your antivirus program or
search program to have their products not alter the last access time stamp
when doing their scans of your files.
I have started this thread to help identify these programs, that way one could look for alternatives or just stop using the auto methods, otherwise archive files will be placed in high performance.

Many thanks for this, never thought about this. Very useful addition :P

May 2, 2008

In high performance I would recommend putting the entire documents and settings folder (exept subfolders put in archive), since the folder "all users" also is used by some programs.
In archive tick all folders in windir starting with "$" that way you don't have to add any future folders in the archive section of your thread, if you chose not to, the I have an addition: windows\$MSI31uninstall*
Archive
You might also add C:\RECYCLER, to archive, since those files in the recycle bin won't be used, otherwise they are restored :P How on earth did i forget to add this?
windows\I386 (correct me if I am wrong, but this is a backup of the same dir on the wincd, won't be used on a daily basis) Yep, totally true, but i don't have this folder on my new PC, so that's why i didn't notice it :rockon:
windows\ie7updates (containing updates not the browser, that is stored in windows\ie7) Thanks for this addition
windows\ServicePackFiles (same as I386) (Same as above)
windows\SoftwareDistribution (used when updating, not used afterwards) (Same as above)
windows\system32\dllcache (name says it all :rockon: backup folder in which Windows XP stores protected system files) (Same as above)
If you have a folder in which you store all your downloaded files (such as installers etc.) place that in archive also, since these files only are used once (the programs run from another folder) I'll add this to ;)

You could also place your temp folders in archive, ideally these should be be emptied every now and then, but if that is not done, this get filled with a lot of files that is no longer used (newly created files in these folders are those files that are used, and they will be placed outside archive until next defrag):
windows\temp
C:\documents and settings\%username%\local settings\temporary internet files
C:\documents and settings\%username%\local settings\temp
C:\documents and settings\default user\temp
I don't agree with you on this last one because of this: When you do a defrag and leave your computer running these Temp files will still be in use and change in size, therefore cause fragmentation in the inner(archive) section and the outer(high performance) section because the new bytes will be written in the high performance area and not in the archive area. This will (for the moment) decrease computer responsiveness significantly.

Many thanks for adding these valuable things, i'll add your name to the credits for the guide too ;)

May 6, 2008

(...)I don't agree with you on this last one because of this: When you do a defrag and leave your computer running these Temp files will still be in use and change in size, therefore cause fragmentation in the inner(archive) section and the outer(high performance) section because the new bytes will be written in the high performance area and not in the archive area. This will (for the moment) decrease computer responsiveness significantly.

You are right here. What I should have written was: Those folders should be excluded from high performance (when placing placing documents and settings there, same applies to windows temp, if you chose to put the entire windir in HP), if the are not present in either archive or high performance, this files will (just as any other new file) be written in the nearest free space from the outer tracks and in (on a new defragmentet HDD the order will be: 1. high performance, 2. "defragmethod" (depends on your choice for example consolidate), 3. free space for new files and 4. archive)

Many thanks for adding these valuable things, i'll add your name to the credits for the guide too :smoke:

You are welcome :dance2:

May 6, 2008

(...)I don't agree with you on this last one because of this: When you do a defrag and leave your computer running these Temp files will still be in use and change in size, therefore cause fragmentation in the inner(archive) section and the outer(high performance) section because the new bytes will be written in the high performance area and not in the archive area. This will (for the moment) decrease computer responsiveness significantly.
You are right here. What I should have written was: Those folders should be excluded from high performance (when placing placing documents and settings there, same applies to windows temp, if you chose to put the entire windir in HP), if the are not present in either archive or high performance, this files will (just as any other new file) be written in the nearest free space from the outer tracks and in (on a new defragmentet HDD the order will be: 1. high performance, 2. "defragmethod" (depends on your choice for example consolidate), 3. free space for new files and 4. archive)

Hmmmm, you're right here. :smoke: :dance2: But in most scenarios it won't matter if these files are placed in the High Performance section or the Consolidate(Everything not within HP and A) section. At least it does not in my case. Removing those folders from the high performance selection will be a pain in the ass because then you'll have to add more separate folders... I'm thinking about adding it though, but i might make something like a 'Configuration that will give you slightly improved performance, but will be a pain in the ass to set up too.' section in the end of my guide. Nah, just kidding here. Thinking about adding it and how to make it (may be impossible) easier to configure that way.

Thanks again :dance2:

May 6, 2008

(...)I don't agree with you on this last one because of this: When you do a defrag and leave your computer running these Temp files will still be in use and change in size, therefore cause fragmentation in the inner(archive) section and the outer(high performance) section because the new bytes will be written in the high performance area and not in the archive area. This will (for the moment) decrease computer responsiveness significantly.
You are right here. What I should have written was: Those folders should be excluded from high performance (when placing placing documents and settings there, same applies to windows temp, if you chose to put the entire windir in HP), if the are not present in either archive or high performance, this files will (just as any other new file) be written in the nearest free space from the outer tracks and in (on a new defragmentet HDD the order will be: 1. high performance, 2. "defragmethod" (depends on your choice for example consolidate), 3. free space for new files and 4. archive)
Hmmmm, you're right here. :sneaky: :P But in most scenarios it won't matter if these files are placed in the High Performance section or the Consolidate(Everything not within HP and A) section. At least it does not in my case. Removing those folders from the high performance selection will be a pain in the ass because then you'll have to add more separate folders... I'm thinking about adding it though, but i might make something like a 'Configuration that will give you slightly improved performance, but will be a pain in the ass to set up too.' section in the end of my guide. Nah, just kidding here. Thinking about adding it and how to make it (may be impossible) easier to configure that way.
Thanks again :D

Well about pain in the ass you can talk about adding all the "$" folders in the windir. When disktrix announced the new UD 2008, they wrote that the new wildcard feature made it possible to exclude all these folders easily... Finally I no longer had to click those 150+ (maybe not that much but close, definitely a lot more than thos 70 claimed in the UD manual) or I at least thought so... When I tried the new version, I tried to exclude those in the wildcards, but they did not end in archive. I searched the website to see what I did wrong, but after the release they no longer claimed this on the site :frusty: :blink: (since they can't keep their promises, will we then see a working bootdefrag option i june? I hope so)... I am still waiting for that feature :beg:

May 6, 2008

Waiting for that feature too, but about the Wildcard option: That only works with files, not with folders. That was very disappointing to me too :D

May 6, 2008

You are right here. What I should have written was: Those folders should be excluded from high performance (when placing placing documents and settings there, same applies to windows temp, if you chose to put the entire windir in HP), if the are not present in either archive or high performance, this files will (just as any other new file) be written in the nearest free space from the outer tracks and in (on a new defragmentet HDD the order will be: 1. high performance, 2. "defragmethod" (depends on your choice for example consolidate), 3. free space for new files and 4. archive)
Hmmmm, you're right here. :blink: :sneaky: But in most scenarios it won't matter if these files are placed in the High Performance section or the Consolidate(Everything not within HP and A) section. At least it does not in my case. Removing those folders from the high performance selection will be a pain in the ass because then you'll have to add more separate folders... I'm thinking about adding it though, but i might make something like a 'Configuration that will give you slightly improved performance, but will be a pain in the ass to set up too.' section in the end of my guide. Nah, just kidding here. Thinking about adding it and how to make it (may be impossible) easier to configure that way.
Thanks again :D

I do not use consolidate as primary defrag method, I use folder/filename, to get further improvement in speed:

This method of ordering files on your hard drive will promote performance since files are sorted in strict order and directory look ups are faster when in alphabetical order. Adjacent track seeks and instantaneous seeks are often achieved since often dll and other data files are called upon by programs in alphabetical order

If you use archive this method won't take that long, and you can use consolidate as a secondary defrag method (you will keep folder/filename order, but newly created files will be consolidated next to this order, that way you get fast subsequent defrags, and an improvement in speed, fragmented files only method can also be used as an even faster subsequent defrag method)

May 7, 2008

I do not use consolidate as primary defrag method, I use folder/filename, to get further improvement in speed:
This method of ordering files on your hard drive will promote performance since files are sorted in strict order and directory look ups are faster when in alphabetical order. Adjacent track seeks and instantaneous seeks are often achieved since often dll and other data files are called upon by programs in alphabetical order
If you use archive this method won't take that long, and you can use consolidate as a secondary defrag method (you will keep folder/filename order, but newly created files will be consolidated next to this order, that way you get fast subsequent defrags, and an improvement in speed, fragmented files only method can also be used as an even faster subsequent defrag method)

Hmmmm, interesting. Theoretically it should improve performance, of course. Going to try it out right now. Thanks again! (Don't worry, eventually i'll get tired of saying thanks all the time and stop :unsure:)

May 7, 2008

I add *.pst (Outlook Data) and *.nsf (Lotus Notes Data) to the 'high performance wildcard.' These files can easily bloat into GBs, but are relevant only to Users of Lotus & Microsoft Outlook.

May 7, 2008

I add *.pst (Outlook Data) and *.nsf (Lotus Notes Data) to the 'high performance wildcard.' These files can easily bloat into GBs, but are relevant only to Users of Lotus & Microsoft Outlook.

Hmmmm, what's the purpose of those files? And what is Lotus Notes? I'd be happy to add them, but i have to know why since i don't use those 2 programs myself ;) Thanks for your suggestion <_<

May 7, 2008

Hmmmm, what's the purpose of those files? And what is Lotus Notes? I'd be happy to add them, but i have to know why since i don't use those 2 programs myself ;) Thanks for your suggestion <_<

Both, Microsoft Outlook and Lotus Notes are 'email clients' - generally assigned by Corporates/MNCs to country-wide employees in a network domain where the email traffic is exceptionally high. These emails reside in .pst and .nsf files, respectively and as mentioned earlier can easily bloat into GBs. I'm sticking with Ultimate Defrag for this singular reason - both my email clients run smoother & quicker.

Sign In

Guide on how to configure UltimateDefrag 2008 properly

Recommended Posts

shought

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Noddy

Link to comment

Share on other sites

shought

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Marik

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Noddy

Link to comment

Share on other sites

LoKz

Link to comment

Share on other sites

shought

Link to comment

Share on other sites

dock98

Link to comment

Share on other sites

shought

Link to comment

Share on other sites

rb2tfm

Link to comment

Share on other sites

shought

Link to comment

Share on other sites

rb2tfm

Link to comment

Share on other sites

spasserfan

Link to comment

Share on other sites

spasserfan

Link to comment

Share on other sites

shought

Link to comment

Share on other sites

shought

Link to comment

Share on other sites

spasserfan

Link to comment

Share on other sites

shought

Link to comment

Share on other sites

spasserfan

Link to comment

Share on other sites

shought

Link to comment

Share on other sites

spasserfan

Link to comment

Share on other sites

shought

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Noddy

Link to comment

Share on other sites

shought

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Noddy

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Archived

Recently Browsing 0 members