biatche Posted April 11, 2009 Share Posted April 11, 2009 any recommended trial resets? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeus_Hunt Posted April 11, 2009 Share Posted April 11, 2009 any recommended trial resets?Here's the Fix from the 1st page. It works fine. I m using it.Sorry lol...http://rapidshare.comCode: /files/196497255/fix.rar.htmlThe file looks suspicious because it does nothing when you run it, but it works reseting trial period.Scanned by Virustotal.com, if you don't trust me do a scan yourself.Note: Close Vipre processes, place fix into Vipre folder, run it. Done.Download the latest version v3.1.2710 from http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Home-Home-Office/VIPRE/which is 13.3 MbThen download the latest definitions from http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Home-Home-O...RE/Definitions/The instructions to update the Signature is mentioned on that page itself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jalaffa Posted April 11, 2009 Share Posted April 11, 2009 About the "patch". It's not patching anything. It simply copies a file named RegistrationConfig.XML to Path=%ALLUSERSPROFILE%\Application Data\Sunbelt\AntiMalwareI really don't get that instruction given.1.Install the program but DO NOT open/run it. (I used it with the program running)2.Close its services if they're running in the background (use Task Manager or via Control Panel-Administrative Tools-Services/need to reboot your PC). (I certainly did not)3.Now copy the patch into Vipre's main directory and apply it. (No need to do that)NOTE:Sometimes, when applying the patch, its window doesn't show up. (What window - the script is set to silent - Silent=1 Overwrite=1)But don't worry, just be sure to run the patch. You'll havealways a 15-days 100% fully functional trial. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
biatche Posted April 11, 2009 Share Posted April 11, 2009 why do i need to download the latest definitions? wont it autoupdate?btw, ive once tried this fix. i had shutdown problems after that, i think it was explorer.exe or loaded programs wont close properly. well it was either the fix or vipre that did it, does anyone experience this problem? how does the fix work with newer version updates from time to time? are new fixes required?another thing, does it mean i have to restart my pc every 15 days? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zoticon Posted April 29, 2009 Share Posted April 29, 2009 cant download the fix from first page, it says the download limit has been reachedhelp? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sonar Posted April 29, 2009 Share Posted April 29, 2009 Fix don't work on Vista Ultimate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rock Lee Posted April 29, 2009 Share Posted April 29, 2009 cant download the fix from first page, it says the download limit has been reachedhelp?Downloads work fine for me. ; going on a trial on my regular pc with VIPRE. We'll see... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sonar Posted April 29, 2009 Share Posted April 29, 2009 cant download the fix from first page, it says the download limit has been reachedhelp?Downloads work fine for me. ; going on a trial on my regular pc with VIPRE. We'll see...It seems better then nod on memory usage and scan speed. but with little people using it no bugs are getting found. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
urioz Posted April 29, 2009 Share Posted April 29, 2009 does this mean that VIPRE antivirus is better than eset nod32? because if it is why do not everybody change to it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sonar Posted April 29, 2009 Share Posted April 29, 2009 does this mean that VIPRE antivirus is better than eset nod32? because if it is why do not everybody change to it?We need more people testing it.Vista Ultimate - VIPRE Works Fine.XP Pro Service Pack 3 - VIPRE Works Fine.Even though this might out do nod32 on memory -> The program might be useless in the virus protection.Test it, get an old machine put VIPRE on download some virus's lol ;p Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bizarre™ Posted April 29, 2009 Share Posted April 29, 2009 @urioz:because it's not popular... yet :lol: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeetPirate Posted April 30, 2009 Share Posted April 30, 2009 Well I am testing this and I must say I am disappointed because it looks so good on paper but in real life not so much.I have no idea how they came up with those bogus memory benchmarks but I am seeing right now with my own 2 eyes:SBAMSvc.exe 59MB and sometimes up to 79MB cpu usage varying up to 50% which is max of 1 core.SBAMTray.exe 45MBsbamui.exe 82MBThis is during a full system scan. I'm not so good in math but I am pretty sure those figures are different from what those benchmarks suggest. Screenshots can be provided upon request.Also I could see why they don't include definitions with the program, the definitions folder is close to 200MB.I might still keep it even though Sunbelt is misleading users with false benchmarks. ;) I can't believe nobody else has looked into this as yet. I almost forgot to mention, a quick scan picked up a false positive which I am greatly disappointed in, it bagged Elcomsoft as malware when it's really a commercial password cracker. Things like that piss me off, atleast the developers of Avira were kind enough to rectify that problem when I emailed them about it, I wonder if Sunbelt would do the same. I am doing a deep scan now so I will report back if there are more FPs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bizarre™ Posted April 30, 2009 Share Posted April 30, 2009 @LeetPirate:Thanks for the heads up ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeetPirate Posted April 30, 2009 Share Posted April 30, 2009 @LeetPirate:Thanks for the heads up ;)No problem. I just finished the full deep scan and it came up with 7 results, 6 are false positives and 1 is a real virus I have in a zip file for testing purposes. It detected 4 keygens as trojans, and 2 legitimate programs including dBpoweramp WMA 10 codec plugin, LOL. I should note that Malware Bytes, Trojan Remover, and NOD32 does not detect any of those false positives, only the real virus. I have to say this is really a disappointing result for me. I was very excited about VIPRE. Nobody take this personal please but frankly speaking I have to say I think VIPRE is a pack of shit. Nevertheless I will keep it for a while and see how it goes. I want a second real time protection that won't hog resources incase NOD32 ever misses anything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Infinite_Vision Posted April 30, 2009 Share Posted April 30, 2009 @LeetPirate:Thanks for the heads up :lol:No problem. I just finished the full deep scan and it came up with 7 results, 6 are false positives and 1 is a real virus I have in a zip file for testing purposes. It detected 4 keygens as trojans, and 2 legitimate programs including dBpoweramp WMA 10 codec plugin, LOL. I should note that Malware Bytes, Trojan Remover, and NOD32 does not detect any of those false positives, only the real virus. I have to say this is really a disappointing result for me. I was very excited about VIPRE. Nobody take this personal please but frankly speaking I have to say I think VIPRE is a pack of shit. Nevertheless I will keep it for a while and see how it goes. I want a second real time protection that won't hog resources incase NOD32 ever misses anything.Thanks for testing it out. I was going to test it out but you already did the work. hehe. ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
urioz Posted April 30, 2009 Share Posted April 30, 2009 So are you saying that i should stick with nod eset 32 and not change to VIPRE ? , because it seems to be better than nod in the test Urioz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeetPirate Posted April 30, 2009 Share Posted April 30, 2009 So are you saying that i should stick with nod eset 32 and not change to VIPRE ? , because it seems to be better than nod in the test UriozGive it a try yourself, lol. before you do any scans, make sure you set the default action to prompt user else expect half your keygens to end up quarantined :D. If you get similar results to what I got then it will be a confirmation that mine wasn't just a bad fluke. Also if anyone else confirms similar results it will be a sign for me to remove VIPRE. Don't worry, one good thing about VIPRE is their uninstall is somewhat clean, the only possibility of remaining folders for you to manually delete are the Sunbelt folder in Program Files and in All Users\Application Data. I emailed them about the false positives but I got no reply as yet, will update you guys if they ever reply. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
urioz Posted April 30, 2009 Share Posted April 30, 2009 ok , but What do you mean with similar result? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bizarre™ Posted April 30, 2009 Share Posted April 30, 2009 @urioz:Look at Post #62 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.