<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>News: Technology News</title><link>https://nsaneforums.com/news/technology-news/page/92/?d=2</link><description>News: Technology News</description><language>en</language><item><title>Google denies report that it&#x2019;s discontinuing Fitbit products</title><link>https://nsaneforums.com/news/technology-news/google-denies-report-that-it%E2%80%99s-discontinuing-fitbit-products-r25064/</link><description><![CDATA[<h3>
	Claims that there will be no new Versas or Senses is incorrect, rep says.
</h3>

<div class="article-content post-page" itemprop="articleBody">
	
	<p>
		Google is denying a recent report that it is no longer making Fitbit smartwatches. A company spokesperson told Ars Technica today that Google has no current plans to discontinue the Fitbit Sense or Fitbit Versa product lines.
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		On Sunday, <a href="https://www.techradar.com/health-fitness/rip-fitbit-smartwatches-an-end-we-could-see-coming-a-mile-away" rel="external nofollow">TechRadar</a> published an article titled “RIP Fitbit smartwatches—an end we could see coming a mile away." The article noted last week's announcement of the new <a href="https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2024/08/googles-pixel-watch-3-has-a-bigger-screen-and-pixel-buds-pro-2-are-smaller/" rel="external nofollow">Google Pixel Watch 3</a>. Notably, the watch from Google, which acquired Fitbit in 2019, gives users free access to the Daily Readiness Score, a feature that previously required a Fitbit Premium subscription (Pixel Watch 3 owners also get six free months of Fitbit Premium). The publication said that Fitbit has been "consigned to wearable history" and reported:
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<blockquote class="QuoteNewsStyle">
		<p>
			Google quietly confirmed that there would never be another Fitbit Sense or Versa model produced. From now on, Fitbit-branded devices will be relegated to Google’s best fitness trackers: the Fitbit Inspire, Luxe, and Charge ranges. The smartwatch form factor would be exclusively reserved for the Pixel Watch line.
		</p>
	</blockquote>

	<p>
		When reached for comment, a Google spokesperson told me that the TechRadar story is "not correct" and shared the following statement:
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<blockquote class="QuoteNewsStyle">
		<p>
			We are very committed to Fitbit, and even more importantly to the customers that use and depend on those products and technology. It's also worth noting that many of the health and fitness features we launched in Pixel Watch 3 were because of Fitbit's innovation and ground-breaking fitness advancements. In addition, we just launched Fitbit Ace LTE, [a smartwatch for kids released on June 5], and you’ll continue to see new products and innovation from Fitbit.
		</p>
	</blockquote>

	<p>
		While the company rep told me that they could not confirm a specific upcoming Sense or Versa model or any other specifics about Google's product road map, they claimed that Google hasn't discontinued the lines.
	</p>

	<h2>
		Fitbit fears
	</h2>

	<p>
		TechRadar's concerns about Fitbit smartwatches dying also stem from the Sense 2 and Versa 4 lacking some features of its predecessors, including ways to control music or access music apps. The Pixel Watch, meanwhile, has music app support, like YouTube, Spotify, and Pandora. "Once Google completed its acquisition in January 2021 and debuted its first Pixel Watch in 2022, the Versa and the Sense watches were holdovers of a bygone era," TechRadar wrote.
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		Google also has more than its fair share of <a href="https://arstechnica.com/series/google-kills-product/" rel="external nofollow">dead products</a>, prompting Fitbit fans to be wary about the future of the smartwatch brand.
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		However, Google's spokesperson noted that "part of everything that we just launched from Pixel Watch is based on Fitbit technology, so it is not going anywhere."
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		While Fitbit tech and perhaps its name may live on, it's reasonable to question the brand's longevity. Concerns about Google discontinuing Fitbit smartwatches have been fueled by Google taking Fitbit features and incorporating them into Google-branded watches. Google has also discontinued various beloved Fitbit features, including the <a href="https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2024/06/googles-abuse-of-fitbit-continues-with-web-app-shutdown/" rel="external nofollow">Fitbit.com online dashboard,</a> <a href="https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2023/03/google-is-killing-most-of-fitbits-social-features-today/" rel="external nofollow">social features</a>, and the <a href="https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2022/08/fitbits-will-soon-lose-the-ability-to-sync-with-computers/" rel="external nofollow">ability to sync with computers</a>. Google also previously announced that it's <a href="https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2022/09/google-will-start-assimilating-fitbit-accounts-next-year/" rel="external nofollow">closing all Fitbit accounts</a> (forcing users onto Google accounts) next year and also shut down the <a href="https://9to5google.com/2023/02/17/fitbit-studio/" rel="external nofollow">Fitbit SDK for app development</a>. Google's Fitbit reputation has been further damaged by widely reported battery problems that some <a href="https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2024/01/time-to-move-on-fitbit-owners-fed-up-with-battery-problems-google-response/" rel="external nofollow">Charge 5</a> users have experienced. Google denied that the quick-dying battery issue stemmed from a firmware update but never publicly confirmed what it believes the problem is. This <a href="https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2024/07/an-absolute-mess-google-seemingly-ignores-hundreds-of-fitbit-complaints/" rel="external nofollow">Google-fication of Fitbit</a> has led long-term customers to publicly complain about Google allegedly reducing customer support and care for Fitbit users.
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		At this time, Google isn't announcing the end of any Fitbit product lines. But it remains possible that if future devices arrive, they may lack the features of previous Fitbits or Pixel Watches. The Fitbit brand isn't dead, but Fitbit, as people knew it before Google's acquisition, is no more.
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>
</div>

<p>
	<a href="https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2024/08/google-denies-report-that-its-discontinuing-fitbit-products/" rel="external nofollow">Source</a>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<span style="font-size:12px;"><em>Hope you enjoyed this news post.</em></span>
</p>

<p>
	<span style="font-size:12px;"><em>Thank you for appreciating my time and effort posting news every single day for many years.</em></span>
</p>

<p>
	<span style="font-size:12px;"><em>2023: Over 5,800 news posts | 2024 (till end of July): 3,313 news posts</em></span>
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">25064</guid><pubDate>Mon, 19 Aug 2024 18:33:27 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel Core Ultra 200 Arrow Lake Specs & Release Date Leak]]></title><link>https://nsaneforums.com/news/technology-news/intel-core-ultra-200-arrow-lake-specs-release-date-leak-r25061/</link><description><![CDATA[<h3>
	The full lineup with specs for the entire Intel Arrow Lake 200 Ultra series of CPUs have leaked. Along with its release date, which expected this October.
</h3>

<p>
	After years of using a monolithic CPU design, which had a whole chip on a single processor, Intel had released Meteor Lake CPUs with a tile / chiplet based design. In it, the processor has dedicated tiles / chiplets for CPU compute, SoC, GPU and I/O respectively.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	However, <a href="https://ourdigitech.com/hardware/intel-meteor-lake-wont-come-on-desktop/" title="Intel Meteor Lake Won’t Come On Desktop, Only AIO, Mini PC" rel="external nofollow">desktops did not get Meteor Lake CPUs</a> with the tile design. Instead, Intel gave desktops Raptor Lake Refresh range of CPUs. Which are nothing but improved Raptor Lake CPUs.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	With Raptor Lake and it’s refresh series facing crashing issues reported worldwide, everyone is waiting to finally get their hand’s on Intel’s next-gen CPU series for the desktops with tile design. The Intel Core Ultra 200 Arrow Lake CPUs.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	We do know <a href="https://ourdigitech.com/hardware/details-about-next-gen-intel-arrow-lake-cpus-leak/" title="Details about next-gen Intel Arrow Lake CPUs leak" rel="external nofollow">some things</a> about them already. Like they will come without hyper-threading, will support only DDR5 RAM and that TSMC is likely to manufacture some higher-range models rather than Intel themselves.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Three months ago, <a href="https://ourdigitech.com/hardware/specs-of-next-gen-intel-core-ultra-200-arrow-lake-cpus-leak/" title="Specs of next-gen Intel Core Ultra 200 Arrow Lake CPUs leak" rel="external nofollow">we also came to know</a> about the core config of some of these CPUs. Now we have a full line-up and its specs leak.
</p>

<h3 class="wp-block-heading">
	Full Intel Arrow Lake Lineup Specs Leak
</h3>

<figure class="wp-block-image size-large">
	<img alt="Intel Arrow Lake Core Ultra 200 CPU Specs Jaykihn" class="ipsImage" data-attachment-id="4796" data-comments-opened="1" data-image-caption="" data-image-description="" data-image-title="Intel Arrow Lake Core Ultra 200 CPU Specs Jaykihn" data-orig-file="https://ourdigitech.com/ServerSide/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Intel-Arrow-Lake-Core-Ultra-200-CPU-Specs-Jaykihn.webp" data-orig-size="2048,704" data-permalink="https://ourdigitech.com/hardware/intel-core-ultra-200-arrow-lake-specs-release-date-leak/attachment/intel-arrow-lake-core-ultra-200-cpu-specs-jaykihn/" decoding="async" height="352" role="button" tabindex="0" width="1024" src="https://ourdigitech.com/ServerSide/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Intel-Arrow-Lake-Core-Ultra-200-CPU-Specs-Jaykihn.webp">
	<figcaption>
		<em>Credit: Jaykihn.</em>
	</figcaption>
</figure>

<p>
	<a href="https://x.com/jaykihn0/status/1825179881887432841" rel="external nofollow" target="_blank" title="">User Jaykihn</a> on Twitter (now X) and <a href="https://benchlife.info/intel-core-ultra-2-desktop-cpu-will-announce-10th-oct/" rel="external nofollow" target="_blank" title="">Benchlife</a> (via <a href="https://x.com/harukaze5719/status/1825178191268618405" rel="external nofollow" target="_blank" title="">@harukaze5719</a>) have leaked the full lineup specs for the B0 silicon chips in the Core Ultra 200 Arrow Lake CPUs. The CPU lineup, which has 14 CPUs in it so far, starts from a 24 core (8P+16E) Intel Core Ultra 285K CPU and to goes till 10 core (6P+4E) Intel Core Ultra 225 CPU.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Not only that, it seems that the turbo boost clock sees some reduction over the turbo boost clocks of Intel Raptor Lake Refresh series. With the turbo boost clock reaching max 5.7GHz. Which is 300MHz less than what Intel Core i9-13900KS could reach due to its 6.0 max clock. However, the base clock seems higher than the Raptor Lake Refresh CPUs.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Additionally, the report reveals that Intel will launch Arrow Lake desktop CPUs starting from 10th October this year. It’s likely that the unlocked K/KF series of CPUs will launch first.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The date is interesting though. The 10th October is the <a href="https://x.com/9550pro/status/1825197059517116532" rel="external nofollow" target="_blank" title="">same date</a> on which AMD is going to release some of its server CPUs.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The report also mentions that the BIOS for these CPUs can only set Intel Default Settings for power settings. However, the Core Ultra 9 users can still choose Performance or Extreme mode within the BIOS. This is probably done to prevent crashes in the Arrow Lake series that are happening currently on the Raptor Lake / Refresh series of CPUs.
</p>

<h3 class="wp-block-heading">
	Specs Table
</h3>

<p>
	Based on the above information, we have made the Intel Arrow Lake specs table below for the readers to understand easily.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<figure class="wp-block-table">
	<div class="table-is-responsive">
		<table border="1px solid black;">
			<thead>
				<tr>
					<th>
						CPU Model
					</th>
					<th>
						Cores
					</th>
					<th>
						Base Clock GHz
					</th>
					<th>
						Turbo Clock GHz
					</th>
					<th>
						TVB
					</th>
					<th>
						TBMT 3.0
					</th>
					<th>
						TBT 2.0
					</th>
					<th>
						TDP
					</th>
					<th>
						iGPU XE
					</th>
					<th>
						iGPU Clock
					</th>
				</tr>
			</thead>
			<tbody>
				<tr>
					<td>
						Core Ultra 9 285K
					</td>
					<td>
						8P + 16E (24)
					</td>
					<td>
						3.7 | 3.2
					</td>
					<td>
						5.4 | 4.6
					</td>
					<td>
						5.7GHz
					</td>
					<td>
						5.6GHz
					</td>
					<td>
						5.5GHz
					</td>
					<td>
						125W
					</td>
					<td>
						64
					</td>
					<td>
						2.0GHz
					</td>
				</tr>
				<tr>
					<td>
						Core Ultra 9 285
					</td>
					<td>
						8P + 16E (24)
					</td>
					<td>
						2.5 | 1.9
					</td>
					<td>
						5.3 | 4.6
					</td>
					<td>
						5.6GHz
					</td>
					<td>
						5.5GHz
					</td>
					<td>
						5.4GHz
					</td>
					<td>
						65W
					</td>
					<td>
						64
					</td>
					<td>
						2.0GHz
					</td>
				</tr>
				<tr>
					<td>
						Core Ultra 9 285T
					</td>
					<td>
						8P + 16E (24)
					</td>
					<td>
						1.4 | 1.2
					</td>
					<td>
						4.7 | 4.5
					</td>
					<td>
						–
					</td>
					<td>
						5.4GHz
					</td>
					<td>
						5.3GHz
					</td>
					<td>
						35W
					</td>
					<td>
						64
					</td>
					<td>
						2.0GHz
					</td>
				</tr>
				<tr>
					<td>
						Core Ultra 7 265K
					</td>
					<td>
						8P + 12E (20)
					</td>
					<td>
						3.9 | 3.3
					</td>
					<td>
						5.2 | 4.6
					</td>
					<td>
						–
					</td>
					<td>
						5.5GHz
					</td>
					<td>
						5.4GHz
					</td>
					<td>
						125W
					</td>
					<td>
						64
					</td>
					<td>
						2.0GHz
					</td>
				</tr>
				<tr>
					<td>
						Core Ultra 7 265KF
					</td>
					<td>
						8P + 12E (20)
					</td>
					<td>
						3.9 | 3.3
					</td>
					<td>
						5.2 | 4.6
					</td>
					<td>
						–
					</td>
					<td>
						5.5GHz
					</td>
					<td>
						5.4GHz
					</td>
					<td>
						125W
					</td>
					<td>
						–
					</td>
					<td>
						 
					</td>
				</tr>
				<tr>
					<td>
						Core Ultra 7 265
					</td>
					<td>
						8P + 12E (20)
					</td>
					<td>
						2.4 | 1.8
					</td>
					<td>
						5.1 | 4.6
					</td>
					<td>
						–
					</td>
					<td>
						5.3GHz
					</td>
					<td>
						5.2GHz
					</td>
					<td>
						65W
					</td>
					<td>
						64
					</td>
					<td>
						2.0GHz
					</td>
				</tr>
				<tr>
					<td>
						Core Ultra 7 265F
					</td>
					<td>
						8P + 12E (20)
					</td>
					<td>
						2.4 | 1.8
					</td>
					<td>
						5.1 | 4.6
					</td>
					<td>
						–
					</td>
					<td>
						5.3GHz
					</td>
					<td>
						5.2GHz
					</td>
					<td>
						65W
					</td>
					<td>
						–
					</td>
					<td>
						 
					</td>
				</tr>
				<tr>
					<td>
						Core Ultra 7 265T
					</td>
					<td>
						8P + 12E (20)
					</td>
					<td>
						1.5 | 1.2
					</td>
					<td>
						5.0 | 4.5
					</td>
					<td>
						–
					</td>
					<td>
						5.3GHz
					</td>
					<td>
						5.2GHz
					</td>
					<td>
						35W
					</td>
					<td>
						64
					</td>
					<td>
						2.0GHz
					</td>
				</tr>
				<tr>
					<td>
						Core Ultra 5 245K
					</td>
					<td>
						6P + 8E (14)
					</td>
					<td>
						4.2 | 3.6
					</td>
					<td>
						5.0 | 4.6
					</td>
					<td>
						–
					</td>
					<td>
						–
					</td>
					<td>
						5.2GHz
					</td>
					<td>
						125W
					</td>
					<td>
						64
					</td>
					<td>
						1.9GHz
					</td>
				</tr>
				<tr>
					<td>
						Core Ultra 5 245KF
					</td>
					<td>
						6P + 8E (14)
					</td>
					<td>
						4.2 | 3.6
					</td>
					<td>
						5.0 | 4.6
					</td>
					<td>
						–
					</td>
					<td>
						–
					</td>
					<td>
						5.2GHz
					</td>
					<td>
						125W
					</td>
					<td>
						–
					</td>
					<td>
						–
					</td>
				</tr>
				<tr>
					<td>
						Core Ultra 5 245
					</td>
					<td>
						6P + 8E (14)
					</td>
					<td>
						–
					</td>
					<td>
						–
					</td>
					<td>
						–
					</td>
					<td>
						–
					</td>
					<td>
						–
					</td>
					<td>
						65W
					</td>
					<td>
						–
					</td>
					<td>
						–
					</td>
				</tr>
				<tr>
					<td>
						Core Ultra 5 235
					</td>
					<td>
						6P + 8E (14)
					</td>
					<td>
						–
					</td>
					<td>
						–
					</td>
					<td>
						–
					</td>
					<td>
						–
					</td>
					<td>
						–
					</td>
					<td>
						65W
					</td>
					<td>
						–
					</td>
					<td>
						–
					</td>
				</tr>
				<tr>
					<td>
						Core Ultra 5 225
					</td>
					<td>
						6P + 4E (10)
					</td>
					<td>
						3.3 | 2.7
					</td>
					<td>
						4.7 | 4.4
					</td>
					<td>
						–
					</td>
					<td>
						–
					</td>
					<td>
						4.9GHz
					</td>
					<td>
						65W
					</td>
					<td>
						32
					</td>
					<td>
						1.8GHz
					</td>
				</tr>
				<tr>
					<td>
						Core Ultra 5 225F
					</td>
					<td>
						6P + 4E (10)
					</td>
					<td>
						3.3 | 2.7
					</td>
					<td>
						4.7 | 4.4
					</td>
					<td>
						–
					</td>
					<td>
						–
					</td>
					<td>
						4.9GHz
					</td>
					<td>
						65W
					</td>
					<td>
						–
					</td>
					<td>
						–
					</td>
				</tr>
			</tbody>
		</table>
	</div>

	<figcaption>
		<em>Source: @Jaykihn and Benchlife.</em>
	</figcaption>
</figure>

<h4 class="wp-block-heading">
	Specs Explained
</h4>

<p>
	What is TVB, TBMT 3.0 and TBT 2.0? Benchlife article explains it simply:
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<blockquote class="QuoteNewsStyle">
	<p>
		TVB = Thermal Velocity Boost (Full heat speed increases frequency), 1-Core
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		TBMT 3.0 = Turbo Boost Max Technology 3.0 (Turbo Boost Max Technology 3.0), 2-Core
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		TBT 2.0 = Turbo Boost Technology 2.0 (Turbo Boost Technology), 1- Core
	</p>
</blockquote>

<p>
	Basically, only Intel Core Ultra 9 285/K/T series supports TVB. Whereas, the Core Ultra 7 265/K/KF/F/T series supports only TBMT 3.0 and TBT 2.0. Similarly, other CPUs in the lineup support only TBT 2.0.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Also, where are the clocks and GPU specs for Intel Core Ultra 5 245 and Core Ultra 5 235? It seems that Jaykihn hasn’t provided them. Whether they are going to release later and not use the B0 stepping, we aren’t aware.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Also, where are Core Ultra 3 CPUs? Earlier rumors suggested that Intel will not make Core Ultra 3 CPUs. However, new rumors suggest that Intel will make them.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	A month ago, <a href="https://x.com/jaykihn0/status/1810087052186169544" rel="external nofollow" target="_blank" title="">Jaykihn mentioned</a> that Intel Core Ultra 3 CPUs will not be based on Arrow Lake CPU core. It will be a refresh of earlier CPUs. While everyone expected a refresh of Raptor Lake, it is possible that the Core Ultra 3 Ultra lineup will be a refresh of core of the Meteor Lake CPUs, which are so far only for notebooks and not made for desktops.
</p>

<h3 class="wp-block-heading">
	Conclusion
</h3>

<p>
	We now know almost everything about Intel Arrow Lake Ultra Core 200 series of CPUs. From core specs to clocks to iGPU to their release dates.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	We even have some idea that the CPU <a href="https://ourdigitech.com/hardware/performance-for-intels-15th-gen-arrow-lake-cpu-gpu-leaks/" title="Performance Of Intel’s 15th-Gen Arrow Lake CPU &amp; GPU Leaks" rel="external nofollow">might not perform that great</a> in some workloads, but the built-in iGPU performs great. However, those tests on the CPUs were done a year ago and checked during their initial tests and their performance might have increased in a big way since then.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	What we don’t know are two big things. One, is Intel going to manufacture all of the above CPUs. There are some rumors that Intel will make only Core Ultra 5 and below CPUs and all the CPUs above it, that is Core Ultra 7 and Core Ultra 9’s CPU chip, will be made by TSMC instead.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The second thing we don’t know is the pricing. However, we expect either leakers to leak them or Intel to officially announce them, either on its release or before that.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Hopefully, Arrow Lake will not have crashes like Raptor Lake / Refresh series and it does better than what <a href="https://ourdigitech.com/hardware/amd-ryzen-9950x-9900x-cpus-get-bad-reviews-in-gaming/" title="AMD Ryzen 9950X / 9900X CPUs Get Bad Reviews In Gaming" rel="external nofollow">AMD is performing</a> with it’s Ryzen 9000 series of CPUs.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<a href="https://ourdigitech.com/hardware/intel-core-ultra-200-arrow-lake-specs-release-date-leak/" rel="external nofollow">Source</a>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<span style="font-size:12px;"><em>Hope you enjoyed this news post.</em></span>
</p>

<p>
	<span style="font-size:12px;"><em>Thank you for appreciating my time and effort posting news every single day for many years.</em></span>
</p>

<p>
	<span style="font-size:12px;"><em>2023: Over 5,800 news posts | 2024 (till end of July): 3,313 news posts</em></span>
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">25061</guid><pubDate>Mon, 19 Aug 2024 07:02:48 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Paul's Tech News - What a weird CPU launch. [Video]</title><link>https://nsaneforums.com/news/technology-news/pauls-tech-news-what-a-weird-cpu-launch-video-r25059/</link><description><![CDATA[<div class="ipsEmbeddedVideo" contenteditable="false">
	<div>
		<iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="113" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" src="https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/-IoAJr3oSz4?feature=oembed" title="What a weird CPU launch." width="200"></iframe>
	</div>
</div>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<a href="https://www.youtube.com/@paulshardware" rel="external nofollow" target="_blank">Paul's Hardware</a> (1.48M subscribers)
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	August 18, 2024
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Video length: 12m 02s
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	0:00 Welcome to Paul’s Tech News - August 18, 2024
</p>

<p>
	1:36 Ryzen 9950X and 9900X Launch - It’s Complicated
</p>

<p>
	3:42 Windows Bug Affecting Ryzen Performance Found
</p>

<p>
	5:53 AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D 6-Core CPU spotted in EEC filing
</p>

<p>
	6:56 AMD won't patch all chips affected by 'Sinkclose' data theft vulnerability
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	TECH BRIEFS
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	7:53 GeForce RTX 4070 GDDR6 GPUs Debut Later This Month
</p>

<p>
	8:57 Intel Preps W890 Chipset For Next-Gen HEDT CPUs
</p>

<p>
	9:55 Google pulls the plug on uBlock Origin
</p>

<p>
	10:43 Google’s Gemini AI fails during live demo at Made by Google event
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-IoAJr3oSz4&amp;t=620s" rel="external nofollow">Source</a>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<span style="font-size:12px;"><em>Hope you enjoyed this news post.</em></span>
</p>

<p>
	<span style="font-size:12px;"><em>Thank you for appreciating my time and effort posting news every single day for many years.</em></span>
</p>

<p>
	<span style="font-size:12px;"><em>2023: Over 5,800 news posts | 2024 (till end of July): 3,313 news posts</em></span>
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">25059</guid><pubDate>Sun, 18 Aug 2024 19:58:03 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Microsoft Weekly: dead Paint 3D, new Windows 11 build, and crashing Office apps</title><link>https://nsaneforums.com/news/technology-news/microsoft-weekly-dead-paint-3d-new-windows-11-build-and-crashing-office-apps-r25055/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	In this episode of Microsoft Weekly, we look at Patch Tuesday updates, a big new preview build, some blocked Windows 11 tricks, crashing Office apps, dead Paint 3D, gaming news, app updates, and a lot more.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Table of contents:
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<ol>
	<li>
		<a href="#windows11" rel="">Windows 10 and 11 news</a>
	</li>
	<li>
		<a href="#wip" rel="">Windows Insider Program</a>
	</li>
	<li>
		<a href="#updates" rel="">Updates are available</a>
	</li>
	<li>
		<a href="#gaming" rel="">Gaming news</a>
	</li>
</ol>

<h3>
	<a id="windows11" name="windows11" rel=""></a>Windows 11 and 10
</h3>

<blockquote class="QuoteNewsStyle">
	<p>
		Here we talk about everything happening around Microsoft's latest operating system in the Stable channel and preview builds: new features, removed features, controversies, bugs, interesting findings, and more. And of course, you may find a word or two about older but still supported versions.
	</p>
</blockquote>

<p>
	The August 2024 Patch Tuesday updates are out. <a href="https://www.neowin.net/news/windows-11-patch-tuesday-update-out-now-for-23h2-22h2-kb5041585-and-21h2-kb5041592/" target="_blank" rel="external nofollow">Windows 11 received KB5041585 and KB5041592</a>, while <a href="https://www.neowin.net/news/windows-10-kb5041580--kb5041578--kb5041773--kb5041782-august-2024-patch-tuesday-out/" target="_blank" rel="external nofollow">Windows 10 got</a> KB5041580, KB5041578, KB5041773, and KB5041782. Copilot+ PCs with Windows 11 24H2 received <a href="https://www.neowin.net/news/patch-tuesday-update-kb5041571-hits-copilot-pcs-running-windows-11-24h2/" rel="external nofollow">KB5041571</a>.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	In addition to the latest Patch Tuesday updates, Microsoft released <a href="https://www.neowin.net/news/microsoft-quietly-updated-defender-for-windows-1110server-install-images/" rel="external nofollow">new Defender images</a> and confirmed that KB5034440 and KB5034441, two "unfixable" updates, <a href="https://www.neowin.net/news/microsoft-kills-unfixable-kb5034440kb5034441-updates-replaces-with-kb5042321kb5042320/" rel="external nofollow">are now </a><a href="https://www.neowin.net/news/microsoft-kills-unfixable-kb5034440kb5034441-updates-replaces-with-kb5042321kb5042320/" rel="external nofollow">dead</a>—the company replaced them with KB5042321 and KB5042320.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<img alt="Windows 10 and 11 Wallpapers" class="ipsImage" height="405" width="720" src="https://cdn.neowin.com/news/images/uploaded/2024/08/1723706614_windows_10_and_11.jpg">
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	After releasing the August 2024 security updates, Microsoft revised its list of known issues to confirm that the bug with <a href="https://www.neowin.net/news/microsoft-fixed-the-problem-with-windows-booting-into-bitlocker-recovery/" rel="external nofollow">Windows systems booting into BitLocker recovery is now fixed</a>. It was not the most earth-shattering bug since you could just enter your encryption key to boot as usual, but some found it annoying nonetheless. After all, not everyone knows where to find their BitLocker keys. If you don't, check out <a href="https://www.neowin.net/news/microsoft-posts-official-bitlocker-key-recovery-and-back-up-guide-for-windows-1110-pcs/" rel="external nofollow">this guide</a>.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Besides fixing some bugs, Microsoft confirmed a bunch of others. Certain Office apps, such as Outlook, OneNote, and Word, <a href="https://www.neowin.net/news/microsoft-confirms-office-apps-crashing-when-typing-offers-a-workaround/" rel="external nofollow">are crashing when performing mundane tasks</a>. Also, Classic Outlook is <a href="https://www.neowin.net/news/microsoft-confirms-classic-outlook-crashes-on-startup-offers-a-workaround/" rel="external nofollow">crashing on startup</a> for some users due to corrupt server-side rules. Fortunately, both bugs have quite simple workarounds.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<img alt="Microsoft Office Logo" class="ipsImage" height="405" width="720" src="https://cdn.neowin.com/news/images/uploaded/2024/08/1723736961_office_logo.jpg">
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Finally, users discovered that one trick that previously allowed installing Windows 11 on unsupported hardware <a href="https://www.neowin.net/news/single-command-windows-11-system-requirements-bypass-trick-for-unsupported-pcs-blocked/" rel="external nofollow">is no longer working</a>. Therefore, you will not be able to install Windows 11 version 24H2 on an unsupported PC by pretending you are installing a server edition of the OS. Luckily, there are plenty of other methods to make the system work, so it is not the end of the world.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<hr>
<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	In a rather surprising move, Microsoft <a href="https://www.neowin.net/news/microsoft-stopped-nagging-some-windows-10-users-with-full-screen-windows-11-ads/" rel="external nofollow">decided to stop nagging</a> <em>certain </em>Windows 10 users with Windows 11 upgrade prompts. Sadly, the change only affects non-managed domain-joined systems with Windows 10 Pro—Home SKU are still subject to Microsoft's relentless prompts and nags to upgrade on eligible hardware (some are getting those ads even on unsupported devices).
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<img alt="Windows 11 ad in Windows 10" class="ipsImage" height="411" width="720" src="https://cdn.neowin.com/news/images/uploaded/2024/08/1723706715_windows_11_ad.jpg">
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	AMD launched its Ryzen 9000 processors, and the chips received quite lukewarm receptions. But the most interesting part was that the reviewers noticed that the hidden Admin account in Windows 11 <a href="https://www.neowin.net/news/windows-hidden-admin-account-apparently-boosting-amd-ryzen-90007000-performance/" rel="external nofollow">can boost performance</a> in AM5 processors.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<strong><a id="wip" name="wip" rel=""></a>Windows Insider Program</strong>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Here is what Microsoft Released this week for testing in the Windows Insider Program:
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<table border="1" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1" style="width:100%">
	<thead>
		<tr>
			<th scope="col">
				 
			</th>
			<th scope="col">
				Windows 11
			</th>
			<th scope="col">
				Windows 10
			</th>
		</tr>
	</thead>
	<tbody>
		<tr>
			<th scope="row">
				Canary Channel
			</th>
			<td>
				<a href="https://www.neowin.net/news/windows-11-insider-canary-channel-build-27686-has-the-new-windows-sandbox-client-preview/" rel="external nofollow">27686</a>
			</td>
			<td>
				Not Applicable
			</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<th scope="row">
				Dev Channel
			</th>
			<td>
				-
			</td>
			<td>
				Not Applicable
			</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<th scope="row">
				Beta Channel
			</th>
			<td>
				-
			</td>
			<td>
				-
			</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<th scope="row">
				Release Preview Channel
			</th>
			<td>
				-
			</td>
			<td>
				-
			</td>
		</tr>
	</tbody>
</table>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The new build 27686, which was introduced in the Canary this week, brought some interesting changes. For example, the maximum FAT32 partition <a href="https://www.neowin.net/news/besides-new-sandbox-microsoft-wants-to-raise-windows-11-fat32-limit-to-2tb-soon/" rel="external nofollow">was finally increased from 32GB to 2TB</a>. Also, the OS can now automatically <a href="https://www.neowin.net/news/windows-11-is-getting-automatic-hdr-switching/" rel="external nofollow">switch on HDR for high dynamic range content</a> and specify different power modes for different power states. If you use Windows Sandbox, you will be glad to learn that the feature received <a href="https://www.neowin.net/news/microsoft-updates-windows-sandbox-with-shared-clipboard-and-folders-audio-video-input-more/" rel="external nofollow">several quality-of-life improvements and new features</a>.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	There were no new Dev Channel updates unless you count known issues. This week, Microsoft updated the release notes for build 26120.1350 to clarify that <a href="https://www.neowin.net/news/microsoft-confirms-a-bug-with-emoji-panel-in-windows-11-build-261201350/" rel="external nofollow">the emoji panel could dismiss itself</a> automatically in certain scenarios. Expect a fix for the bug in future build updates.
</p>

<h3>
	<a id="updates" name="updates" rel=""></a>Updates are available
</h3>

<blockquote class="QuoteNewsStyle">
	<p>
		This section covers software, firmware, and other notable updates (released and coming soon) delivering new features, security fixes, improvements, patches, and more from Microsoft and third parties.
	</p>
</blockquote>

<p>
	Do you remember Paint 3D, Microsoft's ill-fated attempt to replace the immortal classic with a fancy new app capable of 3D modeling? If not, do not be too hard on yourself—the app was a major flop, and now, years after its last feature update, <a href="https://www.neowin.net/news/microsoft-is-retiring-the-paint-3d-windows-app-on-november-4/" rel="external nofollow">Microsoft is abandoning it</a>. An in-app banner started notifying users that Paint 3D will be retired on November 4.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<img alt="Microsoft paint 3d" class="ipsImage" height="457" width="720" src="https://cdn.neowin.com/news/images/uploaded/2024/08/1723267162_paint-3d.jpg">
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	PowerToys, one of our favorite Windows apps, is getting another feature update later this month. Although we do not know the exact changelog, we know for sure that version 0.84 will bring <a href="https://www.neowin.net/news/powertoys-will-soon-let-you-create-app-workspaces-and-launch-them-with-a-single-click/" rel="external nofollow">a big new utility called Workspaces</a>. PowerToys Workspaces allows you to create groups of applications, arrange them on the screen in a certain order, add some arguments or additional commands and then create a shortcut for launching them altogether.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Here is the utility in action:
</p>

<p class="img-center">
	<img alt="PowerToys Workspaces in Windows 11" class="ipsImage" height="459" width="720" src="https://cdn.neowin.com/news/images/uploaded/2024/08/1723750660_powertoys_workspaces.gif">
</p>

<p>
	Microsoft announced <a href="https://www.neowin.net/news/microsoft-to-freeze-unlicensed-onedrive-business-accounts-and-charge-for-restoring-them/" rel="external nofollow">changes for OneDrive Business customers</a>. Starting in January 2025, the company will begin freezing unlicensed OneDrive accounts within companies to prevent security issues and file conflicts. Bringing back archived accounts will require paying Microsoft a fee, so IT admins are recommended to review available options right now.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Microsoft Teams received several preview updates, such as <a href="http://www.neowin.net/news/microsoft-teams-public-preview-users-can-check-out-some-new-minimized-meeting-window-options/" rel="external nofollow">new window options</a> for minimized meetings and <a href="https://www.neowin.net/news/patch-tuesday-update-kb5041571-hits-copilot-pcs-running-windows-11-24h2/" rel="external nofollow">the Speaker Progress feature</a> that can help you become a better public speaker.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Word, another Microsoft-made productivity app, is getting a new feature that should make it easier to ensure your document has no accessibility issues. The latest preview build features a "Quick Fix" button that <a href="https://www.neowin.net/news/microsoft-365-insiders-can-try-out-the-quick-fix-accessibility-feature-in-word-for-windows/" rel="external nofollow">automatically applies suggested accessibility corrections</a>. The button is now available for testing in the Microsoft 365 Insider program.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Firefox received a small update this week <a href="https://www.neowin.net/news/firefox-12901-is-out-with-fixes-for-video-playback-issues-and-crashes-when-dragging-files/" rel="external nofollow">under version number 129.0.1</a>. It fixed two video-related bugs: the inability to play DRM-protected videos, such as Netflix or Hulu and tab crashing when dragging videos onto certain websites.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Microsoft Edge also received new updates this week. In the Dev Channel, <a href="https://www.neowin.net/news/microsoft-edge-dev-129027660-is-out-with-fixes-for-vpn-related-crashes-and-more/" rel="external nofollow">version 129.0.2766.0 is available</a> with fixes for VPN-related issues. In the Stable Channel, Edge received a small update that <a href="https://www.neowin.net/news/microsoft-fixes-edge-crashes-when-uploading-documents/" rel="external nofollow">resolved a bug causing the browser to crash</a> when uploading documents.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<img alt="Microsoft Edge logo" class="ipsImage" height="405" width="720" src="https://cdn.neowin.com/news/images/uploaded/2024/05/1715772477_edge.jpg">
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Another browser-related story that is worth mentioning is about uBlock Origin, one of the most famous content blockers for modern browsers. As it turned out, you can continue using the original extension even with Manifest V2 deprecated. All you need is <a href="https://www.neowin.net/news/official-windows-registry-hack-extends-ublock-origin-support-on-google-chrome-edge/" rel="external nofollow">one small registry tweak</a>.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Other notable updates include the following:
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<ul>
	<li>
		<a href="https://www.neowin.net/news/microsoft-launches-the-first-preview-of-visual-studio-2022-v1712-with-net-9-support/" rel="external nofollow">Microsoft launched the first preview of Visual Studio 2022 v17.12 with .NET 9 support</a>.
	</li>
	<li>
		<a href="https://www.neowin.net/news/microsoft-officially-launches-its-face-check-facial-recognition-tech-for-businesses/" rel="external nofollow">Microsoft officially launched its Face Check facial recognition tech for businesses</a>.
	</li>
	<li>
		<p>
			<a href="https://www.neowin.net/news/microsoft-lists-now-lets-you-reorder-lists-items-with-drag-and-drop/" rel="external nofollow">Microsoft Lists now lets you reorder items with drag and drop</a>.
		</p>
	</li>
	<li>
		<p>
			<a href="https://www.neowin.net/news/clipchamp-mobile-on-ios-is-getting-a-major-update-with-multi-track-editor-and-more/" rel="external nofollow">Clipchamp for iOS received a multi-track editor and other upgrades</a>.
		</p>
	</li>
	<li>
		<p>
			<a href="https://www.neowin.net/news/microsoft-365-insiders-can-try-out-new-regex-modes-in-excel/" rel="external nofollow">Microsoft 365 Insiders can try out new regex modes in Excel</a>.
		</p>
	</li>
	<li>
		<p>
			<a href="https://www.neowin.net/news/microsoft-azure-will-start-pushing-mandatory-multi-factor-authentication-from-october/" rel="external nofollow">Microsoft Azure will start pushing mandatory multi-factor authentication in October</a>.
		</p>
	</li>
	<li>
		<p>
			<a href="https://www.neowin.net/news/microsoft-copilot-will-offer-free-enterprise-data-protection-for-microsoft-entra-users/" rel="external nofollow">Microsoft Copilot will offer free enterprise data protection for Microsoft Entra users</a>.
		</p>

		<p>
			 
		</p>
	</li>
</ul>

<p>
	And here are the newest drivers released this week (only one from Intel):
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<ul>
	<li>
		<a href="https://www.neowin.net/news/intel-releases-new-graphics-driver-with-black-myth-wukong-support-and-more/" rel="external nofollow">Intel 32.0.101.5971 </a><a href="https://www.neowin.net/news/intel-releases-new-graphics-driver-with-black-myth-wukong-support-and-more/" rel="external nofollow">non-WHQL</a> with support for <em>Black Myth: Wukong</em> and two more games.
	</li>
</ul>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	To finish the update section, check out <a href="https://www.neowin.net/news/microsoft-365-roadmap-weekly-new-lists-features-in-sharepoint-are-coming-soon/" rel="external nofollow">this week's Microsoft 365 Roadmap Weekly</a>, where we track the latest features coming soon to Microsoft's productivity apps.
</p>

<h3>
	<a id="gaming" name="gaming" rel=""></a>On the gaming side
</h3>

<blockquote class="QuoteNewsStyle">
	<p>
		Learn about upcoming game releases, Xbox rumors, new hardware, software updates, freebies, deals, discounts and more.
	</p>
</blockquote>

<p>
	Microsoft's racing games, <em>Forza Motorsport </em>and <em>Forza Horizon 5, have </em>received new free content updates. <em>Forza Motorsport </em>now <a href="https://www.neowin.net/news/forza-motorsport-update-11-brings-road-atlanta-and-multi-class-racing/" rel="external nofollow">has the Road Atlanta raceway and multi-class racing</a>. <em>Forza Horizon 5, </em>on the other hand, received <a href="https://www.neowin.net/news/forza-horizon-5-gets-high-performance-dailies-update-with-new-cars-and-routes/" rel="external nofollow">a more substantial update</a>. It brought four exclusive cards, new collectibles, four new race routes, and more.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<img alt="Forza Horizon 5 update" class="ipsImage" height="405" width="720" src="https://cdn.neowin.com/news/images/uploaded/2024/08/1723476432_forza_horizon_5.jpg">
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Earlier this year, Microsoft decided to shut down Tango Gameworks, one of its Xbox-owned studios. Now, in a surprising move, <em>PUBG </em>publisher Krafton <a href="https://www.neowin.net/news/xboxs-tango-gameworks-and-the-hi-fi-rush-ip-get-acquired-by-krafton-publisher-behind-pubg/" rel="external nofollow">acquired the studio</a>. Despite the change, all of the current Tango Gameworks games will remain available on all platforms, including Game Pass.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<img alt="Hi-Fi Rush" class="ipsImage" height="405" width="720" src="https://cdn.neowin.com/news/images/uploaded/2023/01/1674687433_hi-firush_announce_1920x1080-3d7897822a1172ea9b3e.jpg">
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	It appears that the original <em>Red Dead Redemption </em>is coming to PCs. The game's store listing on PSN <a href="https://www.neowin.net/news/red-dead-redemption-is-coming-to-pc-according-to-playstation-network-store-listing/" rel="external nofollow">confirmed</a> that PC users may soon get to play the legendary title. However, the are no official confirmations yet.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Next week, Microsoft is taking its gaming division to Gamescom in Germany, and a fresh report suggests that the company plans to unveil <a href="https://www.neowin.net/news/rumors-claim-another-microsoft-game-is-making-a-playstation-5-debut-soon/" rel="external nofollow">another Xbox/PC title heading to PlayStation 5</a>. For now, there is no consensus on what exact title is going to lose its Microsoft exclusivity.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	If you play <em>Overwatch 2 </em>and you have an active Xbox or PC Game Pass subscription, look out for some free content. Starting September 17, Microsoft will <a href="https://www.neowin.net/news/overwatch-2-will-offer-free-content-for-xbox-game-pass-members-starting-sept-17/" rel="external nofollow">begin rewarding subscribers</a> with free in-game content, such as 30 Mythic prisms and six hero skins.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<img alt="overwatch 2" class="ipsImage" height="405" width="720" src="https://cdn.neowin.com/news/images/uploaded/2024/08/1723655893_9e8u2rcvdjgt1723241914715.jpg">
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Another story coming down from Activision was about <em>Call of Duty, </em>namely its humongous installation size. In order to make life easier for those without super-fast internet connections, <a href="https://www.neowin.net/news/activision-is-cutting-down-the-download-file-sizes-for-call-of-duty-games/" rel="external nofollow">Activision decided to separate</a> <em>Warzone </em>from the main game. That means that <em>Call of Duty 6 </em>will arrive separately from <em>Warzone, </em>but you will be able to download it on demand.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Those living in the United States and Canada and owning an Xbox Series X can <a href="https://www.neowin.net/news/xbox-series-x-owners-in-north-america-can-sign-up-for-the-closed-beta-test-of-mecha-break/" rel="external nofollow">sign up for a beta test</a> of <em>Mecha BREAK. </em>Developers announced that the closed beta will run from August 25 through August 27.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<div class="ipsEmbeddedOther" contenteditable="false">
	<iframe allowfullscreen="" data-controller="core.front.core.autosizeiframe" data-embedid="5eaf817679a73ff24b5ff7b9e66e34c7" src="https://nsaneforums.com/index.php?app=core&amp;module=system&amp;controller=embed&amp;url=https://twitter.com/MechaBREAK/status/1824468663505920490?ref_src=twsrc%255Etfw%257Ctwcamp%255Etweetembed%257Ctwterm%255E1824468663505920490%257Ctwgr%255Eeae5454ab2022b47e055f8b92357655cd6e000e9%257Ctwcon%255Es1_%26ref_url=https://www.neowin.net/news/microsoft-weekly-dead-paint-3d-new-windows-11-build-and-crashing-office-apps/"></iframe>
</div>

<p>
	If you have a Windows-powered handheld console, you will soon get access to the new Compact Mode for better navigation. <a href="https://www.neowin.net/news/xbox-game-bar-receives-compact-mode-for-better-navigation-on-handhelds/" rel="external nofollow">Microsoft has released the feature for Xbox Insiders</a>. Besides handhelds, the new UI will be available for those laying with controllers. If you do not like how Windows works on your handheld, you will be pleased to know that Valve <a href="https://www.neowin.net/news/steamos-is-officially-coming-to-the-rog-ally-valve-confirms/" rel="external nofollow">will soon let you officially run StreamOS</a> on the ROG Ally.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Of course, some may want to do the opposite and install Windows on the Steam Deck. If you are such a user, good news: <a href="https://www.neowin.net/news/you-can-now-install-windows-on-steam-deck-oled-thanks-to-new-official-drivers/" rel="external nofollow">there</a><a href="https://www.neowin.net/news/you-can-now-install-windows-on-steam-deck-oled-thanks-to-new-official-drivers/" rel="external nofollow"> are now official drivers that let you install Windows on the Steam Deck </a><a href="https://www.neowin.net/news/you-can-now-install-windows-on-steam-deck-oled-thanks-to-new-official-drivers/" rel="external nofollow">OLED</a>. Just keep in mind that Valve does not provide official support for Windows-powered Steam Decks.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<img alt="Steam Deck OLED" class="ipsImage" height="405" width="720" src="https://cdn.neowin.com/news/images/uploaded/2023/11/1699554870_press_oled_abxy.jpg">
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Valve also made some changes to how Steam, the most popular store for PC games, <a href="https://www.neowin.net/news/steam-will-now-prioritize-showing-informative-user-reviews-of-games-over-jokes-and-memes/" rel="external nofollow">handles reviews</a>. Now, it prioritizes useful feedback from gamers and lowers jokes and memes to make the review section more useful.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<a href="https://www.neowin.net/news/nvidia-geforce-now-adds-five-games-to-its-catalog-50-percent-discounts-end-aug-18/" rel="external nofollow">Nvidia announced five new games</a> for the catalog of supported titles in its GeForce NOW cloud streaming service. The latest additions include <em>Level Zero: Extraction, shapez 2, Car Manufacture, Psychonauts, </em>and <em>Psychonauts 2. </em>By the way, today is your last chance to purchase a GeForce NOW membership with a 50% discount. The offer ends on August 18.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<strong>Deals and freebies</strong>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	This week, you can get <em>Death's Gambit: Afterlife </em><a href="https://www.neowin.net/news/deaths-gambit-afterlife-is-free-to-claim-on-the-epic-games-store/" rel="external nofollow">for free from the Epic Games Store</a>. As usual, the giveaway is valid until the next Thursday. Just keep in mind that the giveaway is only for <a href="https://www.neowin.net/news/epic-games-store-launches-on-ios-in-the-eu-and-android-worldwide/" rel="external nofollow">PC—the newly launched Epic Games Store on Android and iOS</a> won't let you play that game.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	If one free game is not enough, there is always our weekly <a href="https://www.neowin.net/news/weekend-pc-game-deals-far-cry-to-gather-crpgs-to-bundle-wholesome-specials-and-more/" rel="external nofollow">Weekend PC Game Deals</a> series full of discounted games, specials, and more.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<img alt="Deaths Gambit Afterlife" class="ipsImage" height="405" width="720" src="https://cdn.neowin.com/news/images/uploaded/2024/08/1723730250_gambit.jpg">
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Finally, we have updated our picks for <a href="https://www.neowin.net/news/here-are-our-picks-for-the-most-anticipated-upcoming-pc-games-of-2024/" rel="external nofollow">the most anticipated PC games in the second half of 2024</a>.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Other interesting gaming stories from this week include the following:
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<ul>
	<li>
		<p>
			<a href="https://www.neowin.net/news/the-star-wars-outlaws-pc-hardware-specs-have-been-revealed-with-some-beefy-requirements/" rel="external nofollow"><em>Star Wars Outlaws</em> PC hardware specs have been revealed with some beefy requirements</a>.
		</p>
	</li>
	<li>
		<p>
			<a href="https://www.neowin.net/news/the-release-of-the-terminator-survivors-game-is-being-pushed-back-into-2025/" rel="external nofollow">The release of the <em>Terminator: Survivors</em> game is being pushed back into 2025</a>.
		</p>
	</li>
	<li>
		<p>
			<a href="https://www.neowin.net/news/you-can-get-very-deep-into-stalker-2-heart-of-chornobyl-with-this-new-dev-video/" rel="external nofollow">Developers of <em>S.T.A.L.K.E.R. 2</em> published a new deep dive video with details about the game</a>.
		</p>
	</li>
	<li>
		<p>
			<a href="https://www.neowin.net/news/homeworld-3-will-release-its-first-paid-dlc-on-august-15-with-the-kalan-raiders-fleet-pack/" rel="external nofollow"><em>Homeworld 3</em> will get its first paid DLC on August 15 with the Kalan Raiders Fleet Pack</a>.
		</p>
	</li>
	<li>
		<p>
			<a href="https://www.neowin.net/news/witchfire-is-finally-coming-to-steam-in-2024-after-last-years-epic-games-store-release/" rel="external nofollow"><em>Witchfire</em> is coming to Steam in 2024</a>.
		</p>
	</li>
	<li>
		<p>
			<a href="https://www.neowin.net/news/two-point-studios-and-sega-announce-two-point-museum-a-new-management-sim/" rel="external nofollow">SEGA announced <em>Two Point Museum, </em>a new sim where you manage a museum</a>.
		</p>
	</li>
	<li>
		<p>
			<a href="https://www.neowin.net/news/age-of-empires-mobile-will-officially-launch-on-october-17-on-ios-and-android/" rel="external nofollow"><em>Age of Empires Mobile</em> is launching on October 17 on iOS and Android</a>.
		</p>
	</li>
	<li>
		<p>
			<a href="https://www.neowin.net/news/sins-of-a-solar-empire-ii-launches-on-steam-first-info-on-post-launch-dlc-packs/" rel="external nofollow"><em>Sins of a Solar Empire II </em>is now available on Steam</a>.
		</p>

		<p>
			 
		</p>
	</li>
</ul>

<p>
	<a href="https://www.neowin.net/news/microsoft-weekly-dead-paint-3d-new-windows-11-build-and-crashing-office-apps/" rel="external nofollow">Source</a>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<span style="font-size:12px;"><em>Hope you enjoyed this news post.</em></span>
</p>

<p>
	<span style="font-size:12px;"><em>Thank you for appreciating my time and effort posting news every single day for many years.</em></span>
</p>

<p>
	<span style="font-size:12px;"><em>2023: Over 5,800 news posts | 2024 (till end of July): 3,313 news posts</em></span>
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">25055</guid><pubDate>Sun, 18 Aug 2024 18:20:40 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>The last weapons trailer for Monster Hunter Wilds displays wild new moves for Dual Blades</title><link>https://nsaneforums.com/news/technology-news/the-last-weapons-trailer-for-monster-hunter-wilds-displays-wild-new-moves-for-dual-blades-r25054/</link><description><![CDATA[<h3>
	Dash across the battlefield with lightning-fast speed, and slice and dice anything that gets in your way with the power of the Dual Blades
</h3>

<h2 id="what-you-need-to-know-3">
	What you need to know
</h2>

<ul>
	<li>
		Capcom's next upcoming mainline entry in the Monster Hunter franchise, Monster Hunter Wilds, has just received its final weapon overview gameplay trailer.
	</li>
	<li>
		The trailer gives a glimpse of the Dual Blades, a fast weapon type that allows the player to charge at monsters and use a pair of short swords to chop up monsters with speedy combo attacks.
	</li>
	<li>
		Monster Hunter Wilds will be released in 2025 and the platforms it will launch on include Xbox Series X|S, PlayStation 5, and PC via Steam.
	</li>
</ul>

<p>
	 
</p>

<hr>
<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	It's been a long journey but we've finally reached the end of <a data-analytics-id="inline-link" data-before-rewrite-localise="https://www.windowscentral.com/gaming/monster-hunters-wilds-faq-monsters-weapons-gameplay-and-other-answers-to-hard-questions" href="https://www.windowscentral.com/gaming/monster-hunters-wilds-faq-monsters-weapons-gameplay-and-other-answers-to-hard-questions" rel="external nofollow">Monster Hunter Wilds</a>' weapon overview series as Capcom has just released its final gameplay trailer. The last of this <a data-analytics-id="inline-link" data-before-rewrite-localise="https://www.windowscentral.com/best-upcoming-xbox-games" href="https://www.windowscentral.com/best-upcoming-xbox-games" rel="external nofollow">upcoming Xbox title</a>/<a data-analytics-id="inline-link" data-before-rewrite-localise="https://www.windowscentral.com/gaming/pc-gaming/upcoming-pc-games-list" href="https://www.windowscentral.com/gaming/pc-gaming/upcoming-pc-games-list" rel="external nofollow">upcoming PC title</a>'s fourteen weapon types to be showcased, along with the new moves and gameplay changes it will receive, is the Dual Blades.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<div class="ipsEmbeddedVideo" contenteditable="false">
	<div>
		<iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="113" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" src="https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/FvX367QFb9o?feature=oembed" title="Monster Hunter Wilds: Dual Blades | Weapon Overview" width="200"></iframe>
	</div>
</div>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The Dual Blades equips the player with a pair of short swords which they can use to let loose a never-ending series of slash attacks that can combo into each other. 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Dual Blades have a special, unique gameplay mechanic Demon Mode. When Demon Mode is activated, the user's speed and attack power will increase and they gain access to new attacks and special evasive maneuvers. However, their Stamina gauge will slowly drain while in Demon Mode so players will need to be mindful of it while in this state.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Every attack you land while in Demon Mode, builds up a special gauge meter that when filled activates Archdemon Mode. Archdemon Mode grants the user a portion of Demon Mode's special attacks and stat boosts while they're not in Demon Mode. Archdemon Mode is mainly for helping maintain the Dual Blade user's attack power while they're recovering the Stamina gauge so they can get back into Demon Mode and continue their assault on an enemy monster.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	In the latest Monster Hunter Wilds gameplay trailer, there don't seem to be many changes to Dual Blades' toolkit compared to how it functioned in previous <a data-analytics-id="inline-link" data-before-rewrite-localise="https://www.windowscentral.com/tag/monster-hunter" href="https://www.windowscentral.com/tag/monster-hunter" rel="external nofollow">Monster Hunter</a> games like <a data-analytics-id="inline-link" data-before-rewrite-localise="https://www.windowscentral.com/monster-hunter-world-iceborne-pc-review" href="https://www.windowscentral.com/monster-hunter-world-iceborne-pc-review" rel="external nofollow">Monster Hunter World: Iceborne</a> or <a data-analytics-id="inline-link" data-before-rewrite-localise="https://www.windowscentral.com/gaming/pc-gaming/monster-hunter-rise-sunbreak-pc-review" href="https://www.windowscentral.com/gaming/pc-gaming/monster-hunter-rise-sunbreak-pc-review" rel="external nofollow">Monster Hunter Rise: Sunbreak</a>.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The following changes and new moves for Dual Blades seen thus far are:
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<ul>
	<li>
		A new Archdemon Mode-exclusive evasive move that lets you hop backward during combos to avoid attacks or reposition yourself.
	</li>
	<li>
		The new Focus Strike attack for Dual Blades has you plunge both Dual Blades into a monster's weak spot or wound, leap backward off them into the air, and use the Slinger's grappling hook to latch back onto a monster to unleash a spinning attack where you fly across a monster's entire body to tear their back to shreds.
	</li>
	<li>
		A special dodge move in Demon Mode where if you perform a dodge roll at the last second before a monster hits you, you can completely negate the damage and attack a monster as you're dodging them.
	</li>
</ul>

<h2 id="could-the-dual-blade-user-apos-s-armor-set-hint-at-the-return-of-an-old-school-monster-in-monster-hunter-wilds-3">
	Could the Dual Blade user's armor set hint at the return of an old-school monster in Monster Hunter Wilds?
</h2>

<div>
	<div>
		<p>
			<img alt="Monster Hunter Wilds gameplay trailer screenshot" class="ipsImage" height="720" width="720" src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/HHFMsiB7yLDaDTZCjDXtU5.jpg">
		</p>

		<p>
			<em><span>Launch yourself into the air with the Focus Strike and slide down a monster's body to rip their backs open with the Dual Blades. </span><span itemprop="copyrightHolder">(Image credit: Capcom)</span></em>
		</p>

		<p>
			 
		</p>

		<p>
			The Dual Blades in past games is a fun weapon that lets players go into a frenzied haze and just cut loose with non-stop attacks. One gameplay change that I really like from this trailer is that the awesome and stylish aerial spinning attack where you fly across the monster's body, is now a core part of the Dual Blade's move-set thanks to Monster Hunter Wilds' Focus Mode mechanic. 
		</p>

		<p>
			 
		</p>

		<div id="slice-container-newsletterForm-articleInbodyContent-KwFCUjDU2n8YeQWsHLbVon">
			<div data-hydrate="true">
				<p>
					This move in previous games required players to slide down a hill and jump off it in Monster Hunter World or Wirebug super moves with a long recharge timer in Monster Hunter Rise. In Monster Hunter Wilds we can now use the aerial spinning attack whenever we want so long as we hit a weak spot or wound with the Focus Strike.
				</p>

				<p>
					 
				</p>

				<p>
					Aside from that and the new evasion moves, it is a little disappointing that Dual Blades isn't getting any major reworks or an abundance of crazy new attacks like the <a data-analytics-id="inline-link" data-before-rewrite-localise="https://www.windowscentral.com/gaming/my-least-favorite-weapon-in-monster-hunter-finally-sees-a-massive-rework" href="https://www.windowscentral.com/gaming/my-least-favorite-weapon-in-monster-hunter-finally-sees-a-massive-rework" rel="external nofollow">Bow</a>, <a data-analytics-id="inline-link" data-before-rewrite-localise="https://www.windowscentral.com/gaming/one-of-my-favorite-weapons-monster-hunter-wilds-massive-upgrades" href="https://www.windowscentral.com/gaming/one-of-my-favorite-weapons-monster-hunter-wilds-massive-upgrades" rel="external nofollow">Gunlance</a>, and <a data-analytics-id="inline-link" data-before-rewrite-localise="https://www.windowscentral.com/gaming/rock-on-with-monster-hunter-wilds-hunting-horn-gameplay-trailer" href="https://www.windowscentral.com/gaming/rock-on-with-monster-hunter-wilds-hunting-horn-gameplay-trailer" rel="external nofollow">Hunting Horn</a> are getting. Of course, there is a possibility there may be some new hidden tricks up the Dual Blades' sleeve that Capcom is keeping a secret until the final game is released in 2025.
				</p>

				<p>
					 
				</p>

				<p>
					The biggest surprise for me from this trailer is surprisingly not the Dual Blades themselves, but rather the armor set the player is wearing. Longtime Monster Hunter fans may notice that the armor set looks remarkably similar to an armor set players would get from hunting a Congalala. Congalalas are giant, pink, monkey-like Fanged Beasts that haven't made an appearance in a traditional Monster Hunter game since 2017's Monster Hunter Generations Ultimate on the Nintendo Switch.
				</p>

				<p>
					 
				</p>

				<p>
					Could this be a sign that Congalala will be returning and become a part of <a data-analytics-id="inline-link" data-before-rewrite-localise="https://www.windowscentral.com/gaming/heres-every-monster-hunter-wilds-monster-revealed-thus-far-to-hunt-on-xbox-and-pc" href="https://www.windowscentral.com/gaming/heres-every-monster-hunter-wilds-monster-revealed-thus-far-to-hunt-on-xbox-and-pc" rel="external nofollow">Monster Hunter Wilds' ever-growing list of monsters to hunt</a>? We will have to tune into <a data-analytics-id="inline-link" data-before-rewrite-localise="https://www.windowscentral.com/tag/gamescom" href="https://www.windowscentral.com/tag/gamescom" rel="external nofollow">Gamescom 2024</a> to find out as Capcom will premiere a new cinematic trailer for Monster Hunter Wilds during the opening night live stream on August 20, 2024, which will no doubt reveal new locales, new gear to collect, and new monsters to slay.
				</p>

				<p>
					 
				</p>

				<p>
					<em>Monster Hunter Wilds, the next-gen successor to one of Capcom's </em><a data-analytics-id="inline-link" data-before-rewrite-localise="https://www.windowscentral.com/best-xbox-games" href="https://www.windowscentral.com/best-xbox-games" rel="external nofollow"><em>best Xbox games</em></a><em> and </em><a data-analytics-id="inline-link" data-before-rewrite-localise="https://www.windowscentral.com/gaming/pc-gaming/best-pc-games-of-all-time-our-top-picks-you-should-play-in-year" href="https://www.windowscentral.com/gaming/pc-gaming/best-pc-games-of-all-time-our-top-picks-you-should-play-in-year" rel="external nofollow"><em>best PC games</em></a><em>, Monster Hunter World, is scheduled to launch in 2025 for </em><a data-analytics-id="inline-link" data-before-rewrite-localise="https://www.windowscentral.com/tag/xbox-series-x" href="https://www.windowscentral.com/tag/xbox-series-x" rel="external nofollow"><em>Xbox Series X|S</em></a><em>, PlayStation 5, and PC via Steam.</em>
				</p>

				<p>
					 
				</p>

				<p>
					<a href="https://www.windowscentral.com/gaming/the-last-weapons-trailer-for-monster-hunter-wilds-displays-wild-new-moves-for-dual-blades" rel="external nofollow">Source</a>
				</p>

				<p>
					 
				</p>

				<p>
					<span style="font-size:12px;"><em>Hope you enjoyed this news post.</em></span>
				</p>

				<p>
					<span style="font-size:12px;"><em>Thank you for appreciating my time and effort posting news every single day for many years.</em></span>
				</p>

				<p>
					<span style="font-size:12px;"><em>2023: Over 5,800 news posts | 2024 (till end of July): 3,313 news posts</em></span>
				</p>
			</div>
		</div>
	</div>
</div>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">25054</guid><pubDate>Sun, 18 Aug 2024 18:17:57 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>AMD Ryzen 9 9950X vs. Ryzen 9 7950X: The older Zen 4 CPU remains a great option for most users</title><link>https://nsaneforums.com/news/technology-news/amd-ryzen-9-9950x-vs-ryzen-9-7950x-the-older-zen-4-cpu-remains-a-great-option-for-most-users-r25047/</link><description><![CDATA[<h3>
	The new Ryzen 9 9950X is a hard sell for those already using a 7950X.
</h3>

<div>
	<div data-id="17e120b7-fa68-4b7a-bf4b-aa428989ccf2">
		<p>
			The initial wave of AMD's "Granite Ridge" <a data-analytics-id="inline-link" data-before-rewrite-localise="https://www.windowscentral.com/hardware/amd-reveals-its-ryzen-9000-cpus-with-an-added-treat-for-those-still-on-am4" href="https://www.windowscentral.com/hardware/amd-reveals-its-ryzen-9000-cpus-with-an-added-treat-for-those-still-on-am4" rel="external nofollow">Ryzen 9000</a> desktop processors (CPU) is now complete with the <a data-analytics-id="inline-link" data-before-rewrite-localise="https://www.windowscentral.com/hardware/cpu-gpu-components/amd-ryzen-9-9900x-ryzen-9-9950x-launch-announcement" href="https://www.windowscentral.com/hardware/cpu-gpu-components/amd-ryzen-9-9900x-ryzen-9-9950x-launch-announcement" rel="external nofollow">release of Ryzen 9 9950X and 9900X chips</a>. They join the <a data-analytics-id="inline-link" data-before-rewrite-localise="https://www.windowscentral.com/hardware/cpu-gpu-components/amds-new-mid-range-champion-ryzen-7-9700x-and-its-ryzen-5-9600x-sibling-are-now-available-to-buy" href="https://www.windowscentral.com/hardware/cpu-gpu-components/amds-new-mid-range-champion-ryzen-7-9700x-and-its-ryzen-5-9600x-sibling-are-now-available-to-buy" rel="external nofollow">Ryzen 7 9700X and Ryzen 5 9600X chips</a> released on August 8, 2024.
		</p>

		<p>
			 
		</p>

		<p>
			AMD's new Zen 5 CPUs bring performance gains and, in some cases, improved efficiency, but the jump from Zen 4 to Zen 5 might not be as major as some were expecting. This brings up a good question: is the new Ryzen 9 9950X worth buying over the Ryzen 9 7950X that was released two years ago?
		</p>

		<p>
			 
		</p>

		<p>
			I took a look at raw specs, pricing, and performance to help you make the right decision for your next PC upgrade or build.
		</p>

		<h2 id="section-amd-ryzen-9-9950x-vs-ryzen-9-7950x-specs">
			<span>AMD Ryzen 9 9950X vs. Ryzen 9 7950X: Specs</span>
		</h2>

		<p>
			The specifications that make up these chips aren't too dissimilar. Both chips have 16 cores and 32 threads, a maximum 5.7GHz boost clock, 16MB and 64MB L2 and L3 caches, and a 170W base TDP. The L1 cache is slightly different, with the new Ryzen 9 9950X climbing to 1,280KB compared to 1,024KB. The Zen 5 Ryzen 9 also drops its base clock to 4.3GHz compared to 4.5GHz.
		</p>

		<p>
			 
		</p>

		<p>
			Both chips are unlocked for overclocking, both are compatible with motherboards using the AM5 socket, and both support DDR5 RAM. The core tech is where things pull apart a bit. The Zen 4 Ryzen 9 7950X chip uses a 5nm process, whereas <a data-analytics-id="inline-link" data-before-rewrite-localise="https://www.windowscentral.com/hardware/cpu-gpu-components/amd-zen-5-everything-we-know-so-far" href="https://www.windowscentral.com/hardware/cpu-gpu-components/amd-zen-5-everything-we-know-so-far" rel="external nofollow">Zen 5</a> has shrunk the process to 4nm.
		</p>

		<p>
			 
		</p>

		<p>
			Here's a better look at the specs:
		</p>

		<p>
			 
		</p>

		<div id="slice-container-table-9CmMAzAaAJsVdGVxc6WDg7-7">
			<div>
				<table border="1px solid black;">
					<thead class="table__head">
						<tr class="table__head__row">
							<th class="table__head__heading table__head__heading--left" colspan="1">
								<span>Header Cell - Column 0 </span>
							</th>
							<th class="table__head__heading table__head__heading--left" colspan="1">
								AMD Ryzen 9 9950X
							</th>
							<th class="table__head__heading table__head__heading--left" colspan="1">
								AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
							</th>
						</tr>
					</thead>
					<tbody class="table__body">
						<tr class="table__body__row">
							<td class="table_body__data" colspan="1" style="text-align:left">
								Cores / Threads
							</td>
							<td class="table_body__data" colspan="1" style="text-align:left">
								16 / 32
							</td>
							<td class="table_body__data" colspan="1" style="text-align:left">
								16 / 32
							</td>
						</tr>
						<tr class="table__body__row">
							<td class="table_body__data" colspan="1" style="text-align:left">
								Architecture
							</td>
							<td class="table_body__data" colspan="1" style="text-align:left">
								Zen 5
							</td>
							<td class="table_body__data" colspan="1" style="text-align:left">
								Zen 4
							</td>
						</tr>
						<tr class="table__body__row">
							<td class="table_body__data" colspan="1" style="text-align:left">
								Base Clock
							</td>
							<td class="table_body__data" colspan="1" style="text-align:left">
								4.3GHz
							</td>
							<td class="table_body__data" colspan="1" style="text-align:left">
								4.5GHz
							</td>
						</tr>
						<tr class="table__body__row">
							<td class="table_body__data" colspan="1" style="text-align:left">
								Max Boost Clock
							</td>
							<td class="table_body__data" colspan="1" style="text-align:left">
								5.7GHz
							</td>
							<td class="table_body__data" colspan="1" style="text-align:left">
								5.7GHz
							</td>
						</tr>
						<tr class="table__body__row">
							<td class="table_body__data" colspan="1" style="text-align:left">
								L1 Cache
							</td>
							<td class="table_body__data" colspan="1" style="text-align:left">
								1280KB
							</td>
							<td class="table_body__data" colspan="1" style="text-align:left">
								1024KB
							</td>
						</tr>
						<tr class="table__body__row">
							<td class="table_body__data" colspan="1" style="text-align:left">
								L2 Cache
							</td>
							<td class="table_body__data" colspan="1" style="text-align:left">
								16MB
							</td>
							<td class="table_body__data" colspan="1" style="text-align:left">
								16MB
							</td>
						</tr>
						<tr class="table__body__row">
							<td class="table_body__data" colspan="1" style="text-align:left">
								L3 Cache
							</td>
							<td class="table_body__data" colspan="1" style="text-align:left">
								64MB
							</td>
							<td class="table_body__data" colspan="1" style="text-align:left">
								64MB
							</td>
						</tr>
						<tr class="table__body__row">
							<td class="table_body__data" colspan="1" style="text-align:left">
								Default TDP
							</td>
							<td class="table_body__data" colspan="1" style="text-align:left">
								170W
							</td>
							<td class="table_body__data" colspan="1" style="text-align:left">
								170W
							</td>
						</tr>
						<tr class="table__body__row">
							<td class="table_body__data" colspan="1" style="text-align:left">
								Core Tech
							</td>
							<td class="table_body__data" colspan="1" style="text-align:left">
								TSMC 4nm FinFET
							</td>
							<td class="table_body__data" colspan="1" style="text-align:left">
								TSMC 5nm FinFET
							</td>
						</tr>
						<tr class="table__body__row">
							<td class="table_body__data" colspan="1" style="text-align:left">
								Unlocked?
							</td>
							<td class="table_body__data" colspan="1" style="text-align:left">
								Yes
							</td>
							<td class="table_body__data" colspan="1" style="text-align:left">
								Yes
							</td>
						</tr>
						<tr class="table__body__row">
							<td class="table_body__data" colspan="1" style="text-align:left">
								Socket
							</td>
							<td class="table_body__data" colspan="1" style="text-align:left">
								AM5
							</td>
							<td class="table_body__data" colspan="1" style="text-align:left">
								AM5
							</td>
						</tr>
						<tr class="table__body__row">
							<td class="table_body__data" colspan="1" style="text-align:left">
								Launch Price
							</td>
							<td class="table_body__data" colspan="1" style="text-align:left">
								$649
							</td>
							<td class="table_body__data" colspan="1" style="text-align:left">
								$700
							</td>
						</tr>
						<tr class="table__body__row">
							<td class="table_body__data" colspan="1" style="text-align:left">
								Current Price
							</td>
							<td class="table_body__data" colspan="1" style="text-align:left">
								$649
							</td>
							<td class="table_body__data" colspan="1" style="text-align:left">
								~$518
							</td>
						</tr>
					</tbody>
				</table>

				<h2 id="section-amd-ryzen-9-9950x-vs-ryzen-9-7950x-price-and-availability">
					<span>AMD Ryzen 9 9950X vs. Ryzen 9 7950X: Price and availability</span>
				</h2>

				<div>
					<div>
						<p>
							<img alt="AMD Ryzen 9 7000" class="ipsImage" height="720" width="720" src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/o6BzvssMS4bTsjksQ2R9uU.jpg">
						</p>
						<picture><source class="manual-image-sizes" sizes="602px" srcset="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/QMentUK7z5rucfWa8XrCFh-200-100.png.webp 200w, https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/QMentUK7z5rucfWa8XrCFh-320-100.png.webp 320w" type="image/webp"></source></picture>

						<p>
							<em><span>The Ryzen 9 7950X might be two years old, but it's still a great CPU in 2024. </span><span itemprop="copyrightHolder">(Image credit: Future)</span></em>
						</p>

						<p>
							 
						</p>

						<p>
							AMD's new Ryzen 9 9950X is now available for purchase at retailers like Newegg and Best Buy. It <a data-analytics-id="inline-link" data-google-interstitial="false" data-hl-processed="hawklinks" data-merchant-id="114288" data-merchant-name="newegg.com" data-merchant-network="LS" data-merchant-url="newegg.com" data-placeholder-url="https://click.linksynergy.com/deeplink?id=HlvbvYZP82I&amp;mid=44583&amp;u1=hawk-custom-tracking&amp;murl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.newegg.com%2Famd-ryzen-9-9950x-4-3-ghz-16-core-am5-170w-processor-100-100001277wof%2Fp%2FN82E16819113841" data-url="https://www.newegg.com/amd-ryzen-9-9950x-4-3-ghz-16-core-am5-170w-processor-100-100001277wof/p/N82E16819113841" href="https://click.linksynergy.com/deeplink?id=HlvbvYZP82I&amp;mid=44583&amp;u1=wp-gb-6433909494773548001&amp;murl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.newegg.com%2Famd-ryzen-9-9950x-4-3-ghz-16-core-am5-170w-processor-100-100001277wof%2Fp%2FN82E16819113841" referrerpolicy="no-referrer-when-downgrade" rel="external nofollow" target="_blank"><strong>costs $649</strong></a>, which is $50 less than the launch price for the Ryzen 9 7950X.
						</p>

						<p>
							 
						</p>

						<p>
							The Ryzen 9 7950X is still readily available at major retailers like Best Buy, Newegg, Amazon, and Walmart, and it has come down in price in time since its release. You can now usually find it for <a data-analytics-id="inline-link" data-google-interstitial="false" data-hl-processed="hawklinks" data-merchant-id="114288" data-merchant-name="newegg.com" data-merchant-network="LS" data-merchant-url="newegg.com" data-placeholder-url="https://click.linksynergy.com/deeplink?id=HlvbvYZP82I&amp;mid=44583&amp;u1=hawk-custom-tracking&amp;murl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.newegg.com%2Famd-ryzen-9-7950x-ryzen-9-7000-series-raphael-zen-4-socket-am5%2Fp%2FN82E16819113771" data-url="https://www.newegg.com/amd-ryzen-9-7950x-ryzen-9-7000-series-raphael-zen-4-socket-am5/p/N82E16819113771" href="https://click.linksynergy.com/deeplink?id=HlvbvYZP82I&amp;mid=44583&amp;u1=wp-gb-4557345968939407927&amp;murl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.newegg.com%2Famd-ryzen-9-7950x-ryzen-9-7000-series-raphael-zen-4-socket-am5%2Fp%2FN82E16819113771" referrerpolicy="no-referrer-when-downgrade" rel="external nofollow" target="_blank"><strong>about $518</strong></a>, which is considerably more affordable than the new Ryzen 9 9950X.
						</p>

						<p>
							 
						</p>

						<p>
							Neither chip compared here comes with a bundled cooler, so you'll need to factor the extra cost into your build. AMD suggests a liquid cooler for these chips in order to avoid thermal throttling and maximize performance. Many of the <a data-analytics-id="inline-link" data-before-rewrite-localise="https://www.windowscentral.com/hardware/computers-desktops/best-cpu-cooler-for-amd-ryzen-9-7950x" href="https://www.windowscentral.com/hardware/computers-desktops/best-cpu-cooler-for-amd-ryzen-9-7950x" rel="external nofollow">best coolers for the Ryzen 9 7950X</a> will cross over for the Ryzen 9 9950X.
						</p>

						<h2 id="section-amd-ryzen-9-9950x-vs-ryzen-9-7950x-zen-5-against-zen-4">
							<span>AMD Ryzen 9 9950X vs. Ryzen 9 7950X: Zen 5 against Zen 4</span>
						</h2>

						<div>
							<div>
								<p>
									<img alt="AMD Ryzen 9 9950X in AM5 motherboard socket" class="ipsImage" height="720" width="720" src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/khq7Nnm2bY2wq3VaaheQcE.jpg">
								</p>
								<picture><source class="manual-image-sizes" sizes="602px" srcset="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/zrEsoYWtE2fxCyRRzSosQG-200-100.png.webp 200w, https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/zrEsoYWtE2fxCyRRzSosQG-320-100.png.webp 320w" type="image/webp"></source></picture>

								<p>
									<em><span>The new Ryzen 9 9950X isn't a huge upgrade over the 7950X. </span><span itemprop="copyrightHolder">(Image credit: Ben Wilson | Windows Central)</span></em>
								</p>

								<p>
									 
								</p>

								<p>
									Performance gains between Zen 4 and Zen 5 aren't as large as some were expecting, but they're gains nonetheless. Windows Central Editor Ben Wilson <a data-analytics-id="inline-link" data-before-rewrite-localise="https://www.windowscentral.com/hardware/cpu-gpu-components/amd-ryzen-9-9900x-9950x-review" href="https://www.windowscentral.com/hardware/cpu-gpu-components/amd-ryzen-9-9900x-9950x-review" rel="external nofollow">reviewed the Ryzen 9 9950X</a>, saying:
								</p>

								<p>
									 
								</p>

								<p style="margin-left: 40px;">
									<em>"AMD's new top-end consumer processor is more expensive than its Intel rival, and there isn't much to say about the Ryzen 9 9950X besides that it's the most powerful desktop CPU in the world, at least before you resort to workstation-grade Threadripper chips. A </em><a data-analytics-id="inline-link" data-google-interstitial="false" data-hl-processed="hawklinks" data-placeholder-url="https://click.linksynergy.com/deeplink?id=kXQk6%2AivFEQ&amp;mid=44583&amp;u1=hawk-custom-tracking&amp;murl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.newegg.com%2Famd-ryzen-9-9950x-4-3-ghz-16-core-am5-170w-processor-100-100001277wof%2Fp%2FN82E16819113841" data-url="https://click.linksynergy.com/deeplink?id=kXQk6%2AivFEQ&amp;mid=44583&amp;u1=wp-us-1104885244803254322&amp;murl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.newegg.com%2Famd-ryzen-9-9950x-4-3-ghz-16-core-am5-170w-processor-100-100001277wof%2Fp%2FN82E16819113841" href="https://click.linksynergy.com/deeplink?id=kXQk6%2AivFEQ&amp;mid=44583&amp;u1=wp-gb-1351355113187479745&amp;murl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.newegg.com%2Famd-ryzen-9-9950x-4-3-ghz-16-core-am5-170w-processor-100-100001277wof%2Fp%2FN82E16819113841" referrerpolicy="no-referrer-when-downgrade" rel="external nofollow" target="_blank"><em>$649 MSRP</em></a><em> will sting but allows the best single-core and multi-core benchmarking test scores I've seen to date. It's a beast, topping the charts and doing everything it claims to, albeit reliant on some demanding system requirements."</em>
								</p>

								<p>
									 
								</p>

								<p>
									You can expect better single- and multi-core performance with the Ryzen 9 9950X, but as you can see in the table below, the 7950X isn't too far behind.
								</p>

								<p>
									 
								</p>

								<div id="slice-container-table-9CmMAzAaAJsVdGVxc6WDg7-14">
									<div>
										<table border="1px solid black;">
											<thead class="table__head">
												<tr class="table__head__row">
													<th class="table__head__heading table__head__heading--left" colspan="1">
														<span>Header Cell - Column 0 </span>
													</th>
													<th class="table__head__heading table__head__heading--left" colspan="1">
														AMD Ryzen 9 9950X
													</th>
													<th class="table__head__heading table__head__heading--left" colspan="1">
														AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
													</th>
												</tr>
											</thead>
											<tbody class="table__body">
												<tr class="table__body__row">
													<td class="table_body__data" colspan="1" style="text-align:left">
														Geekbench 5 (single / multi)
													</td>
													<td class="table_body__data" colspan="1" style="text-align:left">
														2,585 / 24,821
													</td>
													<td class="table_body__data" colspan="1" style="text-align:left">
														2,198 / 23,334
													</td>
												</tr>
												<tr class="table__body__row">
													<td class="table_body__data" colspan="1" style="text-align:left">
														7-Zip 32MB (com / decom)
													</td>
													<td class="table_body__data" colspan="1" style="text-align:left">
														167MB/s / 2,986MB/s
													</td>
													<td class="table_body__data" colspan="1" style="text-align:left">
														156MB/s / 2,886
													</td>
												</tr>
												<tr class="table__body__row">
													<td class="table_body__data" colspan="1" style="text-align:left">
														Cinebench R23 (single / multi)
													</td>
													<td class="table_body__data" colspan="1" style="text-align:left">
														2,263 / 40,253
													</td>
													<td class="table_body__data" colspan="1" style="text-align:left">
														1,967 / 35,914
													</td>
												</tr>
											</tbody>
										</table>

										<p>
											 
										</p>

										<p>
											Considering the Ryzen 9 9950X didn't get a TDP drop to make it more efficient, there's almost no reason to upgrade to the newer chip if you already have a Ryzen 9 7950X. In former Windows Central Senior Editor Rich Edmonds' <a data-analytics-id="inline-link" data-before-rewrite-localise="https://www.windowscentral.com/hardware/amd-ryzen-9-7900x-and-7950x-review" href="https://www.windowscentral.com/hardware/amd-ryzen-9-7900x-and-7950x-review" rel="external nofollow">Ryzen 9 7950X review</a>, he stated:
										</p>

										<p>
											 
										</p>

										<p style="margin-left: 40px;">
											<em>"Performance in Blender is excellent, and you won't have time to fetch a cup of tea while Corona runs. These processors are excellent for intensive workloads, and the improvements AMD has made to the AM5 platform with the latest round of processors are noticeable even when simply playing around in Windows 11 (or your favorite flavor of Linux). Everything ... seems faster."</em>
										</p>

										<p>
											 
										</p>

										<p>
											Enthusiasts who want to keep their system as up-to-date as possible and don't mind throwing some money around can grab those slight gains with the 9950X, but otherwise, those who have the 7950X should be happy with what they have.
										</p>

										<h2 id="section-amd-ryzen-9-9950x-vs-ryzen-9-7950x-which-should-you-buy">
											<span>AMD Ryzen 9 9950X vs. Ryzen 9 7950X: Which should you buy?</span>
										</h2>

										<div>
											<div>
												<p>
													<img alt="AMD Ryzen 9 7000" class="ipsImage" height="720" width="720" src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/SsXZGQH4Ewr47hf5NpYwfU.jpg">
												</p>
												<picture><source class="manual-image-sizes" sizes="602px" srcset="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/QMentUK7z5rucfWa8XrCFh-200-100.png.webp 200w, https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/QMentUK7z5rucfWa8XrCFh-320-100.png.webp 320w" type="image/webp"></source></picture>

												<p>
													<em><span>The Ryzen 9 7950X remains a great choice for creators and gamers. </span><span itemprop="copyrightHolder">(Image credit: Future)</span></em>
												</p>

												<p>
													 
												</p>

												<p>
													Making the right choice here comes down to budget and what you're already using in your PC. If you're coming from, say, a Ryzen 5000X CPU, you're going to see a rather impressive bump in performance with the Ryzen 9 9950X. On the other hand, if you already have a Ryzen 9 7950X, there's almost no reason to upgrade to the newer chip.
												</p>

												<p>
													 
												</p>

												<p>
													And even if you are working with an older CPU that's seen better days, ignoring the 9000 series and going for the Ryzen 9 7950X can save you anywhere from $100 to $150 depending on promotions.
												</p>

												<p>
													 
												</p>

												<p>
													These processors are made for creative work and gaming, and those who split time between the two should be happy with the performance. However, PC gamers who want a CPU specifically for gaming should either wait for the Ryzen 9000 X3D variants or check out the Ryzen 9 7950X3D. It usually costs <a data-analytics-id="inline-link" data-google-interstitial="false" data-hl-processed="hawklinks" data-merchant-id="114288" data-merchant-name="newegg.com" data-merchant-network="LS" data-merchant-url="newegg.com" data-placeholder-url="https://click.linksynergy.com/deeplink?id=HlvbvYZP82I&amp;mid=44583&amp;u1=hawk-custom-tracking&amp;murl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.newegg.com%2Famd-ryzen-9-7950x3d-ryzen-9-7000-series-raphael-zen-4-socket-am5%2Fp%2FN82E16819113791" data-url="https://www.newegg.com/amd-ryzen-9-7950x3d-ryzen-9-7000-series-raphael-zen-4-socket-am5/p/N82E16819113791" href="https://click.linksynergy.com/deeplink?id=HlvbvYZP82I&amp;mid=44583&amp;u1=wp-gb-1223490236924793317&amp;murl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.newegg.com%2Famd-ryzen-9-7950x3d-ryzen-9-7000-series-raphael-zen-4-socket-am5%2Fp%2FN82E16819113791" referrerpolicy="no-referrer-when-downgrade" rel="external nofollow" target="_blank"><strong>about $525</strong></a><strong> </strong>and will be the better choice against the Ryzen 9 9950X.
												</p>

												<p>
													 
												</p>

												<p>
													<a href="https://www.windowscentral.com/hardware/cpu-gpu-components/amd-ryzen-9-9950x-vs-ryzen-9-7950x" rel="external nofollow">Source</a>
												</p>

												<p>
													 
												</p>

												<p>
													<span style="font-size:12px;"><em>Hope you enjoyed this news post.</em></span>
												</p>

												<p>
													<span style="font-size:12px;"><em>Thank you for appreciating my time and effort posting news every single day for many years.</em></span>
												</p>

												<p>
													<span style="font-size:12px;"><em>2023: Over 5,800 news posts | 2024 (till end of July): 3,313 news posts</em></span>
												</p>
											</div>
										</div>
									</div>
								</div>
							</div>
						</div>
					</div>
				</div>
			</div>
		</div>
	</div>
</div>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">25047</guid><pubDate>Sat, 17 Aug 2024 19:35:15 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[AMD Ryzen 9 9900X CPU Review & Benchmarks vs. 14700K, 7900X, 9950X, & More [Video]]]></title><link>https://nsaneforums.com/news/technology-news/amd-ryzen-9-9900x-cpu-review-benchmarks-vs-14700k-7900x-9950x-more-video-r25046/</link><description><![CDATA[<div class="ipsEmbeddedVideo" contenteditable="false">
	<div>
		<iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="113" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" src="https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/s922o1aHqT8?feature=oembed" title="AMD Ryzen 9 9900X CPU Review &amp; Benchmarks vs. 14700K, 7900X, 9950X, &amp; More" width="200"></iframe>
	</div>
</div>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<a href="https://www.youtube.com/@GamersNexus" rel="external nofollow" target="_blank">Gamers Nexus</a> (2.26M subscribers)
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	August 17, 2024
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Video length: 32m 18s
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	00:00 - AMD R9 9900X CPU Alternatives &amp; Prices
</p>

<p>
	02:02 - CPU Benchmarks List
</p>

<p>
	05:16 - Windows Administrator
</p>

<p>
	06:11 - All-Core Frequency (9900X, 9700X, 9950X)
</p>

<p>
	07:21 - Single-Core Frequency (Zen 5 vs. Zen 4)
</p>

<p>
	08:27 - Thermal Misconceptions
</p>

<p>
	09:29 - Thermal Benchmarks (Zen 5 Comparison)
</p>

<p>
	10:24 - Power Consumption (All-Core, Blender)
</p>

<p>
	11:32 - Efficiency (Blender)
</p>

<p>
	12:27 - Efficiency (Compression)
</p>

<p>
	13:31 - Efficiency (Decompression)
</p>

<p>
	14:27 - Gaming Efficiency (Stellaris)
</p>

<p>
	15:15 - Gaming Efficiency (Cyberpunk Phantom Liberty)
</p>

<p>
	15:43 - Gaming Efficiency (FFXIV)
</p>

<p>
	16:16 - Computational Fluid Dynamics (Rodinia CFD)
</p>

<p>
	17:58 - 3D Rendering (Blender CPU Benchmarks)
</p>

<p>
	18:51 - Code Compile Benchmark (Chromium CPU Test)
</p>

<p>
	19:45 - File Compression CPU Test
</p>

<p>
	20:29 - File Decompression CPU Comparison
</p>

<p>
	21:13 - Adobe Photoshop CPU Benchmarks
</p>

<p>
	21:59 - Adobe Premiere CPU Benchmarks
</p>

<p>
	22:28 - SpecWS Financial Simulations
</p>

<p>
	23:03 - SpecWS LAMMPS Biomedical Modeling
</p>

<p>
	23:27 - Gaming Benchmarks List
</p>

<p>
	23:58 - Gaming (Dragon's Dogma 2 Best CPUs)
</p>

<p>
	24:59 - Gaming (F1 24)
</p>

<p>
	25:40 - Gaming (FFXIV Dawntrail Benchmarks)
</p>

<p>
	26:38 - Gaming (Stellaris CPU Benchmarks)
</p>

<p>
	27:16 - Gaming (Baldur's Gate 3 CPU Benchmarks)
</p>

<p>
	27:32 - Conclusion
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s922o1aHqT8" rel="external nofollow">Source</a>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<span style="font-size:12px;"><em>Hope you enjoyed this news post.</em></span>
</p>

<p>
	<span style="font-size:12px;"><em>Thank you for appreciating my time and effort posting news every single day for many years.</em></span>
</p>

<p>
	<span style="font-size:12px;"><em>2023: Over 5,800 news posts | 2024 (till end of July): 3,313 news posts</em></span>
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">25046</guid><pubDate>Sat, 17 Aug 2024 19:29:29 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Sins of a Solar Empire II is a big hit on Steam; first hotfix adds 15 more maps</title><link>https://nsaneforums.com/news/technology-news/sins-of-a-solar-empire-ii-is-a-big-hit-on-steam-first-hotfix-adds-15-more-maps-r25045/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	Earlier this week, <em>Sins of a Solar Empire II</em>, the sequel to the acclaimed space-based 4X RTS game, <a href="https://www.neowin.net/news/sins-of-a-solar-empire-ii-launches-on-steam-first-info-on-post-launch-dlc-packs/" rel="external nofollow">made its Steam debut</a> after being available as an Early Access title on the Epic Games Store. <em>Sins II,</em> from developer Ironclad Games and publisher Stardock, also came with a ton of new content, features, and improvements.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The game quickly hit the number one spot for sales on Steam's service in the US. It currently is at <a href="https://store.steampowered.com/charts/topselling/US" rel="external nofollow">number two in sales for the US</a>, as of this writing, and is currently the <a href="https://store.steampowered.com/charts/topselling/global" rel="external nofollow">sixth best-selling game on Steam worldwide</a>.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Late on Friday, Ironclad and Stardock released <a href="https://store.steampowered.com/news/app/1575940?emclan=103582791474504856&amp;emgid=6565771541013099370" rel="external nofollow">the first hotfix for <em>Sins of a Solar Empire II</em> </a>since its Steam release to fix a few issues that have cropped up, along with some new maps. Here's what it contains:
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<blockquote class="QuoteNewsStyle">
	<p>
		<strong>New Content:</strong>
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<ul>
		<li>
			added 15 new maps
		</li>
	</ul>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		<strong>Misc:</strong>
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<ul>
		<li>
			fixed crash attempting to save games with reserved win32 names
		</li>
		<li>
			fixed save game crash
		</li>
		<li>
			added fix for mouse movement through remote desktop
		</li>
		<li>
			fixed unable to complete "Galaxy Overview" tutorial with certain keyboards.
		</li>
		<li>
			updated game credits
		</li>
	</ul>
</blockquote>

<p>
	Keep in mind that the game is <a href="https://store.steampowered.com/app/1575940/Sins_of_a_Solar_Empire_II/" rel="external nofollow">currently being sold at a 20 percent discount until August 29</a>. You can get the base version of <em>Sins of a Solar Empire II</em> for just $39.99 until that date. You can also get the Premium Edition, which includes the game's digital soundtrack and its first Content Pass for a 20 percent discount of $79.99, again until August 29.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	People who order the Premium Edition can expect to get a number of DLC packs for the game over the following weeks and months. Those updates will include a new single-player campaign, an extra scenario pack, new ship units for each of the game's playable factions, and finally, there will also be a new, and so far unrevealed, fourth playable faction as one of the DLC packs.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p style="font-size:small">
	<em>Disclaimer: <a href="https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1065550-stardock-involvement-with-neowin-faq/" rel="external nofollow">Neowin's relationship to Stardock</a></em>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<a href="https://www.neowin.net/news/sins-of-a-solar-empire-ii-is-a-big-hit-on-steam-first-hotfix-adds-15-more-maps/" rel="external nofollow">Source</a>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<span style="font-size:12px;"><em>Hope you enjoyed this news post.</em></span>
</p>

<p>
	<span style="font-size:12px;"><em>Thank you for appreciating my time and effort posting news every single day for many years.</em></span>
</p>

<p>
	<span style="font-size:12px;"><em>2023: Over 5,800 news posts | 2024 (till end of July): 3,313 news posts</em></span>
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">25045</guid><pubDate>Sat, 17 Aug 2024 19:23:45 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Diablo 4's latest patch notes brings plentiful bug fixes &#x2014; here's what you need to know</title><link>https://nsaneforums.com/news/technology-news/diablo-4s-latest-patch-notes-brings-plentiful-bug-fixes-%E2%80%94-heres-what-you-need-to-know-r25033/</link><description><![CDATA[<h3>
	A new patch for Diablo 4 is arriving on August 20, with bug fixes for the Infernal Hordes and general gameplay.
</h3>

<h2 id="what-you-need-to-know-3">
	What you need to know
</h2>

<ul>
	<li>
		Diablo 4 Season 5 recently kicked off, bringing new activities for players to undergo like the Infernal Hordes.
	</li>
	<li>
		The latest patch notes for Diablo 4 are now available, showing a number of bug fixes that players can expect. 
	</li>
	<li>
		This update is scheduled to arrive on Aug. 20, 2024.
	</li>
</ul>

<p>
	 
</p>

<hr>
<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Hell is always changing and growing, and so too are its patch notes.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Developer and publisher Blizzard Entertainment <a data-analytics-id="inline-link" data-hl-processed="none" data-url="https://news.blizzard.com/en-us/diablo4/23964909/diablo-iv-patch-notes" href="https://news.blizzard.com/en-us/diablo4/23964909/diablo-iv-patch-notes" referrerpolicy="no-referrer-when-downgrade" target="_blank" rel="external nofollow">shared</a> the latest notes on Friday for what players can expect in <a data-analytics-id="inline-link" data-before-rewrite-localise="https://www.windowscentral.com/tag/diablo-4" href="https://www.windowscentral.com/tag/diablo-4" rel="external nofollow">Diablo 4</a> across the next update. While nowhere near as gargantuan as the <a data-analytics-id="inline-link" data-before-rewrite-localise="https://www.windowscentral.com/gaming/the-diablo-4-season-5-patch-notes-are-so-long-my-finger-got-tired-scrolling-the-page-heres-whats-coming-in-infernal-hordes" href="https://www.windowscentral.com/gaming/the-diablo-4-season-5-patch-notes-are-so-long-my-finger-got-tired-scrolling-the-page-heres-whats-coming-in-infernal-hordes" rel="external nofollow">finger-numbing list of changes introduced with Season 5</a>, there's still some important things to note, with a number of bug fixes that should make the experience far more pleasant. 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	This update is scheduled to arrive in Diablo 4 on Aug. 20, 2024. You can find the patch notes below:
</p>

<h2 id="infernal-hordes-3">
	Infernal Hordes
</h2>

<ul>
	<li>
		The Spoils of Gold chest is now reuseable.
	</li>
	<li>
		The sound effects that play when picking up Burning Aether have been updated to be more prominent.
	</li>
	<li>
		The Following Infernal Offerings have been updated to increase their rewards:
		<ul>
			<li>
				The Exalted Elite: Burning Aether amount increased from +1 to +2.
			</li>
			<li>
				The Surging Elite: Burning Aether amount increased from +1 to +2.
			</li>
			<li>
				The Unstoppable Elite: Burning Aether amount increased from +1 to +2.
			</li>
			<li>
				The Burning Rain: end of wave Burning Aether increased from 1-3 to 3-9.
			</li>
		</ul>
	</li>
</ul>

<h2 id="accessibility-3">
	Accessibility
</h2>

<ul>
	<li>
		<em>Fixed an issue where a non-functional setting for Read on Hover was present.</em>
	</li>
	<li>
		<em>Fixed an issue where the Screen Reader announced Roman Numerals as letters.</em>
	</li>
</ul>

<h2 id="user-interface-and-user-experience-3">
	User Interface and User Experience
</h2>

<ul>
	<li>
		<em>Trade chat is now separated by World Tier.</em>
	</li>
	<li>
		<em>Players will now be notified when there is a new patch update available.</em>
	</li>
	<li>
		<em>Party Leaders can now promote another Party member to be the new Leader.</em>
	</li>
	<li>
		<em>Newly created characters are now always placed at the top of the character list.</em>
	</li>
	<li>
		<em>Clan Name can now be changed.</em>
	</li>
	<li>
		<em>Fixed an issue where character stats were inaccurate in town when certain items were equipped.</em>
	</li>
	<li>
		<em>Fixed an issue where the tooltip for Infernal Compasses had two instances of "Compass Affixes".</em>
	</li>
	<li>
		<em>Fixed an issue where the name for Echo of Varshan displayed as Tormented Echo of Varshan.</em>
	</li>
	<li>
		<em>Fixed an issue where an error could display when comparing an Ancestral Mythic Unique Item.</em>
	</li>
	<li>
		<em>Fixed an issue where the Whisper icon for defeating the Blood Maiden overlapped the icon for the Accursed Ritual on the map.</em>
	</li>
	<li>
		<em>Fixed an issue where the Icons for Infernal Offerings were inconsistent between the minimap and the world map within the Infernal Hordes.</em>
	</li>
	<li>
		<em>Fixed an issue where Treasure Goblins in Helltide could leave behind a portal indefinitely.</em>
	</li>
	<li>
		<em>Fixed an issue where the visual effect for poison could remain indefinitely on enemy corpses if they were killed while poisoned.</em>
	</li>
	<li>
		<em>Fixed an issue where Thorns granted by the Thorns while Fortified Tempering Affix did not display in character stats.</em>
	</li>
	<li>
		<em>Fixed an issue where players using a Controller would be sent to the Equipment inventory tab when using an Abyssal scroll.</em>
	</li>
	<li>
		<em>Fixed an issue where the minimap was not accurate in certain Infernal Hordes instances.</em>
	</li>
</ul>

<h2 id="gameplay-3">
	Gameplay
</h2>

<ul>
	<li>
		<em>Infernal Hordes</em>

		<ul>
			<li>
				<em>Fixed an issue where Hellborne did not spawn as frequently as intended when the Hellfire Infernal Offering was active.</em>
			</li>
			<li>
				<em>Fixed an issue where the Stalking Devil Infernal Offering pedestal could appear again after being interacted with.</em>
			</li>
			<li>
				<em>Fixed an issue where the Withered Wanderer Infernal Offering reduction to All Resistances did not actually reduce resistance.</em>
			</li>
			<li>
				<em>Fixed an issue where Treasure Goblins spawned during an Infernal Hordes encounter could become indefinitely unkillable, preventing wave progression.</em>
			</li>
			<li>
				<em>Fixed an issue in local co-op play where one player could collect the other player's Burning Aether after that player died. Finders keepers!</em>
			</li>
		</ul>
	</li>
</ul>

<p>
	 
</p>

<ul>
	<li>
		<em>Quests/Dungeons</em>

		<ul>
			<li>
				<em>Fixed an issue where the player could respawn on the other side of the objective while protecting Locran during the To The Edge of the Abyss quest.</em>
			</li>
			<li>
				<em>Fixed an issue where monsters could endlessly spawn during the Seething Mountain quest.</em>
			</li>
			<li>
				<em>Fixed an issue where the Istel Tornado encounter during The Rising Hells quest could persist indefinitely.</em>
			</li>
			<li>
				<em>Fixed an issue where progression in the Sins of the Willing quest could be blocked if the player died during the ritual.</em>
			</li>
			<li>
				<em>Fixed an issue where the second Spider Caller monster in Sirocco Caverns could fail to spawn, preventing progression.</em>
			</li>
			<li>
				<em>Fixed an issue where Stormbane's Wrath didn't deal damage. (Not so wrathful after all.)</em>
			</li>
			<li>
				<em>Fixed an issue where the Aspect of Inevitable Fate could appear on Chest armor through a Seasonal Questline reward.</em>
			</li>
		</ul>
	</li>
</ul>

<p>
	 
</p>

<ul>
	<li>
		<em>General</em>

		<ul>
			<li>
				<em>Fixed an issue where the Tormented Echo version of the Beast in the Ice dropped the same amount of Pincushioned Dolls as the normal version.</em>
			</li>
			<li>
				<em>Fixed an issue where the visual effects for Death Trap and Concealment were not properly visible for other players.</em>
			</li>
			<li>
				<em>Fixed an issue where higher Ranks of Firewall did not have the blue flame effect.</em>
			</li>
			<li>
				<em>Fixed an issue where Dungeon whispers did not appear in the Scouring Sands zone.</em>
			</li>
			<li>
				<em>Fixed an issue where multiple Shade Totems could be spawned by swapping weapons when using the Umbracrux.</em>
			</li>
			<li>
				<em>Fixed an issue where Baneful Hearts could be lost when using Accursed Altars after Helltide ended.</em>
			</li>
			<li>
				<em>Fixed an issue where a small number of affixes couldn't roll as a Greater Affix, such as the Blood Orbs restore essence affix on Blood Artisan's Cuirass.</em>
			</li>
			<li>
				<em>Fixed an issue where the player could get stuck when interacting with the World Tier statue in Kyovashad and using a Town Portal at the same time.</em>
			</li>
			<li>
				<em>Fixed an issue where the Leave Dungeon ability couldn't be used to leave Cellars.</em>
			</li>
			<li>
				<em>Fixed an issue where Echo of Lilith sometimes couldn't be Staggered during the first phase of the encounter.</em>
			</li>
			<li>
				<em>Fixed an issue where Echo of Lilith could remain in the air indefinitely if Staggered immediately after landing.</em>
			</li>
			<li>
				<em>Fixed an issue where Echo of Lilith would not progress to the second stage of the encounter in certain circumstances.</em>
			</li>
			<li>
				<em>Fixed an issue where Summoned Lightning Spear would not consume stacks of Crackling Energy or grant the damage increase bonus.</em>
			</li>
			<li>
				<em>Fixed an issue where certain affixes were not affected by Masterworking for the following Unique Items</em>
				<ul>
					<li>
						<em>The Oculus</em>
					</li>
					<li>
						<em>Blue Rose</em>
					</li>
					<li>
						<em>Storm's Companion</em>
					</li>
				</ul>
			</li>
			<li>
				<em>Fixed an issue where the player couldn’t interact with various objects.</em>
			</li>
			<li>
				<em>Fixed an issue where Blood Howl did not grant Stealth when Waxing Gibbous was equipped.</em>
			</li>
		</ul>
	</li>
</ul>

<h2 id="miscellaneous-3">
	Miscellaneous
</h2>

<ul>
	<li>
		<em>All players will receive a cache of Legendary items with guaranteed Greater Affixes, to make up for the issue seen with patch 1.5.0 where players were not getting items with guaranteed Greater Affixes from multiple sources.</em>
	</li>
	<li>
		<em>The Alchemist Control Tempering affix for Rogue has been re-enabled with the following adjustments:</em>
		<ul>
			<li>
				<em>The Flurry Size affix has been removed from Rogue Innovation and put into Alchemist Control.</em>
			</li>
			<li>
				<em>The Ranks of Trick Attacks affix has been removed from Alchemist Control.</em>
			</li>
		</ul>
	</li>
	<li>
		<em>Extra visual effects have been added to the projectile trail for Corpse Bows to make it easier to track the projectile's origin.</em>
	</li>
	<li>
		<em>Fixed an issue where the corpses of Duriel and Grigoire did not despawn soon after dying.</em>
	</li>
	<li>
		<em>Various UI, visual, stability, and performance improvements.</em>
	</li>
</ul>

<h2 id="diablo-4-is-growing-even-bigger-this-year-3">
	Diablo 4 is growing even bigger this year
</h2>

<div>
	<div>
		<p>
			<img alt="Diablo 4 Vessel of Hatred Spiritborn hero" class="ipsImage" height="720" width="720" src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/wt3UzRToLUmnqrky7G3Dof.jpg">
		</p>

		<p>
			<em><span>Vessel of Hatred is Diablo 4's first big expansion, and it's adding the Spiritborn as a playable class. </span></em>
		</p>

		<p>
			<em><span itemprop="copyrightHolder">(Image credit: Blizzard Entertainment)</span></em>
		</p>

		<p>
			 
		</p>

		<p>
			Diablo 4 is really hitting its stride right now, and there's a lot of excitement around the game thanks to the feedback Blizzard has taken in working on Season 4 and Season 5 of the game. 
		</p>

		<p>
			 
		</p>

		<p>
			Looking ahead, the Vessel of Hatred expansion is bringing more story content in the jungle region of Nahantu, as well as a new playable class, the <a data-analytics-id="inline-link" data-before-rewrite-localise="https://www.windowscentral.com/gaming/everything-we-learned-about-the-spiritborn-a-new-dexterity-based-class-coming-to-diablo-4" href="https://www.windowscentral.com/gaming/everything-we-learned-about-the-spiritborn-a-new-dexterity-based-class-coming-to-diablo-4" target="_blank" rel="external nofollow">Spiritborn</a>, when it arrives in October. 
		</p>

		<p>
			 
		</p>

		<p>
			If you're looking to learn more, <a data-analytics-id="inline-link" data-before-rewrite-localise="https://www.windowscentral.com/gaming/diablo-vessel-of-hatred-spiritborn-interview" href="https://www.windowscentral.com/gaming/diablo-vessel-of-hatred-spiritborn-interview" rel="external nofollow">my colleague Jennifer Young chatted with Blizzard Entertainment about what's gone into crafting the Spiritborn</a> and what players should expect.
		</p>

		<p>
			 
		</p>

		<p>
			<em>Diablo 4 is currently available on Xbox Series X|S, Xbox One, Windows PC, PlayStation 5, and PlayStation 4. It's also available in </em><a data-analytics-id="inline-link" data-before-rewrite-localise="https://www.windowscentral.com/tag/xbox-game-pass" href="https://www.windowscentral.com/tag/xbox-game-pass" rel="external nofollow"><em>Xbox Game Pass</em></a><em>. Diablo 4: Vessel of Hatred is scheduled to launch on Oct. 8, 2024.</em>
		</p>

		<p>
			 
		</p>

		<div id="slice-container-newsletterForm-articleInbodyContent-SwGYhnKBRQRA5YSvTn59BW">
			<div data-hydrate="true">
				<p>
					<a href="https://www.windowscentral.com/gaming/xbox/diablo-4s-latest-patch-notes-brings-plentiful-bug-fixes-heres-what-you-need-to-know" rel="external nofollow">Source</a>
				</p>

				<p>
					 
				</p>

				<p>
					<span style="font-size:12px;"><em>Hope you enjoyed this news post.</em></span>
				</p>

				<p>
					<span style="font-size:12px;"><em>Thank you for appreciating my time and effort posting news every single day for many years.</em></span>
				</p>

				<p>
					<span style="font-size:12px;"><em>2023: Over 5,800 news posts | 2024 (till end of July): 3,313 news posts</em></span>
				</p>
			</div>
		</div>
	</div>
</div>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">25033</guid><pubDate>Sat, 17 Aug 2024 07:22:48 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Dragon Age: The Veilguard reveals its PC hardware specs and a new trailer</title><link>https://nsaneforums.com/news/technology-news/dragon-age-the-veilguard-reveals-its-pc-hardware-specs-and-a-new-trailer-r25032/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	Earlier this week, the release date for the upcoming BioWare fantasy RPG <em>Dragon Age: The Veilguard</em> got leaked <a href="https://www.neowin.net/news/dragon-age-the-veilguard-leak-says-the-bioware-rpg-is-launching-in-late-october/" rel="external nofollow">a few hours before it was officially announced</a>. Publisher Electronic Arts later confirmed that the long-awaited game, previously known as <em>Dragon Age: Dreadwolf</em>, would launch on Halloween, October 31.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	However, the release date for the game was not the only thing that was announced by EA this week. <a href="https://www.ea.com/games/dragon-age/dragon-age-the-veilguard/pc-system-requirements" rel="external nofollow">The game's official website</a> has posted the official hardware recommendations for the PC version of the title.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<blockquote class="QuoteNewsStyle">
	<p>
		<strong>MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS</strong>
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<ul>
		<li>
			OS: Windows 10/11 64-bit
		</li>
		<li>
			Processor: Intel Core i5-8400 / AMD Ryzen 3 3300X* (see notes)
		</li>
		<li>
			Memory: 16GB
		</li>
		<li>
			Graphics: NVIDIA GTX 970/1650 / AMD Radeon R9 290X
		</li>
		<li>
			DirectX: Version 12
		</li>
		<li>
			Storage: 100GB available space
		</li>
		<li>
			Additional Notes: SSD Preferred, HDD Supported; AMD CPUs on Windows 11 require AGESA V2 1.2.0.7
		</li>
	</ul>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		<strong>RECOMMENDED REQUIREMENTS</strong>
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<ul>
		<li>
			OS: Windows 10/11 64-bit
		</li>
		<li>
			Processor: Intel Core i9-9900K / AMD Ryzen 7 3700X (see notes)
		</li>
		<li>
			Memory: 16GB
		</li>
		<li>
			Graphics: NVIDIA RTX 2070 / AMD Radeon RX 5700XT
		</li>
		<li>
			DirectX: Version 12
		</li>
		<li>
			Storage: 100GB SSD available space
		</li>
		<li>
			Additional Notes: SSD Required; AMD CPUs on Windows 11 require AGESA V2 1.2.0.7
		</li>
	</ul>
</blockquote>

<p>
	While the PC hardware specs, even on the higher recommended requirement level, should not be that beefy for most PC gamers, the game will take up a fairly large 100GB of hard drive space, and people who want to play at the recommended level will be required to store <em>Dragon Age: The Veilguard</em> with their SSD option.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<div class="ipsEmbeddedVideo" contenteditable="false">
	<div>
		<iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="113" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" src="https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/g8DkDQhPx2A?feature=oembed" title="Dragon Age: The Veilguard | Official Release Date Trailer" width="200"></iframe>
	</div>
</div>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Along with the release date and PC hardware specs, BioWare and EA also <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g8DkDQhPx2A" rel="external nofollow">released a new trailer</a> for <em>Dragon Age: The Veilguard</em>. It shows off the game's single player visuals with a mix of in-engine gameplay and cinematics. The game will also be released for <a href="https://amzn.to/3M9Ge2t" rel="external nofollow">Microsoft Xbox Series X</a> and <a href="https://amzn.to/4fZkOTE" rel="external nofollow">Sony's PlayStation 5 consoles</a>.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p style="font-size:small">
	<em><em>As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.</em></em>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<a href="https://www.neowin.net/news/dragon-age-the-veilguard-reveals-its-pc-hardware-specs-and-a-new-trailer/" rel="external nofollow">Source</a>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<span style="font-size:12px;"><em>Hope you enjoyed this news post.</em></span>
</p>

<p>
	<span style="font-size:12px;"><em>Thank you for appreciating my time and effort posting news every single day for many years.</em></span>
</p>

<p>
	<span style="font-size:12px;"><em>2023: Over 5,800 news posts | 2024 (till end of July): 3,313 news posts</em></span>
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">25032</guid><pubDate>Sat, 17 Aug 2024 07:20:50 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Windows' hidden Admin Account apparently boosting AMD Ryzen 9000/7000 performance</title><link>https://nsaneforums.com/news/technology-news/windows-hidden-admin-account-apparently-boosting-amd-ryzen-90007000-performance-r25022/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	AMD recently released its Zen 5-based Ryzen 9000 series desktop processors, which boasted an impressive <a href="https://www.neowin.net/news/amd-launches-ryzen-9950x-9900x-9700x-9600x-powered-by-massive-16-ipc-boosted-zen-5/" rel="external nofollow">16% IPC (instructions per clock/cycle) boost</a> during their Computex 2024 announcement. This was a great opportunity for AMD, given how rival Intel is currently <a href="https://www.neowin.net/news/asus-msi-bios-updates-for-intel-13th-14th-gen-unstable-crashing-cpus-now-rolling-out/" rel="external nofollow">struggling with CPU stability issues</a>.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Unfortunately, AMD just could not capitalize on the situation, it seems, as most of the tech media community felt the performance uplift on Ryzen 9000 is not enough compared to Zen 4-based Ryzen 7000 series CPUs. The one area where the new chips have impressed me is power efficiency, and it appears that most of the IPC gains have gone towards that.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	However, that's not all there is to this. Recently, comparative performance testing between Windows 11 24H2 and Linux (Nobara) revealed that the latter generally came out on top much more often <a href="https://www.neowin.net/news/switching-to-linux-from-windows-11-24h2-for-performance-could-be-wiser-on-amd-ryzen-9000/" rel="external nofollow">in gaming as well as other workloads</a>, indicating that Windows needed more optimization.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	It looks like our speculation was correct, that Windows in its current state is indeed slowing down AMD's Ryzen processors, at least some of them.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	YouTube Hardware Unboxed (HWU) recently got in touch with AMD regarding Zen 5's performance, and the latter suggested that a Windows bug related to the Account privileges is what's causing performance loss on the Ryzen 9000 series desktop CPUs.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Upon re-testing via the Administrator Account, the Zen 5 part, Ryzen 7 9700X, gained close to 4% in terms of the average frame rates and just over 3.5% in terms of the percentile lows.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<figure class="image image--expandable">
	<img alt="Ryzen 9000 series performance via Windows hidden Account" class="ipsImage" height="405" width="720" src="https://cdn.neowin.com/news/images/uploaded/2024/08/1723742701_windows_admin_account_testing_ryzen_9000_zen_4_source_hw_unboxed_youtube.jpg">
</figure>

<p>
	For those wondering, the Administrator Account on Windows is generally hidden but can be accessed by using the command:
</p>

<pre><code class="hljs language-bash">net user administrator /active:<span class="hljs-built_in">yes</span></code></pre>

<p>
	It has one of the highest privileges in the Windows environment, surpassed only by the <a href="https://www.neowin.net/news/wintoys-that-lets-you-tweak-customize-optimize-windows-now-skips-system-scheduled-tasks/" rel="external nofollow">SYSTEM Account</a>.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Curiously, although AMD said that the problem is only Zen 5, it appears that the Zen 4-based 7700X also saw improved performance, thus suggesting that the bug could be affecting the entire Socket AM5 lineup. It will be interesting to see if the problem extends to Socket AM4 chips as well.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Speaking of sockets, AMD has also supposedly suggested that incorrect driver provisioning on Windows could also be playing a part in this. The company has apparently indicated that reviewers clean up Windows when changing CPUs or at least re-install the chipset driver.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<div class="ipsEmbeddedOther" contenteditable="false">
	<iframe allowfullscreen="" data-controller="core.front.core.autosizeiframe" data-embedid="a5dfc3fbd84a1d8268458d2daeec6822" src="https://nsaneforums.com/index.php?app=core&amp;module=system&amp;controller=embed&amp;url=https://twitter.com/aschilling/status/1824048104942760134?ref_src=twsrc%255Etfw%257Ctwcamp%255Etweetembed%257Ctwterm%255E1824048104942760134%257Ctwgr%255Edf3c0a8703ee38cb0ae203d1f8afc85756a793bc%257Ctwcon%255Es1_%26ref_url=https://www.neowin.net/news/windows-hidden-admin-account-apparently-boosting-amd-ryzen-90007000-performance/"></iframe>
</div>

<p>
	Provisioning essentially means the automatic configuration of the PC so that the driver is appropriately deployed on a system.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Source: HWU (<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D1INvx9ca9M" rel="external nofollow">YouTube</a>)
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<a href="https://www.neowin.net/news/windows-hidden-admin-account-apparently-boosting-amd-ryzen-90007000-performance/" rel="external nofollow">Source</a>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<span style="font-size:12px;"><em>Hope you enjoyed this news post.</em></span>
</p>

<p>
	<span style="font-size:12px;"><em>Thank you for appreciating my time and effort posting news every single day for many years.</em></span>
</p>

<p>
	<span style="font-size:12px;"><em>2023: Over 5,800 news posts | 2024 (till end of July): 3,313 news posts</em></span>
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">25022</guid><pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2024 06:59:12 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Sins of a Solar Empire II launches on Steam; first info on post-launch DLC packs</title><link>https://nsaneforums.com/news/technology-news/sins-of-a-solar-empire-ii-launches-on-steam-first-info-on-post-launch-dlc-packs-r25013/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	As promised, developer Ironclad Games and publisher Stardock have launched the space-based 4X RTS sequel <a href="https://store.steampowered.com/app/1575940/Sins_of_a_Solar_Empire_II/" rel="external nofollow"><em>Sins of a Solar Empire II</em> on Steam today</a>. The game, which was already available <a href="https://store.epicgames.com/en-US/p/sins-of-a-solar-empire-ii" rel="external nofollow">as an Early Access title on the Epic Games Store since October 2022</a>, also comes with a major update with lots of new content, features, and improvements.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Owners of the game on the Epic Games Store will get all of the improvements and new content that will be made available for Steam owners.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<div class="ipsEmbeddedVideo" contenteditable="false">
	<div>
		<iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="113" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" src="https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/3KkaFBIz7lo?feature=oembed" title="Steam Launch Trailer | Sins of a Solar Empire II" width="200"></iframe>
	</div>
</div>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Here's a quick summary of the game:
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<blockquote class="QuoteNewsStyle">
	<ul>
		<li>
			Three playable races including the Advent, Vasari, and TEC return with two sub-factions that utilize unique items, mechanics, and Empire Systems to achieve total victory
		</li>
		<li>
			Orbiting planets that dynamically alter the map during play, requiring players to gradually shift strategies as new challenges and opportunities emerge
		</li>
		<li>
			Minor factions that provide unique capabilities to players that befriend them through a new influence system
		</li>
		<li>
			Enhanced tactical battles and deeper combat simulation including missiles that can be shot down
		</li>
		<li>
			New economy model that allows players to truly customize their worlds to fit production needs
		</li>
		<li>
			Ten-player multiplayer matches that allow players to seamlessly join or resume games
		</li>
		<li>
			Build and command thousands of high-fidelity units in a new engine built from the ground-up for Sins of a Solar Empire II
		</li>
		<li>
			Capital ships that can be equipped with special augmentations to be more effective in battle
		</li>
		<li>
			New in-game mod browser allows for easy installation for user generated content and maps
		</li>
	</ul>
</blockquote>

<p>
	From now until August 29, you can get the base version of <em>Sins of a Solar Empire II</em> version on Steam for a 20 percent discount of $39.99. You can also get the Premium Edition, which will add the game's digital soundtrack and its first Content Pass for a 20 percent discount of $79.99, again until August 29.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Stardock has also revealed some of the details for its DLC packs that it plans to offer after the launch of <em>Sins of a Solar Empire II </em>that will be included with the purchase of the Premium Edition:
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<blockquote class="QuoteNewsStyle">
	<ul>
		<li>
			<strong>Paths to Power Scenario Pack</strong> - Custom scenarios with unique starting conditions and victory conditions
		</li>
		<li>
			<strong>Reinforcements Ship Pack</strong> - New forces join the fray as each race gains two new units to field
		</li>
		<li>
			<strong>Times of War Campaign Expansion</strong> - A full single player story drive campaign that relates the tragic story of the TEC, Vasari, and Advent.
		</li>
		<li>
			<strong>Harbinger Expansion</strong> - Discover and play as the mysterious fourth faction!
		</li>
	</ul>
</blockquote>

<p>
	There's no word yet on when these DLC packs will become available.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p style="font-size:small">
	<em>Disclaimer: <a href="https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1065550-stardock-involvement-with-neowin-faq/" rel="external nofollow">Neowin's relationship to Stardock</a></em>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<a href="https://www.neowin.net/news/sins-of-a-solar-empire-ii-launches-on-steam-first-info-on-post-launch-dlc-packs/" rel="external nofollow">Source</a>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<span style="font-size:12px;"><em>Hope you enjoyed this news post.</em></span>
</p>

<p>
	<span style="font-size:12px;"><em>Thank you for appreciating my time and effort posting news every single day for many years.</em></span>
</p>

<p>
	<span style="font-size:12px;"><em>2023: Over 5,800 news posts | 2024 (till end of July): 3,313 news posts</em></span>
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">25013</guid><pubDate>Thu, 15 Aug 2024 18:54:03 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Dragon Age: The Veilguard leak says the BioWare RPG is launching in late October</title><link>https://nsaneforums.com/news/technology-news/dragon-age-the-veilguard-leak-says-the-bioware-rpg-is-launching-in-late-october-r25012/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	The next <em>Dragon Age </em>game by BioWare is supposed to receive its official release date later today, but a leak from a promotional short may have spilled the beans a little early. <em>Dragon Age: The Veilguard </em>currently has a fall 2024 launch window, but it is supposedly launching on October 31, right on Halloween.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The leaked trailer appears to be from an advertisement, like the ones that usually play on YouTube. Rehosted on Streamable, <a href="https://streamable.com/ng2z5r" rel="external nofollow">seen here</a>, the video shows off clips that fans may recognize from the <a href="https://www.neowin.net/news/dragon-age-the-veilguard-is-coming-in-the-fall-of-2024-check-out-the-new-gameplay-footage/" rel="external nofollow">recent gameplay reveal</a> that happened in June. A PEGI 18 rating can also be seen. At its closing though, the video clearly shows off a October 31 release date for the RPG.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	By the looks of it, these advertisements were supposed to go live after today's reveal, which is when pre-orders would have opened as well.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<figure class="image image--expandable">
	<img alt="Dragon Age The Veilgaurd" class="ipsImage" height="405" width="720" src="https://cdn.neowin.com/news/images/uploaded/2024/07/1721934106_ss_acb14ba978dbf3a3f0e98c861d3b676d2bf3a99c.1920x1080.jpg">
</figure>

<p>
	Here's how BioWare sets the stage for this latest <em>Dragon Age</em> single-player adventure:
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<blockquote class="QuoteNewsStyle">
	<p>
		"Enter the world of Thedas, a vibrant land of rugged wilderness, treacherous labyrinths, and glittering cities – steeped in conflict and secret magics. Now, a pair of corrupt ancient gods have broken free from centuries of darkness and are hellbent on destroying the world.
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		Rise as Rook, Dragon Age’s newest hero. Be who you want to be and play how you want to play as you fight back and lead your team of seven companions, each with their own rich story. Together, you will become the Veilguard"
	</p>
</blockquote>

<p>
	The title is already <a href="https://www.neowin.net/news/dragon-age-the-veilguard-wont-require-ea-app-on-steam-and-is-already-steam-deck-verified/" rel="external nofollow">Steam Deck Verified too</a>, and the developer has confirmed that the EA App will not be required when launching the game via Steam.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<div class="ipsEmbeddedVideo" contenteditable="false">
	<div>
		<iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="113" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" src="https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/g8DkDQhPx2A?feature=oembed" title="Dragon Age: The Veilguard | Release Date Trailer" width="200"></iframe>
	</div>
</div>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	If the leak turns out to be accurate, <em>Dragon Age: The Veilguard</em> will land on PC, Xbox Series X|S and PlayStation 5 on October 31. As usual though, take the date with a grain of salt until the confirmation arrives from EA or BioWare later today. The <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g8DkDQhPx2A" rel="external nofollow">official trailer with release date info </a>is slated to premiere at 9 AM PT / 12 PM ET on YouTube.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<a href="https://www.neowin.net/news/dragon-age-the-veilguard-leak-says-the-bioware-rpg-is-launching-in-late-october/" rel="external nofollow">Source</a>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<span style="font-size:12px;"><em>Hope you enjoyed this news post.</em></span>
</p>

<p>
	<span style="font-size:12px;"><em>Thank you for appreciating my time and effort posting news every single day for many years.</em></span>
</p>

<p>
	<span style="font-size:12px;"><em>2023: Over 5,800 news posts | 2024 (till end of July): 3,313 news posts</em></span>
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">25012</guid><pubDate>Thu, 15 Aug 2024 18:52:59 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>AMD Ryzen 9000 review: Impressive efficiency, with bugs and so-so speed boosts</title><link>https://nsaneforums.com/news/technology-news/amd-ryzen-9000-review-impressive-efficiency-with-bugs-and-so-so-speed-boosts-r25011/</link><description><![CDATA[<h3>
	High prices on an already-expensive AM5 platform make them a hard sell, though.
</h3>

<div class="article-content post-page" itemprop="articleBody">
	
	<p>
		Nearly two years after the release of the first Ryzen 7000 CPUs, AMD has returned with a full-fledged follow-up. The new Ryzen 9000 chips—the 6-core 9600X, 8-core 9700X, 12-core 9900X, and 16-core 9950X—bring AMD's new Zen 5 architecture to the desktop a couple of weeks after it launched in <a href="https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2024/08/ryzen-ai-300-performance-review-impressive-cpus-even-if-you-dont-care-about-ai/" rel="external nofollow">the Ryzen AI chips for laptops</a>.
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		We came away from the cumbersomely named Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 impressed by both its performance and its power efficiency, and AMD is <a href="https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2024/07/amd-makes-improved-efficiency-a-core-part-of-the-pitch-for-its-ryzen-9000-cpus/" rel="external nofollow">also leaning into power efficiency</a> as a key selling point of the Ryzen 9000 series. Three of the chips have seen their power limits dropped significantly compared to last-gen chips while still bragging of low-double-digit performance increases. That's rare at a time when Intel has been pushing its chips to the edge to squeeze every last bit of performance out of high-end Core i9 and Core i7 chips.
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		The focus on power efficiency will give many users—particularly those who don't touch the default settings—less-power-hungry chips that run a bit cooler. And for people who want to tinker and trade in some of that efficiency for a performance boost, many of these chips (particularly the 9700X and 9900X) have a lot of additional performance headroom. It's also nice that all existing AM5 motherboards on the market should be compatible with the 9000 series once a BIOS update is installed, and the AM5 platform's mandatory BIOS Flashback support means you don't need to use weird, kludgy hacks <a href="https://www.amd.com/en/resources/support-articles/warranty/RMA-BKTC.html" rel="external nofollow">like the "boot kit" CPU loaner program</a> for updating the BIOS when you buy a board with an older BIOS installed.
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		But it's not all smooth sailing. Motherboard and RAM costs remain an issue across the entire AM5 platform nearly two years after launch, especially for budget buyers. Launch pricing is high, especially compared to current street prices for the 7000 and 7000X3D series CPUs. And we ran into a few bugs during testing that may also bite other early adopters while we wait on AMD and the motherboard makers to straighten things out.
	</p>

	<h2>
		Meet Zen 5
	</h2>

	<p>
		Compared to the Ryzen 7000 launch, when AMD was putting out new CPUs, a new architecture, a new I/O die (IOD), new chipsets, a new integrated GPU, (mandatory) DDR5 support, and a brand-new processor socket all at once, the Ryzen 9000 launch is downright placid. The IOD is the same. The integrated RDNA2-based GPU is the same (and, it's worth reiterating, <a href="https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2022/09/ryzen-7600x-and-7950x-review-zen-4-starts-off-expensive-but-impressive/5/#h2" rel="external nofollow">not at all intended to play games</a>). The AM5 socket is the same. Officially supported DDR5 speeds are up a bit, from DDR5-5200 to DDR5-5600. But the widespread availability of and support for factory-overclocked RAM in desktop motherboards means that a modest bump to officially supported RAM speed doesn't mean all that much; AMD still recommends DDR5-6000 for optimal performance.
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		There are new 800-series chipsets, but they're so incrementally improved over the old 600-series chipsets that AMD didn't even send along a new motherboard with the new processors. We were directed to install a new BIOS update on existing X670E boards from the Ryzen 7000 launch instead (this almost never happens, even when forward compatibility is a selling point). This seems like a subtle signal from AMD—don't feel like you need to wait for or pay extra money for a newer motherboard, something that would only increase the AM5 platform's stubbornly high base price.
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<table border="" width="100%">
		<tbody>
			<tr>
				<th>
					CPU
				</th>
				<th>
					Street price
				</th>
				<th>
					Cores/threads
				</th>
				<th>
					Clocks (Base/Boost)
				</th>
				<th>
					Total cache (L2+L3)
				</th>
				<th>
					TDP
				</th>
			</tr>
			<tr>
				<td>
					<a href="https://www.amd.com/en/products/processors/desktops/ryzen/9000-series/amd-ryzen-5-9600x.html" rel="external nofollow"><strong>Ryzen 5 9600X</strong></a>
				</td>
				<td>
					<strong>$279 (MSRP)</strong>
				</td>
				<td>
					6c/12t
				</td>
				<td>
					3.9/5.4 GHz
				</td>
				<td>
					38MB (6+32)
				</td>
				<td>
					65 W
				</td>
			</tr>
			<tr>
				<td>
					<a href="https://www.amd.com/en/products/processors/desktops/ryzen/9000-series/amd-ryzen-7-9700x.html" rel="external nofollow"><strong>Ryzen 7 9700X</strong></a>
				</td>
				<td>
					<strong>$359 (MSRP)</strong>
				</td>
				<td>
					8c/16t
				</td>
				<td>
					3.8/5.5 GHz
				</td>
				<td>
					40MB (8+32)
				</td>
				<td>
					65 W
				</td>
			</tr>
			<tr>
				<td>
					<a href="https://www.amd.com/en/products/processors/desktops/ryzen/9000-series/amd-ryzen-9-9900x.html" rel="external nofollow"><strong>Ryzen 9 9900X</strong></a>
				</td>
				<td>
					<strong>$499 (MSRP)</strong>
				</td>
				<td>
					12c/24t
				</td>
				<td>
					4.4/5.6 GHz
				</td>
				<td>
					76MB (12+64)
				</td>
				<td>
					120 W
				</td>
			</tr>
			<tr>
				<td>
					<a href="https://www.amd.com/en/products/processors/desktops/ryzen/9000-series/amd-ryzen-9-9950x.html" rel="external nofollow"><strong>Ryzen 9 9950X</strong></a>
				</td>
				<td>
					<strong>$649 (MSRP)</strong>
				</td>
				<td>
					16c/32t
				</td>
				<td>
					4.3/5.7 GHz
				</td>
				<td>
					80MB (16+64)
				</td>
				<td>
					170 W
				</td>
			</tr>
			<tr>
				<td>
					<a href="https://www.amd.com/en/products/cpu/amd-ryzen-5-7600x" rel="external nofollow" target="_blank"><strong>Ryzen 5 7600X</strong></a>
				</td>
				<td>
					$195
				</td>
				<td>
					6c/12t
				</td>
				<td>
					4.7/5.3 GHz
				</td>
				<td>
					38MB (6+32)
				</td>
				<td>
					105 W
				</td>
			</tr>
			<tr>
				<td>
					<a href="https://www.amd.com/en/products/cpu/amd-ryzen-7-7700x" rel="external nofollow" target="_blank"><strong>Ryzen 7 7700X</strong></a>
				</td>
				<td>
					$286
				</td>
				<td>
					8c/16t
				</td>
				<td>
					4.5/5.4 GHz
				</td>
				<td>
					40MB (8+32)
				</td>
				<td>
					105 W
				</td>
			</tr>
			<tr>
				<td>
					<a href="https://www.amd.com/en/products/cpu/amd-ryzen-9-7900x" rel="external nofollow" target="_blank"><strong>Ryzen 9 7900X</strong></a>
				</td>
				<td>
					$359
				</td>
				<td>
					12c/24t
				</td>
				<td>
					4.7/5.6 GHz
				</td>
				<td>
					76MB (12+64)
				</td>
				<td>
					170 W
				</td>
			</tr>
			<tr>
				<td>
					<a href="https://www.amd.com/en/products/cpu/amd-ryzen-9-7950x" rel="external nofollow" target="_blank"><strong>Ryzen 9 7950X</strong></a>
				</td>
				<td>
					$516
				</td>
				<td>
					16c/32t
				</td>
				<td>
					4.5/5.7 GHz
				</td>
				<td>
					80MB (16+64)
				</td>
				<td>
					170 W
				</td>
			</tr>
			<tr>
				<td>
					<a href="https://www.amd.com/en/products/processors/desktops/ryzen/7000-series/amd-ryzen-7-7800x3d.html" rel="external nofollow"><strong>Ryzen 7 7800X3D</strong></a>
				</td>
				<td>
					$367
				</td>
				<td>
					8c/16t
				</td>
				<td>
					4.2/5.0 GHz
				</td>
				<td>
					104MB (8+96)
				</td>
				<td>
					120 W
				</td>
			</tr>
			<tr>
				<td>
					<a href="https://www.amd.com/en/products/processors/desktops/ryzen/7000-series/amd-ryzen-9-7900x3d.html" rel="external nofollow"><strong>Ryzen 9 7900X3D</strong></a>
				</td>
				<td>
					$396
				</td>
				<td>
					12c/24t
				</td>
				<td>
					4.4/5.6 GHz
				</td>
				<td>
					140MB (12+128)
				</td>
				<td>
					120 W
				</td>
			</tr>
			<tr>
				<td>
					<a href="https://www.amd.com/en/products/processors/desktops/ryzen/7000-series/amd-ryzen-9-7950x3d.html" rel="external nofollow"><strong>Ryzen 9 7950X3D</strong></a>
				</td>
				<td>
					$525
				</td>
				<td>
					16c/32t
				</td>
				<td>
					4.2/5.7 GHz
				</td>
				<td>
					144MB (16+128)
				</td>
				<td>
					120 W
				</td>
			</tr>
		</tbody>
	</table>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		This leaves us with only two new things of note: the Zen 5 architecture itself and the new core chiplet die (CCD) that combines up to eight Zen 5 cores together.
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		Ryzen 9000's Zen 5 CCD is built using TSMC's N4P process, an upgrade from the 5 nm process used for the Ryzen 7000 series. TSMC <a href="https://pr.tsmc.com/english/news/2874" rel="external nofollow">says</a> that N4P is 22 percent more power efficient than the 5 nm process, which is part of what is enabling AMD to use a lower TDP for most of the Ryzen 9000X CPUs while still providing faster performance.
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		It also probably has at least a bit to do with the lower operating temperatures of Ryzen 9000, which AMD has said should be about 7° Celsius lower than equivalent Ryzen 7000 CPUs at the same power levels. Ryzen 7000X chips running at their default TDPs ran a bit hot, and while AMD said this was normal and safe behavior, a cooler chip will usually offer better consistency and longevity.
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		A major architectural change from Zen 4 relates to support for AVX512 extensions, which Intel introduced (<a href="https://www.phoronix.com/news/Linus-Torvalds-On-AVX-512" rel="external nofollow">infamously, in some circles</a>) in 2017 with some of the higher-end Skylake variants but hasn't enabled on recent consumer CPUs because Intel's E-cores don't support them. Zen 4 brought AVX512 instructions to Ryzen CPUs for the first time, but it did so by combining two 256-bit data paths. Zen 5 has a full 512-bit data path for AVX512 instructions, and for the (still rare-ish) tasks that actually use AVX512, it gives Zen 5 a disproportionately high performance boost.
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>
</div>

<div class="article-content post-page" itemprop="articleBody">
	<p>
		There's one thing Ryzen 9000 doesn't include: There's no integrated neural processing unit (NPU) here. So far, AMD has only included those in laptop processors—like the Ryzen 7040, 8040, or Ryzen AI 300—or in CPUs like the Ryzen 8000G series that repackage laptop silicon for use in desktop motherboards. If you're using a desktop for AI-related work, there's a good chance you're using a powerful dedicated GPU for it. But it leaves regular desktop users without any option for supporting Copilot+ or other NPU-accelerated features. To be clear, NPUs and Copilot+ are still in their infancy in desktop PCs, and even when they're present, they don't do all that much yet. It's just odd to hear AMD talk up its XDNA technology in laptops while ignoring it in high-performance desktops.
	</p>

	<h2>
		Testbed notes
	</h2>

	<table border="" width="100%">
		<tbody>
			<tr>
				<th>
					 
				</th>
				<th>
					AMD Socket AM5
				</th>
				<th>
					Intel LGA 1700
				</th>
				<th>
					AMD Socket AM4
				</th>
			</tr>
			<tr>
				<td>
					<b>CPUs</b>
				</td>
				<td>
					Ryzen 7000, 7000X3D, and 9000 series
				</td>
				<td>
					Intel 12th, 13th, and 14th-generation Core
				</td>
				<td>
					AMD 5000 and 5000X3D series
				</td>
			</tr>
			<tr>
				<td>
					<b>Motherboard</b>
				</td>
				<td>
					<a href="https://rog.asus.com/us/motherboards/rog-crosshair/rog-crosshair-x670e-extreme-model/" rel="external nofollow">Asus ROG Crosshair X670E</a> (provided by AMD)
				</td>
				<td>
					<a href="https://tinyurl.com/33awaycx" rel="external nofollow" target="_blank">Gigabyte Aorus Z690 Pro</a> (provided by Gigabyte)
				</td>
				<td>
					<a href="https://amzn.to/3RfCBrV" rel="external nofollow" target="_blank">Asus ROG Crosshair VIII Dark Hero</a> (provided by Asus)
				</td>
			</tr>
			<tr>
				<td>
					<b>RAM config</b>
				</td>
				<td>
					32GB G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo (provided by AMD), running at DDR5-6000
				</td>
				<td>
					32GB G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo (provided by AMD), running at DDR5-5800 for stability
				</td>
				<td>
					<a href="https://amzn.to/3SvsMY0" rel="external nofollow" target="_blank">16GB Teamgroup T-Force Vulcan Z</a>, running at DDR4-3600
				</td>
			</tr>
		</tbody>
	</table>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		The core of our CPU testbed is the same as it's been for a while now: <a data-ml="true" data-ml-id="0" data-orig-url="https://amzn.to/3R99hDD" data-uri="d58373d9444bb9d9618731360595c97a" data-xid="fr1665626429354gij" href="https://amzn.to/3R99hDD" rel="external nofollow" target="_blank">a Lian Li O11 Air Mini case</a> with an EVGA-provided <a data-ml="true" data-ml-id="1" data-orig-url="https://amzn.to/3J3nazZ" data-uri="b316a1e12bd565b73670febf0dafa0c9" data-xid="fr1663737568112fig" href="https://amzn.to/3r6mtP5" rel="external nofollow" target="_blank">Supernova 850 P6 power supply</a> and a <a data-uri="c9d74e6842f1eb966361ad1df4202085" href="https://tinyurl.com/4h2uywsy" rel="external nofollow" target="_blank">280 mm Corsair iCue H115i Elite Capellix AIO cooler.</a> We use an AMD-provided <a href="https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2022/12/review-amds-radeon-rx-7900-gpus-are-great-4k-gaming-gpus-with-caveats/4/" rel="external nofollow">Radeon RX 7900 XTX</a> as our GPU, so most benchmarks running at 1080p will be more CPU-bottlenecked than GPU-bottlenecked.
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		As usual for our CPU reviews, we also try to test each model with different power limit settings in addition to the manufacturer-specified defaults. For most Intel and AMD chips, this is an easy and relatively foolproof way to either boost performance at the expense of power efficiency or lower performance while improving efficiency (AMD even supports this directly with its "Eco Mode" settings, which automatically sets each CPU's TDP setting one level lower than it is by default).
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		For Intel's chips, these settings are called PL1 and PL2 (Power Level 1 controls how much power the CPU can use during a sustained, intensive workload, while PL2 dictates how much it can use for short bursts). For AMD boards, TDC is roughly equivalent to PL1 and EDC is roughly equivalent to PL2, while a third number (PPT) determines the amount of power provided to the CPU socket.
	</p>

	<h2>
		Testing difficulties
	</h2>

	<figure class="image shortcode-img full-width" style="">
		<img alt="We (and other testers) have had issues getting the Ryzen 9000 series to behave normally." class="ipsImage" height="405" width="720" src="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/IMG_2128.jpeg">
		<figcaption class="caption">
			<div class="caption-text" style="font-style: italic;">
				We (and other testers) have had issues getting the Ryzen 9000 series to behave normally.
			</div>

			<div class="caption-credit" style="font-style: italic;">
				Andrew Cunningham
			</div>
		</figcaption>
	</figure>

	<p>
		When AMD and Intel send us new CPUs to test, they provide a reviewer's guide with some background information on the chips. Included in these guides are some manufacturer-provided reference numbers for some common, easily reproduced benchmark tests—not so reviewers can just republish them but so we can check to make sure our test beds are performing more or less as expected when we go to run our own tests.
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		Normally, this is pretty trivial. AMD and Intel also provide motherboards, RAM kits, pre-release BIOS updates, and pre-release drivers, so there really aren't many unknown variables that should prevent the chips from performing as expected; usually, we can just plunk them in, set an XMP or EXPO RAM overclocking profile, run some perfunctory tests for reference, and get on with it.
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		The 9600X and 9700X in particular weren't performing as expected and were performing <em>worse</em> with memory overclocking profiles applied—often no better than the Ryzen 7000-series CPUs they're supposed to be replacing. Other reviewers, such as the YouTubers at <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rttc_ioflGo" rel="external nofollow">Gamers Nexus</a> and <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c7MT8MLzSio&amp;t=977s" rel="external nofollow">JayzTwoCents</a>, also reported some stability and RAM configuration problems.
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		After much discussion and sharing of log files with AMD—as well as multiple testing runs with both processors, three different motherboards, and three different RAM kits—the issue seems to be that the EXPO memory overclocking profile is applying incorrect settings. Specifically, we had to set the SoC voltage to 1.2 V from the default 1.25 V, and we had to set the Infinity Fabric clock speed (or FCLK) from 2100 MHz to 2000 MHz. There may be other things that could be tweaked, but this got our numbers to where they were supposed to be.
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		AMD told us that part of the issue came down to that 1.25 V voltage setting interacting with the 65 W TDP for both the 9600X and 9700X—that with a relatively limited power budget, delivering more power than necessary to the CPU SoC takes it away from the rest of the processor. This didn't explain why the EXPO profile was apparently loading the wrong SoC voltage in the first place, but it does at least make logical sense.
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		The upshot is that any early adopters who attempt one-click overclocking will probably run into the same issues we did. These are hopefully things that can be cleared up with future BIOS updates, but if you're buying these chips on day one, you may have some problems getting the full performance out of them. AMD didn't give us any kind of timeline for a fix.
	</p>
</div>

<div class="article-content post-page" itemprop="articleBody">
	<h2>
		Performance
	</h2>

	<div class="gallery shortcode-gallery gallery-wide">
		<div class="lSSlideOuter">
			<div class="lSSlideWrapper usingCss">
				<ul class="lightSlider lSSlide">
					<li class="lslide active">
						<figure>
							<img class="ipsImage" height="720" width="720" alt="Ryzen-9000X.001.png" src="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Ryzen-9000X.001.png">
							<figcaption id="caption-2043190">
								<div class="credit" style="font-style: italic;">
									Andrew Cunningham
								</div>
							</figcaption>
						</figure>
					</li>
					<li class="lslide">
						<figure>
							<img class="ipsImage" height="720" width="720" alt="Ryzen-9000X.003.png" src="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Ryzen-9000X.003.png">
							<figcaption id="caption-2043192">
								<div class="credit" style="font-style: italic;">
									Andrew Cunningham
								</div>
							</figcaption>
						</figure>
					</li>
					<li class="lslide">
						<figure>
							<img class="ipsImage" height="720" width="720" alt="Ryzen-9000X.005.png" src="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Ryzen-9000X.005.png">
							<figcaption id="caption-2043194">
								<div class="credit" style="font-style: italic;">
									Andrew Cunningham
								</div>
							</figcaption>
						</figure>
					</li>
					<li class="lslide">
						<figure>
							<img class="ipsImage" height="720" width="720" alt="Ryzen-9000X.006.png" src="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Ryzen-9000X.006.png">
							<figcaption id="caption-2043196">
								<div class="credit" style="font-style: italic;">
									Andrew Cunningham
								</div>
							</figcaption>
						</figure>
					</li>
					<li class="lslide">
						<figure>
							<img class="ipsImage" height="720" width="720" alt="Ryzen-9000X.004.png" src="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Ryzen-9000X.004.png">
							<figcaption id="caption-2043193">
								<div class="credit" style="font-style: italic;">
									Andrew Cunningham
								</div>
							</figcaption>
						</figure>
					</li>
					<li class="lslide">
						<figure>
							<img class="ipsImage" height="720" width="720" alt="Ryzen-9000X.009.png" src="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Ryzen-9000X.009.png">
							<figcaption id="caption-2043200">
								<div class="credit" style="font-style: italic;">
									Andrew Cunningham
								</div>
							</figcaption>
						</figure>
					</li>
					<li class="lslide">
						<figure>
							<img class="ipsImage" height="720" width="720" alt="Ryzen-9000X.010.png" src="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Ryzen-9000X.010.png">
							<figcaption id="caption-2043201">
								<div class="credit" style="font-style: italic;">
									Andrew Cunningham
								</div>
							</figcaption>
						</figure>
					</li>
					<li class="lslide">
						<figure>
							<img class="ipsImage" height="720" width="720" alt="Ryzen-9000X.011.png" src="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Ryzen-9000X.011.png">
							<figcaption id="caption-2043202">
								<div class="credit" style="font-style: italic;">
									Andrew Cunningham
								</div>
							</figcaption>
						</figure>
					</li>
					<li class="lslide">
						<figure>
							<img class="ipsImage" height="720" width="720" alt="Ryzen-9000X.012.png" src="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Ryzen-9000X.012.png">
							<figcaption id="caption-2043203">
								<div class="credit" style="font-style: italic;">
									Andrew Cunningham
								</div>
							</figcaption>
						</figure>
					</li>
					<li class="lslide">
						<figure>
							<img class="ipsImage" height="720" width="720" alt="Ryzen-9000X.013.png" src="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Ryzen-9000X.013.png">
							<figcaption id="caption-2043204">
								<div class="credit" style="font-style: italic;">
									Andrew Cunningham
								</div>
							</figcaption>
						</figure>
					</li>
				</ul>
			</div>
		</div>
	</div>

	<p>
		For simplicity's sake, we've compared the Ryzen 9000X series primarily to the Ryzen 7000X series since the new chips are direct replacements for the old ones, and the non-X Ryzen 7000 series aren't really any cheaper than the 7000X chips at this point. We've also included comparisons to the 7000X3D series, which are cheap enough that they compete with the 9000X chips on price. A smattering of Ryzen 5000-series CPUs are also included to provide data to people with a 3- or 4-year-old PC they're thinking of upgrading.
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		On the Intel side, we're comparing Ryzen 9000 mostly to 13th- and 14th-generation Intel chips, though note that all the Intel performance numbers here were taken before we knew anything about the voltage issues that have caused some of those processors to hang and crash. Intel has said that the microcode update can reduce performance slightly under some circumstances, though in general, there shouldn't be a noticeable difference.
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		AMD generally delivers low-double-digit improvements to single-threaded performance across all of the Ryzen 9000 chips and pretty similar single-core performance regardless of whether you go with the 9600X or the 9950X. Multicore improvements are more all over the place, at least in our testing; the 9600X is usually mid to high single digits faster than the 7600X, and the 9950X is usually 10 or 11 percent faster than the 7750X in our tests. But the 9700X sometimes has trouble outperforming the 7700X at all. That's still arguably a win—the 9700X has a default TDP of 65 W instead of the 105 W TDP of the 9600X. But you're definitely trading speed for efficiency here.
	</p>

	<div class="ars-interlude-container">
		 
	</div>

	<div class="gallery shortcode-gallery gallery-wide">
		<div class="lSSlideOuter">
			<div class="lSSlideWrapper usingCss">
				<ul class="lightSlider lSSlide">
					<li class="lslide active">
						<figure>
							<img class="ipsImage" height="720" width="720" alt="Ryzen-9000X.018.png" src="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Ryzen-9000X.018.png">
							<figcaption id="caption-2043209">
								<div class="credit" style="font-style: italic;">
									Andrew Cunningham
								</div>
							</figcaption>
						</figure>
					</li>
					<li class="lslide">
						<figure>
							<img class="ipsImage" height="720" width="720" alt="Ryzen-9000X.019.png" src="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Ryzen-9000X.019.png">
							<figcaption id="caption-2043210">
								<div class="credit" style="font-style: italic;">
									Andrew Cunningham
								</div>
							</figcaption>
						</figure>
					</li>
					<li class="lslide">
						<figure>
							<img class="ipsImage" height="720" width="720" alt="Ryzen-9000X.020.png" src="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Ryzen-9000X.020.png">
							<figcaption id="caption-2043211">
								<div class="credit" style="font-style: italic;">
									Andrew Cunningham
								</div>
							</figcaption>
						</figure>
					</li>
					<li class="lslide">
						<figure>
							<img class="ipsImage" height="720" width="720" alt="Ryzen-9000X.021.png" src="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Ryzen-9000X.021.png">
							<figcaption id="caption-2043212">
								<div class="credit" style="font-style: italic;">
									Andrew Cunningham
								</div>
							</figcaption>
						</figure>
					</li>
					<li class="lslide">
						<figure>
							<img class="ipsImage" height="720" width="720" alt="Ryzen-9000X.022.png" src="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Ryzen-9000X.022.png">
							<figcaption id="caption-2043213">
								<div class="credit" style="font-style: italic;">
									Andrew Cunningham
								</div>
							</figcaption>
						</figure>
					</li>
					<li class="lslide">
						<figure>
							<img class="ipsImage" height="720" width="720" alt="Ryzen-9000X.025.png" src="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Ryzen-9000X.025.png">
							<figcaption id="caption-2043216">
								<div class="credit" style="font-style: italic;">
									Andrew Cunningham
								</div>
							</figcaption>
						</figure>
					</li>
					<li class="lslide">
						<figure>
							<img class="ipsImage" height="720" width="720" alt="Ryzen-9000X.026.png" src="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Ryzen-9000X.026.png">
							<figcaption id="caption-2043217">
								<div class="credit" style="font-style: italic;">
									Andrew Cunningham
								</div>
							</figcaption>
						</figure>
					</li>
					<li class="lslide">
						<figure>
							<img class="ipsImage" height="720" width="720" alt="Ryzen-9000X.027.png" src="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Ryzen-9000X.027.png">
							<figcaption id="caption-2043218">
								<div class="credit" style="font-style: italic;">
									Andrew Cunningham
								</div>
							</figcaption>
						</figure>
					</li>
					<li class="lslide">
						<figure>
							<img class="ipsImage" height="720" width="720" alt="Ryzen-9000X.028.png" src="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Ryzen-9000X.028.png">
							<figcaption id="caption-2043219">
								<div class="credit" style="font-style: italic;">
									Andrew Cunningham
								</div>
							</figcaption>
						</figure>
					</li>
				</ul>
			</div>
		</div>
	</div>

	<p>
		The higher-end 13th and 14th-generation Core chips from Intel manage to keep pace with the 9950X's multi-core performance, mostly thanks to the sheer number of cores, an advantage of Intel's heterogenous approach to its desktop processors. But there are outliers in either direction; 3DMark Time Spy and <em>Shadow of the Tomb Raider</em> both run quite a bit faster on Intel's cores, but our H.265 video encoding benchmark is a lot faster on the Ryzen 9000 chips thanks to their beefed-up AVX512 support (the 9000-series CPUs are disproportionately faster than the 7000-series CPUs here, too).
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<div class="gallery shortcode-gallery gallery-wide">
		<div class="lSSlideOuter">
			<div class="lSSlideWrapper usingCss">
				<ul class="lightSlider lSSlide">
					<li class="lslide active">
						<figure>
							<img class="ipsImage" height="720" width="720" alt="Ryzen-9000X.029.png" src="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Ryzen-9000X.029.png">
							<figcaption id="caption-2043220">
								<div class="credit" style="font-style: italic;">
									Andrew Cunningham
								</div>
							</figcaption>
						</figure>
					</li>
					<li class="lslide">
						<figure>
							<img class="ipsImage" height="720" width="720" alt="Ryzen-9000X.030.png" src="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Ryzen-9000X.030.png">
							<figcaption id="caption-2043221">
								<div class="credit" style="font-style: italic;">
									Andrew Cunningham
								</div>
							</figcaption>
						</figure>
					</li>
					<li class="lslide">
						<figure>
							<img class="ipsImage" height="720" width="720" alt="Ryzen-9000X.031.png" src="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Ryzen-9000X.031.png">
							<figcaption id="caption-2043222">
								<div class="credit" style="font-style: italic;">
									Andrew Cunningham
								</div>
							</figcaption>
						</figure>
					</li>
					<li class="lslide">
						<figure>
							<img class="ipsImage" height="720" width="720" alt="Ryzen-9000X.032.png" src="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Ryzen-9000X.032.png">
							<figcaption id="caption-2043223">
								<div class="credit" style="font-style: italic;">
									Andrew Cunningham
								</div>
							</figcaption>
						</figure>
					</li>
					<li class="lslide">
						<figure>
							<img class="ipsImage" height="720" width="720" alt="Ryzen-9000X.033.png" src="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Ryzen-9000X.033.png">
							<figcaption id="caption-2043224">
								<div class="credit" style="font-style: italic;">
									Andrew Cunningham
								</div>
							</figcaption>
						</figure>
					</li>
					<li class="lslide">
						<figure>
							<img class="ipsImage" height="720" width="720" alt="Ryzen-9000X.036.png" src="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Ryzen-9000X.036.png">
							<figcaption id="caption-2043227">
								<div class="credit" style="font-style: italic;">
									Andrew Cunningham
								</div>
							</figcaption>
						</figure>
					</li>
					<li class="lslide">
						<figure>
							<img class="ipsImage" height="720" width="720" alt="Ryzen-9000X.037.png" src="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Ryzen-9000X.037.png">
							<figcaption id="caption-2043229">
								<div class="credit" style="font-style: italic;">
									Andrew Cunningham
								</div>
							</figcaption>
						</figure>
					</li>
					<li class="lslide">
						<figure>
							<img class="ipsImage" height="720" width="720" alt="Ryzen-9000X.038.png" src="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Ryzen-9000X.038.png">
							<figcaption id="caption-2043230">
								<div class="credit" style="font-style: italic;">
									Andrew Cunningham
								</div>
							</figcaption>
						</figure>
					</li>
					<li class="lslide">
						<figure>
							<img class="ipsImage" height="720" width="720" alt="Ryzen-9000X.039.png" src="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Ryzen-9000X.039.png">
							<figcaption id="caption-2043232">
								<div class="credit" style="font-style: italic;">
									Andrew Cunningham
								</div>
							</figcaption>
						</figure>
					</li>
				</ul>
			</div>
		</div>
	</div>

	<p>
		This is commonly understood among more veteran desktop builders, but look at the game benchmarks we've included here and remember that for a gaming-focused PC, there's still very little reason to buy anything faster than a good Ryzen 5, Core i5, Ryzen 7, or Core i7 CPU. Plowing more money into a CPU gets you almost nothing in terms of game performance, even at low resolutions—spend more money on your GPU instead. Alternatively, buy one of the Ryzen 7000X3D chips, which still often beat the Ryzen 9000 CPUs in gaming benchmarks.
	</p>

	<h3>
		Power efficiency
	</h3>
</div>

<div class="article-content post-page" itemprop="articleBody">
	<p>
		For the Ryzen 9600X, 9700X, and 9900X, all three chips generally manage to outperform their predecessors despite being set to lower TDP levels and consuming less power.
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		We do see indications that this is holding the 9000-series back. Setting the 9700X to a 105W TDP helps it leap ahead of the 7700X, though its power consumption leaps ahead quite a bit as well. Using AMD's Precision Boost Overdrive should yield good results here since it's meant to help find the best spot on the performance/power curve for specific CPUs.
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<div class="gallery shortcode-gallery gallery-wide">
		<div class="lSSlideOuter">
			<div class="lSSlideWrapper usingCss">
				<ul class="lightSlider lSSlide">
					<li class="lslide active">
						<figure>
							<img class="ipsImage" height="720" width="720" alt="Ryzen-9000X.014.png" src="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Ryzen-9000X.014.png">
							<figcaption id="caption-2043205">
								<div class="credit" style="font-style: italic;">
									Andrew Cunningham
								</div>
							</figcaption>
						</figure>
					</li>
					<li class="lslide">
						<figure>
							<img class="ipsImage" height="720" width="720" alt="Ryzen-9000X.015.png" src="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Ryzen-9000X.015.png">
							<figcaption id="caption-2043206">
								<div class="credit" style="font-style: italic;">
									Andrew Cunningham
								</div>
							</figcaption>
						</figure>
					</li>
				</ul>
			</div>
		</div>
	</div>

	<p>
		At its stock settings, the 9950X is the one exception in our testing. While both the 9950X and 7950X have a 170 W TDP, the 9950X actually pushes up against the limit of that TDP number, performing better but also burning more power when all the CPU cores are engaged in heavy-duty tasks like video transcoding. (It is, however, more efficient than Ryzen 7950X by a bit when both chips are set to their 105 W Eco Mode TDP).
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		When experimenting with higher TDPs for some of the Ryzen chips, we found that each processor will <em>gladly</em> run hotter and consume more power when allowed to. The 9700X is a good example—when manually set to a 105 W TDP, you can expect around 10 percent faster performance in heavy multithreaded tasks, though the CPU can consume as much as 60 percent more power when all its cores are active at once.
	</p>

	<div class="ars-interlude-container">
		 
	</div>

	<div class="gallery shortcode-gallery gallery-wide">
		<div class="lSSlideOuter">
			<div class="lSSlideWrapper usingCss">
				<ul class="lightSlider lSSlide">
					<li class="lslide active">
						<figure>
							<img class="ipsImage" height="720" width="720" alt="Ryzen-9000X.005.png" src="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Ryzen-9000X.005.png">
							<figcaption id="caption-2043194">
								<div class="credit" style="font-style: italic;">
									Andrew Cunningham
								</div>
							</figcaption>
						</figure>
					</li>
					<li class="lslide">
						<figure>
							<img class="ipsImage" height="720" width="720" alt="Ryzen-9000X.007.png" src="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Ryzen-9000X.007.png">
							<figcaption id="caption-2043197">
								<div class="credit" style="font-style: italic;">
									Andrew Cunningham
								</div>
							</figcaption>
						</figure>
					</li>
					<li class="lslide">
						<figure>
							<img class="ipsImage" height="720" width="720" alt="Ryzen-9000X.008.png" src="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Ryzen-9000X.008.png">
							<figcaption id="caption-2043198">
								<div class="credit" style="font-style: italic;">
									Andrew Cunningham
								</div>
							</figcaption>
						</figure>
					</li>
					<li class="lslide">
						<figure>
							<img class="ipsImage" height="720" width="720" alt="Ryzen-9000X.017.png" src="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Ryzen-9000X.017.png">
							<figcaption id="caption-2043208">
								<div class="credit" style="font-style: italic;">
									Andrew Cunningham
								</div>
							</figcaption>
						</figure>
					</li>
					<li class="lslide">
						<figure>
							<img class="ipsImage" height="720" width="720" alt="Ryzen-9000X.016.png" src="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Ryzen-9000X.016.png">
							<figcaption id="caption-2043207">
								<div class="credit" style="font-style: italic;">
									Andrew Cunningham
								</div>
							</figcaption>
						</figure>
					</li>
					<li class="lslide">
						<figure>
							<img class="ipsImage" height="720" width="720" alt="Ryzen-9000X.021.png" src="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Ryzen-9000X.021.png">
							<figcaption id="caption-2043212">
								<div class="credit" style="font-style: italic;">
									Andrew Cunningham
								</div>
							</figcaption>
						</figure>
					</li>
					<li class="lslide">
						<figure>
							<img class="ipsImage" height="720" width="720" alt="Ryzen-9000X.023.png" src="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Ryzen-9000X.023.png">
							<figcaption id="caption-2043214">
								<div class="credit" style="font-style: italic;">
									Andrew Cunningham
								</div>
							</figcaption>
						</figure>
					</li>
					<li class="lslide">
						<figure>
							<img class="ipsImage" height="720" width="720" alt="Ryzen-9000X.024.png" src="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Ryzen-9000X.024.png">
							<figcaption id="caption-2043215">
								<div class="credit" style="font-style: italic;">
									Andrew Cunningham
								</div>
							</figcaption>
						</figure>
					</li>
					<li class="lslide">
						<figure>
							<img class="ipsImage" height="720" width="720" alt="Ryzen-9000X.032.png" src="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Ryzen-9000X.032.png">
							<figcaption id="caption-2043223">
								<div class="credit" style="font-style: italic;">
									Andrew Cunningham
								</div>
							</figcaption>
						</figure>
					</li>
					<li class="lslide">
						<figure>
							<img class="ipsImage" height="720" width="720" alt="Ryzen-9000X.034.png" src="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Ryzen-9000X.034.png">
							<figcaption id="caption-2043225">
								<div class="credit" style="font-style: italic;">
									Andrew Cunningham
								</div>
							</figcaption>
						</figure>
					</li>
					<li class="lslide">
						<figure>
							<img class="ipsImage" height="720" width="720" alt="Ryzen-9000X.035.png" src="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Ryzen-9000X.035.png">
							<figcaption id="caption-2043226">
								<div class="credit" style="font-style: italic;">
									Andrew Cunningham
								</div>
							</figcaption>
						</figure>
					</li>
				</ul>
			</div>
		</div>
	</div>

	<p>
		The Intel comparison is much more flattering for AMD. Whether running at its stock 170 W TDP or in its 105 W TDP Eco Mode profile, the 7950X transcoded our test video as fast or faster than the Core i9-14900K while using a fraction of the power. The 9600X and 9700X are a bit less convincing compared to the i5-14600K and i7-14700K—Intel's core count advantage is still tough for AMD to overcome, here—but AMD still delivers great game performance and good power efficiency even in these workloads.
	</p>

	<h2>
		Conclusions
	</h2>

	<figure class="image shortcode-img full-width" style="">
		<img alt="The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is a better buy for a gaming PC right now." class="ipsImage" height="405" width="720" src="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/IMG_2121.jpeg">
		<figcaption class="caption">
			<div class="caption-text" style="font-style: italic;">
				The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is a better buy for a gaming PC right now.
			</div>

			<div class="caption-credit" style="font-style: italic;">
				Andrew Cunningham
			</div>
		</figcaption>
	</figure>

	<p>
		Right now, Ryzen 9000 chips are a tough sell. While they <em>are</em> improvements over the existing Ryzen 7000-series, they don't deliver the same generational leap we saw between Zen and Zen 2, Zen 2 and Zen 3, or Zen 3 and Zen 4. Ryzen 9000 is certainly more efficient. But Ryzen 7000 was already reasonably efficient, particularly in Eco Mode. And as of this writing, the Ryzen 7800X3D isn't even $20 more expensive than the 9700X, and it comes with some of its own performance advantages.
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		On the other hand, the regular Ryzen 7 7700X and Ryzen 5 7600X (both currently available for about the same price as the non-X variants) are 70 percent and 80 percent of the price of their Ryzen 9000 counterparts while delivering about 92 percent and 98 percent of the speed (depending heavily on the specific app or game and your power settings, of course). Socket AM5 still wouldn't be my first choice for a budget build, but at the moment, Ryzen 7000 and Zen 4 are delivering a better value.
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		That's all here and now, though. Taking a longer view, assuming that new Ryzen 7000 chips will eventually vanish and Ryzen 9000 chips will slide downward a bit in price, they're respectable upgrades. We're always big fans of chips that balance speed and efficiency, something AMD is doing a better job of than Intel these days. If you're sitting on a Ryzen 3000 or Ryzen 5000 system you bought, built, or upgraded three or four years ago (or an Intel system from the 2015–2020 <a href="https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2020/05/intels-comet-lake-desktop-cpus-are-here/" rel="external nofollow">Skylake Forever era</a>), these will give you that much more speed if and when you decide to upgrade your system.
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		Still, it's hard not to feel a touch of disappointment when using Ryzen 9000. Early rumors suggested the desktop chips might copy Intel's or Apple's recent desktop CPUs, swapping to a heterogeneous design that boosted single-core performance with a few large fast cores while supercharging multi-core performance with gobs of smaller efficiency cores. AMD is, in fact, taking this approach with the Ryzen AI 300 series laptop chips, combining four Zen 5 cores with eight smaller, slower Zen 5C cores. AMD's desktop core counts have remained the same since 2019, when the 16-core Ryzen 3950X added a new high-end option to AMD's consumer desktop platform.
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		If AMD plans to take that route for its desktop chips eventually, it isn't doing so with the first wave of Ryzen 9000 CPUs. There's always next generation.
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>
</div>

<p>
	<a href="https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2024/08/amd-ryzen-9000-review-impressive-efficiency-with-bugs-and-so-so-speed-boosts/" rel="external nofollow">Source</a>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<span style="font-size:12px;"><em>Hope you enjoyed this news post.</em></span>
</p>

<p>
	<span style="font-size:12px;"><em>Thank you for appreciating my time and effort posting news every single day for many years.</em></span>
</p>

<p>
	<span style="font-size:12px;"><em>2023: Over 5,800 news posts | 2024 (till end of July): 3,313 news posts</em></span>
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">25011</guid><pubDate>Thu, 15 Aug 2024 18:51:21 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Activision is finally doing something about Call of Duty&#x2019;s giant downloads</title><link>https://nsaneforums.com/news/technology-news/activision-is-finally-doing-something-about-call-of-duty%E2%80%99s-giant-downloads-r25010/</link><description><![CDATA[<h3>
	The company is removing Warzone from the default download for the annual games as well as introducing a big tech update that brings ‘file optimizations.’
</h3>

<div>
	<div>
		<div>
			<div>
				<p>
					<em>Call of Duty</em> games have famously giant file sizes, but ahead of the October 25th launch of <em>Black Ops 6</em>, Activision is going to <a href="https://www.callofduty.com/blog/2024/08/call-of-duty-optimizing-experience-roadmap" rel="external nofollow">make some changes</a> so that <em>Call of Duty</em> titles don’t take up as much space on your hard drive — including separating <em>Warzone</em> from the default download for the annual games.
				</p>

				<p>
					 
				</p>
			</div>

			<div>
				<p>
					The default separation of <em>Warzone</em> is happening soon: on August 21st, alongside the launch of Season 5 Reloaded. As part of that, when you download an annual <em>Call of Duty</em> game, you’ll also be able to opt in to also download <em>Warzone</em> if you want. And if you just want to download <em>Warzone</em>, that will still be an option as well.
				</p>

				<p>
					 
				</p>
			</div>

			<div>
				<p>
					With Season 5 Reloaded, Activision also says that it is going to rely more on texture streaming, and players will be able to pick between “optimized” (the default) or “minimal” streaming. In mid-October, Activision plans to introduce a new user interface for browsing your <em>Call of Duty</em> games, too.
				</p>

				<p>
					 
				</p>
			</div>

			<div>
				<p>
					But to prepare for these changes, Activision says you’re going to have to download a big update as part of the Season 5 rollout that will reorganize game files and add new tech “to prep the way for the full player interface.” After that update is done, Activision says that <em>Call of Duty</em>’s footprint will go down because of the “file optimizations.” (PlayStation 5 players will have to download a series of updates because of “differences in file organization.”)
				</p>

				<p>
					 
				</p>
			</div>

			<div>
				<div>
					<div>
						<div aria-label="Zoom" role="button" tabindex="0">
							<div>
								<div>
									<div>
										<img alt="COD_EXP_ROADMAP_001.png" class="ipsImage" data-ratio="58.47" height="405" width="720" src="https://duet-cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/0x0:3840x2160/750x422/filters:focal(1920x1080:1921x1081):format(webp)/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/25573833/COD_EXP_ROADMAP_001.png">
									</div>
								</div>
							</div>
						</div>
					</div>

					<div>
						<p>
							<em>A roadmap from Activision about upcoming </em>Call of Duty<em> updates.</em>
						</p>

						<p>
							<cite class="duet--article--dangerously-set-cms-markup inline not-italic text-gray-63 dark:text-gray-bd [&amp;&gt;a:hover]:text-gray-63 [&amp;&gt;a:hover]:shadow-underline-black dark:[&amp;&gt;a:hover]:text-gray-bd dark:[&amp;&gt;a:hover]:shadow-underline-gray [&amp;&gt;a]:shadow-underline-gray-63 dark:[&amp;&gt;a]:text-gray-bd dark:[&amp;&gt;a]:shadow-underline-gray">Image: Activision</cite>
						</p>

						<p>
							 
						</p>
					</div>
				</div>
			</div>

			<div>
				<p>
					Because of the updates, Activision says that <em>Black Ops 6</em> will be a “smaller download at launch than <em>Call of Duty: Modern Warfare III.</em>” The company doesn’t have a specific download size for <em>Black Ops 6</em> yet, but it says that the estimated file sizes shown on preorder listings don’t represent the “download size or disk footprint” for the game. (Activision has already <a href="https://www.ign.com/articles/call-of-duty-black-ops-6-isnt-300-gb-after-all" rel="external nofollow">had to clarify this</a> after an Xbox store page listing showed a jaw-dropping 309.85GB download.)
				</p>

				<p>
					 
				</p>
			</div>

			<div>
				<p>
					Activision will also be hosting a <em>Black Ops 6</em> open beta that starts on August 30th.
				</p>

				<p>
					 
				</p>
			</div>
		</div>
	</div>
</div>

<p>
	<a href="https://www.theverge.com/2024/8/15/24221080/activision-call-of-duty-downloads-black-ops-6" rel="external nofollow">Source</a>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<span style="font-size:12px;"><em>Hope you enjoyed this news post.</em></span>
</p>

<p>
	<span style="font-size:12px;"><em>Thank you for appreciating my time and effort posting news every single day for many years.</em></span>
</p>

<p>
	<span style="font-size:12px;"><em>2023: Over 5,800 news posts | 2024 (till end of July): 3,313 news posts</em></span>
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">25010</guid><pubDate>Thu, 15 Aug 2024 18:38:38 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Apple may launch a $1,000 tabletop smart home robot as soon as 2026</title><link>https://nsaneforums.com/news/technology-news/apple-may-launch-a-1000-tabletop-smart-home-robot-as-soon-as-2026-r25009/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	In his latest <a href="https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-08-14/apple-pushes-ahead-with-tabletop-home-device-in-shift-to-robotics" rel="external nofollow">Power-On newsletter</a>, Bloomberg's Mark Gurman claims that Apple is working on a tabletop iPad with a robotic arm that would serve as a control center for smart home devices. According to Gurman, a "team of several hundred people" is allegedly working on a new project, that would have multiple purposes.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Allegedly, the new product could feature an iPad-style display attached to a robotic arm. It would purportedly use actuators to tilt up and down and could also perform 360-degree spins. The report adds that the device will be "a smart home command center, videoconferencing machine, and remote-controlled home security tool."
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Notably, Gurman has previously reported on <a href="https://www.neowin.net/news/apple-is-reportedly-looking-into-making-robots-for-the-home-as-its-next-big-product/" rel="external nofollow">multiple occasions</a> that Apple has been working on a super-project involving home robotics over the last few months. He now adds that the company is pressing on its plans to build a home robotics device under the leadership of Apple's Vice President, Kevin Lynch.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Some sources suggest that Apple could introduce this robotic home device for a premium price of $1,000, with a potential launch sometime in 2026 or 2027. It is speculated that the device will respond to commands using Siri or Apple Intelligence features, such as "Look at me" to tilt the screen of the device towards the face of the user during a video call.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Bloomberg also adds that Apple is allegedly testing models that run a customized version of iPadOS. The shift towards robotics could be a part of Apple's strategy to boost sales and expand the usage of Apple Intelligence, a suite of AI features that will come to the iPhone, iPad, and Mac later this year.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	However, there is a possibility that this could be just another exploratory project for Apple, similar to its ambitious <a href="https://www.neowin.net/news/apple-car-may-still-be-a-thing-as-reports-suggest-its-discussing-partnership-with-rivian/" rel="external nofollow">Apple Car project</a>, which may not ultimately be introduced to the market.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	For now, Apple is preparing for the upcoming launch of the <a href="https://www.neowin.net/news/foxconn-hires-50000-more-workers-in-china-to-ramp-up-iphone-16-production/" rel="external nofollow">iPhone 16 series</a>, which is expected to launch a <a href="https://www.neowin.net/news/apple-may-launch-the-iphone-16-series-a-few-days-earlier-than-last-year/" rel="external nofollow">few days earlier</a> than last year and could <a href="https://www.neowin.net/news/apple-could-launch-iphone-16-series-earlier-than-usual-in-south-korea/" rel="external nofollow">also add South Korea</a> to the launch wave to offset the lower iPhone demand issue in China.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<a href="https://www.neowin.net/news/apple-may-launch-a-1000-tabletop-smart-home-robot-as-soon-as-2026/" rel="external nofollow">Source</a>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<span style="font-size:12px;"><em>Hope you enjoyed this news post.</em></span>
</p>

<p>
	<span style="font-size:12px;"><em>Thank you for appreciating my time and effort posting news every single day for many years.</em></span>
</p>

<p>
	<span style="font-size:12px;"><em>2023: Over 5,800 news posts | 2024 (till end of July): 3,313 news posts</em></span>
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">25009</guid><pubDate>Thu, 15 Aug 2024 18:36:59 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>New Geekbench AI benchmark can test the performance of CPUs, GPUs, and NPUs</title><link>https://nsaneforums.com/news/technology-news/new-geekbench-ai-benchmark-can-test-the-performance-of-cpus-gpus-and-npus-r25008/</link><description><![CDATA[<h3>
	Performance test comes out of beta as NPUs become standard equipment in PCs.
</h3>

<div class="article-content post-page" itemprop="articleBody">
	
	<p>
		Neural processing units (NPUs) are becoming commonplace in chips from Intel and AMD after several years of being something you'd find mostly in smartphones and tablets (and Macs). But as more companies push to do more generative AI processing, image editing, and chatbot-ing locally on-device instead of in the cloud, being able to measure NPU performance will become more important to people making purchasing decisions.
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		Enter Primate Labs, developers of <a href="https://www.geekbench.com/" rel="external nofollow">Geekbench</a>. The main Geekbench app is designed to test CPU performance as well as GPU compute performance, but for the last few years, the company has been experimenting with a side project called <a href="https://www.geekbench.com/blog/2023/12/geekbench-ml-06/" rel="external nofollow">Geekbench ML</a> (for "Machine Learning") to test the inference performance of NPUs. Now, as Microsoft's Copilot+ initiative gets off the ground and Intel, AMD, Qualcomm, and Apple all push to boost NPU performance, Primate Labs is bumping Geekbench ML to version 1.0 and renaming it "Geekbench AI," a change that will presumably help it ride the wave of AI-related buzz.
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		"Just as CPU-bound workloads vary in how they can take advantage of multiple cores or threads for performance scaling (necessitating both single-core and multi-core metrics in most related benchmarks), AI workloads cover a range of precision levels, depending on the task needed and the hardware available," wrote Primate Labs' John Poole in <a href="https://www.geekbench.com/blog/" rel="external nofollow">a blog post about the update</a>. "Geekbench AI presents its summary for a range of workload tests accomplished with single-precision data, half-precision data, and quantized data, covering a variety used by developers in terms of both precision and purpose in AI systems."
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		In addition to measuring speed, Geekbench AI also attempts to measure accuracy, which is important for machine-learning workloads that rely on producing consistent outcomes (identifying and cataloging people and objects in a photo library, for example).
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<figure class="image shortcode-img full-width" style="">
		<img alt="Geekbench AI can run AI workloads on your CPU, GPU, or NPU (when you have a system with an NPU that's compatible)." class="ipsImage" height="456" width="720" src="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Screenshot-2024-08-15-at-11.24.19%E2%80%AFAM.jpeg">
		<figcaption class="caption">
			<div class="caption-text" style="font-style: italic;">
				Geekbench AI can run AI workloads on your CPU, GPU, or NPU (when you have a system with an NPU that's compatible).
			</div>

			<div class="caption-credit" style="font-style: italic;">
				Andrew Cunningham
			</div>
		</figcaption>
	</figure>

	<p>
		Geekbench AI supports several AI frameworks: <a href="https://github.com/openvinotoolkit/openvino" rel="external nofollow">OpenVINO</a> for Windows and Linux, <a href="https://onnx.ai/" rel="external nofollow">ONNX</a> for Windows, <a href="https://onnxruntime.ai/docs/execution-providers/QNN-ExecutionProvider.html" rel="external nofollow">Qualcomm’s QNN</a> on Snapdragon-powered Arm PCs, Apple’s CoreML on macOS and iOS, and a number of vendor-specific frameworks on various Android devices. The app can run these workloads on the CPU, GPU, or NPU, at least when your device has a compatible NPU installed.
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		On Windows PCs, where NPU support and APIs like Microsoft’s DirectML are still works in progress, Geekbench AI supports Intel and Qualcomm’s NPUs but not AMD’s (yet).
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		“We're hoping to add AMD NPU support in a future version once we have more clarity on how best to enable them from AMD,” Poole told Ars.
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		Geekbench AI is available for Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS/iPadOS, and Android. It's free to use, though a Pro license gets you command-line tools, the ability to run the benchmark without uploading results to the Geekbench Browser, and a few other benefits. Though the app is hitting 1.0 today, the Primate Labs team expects to update the app frequently for new hardware, frameworks, and workloads as necessary.
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		“AI is nothing if not fast-changing,” Poole continued in the announcement post, “so anticipate new releases and updates as needs and AI features in the market change.”
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>
</div>

<p>
	<a href="https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2024/08/geekbench-ml-becomes-geekbench-ai-a-cross-platform-performance-test-for-npus-and-more/" rel="external nofollow">Source</a>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<span style="font-size:12px;"><em>Hope you enjoyed this news post.</em></span>
</p>

<p>
	<span style="font-size:12px;"><em>Thank you for appreciating my time and effort posting news every single day for many years.</em></span>
</p>

<p>
	<span style="font-size:12px;"><em>2023: Over 5,800 news posts | 2024 (till end of July): 3,313 news posts</em></span>
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">25008</guid><pubDate>Thu, 15 Aug 2024 18:36:09 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>AMD Ryzen 9950X / 9900X CPUs Get Bad Reviews In Gaming</title><link>https://nsaneforums.com/news/technology-news/amd-ryzen-9950x-9900x-cpus-get-bad-reviews-in-gaming-r24998/</link><description><![CDATA[<h3>
	The reviews for AMD Ryzen 9 9950X and Ryzen 9 9900X CPUs are out. Both are getting bad reviews for gaming. It’s similar to Ryzen 9700X and Ryzen 9600X.
</h3>

<p>
	A few days ago, <a href="https://ourdigitech.com/hardware/amd-ryzen-9700x-9600x-get-mixed-reviews-better-efficiency/" title="AMD Ryzen 9700X, 9600X Get Mixed Reviews, Better Efficiency" rel="external nofollow">the reviews</a> for the AMD Ryzen 7 9700X and Ryzen 5 9600X CPUs were out. Both the processors got very small gains in performance over their previous-gen Ryzen 7000 counterparts.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Except one outlet, Tom’s Hardware, most others found the performance of those two processors quite lacking in gaming. Though many found them to be quite efficient due to reduced official TDP. But, overall, they were disappointing.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Today, the reviews for the flagship AMD Ryzen 9 9950X and Ryzen 9 9900X are out. Let’s check some of them.
</p>

<h3 class="wp-block-heading">
	Ryzen 9950X &amp; Ryzen 9900X Reviews
</h3>

<h4 class="wp-block-heading">
	Tom’s Hardware
</h4>

<figure class="wp-block-image size-large">
	<img alt="AMD Ryzen 9950X and Ryzen 9900X Gaming Performance Review Tom's Hardware" class="ipsImage" data-attachment-id="4783" data-comments-opened="1" data-image-caption="" data-image-description="" data-image-title="AMD Ryzen 9950X and Ryzen 9900X Gaming Performance Review Tom’s Hardware" data-ll-status="loaded" data-orig-file="https://ourdigitech.com/ServerSide/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/AMD-Ryzen-9950X-and-Ryzen-9900X-Gaming-Performance-Review-Toms-Hardware.webp" data-orig-size="1796,1367" data-permalink="https://ourdigitech.com/hardware/amd-ryzen-9950x-9900x-cpus-get-bad-reviews-in-gaming/attachment/amd-ryzen-9950x-and-ryzen-9900x-gaming-performance-review-toms-hardware/" decoding="async" height="548" role="button" tabindex="0" width="720" src="https://ourdigitech.com/ServerSide/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/AMD-Ryzen-9950X-and-Ryzen-9900X-Gaming-Performance-Review-Toms-Hardware.webp">
	<figcaption>
		<em>Credit: Tom’s Hardware.</em>
	</figcaption>
</figure>

<p>
	<a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/cpus/amd-ryzen-9-9950x-cpu-review" rel="external nofollow" target="_blank" title="">Tom’s Hardware reviewed</a> the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X CPU. Though, its performance graph also contains Ryzen 9900X in it.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	In terms of gaming performance at 1080p, Ryzen 9950X was just 8% faster than the previous-gen Ryzen 7950X, which is more disappointing than even Ryzen 9700X.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	But that’s not alone. What’s interesting is that a $100 cheaper Intel Core i9-14900K ($550) is 10% faster than the more expensive Ryzen 9950X ($650). If that’s not enough, then a $400 Intel Core i7-14700K is 5% faster than Ryzen 9950X in their gaming tests.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Similar is the story with Ryzen 9900X. It’s just 2% faster than Ryzen 7900X in gaming. A $200 cheaper Intel Core i5-14600K ($300) is performing better than Ryzen 9900X ($500).
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	It’s only in productivity and application benchmarks that these two CPUs do exceedingly good.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	In terms of power consumption, here too, Ryzen 9950X does good. Ryzen 9950X uses anywhere between 7-15% lesser watts than Ryzen 7950X in various applications.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Two things are interesting though. Tom’s Hardware used officially supported DDR5-5600 RAM in their tests, rather than AMD’s recommended DDR5-6000 RAM. Most other reviewers tested it with a DDR5-6000 RAM.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Second thing is, Tom’s Hardware is saying that AMD has introduced new core parking driver for these CPUs, which was earlier only for Ryzen 7900X3D and Ryzen 7950X3D. This information from AMD came way later during reviews.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Basically, because Ryzen 9950X and Ryzen 9900X come with two chips, they don’t perform great in games. So core parking disables one chip during gaming. However, Tom’s Hardware had big issues getting it to work properly. Including requiring OS reinstallation when changing CPUs.
</p>

<h4 class="wp-block-heading">
	TechSpot
</h4>

<figure class="wp-block-image size-large">
	<img alt="AMD Ryzen 9950X Gaming Performance Review TechSpot" class="ipsImage" data-attachment-id="4784" data-comments-opened="1" data-image-caption="" data-image-description="" data-image-title="AMD Ryzen 9950X Gaming Performance Review TechSpot" data-ll-status="loaded" data-orig-file="https://ourdigitech.com/ServerSide/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/AMD-Ryzen-9950X-Gaming-Performance-Review-TechSpot.webp" data-orig-size="2189,2425" data-permalink="https://ourdigitech.com/hardware/amd-ryzen-9950x-9900x-cpus-get-bad-reviews-in-gaming/attachment/amd-ryzen-9950x-gaming-performance-review-techspot/" decoding="async" height="720" role="button" tabindex="0" width="650" src="https://ourdigitech.com/ServerSide/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/AMD-Ryzen-9950X-Gaming-Performance-Review-TechSpot.webp">
	<figcaption>
		<em>Credit: TechSpot.</em>
	</figcaption>
</figure>

<p>
	Steve Walton from Hardware Unboxed fame tested AMD Ryzen 9 9950X and <a href="https://www.techspot.com/review/2881-amd-ryzen-9-9950x/" rel="external nofollow" target="_blank" title="posted it on TechSpot">posted it on TechSpot</a>. Those who want to watch the review instead of reading it <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=43DFYvOoRhY" rel="external nofollow" target="_blank" title="">can do so here</a> (YouTube).
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	In his review, he found Ryzen 9950X to be, guess what, 1% faster than Ryzen 7950X in gaming. That’s right. Just 1% faster in gaming over previous-gen. In some games, he even saw a performance regression, where Ryzen 7950X was faster than Ryzen 9950X.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	In Cinebench, he found it to be just 4% faster while using the same amount of power. So no changes in power usage either.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	In all, Steve called this CPU a significant disappointment and from a gaming perspective, a complete and utter flop.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	He also mentioned how Ryzen 7950X was massively faster than Ryzen 5950X. In some workloads, the uplift in performance had reached 100% (double fast). So in that context, Ryzen 9950X does seem very bad in performance.
</p>

<h4 class="wp-block-heading">
	TechPowerUp
</h4>

<figure class="wp-block-image size-large">
	<img alt="AMD Ryzen 9950X and Ryzen 9900X Gaming Performance Review TechPowerUP" class="ipsImage" data-attachment-id="4785" data-comments-opened="1" data-image-caption="" data-image-description="" data-image-title="AMD Ryzen 9950X and Ryzen 9900X Gaming Performance Review TechPowerUP" data-ll-status="loaded" data-orig-file="https://ourdigitech.com/ServerSide/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/AMD-Ryzen-9950X-and-Ryzen-9900X-Gaming-Performance-Review-TechPowerUP.webp" data-orig-size="1120,961" data-permalink="https://ourdigitech.com/hardware/amd-ryzen-9950x-9900x-cpus-get-bad-reviews-in-gaming/attachment/amd-ryzen-9950x-and-ryzen-9900x-gaming-performance-review-techpowerup/" decoding="async" height="618" role="button" tabindex="0" width="720" src="https://ourdigitech.com/ServerSide/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/AMD-Ryzen-9950X-and-Ryzen-9900X-Gaming-Performance-Review-TechPowerUP.webp">
	<figcaption>
		<em>Credit: TechPowerUP.</em>
	</figcaption>
</figure>

<p>
	TechPowerUP reviewed both <a href="https://www.techpowerup.com/review/amd-ryzen-9-9950x/" rel="external nofollow" target="_blank" title="AMD Ryzen 9 9950X">AMD Ryzen 9 9950X</a> and <a href="https://www.techpowerup.com/review/amd-ryzen-9-9900x/" rel="external nofollow" target="_blank" title="AMD Ryzen 9 9900X">AMD Ryzen 9 9900X</a>.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	In terms of gaming performance at 1080p (page 18), they found Ryzen 9950X to be just 2.6% faster than previous-gen Ryzen 7950X.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The Ryzen 9900X had a similar story. It was just 1.6% faster than the previous-gen Ryzen 7900X CPU in gaming performance at 1080p (page 18).
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	What’s even more funny is that both previous-gen Ryzen 7950X and Ryzen 7900X had better minimum FPS in gaming than the newer-gen Ryzen 9950X and Ryzen 9900X respectively (page 21).
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	In applications, both the CPUs did perform somewhat better. While Ryzen 9950X was almost 3.5% faster than Ryzen 7950X, the Ryzen 9900X was almost 4.5% faster than the Ryzen 7900X in overall application benchmarks.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The power consumption (page 23) too saw some improvements over the previous-gen counterparts. Ryzen 9950X consumed 14W less in single core tests, 40W less in multithreaded tests, 14W in overall application benchmarks, 12W less in gaming benchmarks and 5W less in overall idle PC benchmarks. Not big but something better.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Ryzen 9900X too was similar. It used 10W less in single core tests, 24W less in multithreaded ones, 10W less in overall application benchmarks, 4W less in gaming benchmarks and 3W less in overall idle PC benchmarks.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Interestingly, the temps differ with both the CPUs. While Ryzen 9950X was very efficient in Blender benchmarks, the temps clocked higher than Ryzen 7950X in gaming. However, Ryzen 9900X saw big improvements in Blender temps and minor improvements in gaming temps too.
</p>

<h3 class="wp-block-heading">
	Conclusion
</h3>

<p>
	Many other reviewers too tested both the processors for those who want to read or watch them. Our friends at Club386 tested <a href="https://www.club386.com/amd-ryzen-9-9950x-and-ryzen-9-9900x-review/" rel="external nofollow" target="_blank" title="">both AMD Ryzen 9 9950X and Ryzen 9 9900X</a>. AnandTech too tested <a href="https://www.anandtech.com/show/21524/the-amd-ryzen-9-9950x-and-ryzen-9-9900x-review" rel="external nofollow" target="_blank" title="both AMD Ryzen 9 9950X and Ryzen 9 9900X">both AMD Ryzen 9 9950X and Ryzen 9 9900X</a>. Gamer Nexus tested just <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iyA9DRTJtyE" rel="external nofollow" target="_blank" title="">AMD Ryzen 9 9950X</a> (YouTube).
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	As for our views. We are very disappointed with the AMD Ryzen 9000 CPU series. They offer hardly any uplift in performance in gaming.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	They do good in applications and in offers better efficiency. Allowing some to suggest that these CPUs are preliminary designed for productivity software and datacenter CPUs.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	What makes us sad is that <a href="https://ourdigitech.com/hardware/amd-ryzen-9000-releasing-on-31-july-no-mention-of-prices/" title="AMD claimed" rel="external nofollow">AMD claimed</a> big gaming performance gains. The above numbers do not agree to those claims. In fact, it’s AMD saying take a hike to gamers.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	While many are saying wait for <a href="https://ourdigitech.com/hardware/amd-ryzen-9000x3d-to-come-in-sept-starting-9950x3d-9900x3d/" title="AMD Ryzen 9000X3D CPUs" rel="external nofollow">AMD Ryzen 9000X3D CPUs</a>. We ask whether the performance gains are going to be similarly minimal with the X3D CPUs too. As AMD is making big claims with them too.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Interestingly, <a href="https://x.com/RyanSmithAT/status/1823708259490128197" rel="external nofollow" target="_blank" title="">some reviewers are mentioning</a> on Twitter (now X) that AMD Ryzen 9 9950X has 2.5 times higher latency than Ryzen 9 7950X. Which makes many think if there’s some chip interconnect issue.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	There are also <a href="https://x.com/g01d3nm4ng0/status/1823691289105457481" rel="external nofollow" target="_blank" title="">some rumors</a> that AMD is considering to increase the TDP of both Ryzen 5 9600X and Ryzen 7 9700X CPUs. It’s likely because many reviewers found some increase in performance when power limits were removed.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	But that’s unlikely to change the overall idea. AMD Ryzen 9000 non-X3D CPUs offer bad uplift in performance in gaming, they are good in application and better in efficiency. AMD could have done better here.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<a href="https://ourdigitech.com/hardware/amd-ryzen-9950x-9900x-cpus-get-bad-reviews-in-gaming/" rel="external nofollow">Source</a>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<span style="font-size:12px;"><em>Hope you enjoyed this news post.</em></span>
</p>

<p>
	<span style="font-size:12px;"><em>Thank you for appreciating my time and effort posting news every single day for many years.</em></span>
</p>

<p>
	<span style="font-size:12px;"><em>2023: Over 5,800 news posts | 2024 (till end of July): 3,313 news posts</em></span>
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">24998</guid><pubDate>Thu, 15 Aug 2024 03:51:17 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>The 9950x doesn't make much sense - Review and Benchmarks vs 14900K, 7950X, 7800X3D... [Video]</title><link>https://nsaneforums.com/news/technology-news/the-9950x-doesnt-make-much-sense-review-and-benchmarks-vs-14900k-7950x-7800x3d-video-r24990/</link><description><![CDATA[<div class="ipsEmbeddedVideo" contenteditable="false">
	<div>
		<iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="113" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" src="https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/u8rbmtVOuZ0?feature=oembed" title="The 9950x doesn't make much sense - Review and Benchmarks vs 14900K, 7950X, 7800X3D..." width="200"></iframe>
	</div>
</div>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<a href="https://www.youtube.com/@paulshardware" rel="external nofollow" target="_blank">Paul's Hardware</a> (1.48M subscribers)
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	August 14, 2024
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Video length: 17m 30s
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	0:00 Welcome to my Ryzen 9950X Review
</p>

<p>
	1:03 A Few Notes - Intel Situation and 9900X Testing Problems
</p>

<p>
	3:32 Spec Comparison
</p>

<p>
	4:25 Testing Hardware
</p>

<p>
	4:44 Power Draw
</p>

<p>
	5:38 Temps
</p>

<p>
	7:02 BENCHMARKS - COMPUTE
</p>

<p>
	10:03 BENCHMARKS - GAMING - 3DMark Time Spy Extreme
</p>

<p>
	10:36 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
</p>

<p>
	11:16 Cyberpunk 2077
</p>

<p>
	11:38 Total War: Warhammer III
</p>

<p>
	12:00 F1 23
</p>

<p>
	12:21 Starfield
</p>

<p>
	12:35 Microsoft Flight Simulator
</p>

<p>
	13:09 Benchmarks Summary / Cost Per Frame
</p>

<p>
	15:27 Conclusion and Closing Thoughts
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u8rbmtVOuZ0" rel="external nofollow">Source</a>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<span style="font-size:12px;"><em>Hope you enjoyed this news post.</em></span>
</p>

<p>
	<span style="font-size:12px;"><em>Thank you for appreciating my time and effort posting news every single day for many years.</em></span>
</p>

<p>
	<span style="font-size:12px;"><em>2023: Over 5,800 news posts | 2024 (till end of July): 3,313 news posts</em></span>
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">24990</guid><pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2024 17:23:00 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[AMD Ryzen 9 9950X CPU Review & Benchmarks vs. 7950X, 9700X, 14900K, & More [Video]]]></title><link>https://nsaneforums.com/news/technology-news/amd-ryzen-9-9950x-cpu-review-benchmarks-vs-7950x-9700x-14900k-more-video-r24989/</link><description><![CDATA[<div class="ipsEmbeddedVideo" contenteditable="false">
	<div>
		<iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="113" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" src="https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/iyA9DRTJtyE?feature=oembed" title="AMD Ryzen 9 9950X CPU Review &amp; Benchmarks vs. 7950X, 9700X, 14900K, &amp; More" width="200"></iframe>
	</div>
</div>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<a href="https://www.youtube.com/@GamersNexus" rel="external nofollow" target="_blank">Gamers Nexus</a> (2.26M subscribers)
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	August 14, 2024
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Video length: 29m 58s
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	00:00 - AMD R9 9950X CPU Review &amp; Prices
</p>

<p>
	02:39 - Basic Specs &amp; Chipset Differences
</p>

<p>
	03:04 - Core Parking on AMD CPUs (9950X, 9900X, X3D)
</p>

<p>
	04:51 - How to Enable Core Parking on Some AMD CPUs
</p>

<p>
	07:44 - All-Core Frequency (9950X vs. 7950X, 9700X)
</p>

<p>
	08:35 - Single-Core Frequency (9950X vs. 7950X, 9700X)
</p>

<p>
	09:01 - Peak Power Consumption (Blender, All-Core)
</p>

<p>
	09:55 - Power Efficiency: Blender All-Core
</p>

<p>
	11:02 - Power Efficiency: 7-Zip Compression
</p>

<p>
	11:37 - Power Efficiency: FFXIV Dawntrail
</p>

<p>
	12:10 - Power Efficiency: Cyberpunk Phantom Liberty
</p>

<p>
	12:39 - Power Efficiency: Stellaris Simulation
</p>

<p>
	12:57 - Blender 3D Rendering CPU Benchmark
</p>

<p>
	14:18 - Adobe Photoshop CPU Comparison
</p>

<p>
	15:40 - Adobe Premiere Video Editing CPU Benchmarks
</p>

<p>
	16:53 - Code Compile Benchmark (Best Programming CPUs)
</p>

<p>
	17:55 - 7-Zip File Compression Test
</p>

<p>
	18:52 - 7-Zip File Decompression 9950X vs 7950X
</p>

<p>
	19:28 - SpecWS LAMMPS Test
</p>

<p>
	19:52 - SpecWS Financial Simulation Tests
</p>

<p>
	20:52 - Dragon's Dogma 2 Benchmarks
</p>

<p>
	22:09 - Baldur's Gate 3 Benchmarks
</p>

<p>
	22:55 - Stellaris CPU Simulation Time Comparison
</p>

<p>
	23:52 - FFXIV Dawntrail CPU Benchmarks
</p>

<p>
	24:17 - Dawntrail Frequency vs 9700X
</p>

<p>
	25:09 - F1 24 Benchmark
</p>

<p>
	25:51 - F1 CPU Frequency
</p>

<p>
	26:12 - Conclusion
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iyA9DRTJtyE" rel="external nofollow">Source</a>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<span style="font-size:12px;"><em>Hope you enjoyed this news post.</em></span>
</p>

<p>
	<span style="font-size:12px;"><em>Thank you for appreciating my time and effort posting news every single day for many years.</em></span>
</p>

<p>
	<span style="font-size:12px;"><em>2023: Over 5,800 news posts | 2024 (till end of July): 3,313 news posts</em></span>
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">24989</guid><pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2024 17:20:48 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>AMD Fumbled this launch... 9950X / 9900X CPU Reviews (21 CPUs Tested) [Video]</title><link>https://nsaneforums.com/news/technology-news/amd-fumbled-this-launch-9950x-9900x-cpu-reviews-21-cpus-tested-video-r24988/</link><description><![CDATA[<div class="ipsEmbeddedVideo" contenteditable="false">
	<div>
		<iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="113" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" src="https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/PkOoEPTqB-Q?feature=oembed" title="AMD Fumbled this launch... 9950X / 9900X CPU Reviews (21 CPUs Tested)" width="200"></iframe>
	</div>
</div>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<a href="https://www.youtube.com/@Jayztwocents" rel="external nofollow" target="_blank">JayzTwoCents</a> (4.08M subscribers)
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	August 14, 2024
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Video length: 27m 00s
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	"We tested 21 CPUs in this round of CPU testing to see whether or not the new 9000 series CPUs from AMD are worth it... spoiler... they aren't. "
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PkOoEPTqB-Q" rel="external nofollow">Source</a>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<span style="font-size:12px;"><em>Hope you enjoyed this news post.</em></span>
</p>

<p>
	<span style="font-size:12px;"><em>Thank you for appreciating my time and effort posting news every single day for many years.</em></span>
</p>

<p>
	<span style="font-size:12px;"><em>2023: Over 5,800 news posts | 2024 (till end of July): 3,313 news posts</em></span>
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">24988</guid><pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2024 17:16:27 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>AMD Ryzen 9 9900X and 9950X review: Team Red built the world's most powerful CPU and sent Intel back to school</title><link>https://nsaneforums.com/news/technology-news/amd-ryzen-9-9900x-and-9950x-review-team-red-built-the-worlds-most-powerful-cpu-and-sent-intel-back-to-school-r24983/</link><description><![CDATA[<h2>
	The Ryzen 9 9950X is more power-hungry than its rivals but wins in all metrics, while the 9900X offers a more efficient high-end option for creative enthusiasts.
</h2>

<p>
	After a short delay to the planned release of AMD's all-new Ryzen 9000 Series desktop processors, the ultra-powerful Ryzen 9 9900X and 9950X are ready for an imminent launch.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Following the entry-level Ryzen 5 9600X and mid-range champion Ryzen 7 9700X, these high-end chips increase the critical specifications to target enthusiast gamers and professional creators.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Are the extreme performance goals of the Ryzen 9 9950X worth the considerable asking price, or can you settle for a more affordable Ryzen 9 9900X and still crunch the most complex creative tasks? Here's what I found in my testing.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<div id="slice-container-freeText-wJE2mdEgt5b3sVKU2ZyG6L-5">
	<div>
		<p>
			<em>This review was made possible by a review sample provided by AMD. The company did not see the contents of the review before publishing. Some extra benchmark results (mainly for Intel Core CPUs) come from public databases and third-party sources, including CPU Monkey.</em>
		</p>

		<h2 id="section-ryzen-9-9900x-and-9950x-price-availability-and-specs">
			<span>Ryzen 9 9900X and 9950X: Price, availability, and specs</span>
		</h2>

		<div>
			<div>
				<p>
					<img alt="AMD Ryzen 9 9900X and 9950X processors in retail boxes" class="ipsImage" height="720" width="720" src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/8wbxrSUoRj32KWTJDjL7MP.jpg">
				</p>

				<p>
					<em><span>The 9900X or 9950X don't have boxed air coolers, but AMD strongly encourages aftermarket AIO liquid </span></em>
				</p>

				<p>
					<em><span>coolers anyway. </span><span itemprop="copyrightHolder">(Image credit: Ben Wilson | Windows Central)</span></em>
				</p>

				<p>
					 
				</p>

				<p>
					AMD will sell the Ryzen 9 9950X through mainstream third-party storefronts, like Best Buy and Newegg, for a $649 MSRP from Thursday, August 15, 2024. It's the lowest price for a Ryzen 9 -950X chip so far, dropping $50 from the previous-gen <a data-analytics-id="inline-link" data-before-rewrite-localise="https://www.windowscentral.com/hardware/amd-ryzen-9-7900x-and-7950x-review" href="https://www.windowscentral.com/hardware/amd-ryzen-9-7900x-and-7950x-review" rel="external nofollow">Ryzen 9 7950X</a> and $150 below the <a data-analytics-id="inline-link" data-before-rewrite-localise="https://www.windowscentral.com/amd-ryzen-9-5950x-review" href="https://www.windowscentral.com/amd-ryzen-9-5950x-review" rel="external nofollow">5950X</a>.
				</p>

				<p>
					 
				</p>

				<p>
					Its second-most powerful <a data-analytics-id="inline-link" data-before-rewrite-localise="https://www.windowscentral.com/hardware/amd-reveals-its-ryzen-9000-cpus-with-an-added-treat-for-those-still-on-am4" href="https://www.windowscentral.com/hardware/amd-reveals-its-ryzen-9000-cpus-with-an-added-treat-for-those-still-on-am4" rel="external nofollow">9000 Series</a> chip, the Ryzen 9 9900X, launches simultaneously at the same storefronts for $499 MSRP. That's another $50 drop from the <a data-analytics-id="inline-link" data-before-rewrite-localise="https://www.windowscentral.com/hardware/amd-ryzen-7000-series-everything-you-need-to-know-about-zen-4" href="https://www.windowscentral.com/hardware/amd-ryzen-7000-series-everything-you-need-to-know-about-zen-4" rel="external nofollow">Ryzen 7000 Series</a> equivalent, which matched its price with its <a data-analytics-id="inline-link" data-before-rewrite-localise="https://www.windowscentral.com/everything-you-need-know-about-amd-ryzen-5000-series-processors" href="https://www.windowscentral.com/everything-you-need-know-about-amd-ryzen-5000-series-processors" rel="external nofollow">5000 Series</a> predecessor.
				</p>

				<p>
					 
				</p>

				<p>
					While the top-end Ryzen 9 9950X's <a data-analytics-id="inline-link" data-before-rewrite-localise="https://www.windowscentral.com/what-tdp-and-why-should-you-care-about-it" href="https://www.windowscentral.com/what-tdp-and-why-should-you-care-about-it" rel="external nofollow">base TDP</a> hasn't changed, matching the massive 170W pull of the <a data-analytics-id="inline-link" data-before-rewrite-localise="https://www.windowscentral.com/hardware/amd-ryzen-9-7900x-and-7950x-review" href="https://www.windowscentral.com/hardware/amd-ryzen-9-7900x-and-7950x-review" rel="external nofollow">7900X and 7950X</a>, the Ryzen 9 9900X slims to a more modest 120W. It's not quite the 105W of the high-end 5000 Series chips, but it follows the performance-per-watt targets of the <a data-analytics-id="inline-link" data-before-rewrite-localise="https://www.windowscentral.com/hardware/cpu-gpu-components/amd-ryzen-5-9600x-review" href="https://www.windowscentral.com/hardware/cpu-gpu-components/amd-ryzen-5-9600x-review" rel="external nofollow">Ryzen 5 9600X</a> and <a data-analytics-id="inline-link" data-before-rewrite-localise="https://www.windowscentral.com/hardware/cpu-gpu-components/amd-ryzen-7-9700x-review" href="https://www.windowscentral.com/hardware/cpu-gpu-components/amd-ryzen-7-9700x-review" rel="external nofollow">Ryzen 7 9700X</a>.
				</p>

				<p>
					 
				</p>

				<div id="slice-container-table-wJE2mdEgt5b3sVKU2ZyG6L-11">
					<div>
						<table border="1px solid black;">
							<thead class="table__head">
								<tr class="table__head__row">
									<th class="table__head__heading table__head__heading--left" colspan="1">
										CPU
									</th>
									<th class="table__head__heading table__head__heading--left" colspan="1">
										Cores / Threads
									</th>
									<th class="table__head__heading table__head__heading--left" colspan="1">
										Max clock
									</th>
									<th class="table__head__heading table__head__heading--left" colspan="1">
										L3
									</th>
									<th class="table__head__heading table__head__heading--left" colspan="1">
										Base TDP
									</th>
									<th class="table__head__heading table__head__heading--left" colspan="1">
										MSRP
									</th>
								</tr>
							</thead>
							<tbody class="table__body">
								<tr class="table__body__row">
									<td class="table_body__data" colspan="1" style="text-align:left">
										AMD Ryzen 9 9950X
									</td>
									<td class="table_body__data" colspan="1" style="text-align:left">
										16/32
									</td>
									<td class="table_body__data" colspan="1" style="text-align:left">
										5.7 GHz
									</td>
									<td class="table_body__data" colspan="1" style="text-align:left">
										64 MB
									</td>
									<td class="table_body__data" colspan="1" style="text-align:left">
										170 W
									</td>
									<td class="table_body__data" colspan="1" style="text-align:left">
										$649
									</td>
								</tr>
								<tr class="table__body__row">
									<td class="table_body__data" colspan="1" style="text-align:left">
										AMD Ryzen 9 9900X
									</td>
									<td class="table_body__data" colspan="1" style="text-align:left">
										12/24
									</td>
									<td class="table_body__data" colspan="1" style="text-align:left">
										5.6 GHz
									</td>
									<td class="table_body__data" colspan="1" style="text-align:left">
										64 MB
									</td>
									<td class="table_body__data" colspan="1" style="text-align:left">
										120 W
									</td>
									<td class="table_body__data" colspan="1" style="text-align:left">
										$499
									</td>
								</tr>
								<tr class="table__body__row">
									<td class="table_body__data" colspan="1" style="text-align:left">
										AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
									</td>
									<td class="table_body__data" colspan="1" style="text-align:left">
										16/32
									</td>
									<td class="table_body__data" colspan="1" style="text-align:left">
										5.7 GHz
									</td>
									<td class="table_body__data" colspan="1" style="text-align:left">
										64 MB
									</td>
									<td class="table_body__data" colspan="1" style="text-align:left">
										170 W
									</td>
									<td class="table_body__data" colspan="1" style="text-align:left">
										$699
									</td>
								</tr>
								<tr class="table__body__row">
									<td class="table_body__data" colspan="1" style="text-align:left">
										AMD Ryzen 9 7900X
									</td>
									<td class="table_body__data" colspan="1" style="text-align:left">
										12/24
									</td>
									<td class="table_body__data" colspan="1" style="text-align:left">
										5.6 GHz
									</td>
									<td class="table_body__data" colspan="1" style="text-align:left">
										64 MB
									</td>
									<td class="table_body__data" colspan="1" style="text-align:left">
										170 W
									</td>
									<td class="table_body__data" colspan="1" style="text-align:left">
										$549
									</td>
								</tr>
								<tr class="table__body__row">
									<td class="table_body__data" colspan="1" style="text-align:left">
										AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
									</td>
									<td class="table_body__data" colspan="1" style="text-align:left">
										16/32
									</td>
									<td class="table_body__data" colspan="1" style="text-align:left">
										4.9 GHz
									</td>
									<td class="table_body__data" colspan="1" style="text-align:left">
										64 MB
									</td>
									<td class="table_body__data" colspan="1" style="text-align:left">
										105 W
									</td>
									<td class="table_body__data" colspan="1" style="text-align:left">
										$799
									</td>
								</tr>
								<tr class="table__body__row">
									<td class="table_body__data" colspan="1" style="text-align:left">
										AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
									</td>
									<td class="table_body__data" colspan="1" style="text-align:left">
										12/24
									</td>
									<td class="table_body__data" colspan="1" style="text-align:left">
										4.8 GHz
									</td>
									<td class="table_body__data" colspan="1" style="text-align:left">
										64 MB
									</td>
									<td class="table_body__data" colspan="1" style="text-align:left">
										105 W
									</td>
									<td class="table_body__data" colspan="1" style="text-align:left">
										$549
									</td>
								</tr>
							</tbody>
						</table>

						<p>
							 
						</p>

						<p>
							AMD's <a data-analytics-id="inline-link" data-before-rewrite-localise="https://www.windowscentral.com/hardware/cpu-gpu-components/amd-zen-5-everything-we-know-so-far" href="https://www.windowscentral.com/hardware/cpu-gpu-components/amd-zen-5-everything-we-know-so-far" rel="external nofollow">Zen 5</a> Ryzen 9000 chips don't include its XDNA 2 <a data-analytics-id="inline-link" data-before-rewrite-localise="https://www.windowscentral.com/hardware/what-is-npu-vs-gpu" href="https://www.windowscentral.com/hardware/what-is-npu-vs-gpu" rel="external nofollow">NPU (Neural Processing Unit)</a> for dedicated AI processing, but the CPU chiplet still processes any workloads with an 'enhanced' Advanced Vector Extensions 512 (AVX-512) datapath. Anyone looking for a modern NPU on AMD hardware should explore the <a data-analytics-id="inline-link" data-before-rewrite-localise="https://www.windowscentral.com/hardware/laptops/amd-ryzen-ai-300-announce" href="https://www.windowscentral.com/hardware/laptops/amd-ryzen-ai-300-announce" rel="external nofollow">Ryzen AI 300 Series</a> mobile chips and <a data-analytics-id="inline-link" data-before-rewrite-localise="https://www.windowscentral.com/hardware/cpu-gpu-components/amd-ryzen-8000g-series-cpu-run-ai-models-on-local-devices" href="https://www.windowscentral.com/hardware/cpu-gpu-components/amd-ryzen-8000g-series-cpu-run-ai-models-on-local-devices" rel="external nofollow">Ryzen 8000G</a> desktop chips, like the <a data-analytics-id="inline-link" data-before-rewrite-localise="https://www.windowscentral.com/hardware/cpu-gpu-components/amd-ryzen-7-8700g-review" href="https://www.windowscentral.com/hardware/cpu-gpu-components/amd-ryzen-7-8700g-review" rel="external nofollow">previously reviewed Ryzen 7 8700G</a>, instead.
						</p>

						<p>
							 
						</p>

						<p>
							A dual-core integrated Radeon graphics chiplet features in the Ryzen 9 9900X and 9950X, each clocked at 2.2GHz, which supports video-out for those without a discrete desktop graphics card. Expansion card support depends on your <a data-analytics-id="inline-link" data-before-rewrite-localise="https://www.windowscentral.com/hardware/cpu-gpu-components/best-motherboard-amd-ryzen-7-9700x" href="https://www.windowscentral.com/hardware/cpu-gpu-components/best-motherboard-amd-ryzen-7-9700x" rel="external nofollow">motherboard choice</a>, though PCIe 5.0 modern GPUs and NVMe solid-state drives alongside mandatory DDR5 RAM are standard. Choosing between the Ryzen 9 9900X and 9950X will depend mostly on your software needs, but AMD has the same component recommendations for both.
						</p>

						<h2 id="recommended-hardware-3">
							Recommended hardware
						</h2>

						<div>
							<div>
								<p>
									<img alt="AMD Ryzen 9 9900X and 9950X in plastic packaging" class="ipsImage" height="720" width="720" src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/NAhj2dVEq84kdV3XTcciYf.jpg">
								</p>

								<p>
									<em><span>X870E motherboards will launch later in 2024, but the 9900X and 9950X ran fine with my B650-A board. </span></em>
								</p>

								<p>
									<em><span itemprop="copyrightHolder">(Image credit: Ben Wilson | Windows Central)</span></em>
								</p>

								<p>
									 
								</p>

								<p>
									AMD recommends a 240mm or 280mm all-in-one (AIO) liquid cooler for the Ryzen 9 9900X and 9950X with the upcoming 800 Series of AM5 motherboards, including X870 and X870E chipsets. While 870 Series motherboards will be able to push overclocked DDR5 memory speeds to 8000MT/s and beyond, I used a sample of T-Force Delta RGB 32GB DDR5-6000 RAM with the still-encouraged AUTO:1:1 DDR5-6000 EXPO profile to stay in the performance "sweet spot."
								</p>

								<h2 id="section-ryzen-9-9900x-benchmark-results">
									<span>Ryzen 9 9900X: Benchmark results</span>
								</h2>

								<div>
									<div>
										<p>
											<img alt="AMD Ryzen 9 9900X benchmark result graph for Geekbench 6" class="ipsImage" height="720" width="720" src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/fD9hhfcL9seqZMBHnL9rWd.jpg">
										</p>

										<p>
											<em><span>Geekbench 6 tests CPU burst performance in its benchmark. </span></em>
										</p>

										<p>
											<em><span itemprop="copyrightHolder">(Image credit: Ben Wilson | Windows Central)</span></em>
										</p>

										<p>
											 
										</p>

										<p>
											The Ryzen 9 9900X is the third desktop chip in the <a data-analytics-id="inline-link" data-before-rewrite-localise="https://www.windowscentral.com/hardware/cpu-gpu-components/amd-zen-5-everything-we-know-so-far" href="https://www.windowscentral.com/hardware/cpu-gpu-components/amd-zen-5-everything-we-know-so-far" rel="external nofollow">Zen 5 range</a> to drop its base TDP, moving down from the <a data-analytics-id="inline-link" data-before-rewrite-localise="https://www.windowscentral.com/hardware/amd-ryzen-9-7900x-and-7950x-review" href="https://www.windowscentral.com/hardware/amd-ryzen-9-7900x-and-7950x-review" rel="external nofollow">Ryzen 9 7900X</a>'s 170W to 120W. It follows the <a data-analytics-id="inline-link" data-before-rewrite-localise="https://www.windowscentral.com/hardware/cpu-gpu-components/amd-ryzen-5-9600x-review" href="https://www.windowscentral.com/hardware/cpu-gpu-components/amd-ryzen-5-9600x-review" rel="external nofollow">Ryzen 5 9600X</a> and <a data-analytics-id="inline-link" data-before-rewrite-localise="https://www.windowscentral.com/hardware/cpu-gpu-components/amd-ryzen-7-9700x-review" href="https://www.windowscentral.com/hardware/cpu-gpu-components/amd-ryzen-7-9700x-review" rel="external nofollow">Ryzen 7 9700X</a>, each dropping from 105W to 65W while maintaining a generational performance improvement. The focus on performance-per-watt means that the multi-core leap wasn't as significant for this generation, but a massive boost in single-core performance stands out, again, on the Ryzen 9 9900X.
										</p>

										<p>
											 
										</p>

										<figure>
											<blockquote class="QuoteNewsStyle">
												<p>
													The 9900X falls behind (Intel's Core i9-14700K) in multi-core performance but fires miles ahead in single-core equivalents.
												</p>
											</blockquote>
										</figure>

										<p>
											Officially, AMD pitches the Ryzen 9 9900X as a direct rival to Intel's 14th Gen Core i9-14900K, a 125W chip with a higher 24/32 core/thread count and $589 MSRP. Since release, the 14900K has dropped to around $546, which doesn't help its chances of temptations alongside the recent <a data-analytics-id="inline-link" data-before-rewrite-localise="https://www.windowscentral.com/hardware/cpu-gpu-components/intels-13th-and-14th-gen-cpu-instability-damage-is-irreversible-and-it-can-happen-to-way-more-chips-than-we-thought" href="https://www.windowscentral.com/hardware/cpu-gpu-components/intels-13th-and-14th-gen-cpu-instability-damage-is-irreversible-and-it-can-happen-to-way-more-chips-than-we-thought" rel="external nofollow">degradation controversy</a> I'll get into later. However, the 9900X falls behind in multi-core burst performance with Geekbench 6 benchmark tests but fires miles ahead in single-core equivalents, second only to the Ryzen 9 9950X.
										</p>

										<p>
											 
										</p>

										<div>
											<div>
												<p>
													<img alt="AMD Ryzen 9 9900X benchmark results graph for Cinebench 2024" class="ipsImage" height="720" width="720" src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/V9m5ou4uKHugyhj8WGqmxV.jpg">
												</p>

												<p>
													<em><span>Cinebench 2024's CPU test runs for longer to determinte sustained stress performance. </span></em>
												</p>

												<p>
													<em><span itemprop="copyrightHolder">(Image credit: Ben Wilson | Windows Central)</span></em>
												</p>

												<p>
													 
												</p>

												<p>
													Intel creeps ahead in sustained stress tests with Cinebench 2024 with its <a data-analytics-id="inline-link" data-before-rewrite-localise="https://www.windowscentral.com/hardware/intel-core-i7-14700k-review" href="https://www.windowscentral.com/hardware/intel-core-i7-14700k-review" rel="external nofollow">14th Gen Core i7-14700K</a> and two Core i9 chips, one from the previous 13th Gen. Only here does AMD drop slightly behind the top Core i9-14900K in single-core performance. The wattage difference is slimmer than for the 65W <a data-analytics-id="inline-link" data-before-rewrite-localise="https://www.windowscentral.com/hardware/cpu-gpu-components/amd-ryzen-5-9600x-review" href="https://www.windowscentral.com/hardware/cpu-gpu-components/amd-ryzen-5-9600x-review" rel="external nofollow">Ryzen 5 9600X</a> and <a data-analytics-id="inline-link" data-before-rewrite-localise="https://www.windowscentral.com/hardware/cpu-gpu-components/amd-ryzen-7-9700x-review" href="https://www.windowscentral.com/hardware/cpu-gpu-components/amd-ryzen-7-9700x-review" rel="external nofollow">Ryzen 7 9700X</a> chips against the 125W Core i5-14600K, but accolades should be awarded for AMD's efficient single-core efforts.
												</p>

												<p>
													 
												</p>

												<p>
													It's a similar story across all the <a data-analytics-id="inline-link" data-before-rewrite-localise="https://www.windowscentral.com/hardware/amd-reveals-its-ryzen-9000-cpus-with-an-added-treat-for-those-still-on-am4" href="https://www.windowscentral.com/hardware/amd-reveals-its-ryzen-9000-cpus-with-an-added-treat-for-those-still-on-am4" rel="external nofollow">9000 Series</a>: if your software suite benefits from single-core performance, the 9900X is for you. Its 120W base TDP is a considerable decrease from its power-hungry sibling, the top-end Ryzen 9 9950X, but it's impossible to deny the performance gap between the two. The good news is that the gap has a difference of $150, so you're not being sold an impossible dream, just that AMD made a set of cuts to market the 9900X to those in a specific budget range.
												</p>

												<h2 id="is-the-amd-ryzen-9-9900x-good-for-creators-3">
													Is the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X good for creators?
												</h2>

												<div>
													<div>
														<p>
															<img alt="AMD Ryzen 9 9900X benchmark results graph for Blender 4.2.0" class="ipsImage" height="720" width="720" src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/5xjjA6AhfDiRR62iV3kxZG.jpg">
														</p>

														<p>
															<em><span>Blender 4.2.0 has a dedicated benchmark mode to rank CPU rendering performance. </span><span itemprop="copyrightHolder">(Image credit: Windows Central | Blender Foundation)</span></em>
														</p>

														<p>
															 
														</p>

														<p>
															Comparing CPU-centric median benchmark results for Blender (4.2.0) places the Ryzen 9 9900X between its more powerful Ryzen 9 9950X counterpart and Intel's Core i9-14900K, though it's closer to the <a data-analytics-id="inline-link" data-before-rewrite-localise="https://www.windowscentral.com/hardware/intel-core-i7-14700k-review" href="https://www.windowscentral.com/hardware/intel-core-i7-14700k-review" rel="external nofollow">Core i7-14700K</a> overall. It matches the average placement of the results from my usual benchmark, showing that AMD can fight against Intel's best with slightly less power and a much lower asking price.
														</p>

														<p>
															 
														</p>

														<p>
															If you work with 3D rendering software like Blender or anything with a similar CPU load, you should be thrilled with this more affordable, almost top-end desktop offering. Intel's Core i7-14700K is available for around $419 these days, which is slightly cheaper than the Ryzen 9 9900X, but performs slightly below the same chip in multi-core tests and much further below in single-core tests.
														</p>

														<h2 id="section-ryzen-9-9950x-benchmark-results">
															<span>Ryzen 9 9950X: Benchmark results</span>
														</h2>

														<div>
															<div>
																<p>
																	<img alt="AMD Ryzen 9 9950X benchmark result graph for Geekbench 6" class="ipsImage" height="720" width="720" src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/uDAad9KfFxxADAQtZJhLdd.jpg">
																</p>

																<p>
																	<em><span>Geekbench 6 tests CPU burst performance in its benchmark. </span></em>
																</p>

																<p>
																	<em><span itemprop="copyrightHolder">(Image credit: Ben Wilson | Windows Central)</span></em>
																</p>

																<p>
																	 
																</p>

																<p>
																	AMD's new top-end consumer processor is more expensive than its Intel rival, and there isn't much to say about the Ryzen 9 9950X besides that it's the most powerful desktop CPU in the world, at least before you resort to workstation-grade Threadripper chips. A <a data-analytics-id="inline-link" data-google-interstitial="false" data-hl-processed="hawklinks" data-merchant-id="114288" data-merchant-name="newegg.com" data-merchant-network="LS" data-merchant-url="newegg.com" data-placeholder-url="https://click.linksynergy.com/deeplink?id=HlvbvYZP82I&amp;mid=44583&amp;u1=hawk-custom-tracking&amp;murl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.newegg.com%2Famd-ryzen-9-9950x-4-3-ghz-16-core-am5-170w-processor-100-100001277wof%2Fp%2FN82E16819113841" data-url="https://www.newegg.com/amd-ryzen-9-9950x-4-3-ghz-16-core-am5-170w-processor-100-100001277wof/p/N82E16819113841" href="https://click.linksynergy.com/deeplink?id=HlvbvYZP82I&amp;mid=44583&amp;u1=wp-gb-1087067352165587005&amp;murl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.newegg.com%2Famd-ryzen-9-9950x-4-3-ghz-16-core-am5-170w-processor-100-100001277wof%2Fp%2FN82E16819113841" referrerpolicy="no-referrer-when-downgrade" rel="external nofollow" target="_blank">$649 MSRP</a> will sting but allows the best single-core and multi-core benchmarking test scores I've seen to date. It's a beast, topping the charts and doing everything it claims to, albeit reliant on some demanding system requirements.
																</p>

																<p>
																	 
																</p>

																<figure>
																	<blockquote class="QuoteNewsStyle">
																		<p>
																			There isn't much to say about the 9950X besides that it's the most powerful desktop CPU in the world. It's a beast.
																		</p>
																	</blockquote>
																</figure>

																<p>
																	The most important specification of the Ryzen 9 9950X to remember is its massive 170W <a data-analytics-id="inline-link" data-before-rewrite-localise="https://www.windowscentral.com/what-tdp-and-why-should-you-care-about-it" href="https://www.windowscentral.com/what-tdp-and-why-should-you-care-about-it" rel="external nofollow">base TDP</a>. That's significantly higher than Intel's 125W Core i9-14900K and only matched by previous-gen desktop chips from AMD. The 9950X sticks to a 16-core setup with 32 threads rather than the 24-core, 32-threads of Intel's 14900K, dividing that power to fewer physical cores while offering more shared L3 cache at 64MB over Intel's 36MB of Smart Cache. It's a more powerful chip, but that power doesn't come out of thin air.
																</p>

																<p>
																	 
																</p>

																<div>
																	<div>
																		<p>
																			<img alt="AMD Ryzen 9 9950X benchmark results graph for Cinebench 2024" class="ipsImage" height="720" width="720" src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/bz4uoGXQheMRs3JfpWtm5W.jpg">
																		</p>

																		<p>
																			<em><span>Cinebench 2024's CPU test runs for longer to determinte sustained stress performance. </span></em>
																		</p>

																		<p>
																			<em><span itemprop="copyrightHolder">(Image credit: Ben Wilson | Windows Central)</span></em>
																		</p>

																		<p>
																			 
																		</p>

																		<p>
																			AMD's Ryzen 9 9900X scores are at the top of my usual burst and sustained stress testing. As pointed out in the <a data-analytics-id="inline-link" href="#section-ryzen-9-9900x-benchmark-results" rel="">Ryzen 9 9900X</a> section of my review, it even soars past Intel's 14th Gen Core i9-14900K in creative 3D apps like Blender, meaning there isn't anything more powerful to choose until you graduate to workstation machines with <a data-analytics-id="inline-link" data-before-rewrite-localise="https://www.windowscentral.com/amd-ryzen-threadripper-pro" href="https://www.windowscentral.com/amd-ryzen-threadripper-pro" rel="external nofollow">AMD's Ryzen Threadripper</a> chips. Intel at least scores level in single-core performance results with the Cinebench 2024 benchmark, but the 9950X moves ahead with its multi-core score.
																		</p>

																		<p>
																			 
																		</p>

																		<p>
																			Again, this processor pulls significant power from the socket and requires a capable liquid cooler to prevent throttling due to overheating. However, anyone seriously considering the absolute top-end parts likely isn't worried about the penny-pinching habits of ultra-budgeting and will pair a suitable set of components with the Ryzen 9 9950X to maximize its potential. AMD has delivered the ultimate performance CPU for any manner of creative work and enthusiast-grade gaming, including complex livestreaming.
																		</p>

																		<h2 id="section-ryzen-9-9900x-and-9950x-the-competition">
																			<span>Ryzen 9 9900X and 9950X: The competition</span>
																		</h2>

																		<div>
																			<div>
																				<p>
																					<img alt="Intel Core i9-13900K processor showing contacts" class="ipsImage" height="720" width="720" src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/eH2VycLWBGYNBVrfKdYLqS.jpg">
																				</p>

																				<p>
																					<em><span>Intel's 14th Gen Core i9 chip is the top competitor if you're comfortable applying microcode patches. </span></em>
																				</p>

																				<p>
																					<em><span itemprop="copyrightHolder">(Image credit: Daniel Rubino)</span></em>
																				</p>

																				<p>
																					 
																				</p>

																				<p>
																					Making comparisons is tricky when you're at the top, and AMD only has one chip at Intel to compete with: the 14th Gen Core i9-14900K. That goes for the Ryzen 9 9900X and the 9950X, both of which beat (or match) the i9-14900K in single-core performance. It's a bit of a moot point for the top-end 9950X for everything except the <a data-analytics-id="inline-link" data-google-interstitial="false" data-hl-processed="hawklinks" data-merchant-id="114288" data-merchant-name="newegg.com" data-merchant-network="LS" data-merchant-url="newegg.com" data-placeholder-url="https://click.linksynergy.com/deeplink?id=HlvbvYZP82I&amp;mid=44583&amp;u1=hawk-custom-tracking&amp;murl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.newegg.com%2Famd-ryzen-9-9950x-4-3-ghz-16-core-am5-170w-processor-100-100001277wof%2Fp%2FN82E16819113841" data-url="https://www.newegg.com/amd-ryzen-9-9950x-4-3-ghz-16-core-am5-170w-processor-100-100001277wof/p/N82E16819113841" href="https://click.linksynergy.com/deeplink?id=HlvbvYZP82I&amp;mid=44583&amp;u1=wp-gb-1308400010680656502&amp;murl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.newegg.com%2Famd-ryzen-9-9950x-4-3-ghz-16-core-am5-170w-processor-100-100001277wof%2Fp%2FN82E16819113841" referrerpolicy="no-referrer-when-downgrade" rel="external nofollow" target="_blank">$649 asking price</a> since the <a data-analytics-id="inline-link" data-google-interstitial="false" data-hl-processed="hawklinks" data-merchant-id="114288" data-merchant-name="newegg.com" data-merchant-network="LS" data-merchant-url="newegg.com" data-placeholder-url="https://click.linksynergy.com/deeplink?id=HlvbvYZP82I&amp;mid=44583&amp;u1=hawk-custom-tracking&amp;murl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.newegg.com%2Fintel-core-i9-14900k-core-i9-14th-gen-raptor-lake-lga-1700-desktop-processor%2Fp%2FN82E16819118462" data-url="https://www.newegg.com/intel-core-i9-14900k-core-i9-14th-gen-raptor-lake-lga-1700-desktop-processor/p/N82E16819118462" href="https://click.linksynergy.com/deeplink?id=HlvbvYZP82I&amp;mid=44583&amp;u1=wp-gb-9127465473712210847&amp;murl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.newegg.com%2Fintel-core-i9-14900k-core-i9-14th-gen-raptor-lake-lga-1700-desktop-processor%2Fp%2FN82E16819118462" referrerpolicy="no-referrer-when-downgrade" rel="external nofollow" target="_blank">14900K has dropped as low as $546</a> since launch, while the 9900X starts even cheaper at its <a data-analytics-id="inline-link" data-google-interstitial="false" data-hl-processed="hawklinks" data-merchant-id="114288" data-merchant-name="newegg.com" data-merchant-network="LS" data-merchant-url="newegg.com" data-placeholder-url="https://click.linksynergy.com/deeplink?id=HlvbvYZP82I&amp;mid=44583&amp;u1=hawk-custom-tracking&amp;murl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.newegg.com%2Famd-ryzen-9-9900x-4-4-ghz-12-core-am5-120w-processor-100-100000662wof%2Fp%2FN82E16819113842" data-url="https://www.newegg.com/amd-ryzen-9-9900x-4-4-ghz-12-core-am5-120w-processor-100-100000662wof/p/N82E16819113842" href="https://click.linksynergy.com/deeplink?id=HlvbvYZP82I&amp;mid=44583&amp;u1=wp-gb-1207508996539055562&amp;murl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.newegg.com%2Famd-ryzen-9-9900x-4-4-ghz-12-core-am5-120w-processor-100-100000662wof%2Fp%2FN82E16819113842" referrerpolicy="no-referrer-when-downgrade" rel="external nofollow" target="_blank">$499 MSRP</a>.
																				</p>

																				<p>
																					 
																				</p>

																				<p>
																					Again, a discussion around <a data-analytics-id="inline-link" data-before-rewrite-localise="https://www.windowscentral.com/what-tdp-and-why-should-you-care-about-it" href="https://www.windowscentral.com/what-tdp-and-why-should-you-care-about-it" rel="external nofollow">base TDP</a> is only relevant for the Ryzen 9 9900X running at 120W, which is an almost negligible 5W below the 14900K. The 9950X sticks to AMD's monstrous 170W category for its high-end -X Series chips, far higher than Intel's top-end. If you're comfortable running a power-hungry processor and can keep the 9950X cool enough with a capable AIO liquid solution, it'll offer the best performance on the market but charge a $100 premium for the benefit.
																				</p>

																				<p>
																					 
																				</p>

																				<div>
																					<div>
																						<p>
																							<img alt="Geekbench 6 benchmark results graph" class="ipsImage" height="720" width="720" src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/TWWHyGBLthCfS5eYfAW3Ea.jpg">
																						</p>

																						<p>
																							<em><span>Ranked by single-core performance, here's how each competing chip differs in base TDP. </span></em>
																						</p>

																						<p>
																							<em><span itemprop="copyrightHolder">(Image credit: Windows Central | CPU Monkey)</span></em>
																						</p>

																						<p>
																							 
																						</p>

																						<p>
																							For performance-per-dollar, the Ryzen 9 9900X still beats Intel's Core i9-14900K despite its post-launch price drop, and that could remain the case if AMD reduces the listings in a matching cadence over the coming months. So, even if the playing field were even, AMD would still have the edge on value with the 9900X, at least for the first few months of its availability.
																						</p>

																						<p>
																							 
																						</p>

																						<figure>
																							<blockquote class="QuoteNewsStyle">
																								<p>
																									If you absolutely must have the best performance, the Ryzen 9 9950X will deliver.
																								</p>
																							</blockquote>
																						</figure>

																						<p>
																							However, I can't ignore the <a data-analytics-id="inline-link" data-before-rewrite-localise="https://www.windowscentral.com/hardware/cpu-gpu-components/intels-13th-and-14th-gen-cpu-instability-damage-is-irreversible-and-it-can-happen-to-way-more-chips-than-we-thought" href="https://www.windowscentral.com/hardware/cpu-gpu-components/intels-13th-and-14th-gen-cpu-instability-damage-is-irreversible-and-it-can-happen-to-way-more-chips-than-we-thought" rel="external nofollow">instability crisis Intel is suffering with its 13th and 14th Gen Core desktop chips</a>. A microcode (firmware) patch has already started <a data-analytics-id="inline-link" data-before-rewrite-localise="https://www.windowscentral.com/hardware/cpu-gpu-components/asus-and-msi-motherboard-bios-microcode-update-intel" href="https://www.windowscentral.com/hardware/cpu-gpu-components/asus-and-msi-motherboard-bios-microcode-update-intel" rel="external nofollow">rolling out to compatible motherboards</a>, which should, in theory, prevent any overvoltage damage to the affected chips, like the i9-14900K. This slight reduction in performance profile metrics reportedly doesn't seem to make a noticeable difference in real-world usage, either (<a data-analytics-id="inline-link" data-hl-processed="none" data-url="https://www.anandtech.com/show/21518/intel-publishes-first-microcode-update-for-raptor-lake-stability" href="https://www.anandtech.com/show/21518/intel-publishes-first-microcode-update-for-raptor-lake-stability" referrerpolicy="no-referrer-when-downgrade" target="_blank" rel="external nofollow">via AnandTech</a>).
																						</p>

																						<p>
																							 
																						</p>

																						<p>
																							Still, the Ryzen 9 9900X and 9950X top the charts for single-core performance and offer a split set of specs with a huge difference in cost. If you absolutely must have the best performance, the 9950X will deliver, but you'll need to pair it with a capable cooler to prevent throttling. On the other hand, the 9900X offers a solid challenge for Intel's top-end Core i9-14900K for a slightly lower asking price and base TDP if you're ready to adopt AM5 motherboards.
																						</p>

																						<h2 id="section-ryzen-9-9900x-and-9950x-should-you-buy">
																							<span>Ryzen 9 9900X and 9950X: Should you buy?</span>
																						</h2>

																						<div>
																							<div>
																								<p>
																									<img alt="AMD Ryzen 9 9950X in AM5 motherboard socket" class="ipsImage" height="720" width="720" src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/khq7Nnm2bY2wq3VaaheQcE.jpg">
																								</p>

																								<p>
																									<em><span>It runs hot, but the 170W 9950X's performance is unmatched if you pair it with a capable AIO liquid cooler. </span></em>
																								</p>

																								<p>
																									<em><span itemprop="copyrightHolder">(Image credit: Ben Wilson | Windows Central)</span></em>
																								</p>

																								<h2 id="you-should-buy-this-if-3">
																									You should buy this if ...
																								</h2>

																								<p style="margin-left: 40px;">
																									<span class="ipsEmoji">✅</span> <strong>You want the best consumer desktop CPU</strong>
																								</p>

																								<p style="margin-left: 40px;">
																									 
																								</p>

																								<p style="margin-left: 40px;">
																									If you want the ultimate performance for creative software and complex livestreaming, the Ryzen 9 9950X is the king of the hill in all metrics.
																								</p>

																								<p style="margin-left: 40px;">
																									 
																								</p>

																								<p style="margin-left: 40px;">
																									<span class="ipsEmoji">✅</span> <strong>You need a powerful processor for creative apps</strong>
																								</p>

																								<p style="margin-left: 40px;">
																									 
																								</p>

																								<p style="margin-left: 40px;">
																									The Ryzen 9 9900X offers a more sensible option for those working with real-time and pre-rendered content, matching or closely comparable to Intel's Core i9-14900K.
																								</p>

																								<h2 id="you-should-avoid-this-if-3">
																									You should avoid this if ...
																								</h2>

																								<p style="margin-left: 40px;">
																									<span class="ipsEmoji">❌</span> <strong>You already use a Ryzen 9 7900X or 7950X</strong>
																								</p>

																								<p style="margin-left: 40px;">
																									 
																								</p>

																								<p style="margin-left: 40px;">
																									The multi-core generational leap is so minor from the 7000 Series to the 9000 Series that you won't see any significant differences to warrant the cost.
																								</p>

																								<p style="margin-left: 40px;">
																									 
																								</p>

																								<p style="margin-left: 40px;">
																									<span class="ipsEmoji">❌</span> <strong>You already use an Intel 13th or 14th Gen Core i9</strong>
																								</p>

																								<p style="margin-left: 40px;">
																									 
																								</p>

																								<p style="margin-left: 40px;">
																									Choosing the 9900X over an i9-13900K or the 9950X over an i9-14900K makes sense if you're upgrading from older hardware, but overhauling your modern motherboard to switch to AMD isn't worth it.
																								</p>

																								<p>
																									 
																								</p>

																								<hr>
																								<p>
																									 
																								</p>

																								<p>
																									Much like the entry-level Ryzen 5 9600X and mid-range Ryzen 7 9700X, this pairing of high-end Ryzen 9 desktop chips makes more sense to those upgrading from AMD's <a data-analytics-id="inline-link" data-before-rewrite-localise="https://www.windowscentral.com/everything-you-need-know-about-amd-ryzen-5000-series-processors" href="https://www.windowscentral.com/everything-you-need-know-about-amd-ryzen-5000-series-processors" rel="external nofollow">Ryzen 5000 Series</a> or <a data-analytics-id="inline-link" data-before-rewrite-localise="https://www.windowscentral.com/intel-announces-new-12th-gen-alder-lake-desktop-processors" href="https://www.windowscentral.com/intel-announces-new-12th-gen-alder-lake-desktop-processors" rel="external nofollow">Intel's 12th Gen</a> and older. For this crowd, there's no denying the 9950X's dominant grip on the consumer CPU market, even if it comes with a considerable price tag. Meanwhile, the 9900X aggressively targets Intel's top-end 14th Gen Core i9-14900K and heartily competes at a lower cost, though it fell behind at times.
																								</p>

																								<p>
																									 
																								</p>

																								<p>
																									They're excessive and powerful, needing capable CPU coolers to prevent throttling from overheating, especially with the 170W powerhouse 9950X, but both Ryzen 9 chips deliver what AMD promises: high-end performance for creators. I'd still recommend that hardcore PC gamers hold on for the inevitable <a data-analytics-id="inline-link" data-before-rewrite-localise="https://www.windowscentral.com/hardware/cpu-gpu-components/amd-ryzen-7-9700x-vs-ryzen-7-7800x3d" href="https://www.windowscentral.com/hardware/cpu-gpu-components/amd-ryzen-7-9700x-vs-ryzen-7-7800x3d" target="_blank" rel="external nofollow">Ryzen 9000 -X3D chips</a>, but those heavily into content creation will appreciate the standard -X Series if it fits into their budget.
																								</p>

																								<p>
																									 
																								</p>

																								<p>
																									<a href="https://www.windowscentral.com/hardware/cpu-gpu-components/amd-ryzen-9-9900x-9950x-review" rel="external nofollow">Source</a>
																								</p>

																								<p>
																									 
																								</p>

																								<p>
																									<span style="font-size:12px;"><em>Hope you enjoyed this news post.</em></span>
																								</p>

																								<p>
																									<span style="font-size:12px;"><em>Thank you for appreciating my time and effort posting news every single day for many years.</em></span>
																								</p>

																								<p>
																									<span style="font-size:12px;"><em>2023: Over 5,800 news posts | 2024 (till end of July): 3,313 news posts</em></span>
																								</p>
																							</div>
																						</div>
																					</div>
																				</div>
																			</div>
																		</div>
																	</div>
																</div>
															</div>
														</div>
													</div>
												</div>
											</div>
										</div>
									</div>
								</div>
							</div>
						</div>
					</div>
				</div>
			</div>
		</div>
	</div>
</div>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">24983</guid><pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2024 16:36:57 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Homeworld 3 will release its first paid DLC on August 15 with the Kalan Raiders Fleet Pack</title><link>https://nsaneforums.com/news/technology-news/homeworld-3-will-release-its-first-paid-dlc-on-august-15-with-the-kalan-raiders-fleet-pack-r24977/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	<em>Homeworld 3</em>, the long-awaited third game in the space-based RTS game series, <a href="https://www.neowin.net/news/homeworld-3-is-getting-a-ton-of-changes-from-player-feedback-before-its-may-13-release/" rel="external nofollow">finally launched in May</a> after delays that pushed its release date back by over a year past its original launch time period. Before the release, developer Blackbird Interactive revealed a <a href="https://www.neowin.net/news/homeworld-3-lowers-pc-system-requirements-and-reveals-its-first-year-of-post-launch-content/" rel="external nofollow">plan for at least a year of post-launch content updates</a>.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Today, Blackbird announced details of its first paid DLC drop, which will launch with the game's 1.2 update on August 15. In a <a href="https://store.steampowered.com/app/1840080/Homeworld_3/" rel="external nofollow">post on its Steam page</a>, it shows that the paid DLC will be the Kalan Raiders Fleet Pack. The Kalan Raiders were a non-playable part of <em>Homeworld 3</em>'s campaign, but now its ships will be playable in two separate fleets for its War Games mode.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Here's the description of the two new fleets:
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<blockquote class="QuoteNewsStyle">
	<p>
		The Raider Fleet has extensively raided Hiigaran space, resulting in a mix of Hiigaran and Kalan ships to make up its tactical forces. This fleet will power ahead to be a formidable force for the enemies you take on. The Capture Fleet specializes in capturing enemy units. You’ll see a mix of Incarnate and Kalan vessels making up this fleet.
	</p>
</blockquote>

<p>
	In addition to the ships from the Kalan Raiders faction, the update will add three more ships (Swarm Fighter, Mine Launcher Corvette, and Capture Frigate), along with 11 new challenges and 40 Artifacts to the War Games mode that are linked to the Kalan Raiders faction.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The paid DLC will be launched as a stand-alone package, but a price has yet to be revealed. It will also be included in the game's Year One pass, which costs $19.99 and will include access to two more paid DLC packs, which will include even more new fleets and ship factions for the War Games mode. The 1.2 patch is already available in a Beta preview release on Steam, <a href="https://steamcommunity.com/linkfilter/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fstore.epicgames.com%2Fen-US%2Fp%2Fhomeworld-3--mod-tools-and-editor-preview" rel="external nofollow">as well as on the Epic Games Store</a>.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<a href="https://www.neowin.net/news/homeworld-3-will-release-its-first-paid-dlc-on-august-15-with-the-kalan-raiders-fleet-pack/" rel="external nofollow">Source</a>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<span style="font-size:12px;"><em>Hope you enjoyed this news post.</em></span>
</p>

<p>
	<span style="font-size:12px;"><em>Thank you for appreciating my time and effort posting news every single day for many years.</em></span>
</p>

<p>
	<span style="font-size:12px;"><em>2023: Over 5,800 news posts | 2024 (till end of July): 3,313 news posts</em></span>
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">24977</guid><pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2024 08:16:00 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Obsidian Entertainment CEO says development of upcoming Xbox RPG The Outer Worlds 2 is "going really well"</title><link>https://nsaneforums.com/news/technology-news/obsidian-entertainment-ceo-says-development-of-upcoming-xbox-rpg-the-outer-worlds-2-is-going-really-well-r24971/</link><description><![CDATA[<h3>
	Obsidian CEO Feargus Urquhart offers an update on the studio's science-fiction RPG that was announced back in 2021.
</h3>

<h2 id="what-you-need-to-know-3">
	What you need to know
</h2>

<ul>
	<li>
		Xbox studio Obsidian Entertainment is currently working on multiple projects, including  fantasy RPG Avowed and a science-fiction sequel, The Outer Worlds 2.
	</li>
	<li>
		Speaking with the Hit the Limit Break podcast, Obsidian Entertainment CEO Feargus Urquhart shared that work on The Outer Worlds 2 is "going really well."
	</li>
	<li>
		Feargus added that Obsidian struggled early on with COVID, and that the studio considered canceling projects to focus entirely on Avowed, but was able to come together and find the right balance eventually. 
	</li>
</ul>

<p>
	 
</p>

<hr>
<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Even if it's a ways off, it sounds like another science-fiction Xbox role-playing game (RPG) is shaping up nicely. 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Speaking with Tom Caswell on the newly-launched Hit the Limit Break podcast (thanks, <a data-analytics-id="inline-link" data-hl-processed="none" data-url="https://x.com/HazzadorGamin/status/1823413802437894382" href="https://x.com/HazzadorGamin/status/1823413802437894382" referrerpolicy="no-referrer-when-downgrade" target="_blank" rel="external nofollow">@HazzadorGamin</a>), Obsidian Entertainment CEO Feargus Urquhart explained that development on <a data-analytics-id="inline-link" data-before-rewrite-localise="https://www.windowscentral.com/tag/outer-worlds" href="https://www.windowscentral.com/tag/outer-worlds" rel="external nofollow">The Outer Worlds 2</a> is "going really well," with the team coming together and figuring out how to support development simultaneously with multiple projects, including the studio's upcoming fantasy RPG <a data-analytics-id="inline-link" data-before-rewrite-localise="https://www.windowscentral.com/tag/avowed" href="https://www.windowscentral.com/tag/avowed" rel="external nofollow">Avowed</a>.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	"I've actually been really impressed. We had a really hard time at the studio in COVID," he says. Urquhart went on to share that Obsidian was having a very hard time in the early months of COVID figuring out how to handle different projects, including briefly considering just putting the entire studio on Avowed.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	"I appreciate Microsoft and the teams and everybody and that we kinda said 'No, we will get there. We will get there with all these games. Are they gonna be on the timelines that we originally thought? No. But we're gonna get there,'" he says. "And I think that's proven, right? Grounded turned out awesome, Pentiment turned out awesome, Avowed is gonna be great, Outer Worlds 2 is looking incredible." 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	You can listen to the full podcast below, though you do need to be aware that it was recorded before <a data-analytics-id="inline-link" data-before-rewrite-localise="https://www.windowscentral.com/gaming/xbox/obsidian-entertainments-xbox-rpg-avowed-is-delayed-to-2025-heres-the-new-release-date" href="https://www.windowscentral.com/gaming/xbox/obsidian-entertainments-xbox-rpg-avowed-is-delayed-to-2025-heres-the-new-release-date" rel="external nofollow">Avowed was officially delayed to February 2025</a>.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<div class="ipsEmbeddedVideo" contenteditable="false">
	<div>
		<iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="113" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" src="https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/ADkKzjY6j7Y?feature=oembed" title="“We were a crappy developer”: Obsidian studio head Feargus Urquhart on state of gaming industry" width="200"></iframe>
	</div>
</div>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	In the full podcast, Urquhart touches on several other topics, including the nature of the <a data-analytics-id="inline-link" data-before-rewrite-localise="https://www.windowscentral.com/gaming/xbox/fallout-franchise-sees-player-count-resurgence-across-all-games-thanks-to-sales-promotions-and-an-excellent-tv-series" href="https://www.windowscentral.com/gaming/xbox/fallout-franchise-sees-player-count-resurgence-across-all-games-thanks-to-sales-promotions-and-an-excellent-tv-series" rel="external nofollow">Fallout TV series giving the franchise a resurgence</a>, <a data-analytics-id="inline-link" data-before-rewrite-localise="https://www.windowscentral.com/gaming/xbox/microsoft-closes-arkane-austin-alpha-dog-games-and-tango-gameworks" href="https://www.windowscentral.com/gaming/xbox/microsoft-closes-arkane-austin-alpha-dog-games-and-tango-gameworks" rel="external nofollow">Xbox studio closures</a>, and more. 
</p>

<h2 id="when-will-the-outer-worlds-2-launch-3">
	When will The Outer Worlds 2 launch?
</h2>

<div>
	<div>
		<p>
			<img alt="Image of Avowed." class="ipsImage" height="720" width="720" src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/fZmXDNKYJExHoKgE69LiNA.jpg">
		</p>

		<p>
			<em><span>Avowed features creatures endemic to the world of Eora. </span><span itemprop="copyrightHolder">(Image credit: Xbox Game Studios)</span></em>
		</p>

		<p>
			 
		</p>

		<p>
			The Outer Worlds first launched in 2019, giving players a solar system to explore and a story to progress in classic Obsidian role-playing game fashion, including options for double-crossing the different factions and corporations that dominated nearby life. 
		</p>

		<p>
			 
		</p>

		<div id="slice-container-newsletterForm-articleInbodyContent-SYFyt3xUHDenwBZY3tfpVS">
			<div data-hydrate="true">
				<p>
					The Outer Worlds 2 was first announced at E3 2021 with a tongue-in-cheek trailer poking fun at how little work had actually been accomplished on the game so far. Since then, Obsidian has released co-op survival game <a data-analytics-id="inline-link" data-before-rewrite-localise="https://www.windowscentral.com/tag/grounded" href="https://www.windowscentral.com/tag/grounded" rel="external nofollow">Grounded</a> and the truly unique medieval narrative game Pentiment, while the studio's next big Xbox game, Avowed, is slated to launch on Feb. 18, 2025. 
				</p>

				<p>
					 
				</p>

				<p>
					There's been few updates on The Outer Worlds 2, bar Feargus's comments, so it's hard to gauge exactly when the game will arrive. Depending on the scope and level of improvements the team is aiming to implement, it's certainly possible that we could see it arrive in 2026, but we'll have a better idea of what to expect when we learn more.
				</p>

				<h2 id="analysis-i-will-be-eagerly-waiting-3">
					Analysis: I will be eagerly waiting
				</h2>

				<p>
					Obsidian is a storied developer for good reason, and I'm eagerly looking forward to both The Outer Worlds 2. Hopefully we won't be waiting too much longer for more information on the latter, but as someone that really enjoyed the first game, I'll just remain excited for now. 
				</p>

				<p>
					 
				</p>

				<p>
					In the meantime, I'm certainly also looking forward to Avowed, which is coming to Xbox Series X|S and Windows PC next year. Like all Xbox first-party games, it's also launching day one in <a data-analytics-id="inline-link" data-before-rewrite-localise="https://www.windowscentral.com/tag/xbox-game-pass" href="https://www.windowscentral.com/tag/xbox-game-pass" rel="external nofollow">Xbox Game Pass Ultimate</a>.
				</p>

				<p>
					 
				</p>

				<p>
					<a href="https://www.windowscentral.com/gaming/xbox/obsidian-entertainment-ceo-says-development-of-upcoming-xbox-rpg-the-outer-worlds-2-is-going-really-well" rel="external nofollow">Source</a>
				</p>

				<p>
					 
				</p>

				<p>
					<span style="font-size:12px;"><em>Hope you enjoyed this news post.</em></span>
				</p>

				<p>
					<span style="font-size:12px;"><em>Thank you for appreciating my time and effort posting news every single day for many years.</em></span>
				</p>

				<p>
					<span style="font-size:12px;"><em>2023: Over 5,800 news posts | 2024 (till end of July): 3,313 news posts</em></span>
				</p>
			</div>
		</div>
	</div>
</div>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">24971</guid><pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2024 03:39:44 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Obsidian's CEO would love to make another Fallout, but there's another Xbox IP he'd like a crack at ...</title><link>https://nsaneforums.com/news/technology-news/obsidians-ceo-would-love-to-make-another-fallout-but-theres-another-xbox-ip-hed-like-a-crack-at-r24970/</link><description><![CDATA[<h3>
	Obsidian Entertainment CEO Feargus Urquhart thinks Shadowrun is a "super cool" world to explore.
</h3>

<h2 id="what-you-need-to-know-3">
	What you need to know
</h2>

<ul>
	<li>
		Obsidian Entertainment CEO Feargus Urquhart spoke with the Hit the Limit Break podcast about a number of topics, including other Xbox-owned IP he'd like to work on. 
	</li>
	<li>
		Urquhart noted that he'd be interested in making a Shadowrun game, saying that it's a "super cool" world to explore. 
	</li>
	<li>
		Obsidian Entertainment is currently working on fantasy role-playing game Avowed and a spacefaring adventure, The Outer Worlds 2.
	</li>
</ul>

<p>
	 
</p>

<hr>
<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Xbox developer Obsidian Entertainment already has a number of projects in the works, but there's one other Xbox IP that CEO Feargus Urquhart would like to explore. 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	During an interview with Tom Caswell on the new Hit the Limit Break podcast, Urquhart was asked if there was a non-<a data-analytics-id="inline-link" data-before-rewrite-localise="https://www.windowscentral.com/gaming/fallout" data-before-rewrite-redirect="https://www.windowscentral.com/tag/fallout" href="https://www.windowscentral.com/gaming/fallout" rel="external nofollow">Fallout</a> Xbox IP that he'd like to see Obsidian work on. Urquhart immediately responded with Shadowrun, noting that he'd asked to see the list of IP Microsoft owned shortly after Obsidian was purchased and added to Xbox Game Studios.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	"I love Shadowrun. I think it's super cool," he says, adding that "If you had to pin me down on one, yes, Shadowrun is the one. I bought the book when it first came out, I probably own four of the six editions, I think it's a super cool IP."
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	You can check out the full podcast below:
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<div class="ipsEmbeddedVideo" contenteditable="false">
	<div>
		<iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="113" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" src="https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/ADkKzjY6j7Y?feature=oembed" title="“We were a crappy developer”: Obsidian studio head Feargus Urquhart on state of gaming industry" width="200"></iframe>
	</div>
</div>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	During the podcast, Urquhart also touches on a number of other topics, including the nature of <a data-analytics-id="inline-link" data-before-rewrite-localise="https://www.windowscentral.com/gaming/xbox/fallout-franchise-sees-player-count-resurgence-across-all-games-thanks-to-sales-promotions-and-an-excellent-tv-series" href="https://www.windowscentral.com/gaming/xbox/fallout-franchise-sees-player-count-resurgence-across-all-games-thanks-to-sales-promotions-and-an-excellent-tv-series" rel="external nofollow">Fallout's resurgence thanks to the Prime Video TV series</a>, <a data-analytics-id="inline-link" data-before-rewrite-localise="https://www.windowscentral.com/gaming/xbox/obsidian-entertainment-ceo-says-development-of-upcoming-xbox-rpg-the-outer-worlds-2-is-going-really-well" href="https://www.windowscentral.com/gaming/xbox/obsidian-entertainment-ceo-says-development-of-upcoming-xbox-rpg-the-outer-worlds-2-is-going-really-well" rel="external nofollow">how development on The Outer Worlds 2 is going</a>, and more. 
</p>

<h2 id="shadowrun-has-a-complicated-history-3">
	Shadowrun has a complicated history
</h2>

<p>
	Shadowrun first began life as a pen-and-paper role-playing game, with the first edition launching back in 1989. Shadowrun is a cross between cyberpunk dystopia and dark fantasy, with powerful corporations and gangs wielding magic as elves and dwarves are born into the world.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Developed by FASA, several editions followed, with the pen-and-paper rights transferring to WizKids, a company that was then acquired by Topps, which now licenses the rights to Catalyst Game Labs (CGL). 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<div id="slice-container-newsletterForm-articleInbodyContent-MiH24TpaPCuVsXdEowoDqm">
	<div data-hydrate="true">
		<p>
			Meanwhile, the digital rights for video and computer games were spun out alongside FASA Interactive, which was acquired by Microsoft in 2000 and then closed in 2007. Since then, Microsoft has licensed the video game rights to developer Harebrained Schemes, which has launched a number of role-playing games and expansions set in the Shadowrun universe. <a data-analytics-id="inline-link" data-before-rewrite-localise="https://www.windowscentral.com/shadowrun-trilogy-coming-xbox-game-pass" href="https://www.windowscentral.com/shadowrun-trilogy-coming-xbox-game-pass" rel="external nofollow">The team's games were updated and made available</a> across Xbox Series X|S, Xbox One, PlayStation 5, PlayStation, and Windows PC back in 2022. 
		</p>

		<h2 id="analysis-absolutely-3">
			Analysis: Absolutely
		</h2>

		<p>
			I know Obsidian Entertainment is hard at work on <a data-analytics-id="inline-link" data-before-rewrite-localise="https://www.windowscentral.com/tag/avowed" href="https://www.windowscentral.com/tag/avowed" rel="external nofollow">Avowed</a> and The Outer Worlds 2 — with the former title <a data-analytics-id="inline-link" data-before-rewrite-localise="https://www.windowscentral.com/gaming/xbox/obsidian-entertainments-xbox-rpg-avowed-is-delayed-to-2025-heres-the-new-release-date" href="https://www.windowscentral.com/gaming/xbox/obsidian-entertainments-xbox-rpg-avowed-is-delayed-to-2025-heres-the-new-release-date" rel="external nofollow">now being scheduled to launch in February 2025</a> — but Shadowrun would absolutely be a perfect fit for one of the studio's teams. Maybe this was just wishful thinking, but I hope Urquhart's inclinations prove true and we get to see what a dark, cyberpunk world filled with magic could look like under the talent of Obsidian and the resources of Xbox Game Studios.
		</p>

		<p>
			 
		</p>

		<p>
			<a href="https://www.windowscentral.com/gaming/xbox/obsidian-entertainments-ceo-would-love-to-make-one-other-xbox-ip-that-isnt-fallout" rel="external nofollow">Source</a>
		</p>

		<p>
			 
		</p>

		<p>
			<span style="font-size:12px;"><em>Hope you enjoyed this news post.</em></span>
		</p>

		<p>
			<span style="font-size:12px;"><em>Thank you for appreciating my time and effort posting news every single day for many years.</em></span>
		</p>

		<p>
			<span style="font-size:12px;"><em>2023: Over 5,800 news posts | 2024 (till end of July): 3,313 news posts</em></span>
		</p>
	</div>
</div>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">24970</guid><pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2024 03:37:14 +0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
