<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[News: Security & Privacy News]]></title><link>https://nsaneforums.com/news/security-privacy-news/page/54/?d=2</link><description><![CDATA[News: Security & Privacy News]]></description><language>en</language><item><title>WhatsApp is rolling out self-destructing voice messages</title><link>https://nsaneforums.com/news/security-privacy-news/whatsapp-is-rolling-out-self-destructing-voice-messages-r20477/</link><description><![CDATA[<h3>
	Two years after the ‘View Once’ feature arrived for photos and videos, the messaging app’s voice notes are getting the same protection.
</h3>

<div>
	<div class="duet--article--article-body-component">
		<p>
			WhatsApp has officially announced that you’ll soon be able to set voice messages to disappear after their recipient hears them. The “View Once” feature has been <a href="https://www.theverge.com/2021/8/3/22608419/whatsapp-view-once-dissapearing-media-launch-testing-sensitive-info" rel="external nofollow">available for photos and videos since 2021</a>, but it’s now expanding to cover audio messages.
		</p>

		<p>
			 
		</p>
	</div>

	<div class="duet--article--article-body-component">
		<p>
			While it’s a little confusing that WhatsApp is using the “View Once” branding for messages that you listen to rather than look at, it’s nice to see the protection available for another of the messaging service’s formats. As a <a href="https://www.theverge.com/2022/10/31/23432534/voice-message-note-imessage-whatsapp-defense-etiquette" rel="external nofollow">public defender of voice messages</a>, I, for one, am thrilled.
		</p>

		<p>
			 
		</p>
	</div>

	<div class="duet--article--article-body-component">
		<p>
			In a press release, the company suggests you might want to use the feature “for reading out your credit card details to a friend, or when you’re planning a surprise.” To that list, I would also add “bitching about your boss” or simply “being romantic and / or horny,” but I can see why those examples wouldn’t make it into Meta’s family-friendly press release.
		</p>

		<p>
			 
		</p>
	</div>

	<div class="duet--article--article-body-component">
		<p>
			As always, we had some idea this was coming thanks to the <a href="https://www.theverge.com/2023/10/19/23923648/whatsapp-view-once-voice-messages-notes-beta-test" rel="external nofollow">code sleuthing of <em>WABetaInfo</em></a>, but now we know it’s officially rolling out for iOS and Android globally “over the coming days.” I’ve yet to see the feature appear on my device, but earlier reporting from <em>WABetaInfo </em>suggests you’ll be able to make a voice note “View Once” by tapping the “1” icon to the right of the message’s waveform while recording.
		</p>

		<p>
			 
		</p>
	</div>
</div>

<p>
	<a href="https://www.theverge.com/2023/12/7/23992008/whatsapp-view-once-voice-notes-messages-self-destruct-privacy" rel="external nofollow">Source</a>
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">20477</guid><pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2023 17:22:01 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Meta begins rolling out E2E encryption on Messenger chats and calls</title><link>https://nsaneforums.com/news/security-privacy-news/meta-begins-rolling-out-e2e-encryption-on-messenger-chats-and-calls-r20476/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	Meta’s Messenger is one of the world’s most common ways to send messages with contacts, now the company has said it will roll out end-to-end (E2E) encryption for all personal chats and calls on Messenger and Facebook.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	To be clear, encryption has been available on these platforms for a while but this latest news means the feature is switched on by default for personal messages and calls. Under the new scheme, messages that you send are protected from the moment they leave your device to the moment they reach your contact’s device, preventing any middlemen, including Meta, from seeing what you said.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	In the past when messaging clients had or added encryption, it sometimes meant a more restrictive experience in terms of features. With this launch, Meta said that users will retain familiar features like themes and custom reactions but will also get a bunch of new features too including edited and disappearing messages, read receipts control, improved photo and video sending, and improved voice messaging.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	With message editing, Meta is striking a balance. You will only be able to edit messages for 15 minutes after sending them and if you want to report someone’s original message before they edited it then Meta will be able to read the message edit history.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	With disappearing messages, they will now last 24 hours after being sent and the chat interface has been updated to inform users that the messages will disappear. As for read receipts control, you’ll be able to decide if you want to let others see that you’ve read their messages. This will reduce the pressure to respond to people right away if you don’t feel like it.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	When you get the update, you’ll also benefit from higher image quality and improved responding or reacting to any photo or video in a collection. Meta said it’s also testing HD media and file sharing improvements with some users and plans to scale this in the coming months.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Finally, Meta said that voice messaging is the fastest growing messaging format today and with this update you’ll be able to listen at 1.5x and 2x speeds as well as begin listening where you left so you can pick up again if you have to leave the app.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The roll out will take several months until everyone gets it but when you do, you’ll need to set up a recovery method, such as a pin, to restore your messages if you lose, change, or add a device.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<a href="https://www.neowin.net/news/meta-begins-rolling-out-e2e-encryption-on-messenger-chats-and-calls/" rel="external nofollow">Source</a>
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">20476</guid><pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2023 17:21:28 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Russia hacking: 'FSB in years-long cyber attacks on UK', says government</title><link>https://nsaneforums.com/news/security-privacy-news/russia-hacking-fsb-in-years-long-cyber-attacks-on-uk-says-government-r20472/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	<strong>The UK is accusing Russia's Security Service, the FSB, of a sustained cyber-hacking campaign, targeting politicians and others in public life.</strong>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The government said one group stole data through cyber-attacks, which was later made public, including material linked to the 2019 election.
</p>

<p>
	<br />
	Russia has repeatedly denied claims it is involved in such activities.
</p>

<p>
	<br />
	Foreign Secretary David Cameron said the group's actions were "completely unacceptable".
</p>

<p>
	<br />
	"Despite their repeated efforts, they have failed. We will continue to work together with our allies to expose Russian covert cyber activity and hold Russia to account for its actions," the former prime minister said.
</p>

<p>
	<br />
	Foreign Office Minister Leo Docherty told the House of Commons on Thursday that Russia's ambassador has been summoned and two individuals were being sanctioned. One of them is a serving FSB officer.
</p>

<p>
	<br />
	The Russian ambassador was unavailable after being summoned on Wednesday, but officials instead met with the Russian Embassy's deputy head of mission and expressed the UK's deep concern about the alleged cyber-attacks.
</p>

<p>
	<br />
	The group is accused of carrying out hundreds of highly targeted hacks against politicians, civil servants, those working for think-tanks, journalists, academics and others in public life. These mainly targeted the private emails of individuals following extensive research and the creation of false accounts impersonating their trusted contacts.
</p>

<p>
	<br />
	Amongst those targeted was an MP who told the BBC in February his emails had been stolen.
</p>

<p>
	<br />
	The Federal Security Service (FSB) is the successor agency to the KGB, which operated throughout the Cold War.
</p>

<p>
	<br />
	Russian President Vladimir Putin was director of the FSB for a period in the 1990s.
</p>

<p>
	<br />
	The group linked to the FSB - and specifically the part of it known as Centre 18 - has been targeting the UK by stealing information from those in political and public life since at least 2015, it is believed.
</p>

<p>
	<br />
	It is claimed the group remains active.
</p>

<p>
	<br />
	The US is also expected to announce action against the group.
</p>

<p>
	<br />
	"Russia is targeting the UK's democratic process," Western officials said.
</p>

<p>
	<br />
	However, the campaign has been judged not to have been successful in interfering in the democratic process.
</p>

<p>
	<br />
	Thursday's public accusation is aimed at disrupting the group's work and increasing awareness ahead of major elections around the world next year.<br />
	"This group has acquired a vast amount of data," Western officials said. "This information is used to undermine the West in various ways."
</p>

<p>
	<br />
	The UK had already accused Russia of interfering in the 2019 election after stealing documents on US-UK trade from Conservative MP Liam Fox which were then leaked.
</p>

<p>
	<br />
	But when that accusation was made in 2020 the specific group behind that attack was not named and it is now being linked to the wider activities by the same FSB-linked group.
</p>

<p>
	<br />
	Those targeted by the organisation come from across the political spectrum.
</p>

<p>
	<br />
	SNP MP Stewart McDonald told the BBC this February that a group believed to have been linked to Russian intelligence stole his emails after posing as one of his staff. He went public in order to pre-empt the leak of any emails. They did not appear.
</p>

<p>
	<br />
	Speaking in the House of Commons on Thursday, the SNP's Brendan O'Hara, the party's foreign affairs spokesman, said Russia's actions were part of a "persistent pattern of behaviour", and asked if the government had "considered making cybersecurity training mandatory for all MPs and their staff."
</p>

<p>
	<br />
	Labour's David Lammy said democracy is "built on trust" and asked if the government was "confident" the full extent of the attack had been uncovered.
</p>

<p>
	<br />
	The FSB-linked group itself is thought to focus on hacking the data with others involved in disseminating it through different channels and amplifying its impact.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p style="text-align:center;">
	<img alt="_113837280_hi062709390.jpg.webp" class="ipsImage" data-ratio="62.50" height="405" width="720" src="https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/800/cpsprodpb/2051/production/_113837280_hi062709390.jpg.webp" />
</p>

<p style="text-align:center;">
	<span style="font-size:12px;"><em>Russia has previously denied allegations of interference</em></span>
</p>

<p style="text-align:center;">
	 
</p>

<p>
	Other targets include the think-tank the Institute for Statecraft and its founder Chris Donnelly whose data was leaked online as well as a former head of MI6, Sir Richard Dearlove.
</p>

<p>
	<br />
	Western officials said the group was involved in 'intelligence acquisition' by hacking the email accounts and stealing the data. In some cases, it then passed on information to others in order for it to be made public.
</p>

<p>
	<br />
	The accusation by the UK, which will be followed by further moves from the US, is designed to disrupt the activities of the FSB group by exposing them.
</p>

<p>
	<br />
	It is believed to have taken some months for the US and UK to establish with high-enough confidence that FSB Centre 18 was responsible and to co-ordinate public announcements about the activity.
</p>

<p>
	<br />
	A previous advisory from the National Cyber Security Centre, an arm of GCHQ, in January warned of the threat of emails being targeted by both Russia and Iran and further advisories, including to high-profile individuals, are being issued later on Thursday.
</p>

<p>
	<br />
	All of those who are known to have been hacked have been informed.
</p>

<p>
	<br />
	Officials want to increase awareness of the dangers as the UK heads towards an election, likely next year. The US election due next November could also be targeted by hackers.
</p>

<p>
	<br />
	In 2016, a different part of Russian intelligence was accused of stealing and making public emails belonging to Hillary Clinton's campaign, a move some considered significant in a tight race.
</p>

<p>
	<br />
	The hacking group is known by a variety of names including Star Blizzard, Cold River and Seaborgium.
</p>

<p>
	<br />
	A large amount of data is thought to have been stolen by the FSB group in recent years and only a fraction of it has been made public.
</p>

<p>
	<br />
	Asked if they could leak more data they have collected, western officials said: "There is no evidence of that intent. There is that possibility. They have collected a lot of information."
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<strong><a href="https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-67647548" rel="external nofollow">Source</a></strong>
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">20472</guid><pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2023 15:09:37 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Microsoft appoints new CISO, shifts security leadership</title><link>https://nsaneforums.com/news/security-privacy-news/microsoft-appoints-new-ciso-shifts-security-leadership-r20462/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	According to a recent Business Insider report, Microsoft this week announced leadership changes to its information security team, appointing a new Chief Information Security Officer (CISO) to take over on January 1st. Igor Tsyganskiy, formerly Chief Technology Officer at hedge fund Bridgewater Associates, will assume the CISO position.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The current CISO, Bret Arsenault, is transitioning into a new role as Chief Cybersecurity Officer after serving over 8 years as CISO. Arsenault’s deputy CISO, Aanchal Gupta, is also departing Microsoft to take an advisory position in the Office Product Group.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The shifts suggest Microsoft’s security leadership, headed by Corporate Vice President for Security, Compliance, Identity &amp; Management Charlie Bell, aims to revamp the company’s internal security strategy. As one unnamed senior employee stated, “It feels like Charlie brought in a leader who can shake things up.”
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	As CISO, Tsyganskiy will be responsible for securing Microsoft’s global business operations and establishing security standards for the company’s products and services. This comes as Microsoft invests heavily in new AI capabilities, including a virtual assistant called Security Copilot.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Appointing a new CISO from outside Microsoft indicates Bell’s desire for fresh perspectives on the company’s cybersecurity challenges. With Arsenault and Gupta departing their roles simultaneously, Tsyganskiy has space to overhaul existing security initiatives.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The leadership changes suggest Microsoft perceives a need to modernize its security posture in today’s increasingly complex threat landscape. Tsyganskiy’s experience as Bridgewater’s CTO preps him to manage technical security for a giant corporation like Microsoft.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	It remains to be seen how Microsoft’s new security brass will impact the company’s business divisions and customers. But the appointments make clear that evolving threats require evolving defense.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<strong><a href="https://readwrite.com/microsoft-appoints-new-ciso-shifts-security-leadership/" rel="external nofollow">Source</a></strong>
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">20462</guid><pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2023 21:36:12 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>This huge Russian phishing campaign is hitting targets across the world</title><link>https://nsaneforums.com/news/security-privacy-news/this-huge-russian-phishing-campaign-is-hitting-targets-across-the-world-r20459/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	<span style="font-size:22px;">Russian state-sponsored group is ramping up its phishing efforts</span>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Cybersecurity researchers have observed a significant uptick in Russian phishing campaigns targeting government agencies and other organizations in the West.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	In a new research report, Proofpoint said that it spotted APT28, AKA Fancy Bear, distributing a larger amount of malicious emails to targets across Europe and North America. 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The campaign started in March 2023 and resulted in tens of thousands of phishing emails sent to organizations in government, aerospace, education, finance, manufacturing, and technology sectors.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<span style="font-size:22px;"><strong>Outlook and WinRAR</strong></span>
</p>

<p>
	<br />
	US intelligence puts Fancy Bear under the direct command of the Russian General Staff Main Intelligence Directorate (GRU).
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	These emails carry either malicious files, or links, and try to exploit multiple vulnerabilities that the cybersecurity community discovered, and patched, months ago. This means that Fancy Bear is after organizations that aren’t that diligent when it comes to their systems and endpoints.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Proofpoint singles out two vulnerabilities - CVE-2023-23397, which is an elevation of privilege flaw found in Microsoft Outlook, and CVE-2023-38831, a remote code execution flaw discovered recently in WinRAR. While the former allows ATP28 to exploit TNEF files and grab a hash of the target’s NTLM password, the latter allows for the execution of “arbitrary code when a user attempts to view a benign file within a ZIP archive.” 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	While the campaign’s goal is debatable, it’s most likely to gather intelligence. This could be particularly damaging if the campaign is successful in the government, aerospace, and technology sectors. 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The last time we heard of APT28 was in late spring 2023 year when the group was targeting Ukrainian government employees with information-stealing malware by posing as IT staff working in these institutions. After successfully contacting their targets, the hackers would talk them into running a PowerShell command which would download information-stealing malware.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<strong><a href="https://www.techradar.com/pro/security/this-huge-russian-phishing-campaign-is-hitting-targets-across-the-world" rel="external nofollow">Source</a></strong>
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">20459</guid><pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2023 21:24:49 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Just about every Windows and Linux device vulnerable to new LogoFAIL firmware attack</title><link>https://nsaneforums.com/news/security-privacy-news/just-about-every-windows-and-linux-device-vulnerable-to-new-logofail-firmware-attack-r20449/</link><description><![CDATA[<h3>
	UEFIs booting Windows and Linux devices can be hacked by malicious logo images.
</h3>

<div itemprop="articleBody">
	
	<p>
		Hundreds of Windows and Linux computer models from virtually all hardware makers are vulnerable to a new attack that executes malicious firmware early in the boot-up sequence, a feat that allows infections that are nearly impossible to detect or remove using current defense mechanisms.
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		The attack—dubbed LogoFAIL by the researchers who devised it—is notable for the relative ease in carrying it out, the breadth of both consumer- and enterprise-grade models that are susceptible, and the high level of control it gains over them. In many cases, LogoFAIL can be remotely executed in post-exploit situations using techniques that can’t be spotted by traditional endpoint security products. And because exploits run during the earliest stages of the boot process, they are able to bypass a host of defenses, including the industry-wide Secure Boot, Intel’s Secure Boot, and similar protections from other companies that are devised to prevent so-called bootkit infections.
	</p>

	<h2>
		Game over for platform security
	</h2>

	<p>
		LogoFAIL is a constellation of two dozen newly discovered vulnerabilities that have lurked for years, if not decades, in Unified Extensible Firmware Interfaces responsible for booting modern devices that run Windows or Linux. The vulnerabilities are the product of almost a year’s worth of work by Binarly, a firm that helps customers identify and secure vulnerable firmware.
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		The vulnerabilities are the subject of a coordinated mass disclosure released Wednesday. The participating companies comprise nearly the entirety of the x64 and ARM CPU ecosystem, starting with UEFI suppliers AMI, Insyde, and Phoenix (sometimes still called IBVs or independent BIOS vendors); device manufacturers such as Lenovo, Dell, and HP; and the makers of the CPUs that go inside the devices, usually Intel, AMD or designers of ARM CPUs. The researchers unveiled the attack on Wednesday at the Black Hat Security Conference in London.
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		The affected parties are releasing advisories that disclose which of their products are vulnerable and where to obtain security patches. Links to advisories and a list of vulnerability designations appears at the end of this article.
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		As its name suggests, LogoFAIL involves logos, specifically those of the hardware seller that are displayed on the device screen early in the boot process, while the UEFI is still running. Image parsers in UEFIs from all three major IBVs are riddled with roughly a dozen critical vulnerabilities that have gone unnoticed until now. By replacing the legitimate logo images with identical-looking ones that have been specially crafted to exploit these bugs, LogoFAIL makes it possible to execute malicious code at the most sensitive stage of the boot process, which is known as DXE, short for Driver Execution Environment.
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		“Once arbitrary code execution is achieved during the DXE phase, it’s game over for platform security,” researchers from Binarly, the security firm that discovered the vulnerabilities, wrote in a whitepaper. “From this stage, we have full control over the memory and the disk of the target device, thus including the operating system that will be started.”
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		From there, LogoFAIL can deliver a second-stage payload that drops an executable onto the hard drive before the main OS has even started. The following video demonstrates a proof-of-concept exploit created by the researchers. The infected device—a Gen 2 Lenovo ThinkCentre M70s running an 11th-Gen Intel Core with a UEFI released in June—runs standard firmware defenses, including Secure Boot and Intel Boot Guard.
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<div class="ipsEmbeddedVideo" contenteditable="false">
		<div>
			<iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="113" src="https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/EufeOPe6eqk?feature=oembed" title="Finding LogoFAIL: The Dangers of Image Parsing During System Boot" width="200"></iframe>
		</div>
	</div>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		In an email, Binarly founder and CEO Alex Matrosov wrote:
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<blockquote class="QuoteNewsStyle">
		<p>
			LogoFAIL is a newly discovered set of high-impact security vulnerabilities affecting different image parsing libraries used in the system firmware by various vendors during the device boot process. These vulnerabilities are present in most cases inside reference code, impacting not a single vendor but the entire ecosystem across this code and device vendors where it is used. This attack can give a threat actor an advantage in bypassing most endpoint security solutions and delivering a stealth firmware bootkit that will persist in a firmware capsule with a modified logo image.
		</p>
	</blockquote>
</div>

<div itemprop="articleBody">
	<h2>
		Hijacking the execution flow
	</h2>

	<p>
		There are several ways to exploit LogoFAIL. Remote attacks work by first exploiting an unpatched vulnerability in a browser, media player, or other app and using the administrative control gained to replace the legitimate logo image processed early in the boot process with an identical-looking one that exploits a parser flaw. The other way is to gain brief access to a vulnerable device while it’s unlocked and replace the legitimate image file with a malicious one.
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		In either case, the malicious logo causes the UEFI to execute attacker-created code during the all-important DXE phase each time the device boots. By executing code in this early stage, when most of the system initialization is performed, an exploit hijacks all execution flow that follows, allowing it to bypass security defenses such as Secure Boot and hardware-based verified boot mechanisms such as Intel Boot Guard, AMD Hardware-Validated Boot, or ARM TrustZone-based Secure Boot.
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		Depending on how the UEFI is configured, a simple copy/paste command, executed either by the malicious image or with physical access, is in many cases all that’s required to place the malicious image into what’s known as the ESP, short for EFI System Partition, a region of the hard drive that stores boot loaders, kernel images, and any device drivers, system utilities, or other data files needed before the main OS loads.
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		There are major benefits to this approach. One is that no executable code ever touches the hard drive, a technique known as <a href="https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2017/02/a-rash-of-invisible-fileless-malware-is-infecting-banks-around-the-globe/" rel="external nofollow">fileless malware</a> that hampers detection by antivirus and other types of endpoint protection software. Another benefit: Once the image is in place, it ensures a device remains infected even when an operating system is reinstalled or the main hard drive is replaced.
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		When UEFI-based system firmware is configured to use protections like Intel Boot Guard correctly with a non-modifiable logo, it’s not possible to drop the malicious image into the ESP. In many of these cases, however, it’s still possible to run a software tool freely available from the IBV or device vendor website that reflashes the firmware from the OS. To pass security checks, the tool installs the same cryptographically signed UEFI firmware already in use, with only the logo image, which doesn’t require a valid digital signature, changed. In many cases, the IBV tool is digitally signed, making it less likely that endpoint protections will intervene.
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		In Wednesday's presentation, the researchers provided the following image to illustrate how LogoFAIL attacks work.
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		<img alt="3-steps-of-logofail-640x791.jpg" class="ipsImage" data-ratio="84.38" height="540" width="436" src="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/3-steps-of-logofail-640x791.jpg">
	</p>

	<div>
		<em>An illustration showing the three steps in LogoFAIL attacks.</em>
	</div>

	<div>
		<em>Binarly</em>
	</div>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		In the whitepaper accompanying the presentation, the researchers wrote:
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<blockquote class="QuoteNewsStyle">
		<p>
			As it’s possible to see from the previous picture, a LogoFAIL attack can be divided in three different steps. First, the attacker prepares a malicious logo image and stores it into the ESP or inside an unsigned section of a firmware update, and it restarts the device. During the boot process, vulnerable firmware will load the malicious logo from the ESP and parse it with a vulnerable image parser, thus the attacker can hijack the execution flow by exploiting a vulnerability in the parser itself. By exploiting this threat, the attacker can achieve arbitrary code execution during the DXE phase, which means complete game-over for platform security.
		</p>

		<p>
			 
		</p>

		<p>
			<img alt="logofail-vs-blacklotus-640x763.jpg" class="ipsImage" data-ratio="84.38" height="540" width="452" src="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/logofail-vs-blacklotus-640x763.jpg">
		</p>

		<div>
			<em>This picture reflects the influence of UEFI firmware boot process and </em>
		</div>

		<div>
			<em>shows the difference between the BlackLotus exploit, which is less </em>
		</div>

		<div>
			<em>impactful than LogoFAIL.</em>
		</div>

		<div>
			<em>Binarly</em>
		</div>

		<p>
			 
		</p>

		<p>
			In short, what is exactly the impact of our findings and what makes LogoFAIL so dangerous? As we can see in the previous picture:
		</p>

		<p>
			 
		</p>

		<p>
			LogoFAIL doesn’t require any physical access to the device. Since it can be done entirely from the operating system, it completely breaks any security boundary between the OS and firmware. Modern “below-the-OS” defenses, such as Secure Boot, are also completely ineffective at stopping this threat.
		</p>

		<p>
			 
		</p>

		<p>
			Attacks starting from the firmware level can be leveraged to install a bootkit and subvert any OS-level security mechanism, while remaining completely undetectable by security detection solutions.
		</p>

		<p>
			 
		</p>

		<p>
			Since LogoFAIL targets UEFI specific code, this new threat is not confined to a single architecture, but it's instead another example of cross-silicon exploitation that affects both x86 and ARM devices.
		</p>
	</blockquote>
</div>

<div itemprop="articleBody">
	<h2>
		Is there a fuzzer in the house?
	</h2>

	<p>
		The researchers found the vulnerabilities by running the UEFI image parsers through a tool known as a fuzzer. Fuzzers are designed to identify programming bugs by executing small chunks of code over and over with small variations in the input each time. Each time there’s a crash, the fuzzer notes the memory address where it occurred and the input that triggered it. Further analysis using other tools and processes enabled researchers to isolate the bugs that allow the execution of arbitrary code or other types of vulnerabilities.
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		“When the campaign finished, we were overwhelmed by the amount of crashes we found, so much that triaging them manually was quite complicated,” the researchers wrote. In all, they identified 24 unique root causes, 13 of which they believe are exploitable.
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		The results raise a vexing question: If fuzzers identified so many exploitable vulnerabilities, why hadn’t the developers of the UEFIs (often called IBVs or independent BIOS vendors) and the OEMs selling the devices already used these tools and fixed the underlying bugs? The Binarly researchers continued:
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<blockquote class="QuoteNewsStyle">
		<p>
			This triaging process gave us a good understanding of the root causes behind these bugs. While they cover a wide range of software security problems, the underlying theme is a lack of validation on attacker-supplied data. For example, the first screenshot shows a bug in the BMP parser of AMI: the pointer called “Image” is initialized by adding to the image starting address (&amp;Header-&gt;CharB) the header field “ImageOffset”. As this offset can be set arbitrarily by an attacker, the variable “Image” can be made to point almost anywhere in memory. The second screenshot is taken from the PNG parser of AMI and it doesn’t contain only one bug, but actually two. The first bug is a missing check on the return value of the “EfiLibAllocateZeroPool” function, which returns NULL on failure. The second bug is instead an integer overflow on the 32-bit integer representing the allocation size. When the attacker sets the variable “PngWidth” to a large value, the multiplication by two will make the result overflow around and become a small value (for example: 0x80000200 * 2 = 0x400). In this way, the attacker can force the allocation of a buffer that is too small to hold the decoded PNG data and thus overflow the buffer when it will be used.
		</p>

		<p>
			 
		</p>

		<p>
			<img alt="ami-bmp-parser-640x163.jpg" class="ipsImage" data-ratio="25.47" height="163" width="640" src="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/ami-bmp-parser-640x163.jpg">
		</p>

		<div>
			<em>BMP image parsing code found in a UEFI from AMI</em>
		</div>

		<div>
			<em>Binarly</em>
		</div>

		<p>
			 
		</p>

		<p>
			<img alt="ami-png-parser-640x127.jpg" class="ipsImage" data-ratio="19.84" height="127" width="640" src="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/ami-png-parser-640x127.jpg">
		</p>

		<div>
			<em>PNG image parsing code found in a UEFI from AMI.</em>
		</div>

		<div>
			<em>Binarly</em>
		</div>

		<p>
			 
		</p>

		<p>
			The results from our fuzzing campaign unequivocally say that none of these image parsers were ever tested by IBVs or OEMs. We can confidently say this because the fuzzer was able to find some crashes just after running for a few seconds and we found crashes in almost every parser we tested.
		</p>
	</blockquote>

	<p>
		Because the image-parser vulnerabilities exploited by LogoFAIL reside in the UEFI, Macs, smartphones, and other devices that rely on alternative boot mechanisms aren’t affected. Interestingly, even when Apple relied on UEFI to boot an earlier generation of Macs that ran Intel CPUs, they still weren’t vulnerable to LogoFAIL. The reason: Apple hardcoded the image files into the UEFI, making it impossible to swap the legitimate one for a malicious lookalike. As a developer of both the hardware and software running Macs, Apple had that ability. The diversity of ecosystems revolving around Windows and Linux platforms requires more flexibility.
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		Many devices sold by Dell aren't directly exploitable because the image files are protected by Intel Boot Guard, making it impossible to be replaced, even during a physical attack. As a further measure, many Dell devices don't permit logo customization. While those designs effectively close off the LogoFAIL attack surface, Binarly recommends patching the high-severity image parsing vulnerabilities, "as they represent a hazard that could inadvertently turn into a security issue."
	</p>
</div>

<div itemprop="articleBody">
	<h2>
		A brief history of firmware exploits
	</h2>

	<p>
		LogoFAIL builds off a large corpus of research conducted over more than a decade. Hijacking the boot sequence by exploiting image-parsing bugs in UEFIs was first demonstrated in a <a href="https://www.blackhat.com/presentations/bh-usa-09/WOJTCZUK/BHUSA09-Wojtczuk-AtkIntelBios-SLIDES.pdf" rel="external nofollow">2009 Black Hat presentation</a> by researchers Rafal Wojtczuk and Alexander Tereshkin. Since then, there has been a steady stream of new discoveries provided in both follow-on research and, in a few cases, attacks found in the wild from real-world threat actors.
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		The first known case of a real-world attack harnessing the power of the UEFI came in 2018 with the discovery of malware dubbed <a href="https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2018/10/first-uefi-malware-discovered-in-wild-is-laptop-security-software-hijacked-by-russians/" rel="external nofollow">LoJax</a>. A repurposed version of legitimate anti-theft software known as LoJack, LoJax was created by the Kremlin-backed hacking group tracked under names including Sednit, Fancy Bear, and APT 28. The malware was installed remotely using malware tools that can read and overwrite parts of the UEFI firmware’s flash memory.
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		In 2020, researchers unearthed the second known instance of real-world <a href="https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2020/10/custom-made-uefi-bootkit-found-lurking-in-the-wild/" rel="external nofollow">malware attacking the UEFI</a>. Each time an infected device rebooted, its UEFI checked if a malicious file was present inside the Windows startup folder and, if not, would install it. Researchers from Kaspersky, the security provider that discovered the malware and named it “MosaicRegressor," still don’t know how the UEFI came to be infected. One possibility is that the PCs received a fake UEFI update. Another possibility was gaining brief physical access to a device and using a specially designed USB drive to infect the UEFI.
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		Since then, a handful of new UEFI bootkits have come to light. They are tracked under names including ESpecter, FinSpy, and MoonBounce. In response to the threats, device makers started introducing measures to better lock down the UEFI boot process.
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		Key among the defenses is Secure Boot, an industry-wide standard that uses cryptographic signatures to ensure that each piece of software used during startup is trusted by a computer's manufacturer. Secure Boot is designed to create a chain of trust that prevents attackers from replacing the intended bootup firmware with malicious firmware. If a single link in the startup chain isn’t recognized, Secure Boot will prevent the device from starting.
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		Earlier this year, researchers from security firm ESET discovered the first known instance of UEFI malware that <a href="https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2023/03/unkillable-uefi-malware-bypassing-secure-boot-enabled-by-unpatchable-windows-flaw/" rel="external nofollow">bypasses Secure Boot</a>. The ability of the UEFI bootkit, which was dubbed Black Lotus, to defeat a security protection that had been in place for 12 years was impressive, but it suffered a key limitation—it could be killed by performing a simple reinstallation of the main operating system. LogoFAIL has no such limitation. As long as the malicious image is executed by the UEFI, the machine running the firmware will remain infected. The following image, shown earlier in this article, contrasts the differences between LogoFAIL and Black Lotus.
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		<img alt="logofail-vs-blacklotus-640x763.jpg" class="ipsImage" data-ratio="84.38" height="540" width="452" src="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/logofail-vs-blacklotus-640x763.jpg">
	</p>

	<div>
		<em>This image reflects the influence of the UEFI firmware boot process and </em>
	</div>

	<div>
		<em>shows the difference between the BlackLotus exploit, which is less </em>
	</div>

	<div>
		<em>impactful than LogoFAIL, and LogoFAIL.</em>
	</div>

	<div>
		<em>Binarly</em>
	</div>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		There’s no indication that LogoFAIL vulnerabilities have been actively exploited in the wild, but there’s also little way one would know, since infections are so hard to spot using traditional tools and methods. One clue of compromise, however, can be provided by examining the image file that’s parsed during bootup. If the cryptographic hash of that file differs from the hash of the file that device manufacturers typically make available for free, the device can be further analyzed to check for signs that it has been exploited.
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		LogoFAIL vulnerabilities are tracked under the following designations:
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<ul>
		<li>
			CVE-2023-5058
		</li>
		<li>
			CVE-2023-39538
		</li>
		<li>
			CVE-2023-39539
		</li>
		<li>
			<a href="https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2023-40238" rel="external nofollow">CVE-2023-40238</a>
		</li>
	</ul>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		This list is currently incomplete. Advisories are available from roughly a dozen parties. A non-exhaustive list of companies releasing advisories includes <a href="https://9443417.fs1.hubspotusercontent-na1.net/hubfs/9443417/Security%20Advisories/AMI-SA-2023009.pdf" rel="external nofollow">AMI</a>, <a href="https://www.insyde.com/security-pledge/SA-2023053" rel="external nofollow">Insyde</a>, <a href="https://www.phoenix.com/security-notifications/cve-2023-5058" rel="external nofollow">Phoenix</a>, and <a href="https://support.lenovo.com/us/en/product_security/LEN-145284" rel="external nofollow">Lenovo</a>. The complete list wasn’t available at publication time. People who want to know if a specific device is vulnerable should check with the manufacturer.
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		The best way to prevent LogoFAIL attacks is to install the UEFI security updates that are being released as part of Wednesday’s coordinated disclosure process. Those patches will be distributed by the manufacturer of the device or the motherboard running inside the device. It’s also a good idea, when possible, to configure UEFIs to use multiple layers of defenses. Besides Secure Boot, this includes both Intel Boot Guard and, when available, Intel BIOS Guard. There are similar additional defenses available for devices running AMD or ARM CPUs.
	</p>
</div>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<a href="https://arstechnica.com/security/2023/12/just-about-every-windows-and-linux-device-vulnerable-to-new-logofail-firmware-attack/" rel="external nofollow">Source</a>
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">20449</guid><pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2023 18:55:30 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Fancy Bear goes phishing in US, European high-value networks</title><link>https://nsaneforums.com/news/security-privacy-news/fancy-bear-goes-phishing-in-us-european-high-value-networks-r20439/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	<span style="font-size:22px;">GRU-linked crew going after our code warns Microsoft - Outlook not good</span>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Fancy Bear, the Kremlin's cyber-spy crew, has been exploiting two previously patched bugs for large-scale phishing campaigns against high-value targets – like government, defense, and aerospace agencies in the US and Europe – since March, according to Microsoft. 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The US and UK governments have linked this state-sponsored gang to Russia's military intelligence agency, the GRU. Its latest phishing expeditions look to exploit CVE-2023-23397, a Microsoft Outlook elevation of privilege flaw, and  CVE-2023-38831, a WinRAR remote code execution flaw that allows arbitrary code execution.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Microsoft initially patched the Outlook bug in March. It warned at the time that the flaw had already been exploited in the wild by miscreants in Russia against government, energy, and military sectors in Europe – with a specific focus on Ukraine, according to the EU's CERT org. Two months later, Redmond issued an additional fix.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	On Monday, Microsoft updated its March guidance for organizations investigating attacks exploiting this Exchange hole, and reported that Fancy Bear has been "actively exploiting CVE-2023-23397 to provide secret, unauthorized access to email accounts within Exchange servers."
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Microsoft tracks Fancy Bear as Forest Blizzard, and it used to call the GRU-backed group Strontium. Other threat hunters call it APT28 and TA422.
</p>

<p>
	Some of the compromised Outlook accounts belong to Polish public and private orgs, according to the Polish Cyber Command (DKWOC), which partnered with Microsoft to investigate the attacks.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	"In cases identified by Cyber Command, folders permissions were modified, among others, in mailboxes that were high-value information targets for the adversary," the Polish agency stated in its advisory.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	"As a result of this change, the adversary was able to gain unauthorized access to the resources of high-value informational mailboxes through any compromised email account in the Exchange organization, using the Exchange Web Services (EWS) protocol," the alert continued.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	"It should be emphasized that the introduction of such modifications allows for the maintenance of unauthorized access to the contents of the mailbox even after losing direct access to it."
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	In separate analysis published on Tuesday, security biz Proofpoint advised it spotted a "significant deviation from expected volumes of emails sent in campaigns exploiting" the Outlook vulnerability. 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Specifically, more than 10,000 emails that Proofpoint has attributed to Fancy Bear were sent during the late summer. All came from a single email provider, to defense, aerospace, technology, government, and manufacturing firms across North America and Europe.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	"Their actions indicate that they seek to discover easily exploitable networks that have strategic interest to the adversary," Greg Lesnewich, senior threat researcher at Proofpoint, told The Register. "However, it's unclear if the quantity of emails – more than 10,000 total since August 2023 – has been a tactical decision or an operator error."
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The security shop also noted occasional, smaller-volume phishing campaigns targeting higher education, construction, and consulting businesses.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	CVE-2023-23397 can be exploited by a remote, unauthenticated attacker to access a victim's Net-NTLMv2 hash by sending a tailored email to a compromised system, then use the hash to authenticate the attacker, thus gaining access to email communications. 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	"For all the late summer 2023 campaigns, TA422 sent malicious emails from various Portugalmail addresses with the subject line 'Test Meeting' and identical message body of 'Test meeting, please ignore this message,'" the intel team explained.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	These phishing emails contained an appointment attachment, using a TNEF file disguised as a CSV, Excel file, or Word document. The malicious extension contained a UNC path that directed traffic to an SMB listener hosted on a likely compromised Ubiquiti router, according to Proofpoint.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	In the past, Fancy Bear has used compromised routers to host its command-and-control nodes, or NTLM listeners [PDF]. "The compromised routers act as listeners for the NTLM authentication where they can record inbound credential hashes without extensive engagement with the target network," the researchers explained.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<span style="font-size:22px;"><strong>Don't forget WinRAR</strong></span>
</p>

<p>
	<br />
	Plus, using a different set of Portugalmail email addresses the Russian spies also sent phishes exploiting a WinRAR vulnerability, CVE-2023-32231, according to Proofpoint. This vulnerability, which allows miscreants to execute malware hidden inside legitimate files, was fixed in August – but, it appears, not patched by enough people. 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	For this campaign, the Russians spoofed geopolitical organizations and used the BRICS Summit and a European Parliament meeting as subject lures. 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	This campaign is not the same one that other security orgs including Google TAG have previously highlighted as abusing WinRAR, we're told. 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Proofpoint explained that the September phishing campaign uses RAR file attachments that exploit CVE-2023-32231 to drop a .cmd file and establish communications with a Responder listener server. "The .cmd file attempted to modify proxy settings in registry, download a lure document, and beacon to an IP-literal Responder server," according to the report.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Unsuprisingly, the security shop expects the criminals to continue exploiting both bugs in unpatched systems.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Lesnewich told us "The payloads, tactics, and techniques used in these campaigns reflect TA422's ultimate shift away from compiled malware for persistent access on targeted networks to lighter-weight, credential-oriented access." ®
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<strong><a href="https://www.theregister.com/2023/12/06/fancy_bear_phishing_microsoft/" rel="external nofollow">Source</a></strong>
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">20439</guid><pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2023 00:53:45 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Gmail&#x2019;s AI-powered spam detection is its biggest security upgrade in years</title><link>https://nsaneforums.com/news/security-privacy-news/gmail%E2%80%99s-ai-powered-spam-detection-is-its-biggest-security-upgrade-in-years-r20417/</link><description><![CDATA[<h3>
	Gmail's spam filters can now understand "adversarial text manipulations."
</h3>

<div class="article-content post-page" itemprop="articleBody">
	
	<p>
		The latest post on the <a href="https://security.googleblog.com/2023/11/improving-text-classification.html" rel="external nofollow">Google Security blog</a> details a new upgrade to Gmail's spam filters that Google is calling "one of the largest defense upgrades in recent years." The upgrade comes in the form of a new text classification system called RETVec (Resilient &amp; Efficient Text Vectorizer). Google says this can help understand "adversarial text manipulations"—these are emails full of special characters, emojis, typos, and other junk characters that previously were legible by humans but not easily understandable by machines. Previously, spam emails full of special characters made it through Gmail's defenses easily.
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		If you want an example of what "adversarial text manipulation" looks like, the below message is something from my spam folder. My personal Gmail experience with these emails is that they used to be a major problem during the first half of the year, with emails like this regularly landing in my inbox. It does seem like this RETVec tech upgrade works, though, because emails like this haven't been a problem at all for me in the last few months.
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<figure class="image shortcode-img full-width" style="width:980px">
		<img alt="floorp_69j3MIP2KP-980x794.png" class="ipsImage" data-ratio="75.10" height="540" width="666" src="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/floorp_69j3MIP2KP-980x794.png">
		<figcaption class="caption">
			<div class="caption-text">
				<em>An example of "adversarial text manipulation" from my spam folder.</em>
			</div>

			<div class="caption-credit">
				<em>Ron Amadeo</em>
			</div>
		</figcaption>
	</figure>

	<p>
		Emails like this have been so difficult to classify because, while any spam filter could probably swat down an email that says, "Congratulations! A balance of $1,000 is available for your jackpot account," that's not what this email actually says. A big portion of the letters here are "<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homoglyph" rel="external nofollow">homoglyphs</a>"—by diving into the endless depths of the Unicode standard, you can find obscure characters that look like they're part of the normal Latin alphabet but actually aren't.
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		For instance, the subject "𝐂𝐡𝐞𝐜𝐤_𝐘𝐨𝐮𝐫_𝐀𝐜𝐜𝐨𝐮𝐧𝐭" is weirdly bolded not because it has bolded styling but because it uses Unicode glyphs like the "<a href="https://www.compart.com/en/unicode/U+1D402" rel="external nofollow">Mathematical Bold Capital C</a>." It's a math symbol that happens to look like the letter "C" to people, but the robot doing spam filtering accurately views it as a math symbol and doesn't understand the intended English meaning. The closer you look at an email like this, the worse it gets: "C0NGRATULATIONS" has a zero replacing one of the "O" characters, the underlined letters in "Jᴀ̲ᴄ̲ᴋ̲pot" are so strange they don't even come up in Unicode searches, and a lot of spaces are swapped out for periods or underscores. The result is that a spam filter looks at this <em>hot mess</em> of an email and basically gives up. (I don't understand why illegible emails default to "inbox" instead of "spam," but I'm not in charge.)
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		Google says RETVec is here to save the day: "RETVec is trained to be resilient against character-level manipulations including insertion, deletion, typos, homoglyphs, LEET substitution, and more. The RETVec model is trained on top of a novel character encoder which can encode all UTF-8 characters and words efficiently. Thus, RETVec works out-of-the-box on over 100 languages without the need for a lookup table or fixed vocabulary size."
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		Google says the efficiency here is a big deal. Alternative approaches that used a "fixed vocabulary size" or "lookup table" for homoglyphs made them resource-intensive to run. Imagine a list of every possible spelling and misspelling of "congratulations" that swaps out one or more characters for numbers, math symbols, Cyrillic, Hebrew, or emojis, and you have a nearly endless list. Google says RETVec is only 200,000 "instead of millions of parameters," so while Google's spam-filtering cloud is probably big enough to run anything, this is small enough that it could even run on a local device. RETVec <a href="https://github.com/google-research/retvec" rel="external nofollow">is open source</a>, and Google hopes it will rid the world of homoglyph attacks, so even your local comment section could be running it someday.
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		RETVec appears to work a lot like how humans read: It's a machine-learning TensorFlow model that uses visual "similarity" to identify what words mean instead of their actual character content. Google's <a href="https://github.com/tensorflow/similarity/" rel="external nofollow">similarity demo</a> uses the same technology to identify pictures of cats, so turning that into the world's fanciest optical character recognition system sounds pretty doable. Apparently, this approach has led to big improvements, with Google saying: "Replacing the Gmail spam classifier’s previous text vectorizer with RETVec allowed us to improve the spam detection rate over the baseline by 38% and reduce the false positive rate by 19.4%. Additionally, using RETVec reduced the TPU usage of the model by 83%, making the RETVec deployment one of the largest defense upgrades in recent years."
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		Google says it has been testing RETVec internally "for the past year," and it has already rolled out to your Gmail account.
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>
</div>

<p>
	<a href="https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2023/12/gmails-ai-powered-spam-detection-is-its-biggest-security-upgrade-in-years/" rel="external nofollow">Source</a>
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">20417</guid><pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2023 08:45:38 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Hackers stole ancestry data of 6.9 million users, 23andMe finally confirmed</title><link>https://nsaneforums.com/news/security-privacy-news/hackers-stole-ancestry-data-of-69-million-users-23andme-finally-confirmed-r20412/</link><description><![CDATA[<h3>
	Majority of impacted users are now being notified, 23andMe confirmed.
</h3>

<div class="article-content post-page" itemprop="articleBody">
	
	<p>
		It's now been confirmed that an additional 6.9 million 23andMe users had ancestry data stolen after hackers accessed thousands of accounts by likely reusing previously leaked passwords.
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		23andMe previously disclosed in a <a href="https://www.sec.gov/ix?doc=/Archives/edgar/data/1804591/000119312523287449/d242666d8ka.htm" rel="external nofollow">Securities and Exchange Commission filing</a> that 0.1 percent of users—approximately 14,000, <a href="https://techcrunch.com/2023/12/04/23andme-confirms-hackers-stole-ancestry-data-on-6-9-million-users/" rel="external nofollow">TechCrunch estimated</a>—had accounts accessed by hackers using compromised passwords.
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		After the cyberattack was reported, <a href="https://www.wired.com/story/23andme-credential-stuffing-data-stolen/" rel="external nofollow">Wired estimated</a> that "at least a million data points from 23andMe accounts" that were "exclusively about Ashkenazi Jews" and data points from "hundreds of thousands of users of Chinese descent" seemed to be exposed. But beyond those estimates, for two months, all the public knew was that 23andMe's filing noted that “a significant number of files containing profile information about other users’ ancestry" were also accessed.
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		TechCrunch pushed 23andMe to verify exactly how many "other users" were impacted, prompting a spokesperson to confirm that two groups of users who opted into the DNA Relatives feature had their personal data stolen.
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		23andMe <a href="https://customercare.23andme.com/hc/en-us/articles/115004659068-DNA-Relatives-The-Genetic-Relative-Basics" rel="external nofollow">describes</a> the DNA Relatives feature as "one of the most interactive features" offered on the site, "allowing you to find and connect with genetic relatives and learn more about your family." By opting in, users hope to find lost family members by willingly giving others access to information like their birth year, current location, and ancestors' names and birth locations. Users can opt out at any time, but if they do, it makes it harder to detect relatives "on any branch of your family tree," the website says.
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		The largest group, spanning about 5.5 million users, was hacked after opting into automatically sharing information with DNA Relatives, including their "name, birth year, relationship labels, the percentage of DNA shared with relatives, ancestry reports, and self-reported location," TechCrunch reported. The smaller group, about 1.4 million users, shared "Family Tree profile information" that was hacked, including display names, relationship labels, birth year, and self-reported location, TechCrunch reported.
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		Asked for comment, a 23andMe spokesperson linked Ars to a <a href="https://blog.23andme.com/articles/addressing-data-security-concerns" rel="external nofollow">blog</a> noting that all impacted users are currently being notified. The company has not clarified why it did not disclose these exact numbers when announcing the cyberattack. According to TechCrunch, these new numbers suggest that nearly half of 23andMe's 14 million users were hacked.
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		When the hack was first reported, a nonprofit dedicated to defending online privacy, the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), <a href="https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2023/10/what-do-if-youre-concerned-about-23andme-breach" rel="external nofollow">reported</a> that "there are no federal laws that clearly protect users of online genetic testing sites like 23andMe." While 23andMe recommended that all users strengthen their passwords, EFF went one step further and suggested that users consider disabling the DNA Relatives feature, especially if they're not actively using it. EFF also provided a tutorial for users preparing to download their 23andMe data and delete their accounts.
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		To entice users to stick around, 23andMe has also worked to enhance account security since the breach, its blog said.
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		"We have taken steps to further protect customer data, including requiring all existing customers to reset their password and requiring two-step verification for all new and existing customers," the blog said. "The company will continue to invest in protecting our systems and data."
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		23andMe says that its investigation has concluded, but it appears its troubles have only begun. The popular DNA testing site told the SEC that it expects to spend $1 million to $2 million responding to the incident through the end of the fiscal year. 23andMe also reported that it's defending against multiple class-action lawsuits filed in US federal and state courts, as well as courts in British Columbia and Ontario, Canada. Consumers in California have also filed complaints under the California Consumer Privacy Act, and various governmental officials and agencies have made inquiries.
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		"The full scope of the costs and related impacts of this incident and related litigation, including, without limitation, the availability of insurance to offset some of these costs, cannot be estimated at this time," the SEC filing said.
	</p>
</div>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<a href="https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2023/12/hackers-stole-ancestry-data-of-6-9-million-users-23andme-finally-confirmed/" rel="external nofollow">Source</a>
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">20412</guid><pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2023 08:38:07 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Fake WordPress security advisory pushes backdoor plugin</title><link>https://nsaneforums.com/news/security-privacy-news/fake-wordpress-security-advisory-pushes-backdoor-plugin-r20396/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	WordPress administrators are being emailed fake WordPress security advisories for a fictitious vulnerability tracked as CVE-2023-45124 to infect sites with a malicious plugin.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The campaign has been caught and reported by WordPress security experts at <a href="https://www.wordfence.com/blog/2023/12/psa-fake-cve-2023-45124-phishing-scam-tricks-users-into-installing-backdoor-plugin/" rel="external nofollow" target="_blank">Wordfence</a> and <a href="https://patchstack.com/articles/fake-cve-phishing-campaign-tricks-wordpress-users-to-install-malware/" rel="external nofollow" target="_blank">PatchStack</a>, who published alerts on their sites to raise awareness.
</p>

<h2>
	Fake WordPress update
</h2>

<p>
	The emails pretend to be from WordPress, warning that a new critical remote code execution (RCE) flaw in the platform was detected on the admin's site, urging them to download and install a plugin that allegedly addresses the security issue.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<div style="text-align:center">
	<p style="text-align: left;">
		<img alt="phishing-email.png" class="ipsImage" data-ratio="75.10" height="377" width="720" src="https://www.bleepstatic.com/images/news/u/1220909/2023/Phishing/23/phishing-email.png">
	</p>

	<div style="text-align: left;">
		<em>Phishing email impersonating a WordPress security advisorySource: PatchStack</em>
	</div>

	<p>
		 
	</p>
</div>

<p>
	Clicking on the email's 'Download Plugin' button takes the victim to a fake landing page at 'en-gb-wordpress[.]org' that looks identical to the legitimate 'wordpress.com' site.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<div style="text-align:center">
	<p style="text-align: left;">
		<img alt="landing-site.png" class="ipsImage" data-ratio="75.10" height="359" width="720" src="https://www.bleepstatic.com/images/news/u/1220909/2023/Phishing/23/landing-site.png">
	</p>

	<div style="text-align: left;">
		<em>Fake WordPress landing pageSource: PatchStack</em>
	</div>

	<p>
		 
	</p>
</div>

<p>
	The entry for the fake plugin shows a likely inflated download count of 500,000, along with multiple phony user reviews elaborating on how the patch restored their compromised site and helped them thwart hacker attacks.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The vast majority of the user reviews are five-star reviews, but four-, three-, and one-star reviews are thrown in to make it appear more realistic.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<div style="text-align:center">
	<p style="text-align: left;">
		<img alt="reviews.png" class="ipsImage" data-ratio="75.10" height="478" width="720" src="https://www.bleepstatic.com/images/news/u/1220909/2023/Phishing/23/reviews.png">
	</p>

	<div style="text-align: left;">
		<em>Fake user reviewsSource: Wordfence</em>
	</div>

	<p>
		 
	</p>
</div>

<p>
	Upon installation, the plugin creates a hidden admin user named 'wpsecuritypatch' and sends information about the victim to the attackers' command and control server (C2) at 'wpgate[.]zip.'
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Next, the plugin downloads a base64-encoded backdoor payload from the C2 and saves it as 'wp-autoload.php' in the website's webroot.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The backdoor features file management capabilities, a SQL client, a PHP console, and a command line terminal and displays detailed information about the server environment to the attackers.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<div style="text-align:center">
	<p style="text-align: left;">
		<img alt="backdoor-func.png" class="ipsImage" data-ratio="53.06" height="266" width="720" src="https://www.bleepstatic.com/images/news/u/1220909/2023/Phishing/23/backdoor-func.png">
	</p>

	<div style="text-align: left;">
		<em>Backdoor functionalitySource: Wordfence</em>
	</div>

	<p>
		 
	</p>
</div>

<p>
	The malicious plugin hides itself from the list of installed plugins, so a manual search on the site's root directory is required to remove it.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<div style="text-align:center">
	<p style="text-align: left;">
		<img alt="hide.png" class="ipsImage" data-ratio="75.10" height="540" width="691" src="https://www.bleepstatic.com/images/news/u/1220909/2023/Phishing/23/hide.png">
	</p>

	<div style="text-align: left;">
		<em>Code to hide the admin user and the malicious pluginSource: PatchStack</em>
	</div>

	<p>
		 
	</p>
</div>

<p>
	At this time, the operational goal of the plugin remains unknown.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	However, PatchStack speculates that it might be used for injecting ads on compromised sites, performing visitor redirection, stealing sensitive information, or even blackmailing owners by threatening to leak their website's database contents.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<a href="https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/fake-wordpress-security-advisory-pushes-backdoor-plugin/" rel="external nofollow">Source</a>
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">20396</guid><pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2023 18:06:28 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Ad Speedup: mute, skip and fast forward ads on YouTube</title><link>https://nsaneforums.com/news/security-privacy-news/ad-speedup-mute-skip-and-fast-forward-ads-on-youtube-r20388/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	Over the past couple of months, a new breed of extensions has emerged to deal with YouTube's ever increasing arsenal of ads. These extensions don't block advertisement on YouTube like traditional content blockers. Instead, they use a different technology to manipulate the ad video stream.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The three core changes are mute, skip and fast forward. Mute turns off the volume, so that ads don't play any sound anymore. The extensions unmute immediately once the actual video starts playing. Then, depending on how the ad is served, these ads are either skipped entirely or fast forwarded.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<a data-wpel-link="external" href="https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/ad-speedup-skip-video-ads/pcjlckhhhmlefmobnnoolakplfppdchi?pli=1" rel="external nofollow" target="_blank">Ad Speedup</a> is the third extension of this new breed of extensions that I review here on this site (there is also a userscript called <a data-wpel-link="external" href="https://github.com/TheRealJoelmatic/RemoveAdblockThing" rel="external nofollow" target="_blank">Remove Adblock Thing</a> which does the same) The first, <a data-wpel-link="internal" href="https://www.ghacks.net/2023/10/28/this-special-youtube-adblocker-skips-ads-instead-of-blocking-them/" rel="external nofollow">Skip and Fast-Forward YouTube ads</a>, was turned into a paid extension unfortunately by its developer. Then came <a data-wpel-link="internal" href="https://www.ghacks.net/2023/11/19/ad-accelerator-mutes-and-speeds-up-youtube-ads/" rel="external nofollow">Ad Accelerator</a>, which offered similar functionality.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Now it is Ad Speedup that promises to make advertisement on YouTube more pleasant to endure. Just like its cousins, Ad Speedup will mute any advertisement on YouTube that you encounter. It will also try to skip ads entirely, if possible, or fast forward them. The fast forward option speeds up ads by the factor 16. In other words, a 30 second ad plays in about 2 seconds with the extension enabled.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<img alt="ad-speedup-chrome-extension.png" class="ipsImage" data-ratio="75.10" height="415" width="720" src="https://www.ghacks.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/ad-speedup-chrome-extension.png">
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<div class="rvloader-container mb--10" id="td-incontent-1281254663480">
	<script class="rvloader">!function(){var t="td-incontent-"+Math.floor(Math.random()*Date.now()),e=document.getElementsByClassName("rvloader"),n=e[e.length-1].parentNode;undefined==n.getAttribute("id")&&(n.setAttribute("id",t),revamp.displaySlots([t]))}();</script>
</div>

<p>
	First the basics. Ad Speedup is a Chrome extension. It is  currently available on the Chrome Web Store and compatible with Google Chrome and all other Chromium-based browsers (including Brave, Edge, Vivaldi and Opera).
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The extension works automatically, there is nothing that users need to configure or enable. It runs only on YouTube and will apply its magic to any video ads that you may encounter on the site.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Note that extensions don't run in private windows by default. You need to manage the extension and allow it to run in private browsing mode if you require that.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	This type of extension works different when compared to content blockers. Content blockers try to block ads so that they never show on the user's screen, not even for the fraction of a second. Ad Speedup and other extensions of its kind skip or fast forward ads. This is not ad-blocking in the common sense, but it means that you may notice ads for a fraction of a second before the actual video plays.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	At the very least, these extensions are a good backup option<a data-wpel-link="internal" href="https://www.ghacks.net/2023/12/03/soon-google-has-even-more-leverage-against-adblockers/" rel="external nofollow"> once Google makes</a> Manifest V3 mandatory in mid-2024 in Chrome.
</p>

<div class="rvloader-container mb--10" id="td-incontent-979097502455">
	<script class="rvloader">!function(){var t="td-incontent-"+Math.floor(Math.random()*Date.now()),e=document.getElementsByClassName("rvloader"),n=e[e.length-1].parentNode;undefined==n.getAttribute("id")&&(n.setAttribute("id",t),revamp.displaySlots([t]))}();</script>
</div>

<div id="div-gpt-ad-1524862513262-0">
	 
</div>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<a href="https://www.ghacks.net/2023/12/03/ad-speedup-mute-skip-and-fast-forward-ads-on-youtube/" rel="external nofollow">Source</a>
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">20388</guid><pubDate>Sun, 03 Dec 2023 22:11:50 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Chrome&#x2019;s next weapon in the War on Ad Blockers: Slower extension updates</title><link>https://nsaneforums.com/news/security-privacy-news/chrome%E2%80%99s-next-weapon-in-the-war-on-ad-blockers-slower-extension-updates-r20376/</link><description><![CDATA[<h3>
	When ad blocking is a cat-and-mouse game, make the mouse slower.
</h3>

<div class="article-content post-page" itemprop="articleBody">
	
	<p>
		Google's war on ad blockers is just gearing up, with YouTube doing its best to <a href="https://arstechnica.com/google/2023/11/youtube-tries-to-kill-ad-blockers-in-push-for-ad-dollars-premium-subs/" rel="external nofollow">detect and block</a> ad blockers and Chrome aiming to roll out the ad block-limiting <a href="https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2023/11/google-chrome-will-limit-ad-blockers-starting-june-2024/" rel="external nofollow">Manifest V3 extension platform</a> in June 2024. A new article <a href="https://www.engadget.com/inside-the-arms-race-between-youtube-and-ad-blockers-140031824.html" rel="external nofollow">from Engadget</a> detailing the "arms race" over ad blocking brings up an interesting point regarding the power that YouTube and Chrome have in this battle: a dramatic update advantage over the ad blockers.
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		In addition to hamstringing Chrome's extension platform with no real user-centric justifications, Manifest V3 will also put roadblocks up before extension <em>updates</em>, which will delay an extension developer's ability to quickly respond to changes. YouTube can instantly switch up its ad delivery system, but once Manifest V3 becomes mandatory, that won't be true for extension developers. If ad blocking is a cat-and-mouse game of updates and counter-updates, then Google will force the mouse to slow down.
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		Chrome's "Manifest V3" makes dramatic changes to the Chrome extension platform. The current platform, Manifest V2, has been around for over ten years and works just fine, but it's also quite powerful and allows extensions to have full filtering control over the traffic your web browser sees. That's great for protecting privacy, speeding up the web, and blocking ads, but it also means you can download a browser from the world's biggest ad company and use it to block ads—and that was only going to last for so long.
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		Google's first attack on ad blockers is blowing up the "WebRequest API"—the primary API that ad blockers use—and replacing it with a more limited filtering API that Google has more control over. The new <a href="https://developer.chrome.com/docs/extensions/mv3/intro/mv3-overview/#network-request-modification" rel="external nofollow">declarativeNetRequest</a> API now has extensions <em>ask</em> Chrome to block a network request on their behalf, features arbitrary limits on the number of filtering rules, and puts limits on <a href="https://github.com/uBlockOrigin/uBOL-home/wiki/Frequently-asked-questions-(FAQ)" rel="external nofollow">how effective</a> individual rules can be.
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		We've covered this already. But we haven't talked about the other side of the equation: Ad block rules can't be updated quickly anymore. Today, ad blockers and privacy apps can ship filter list updates themselves, often using giant open-source community lists. Manifest V3 will stop this by limiting what Google describes "remotely hosted code." All updates, even to benign things like a filtering list, will need to happen through full extension updates through the Chrome Web Store. They will all be subject to Chrome Web Store reviews process, and that comes with a significant time delay.
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		<a href="https://www.engadget.com/inside-the-arms-race-between-youtube-and-ad-blockers-140031824.html" rel="external nofollow">Engadget's Anthony Ha</a> interviewed some developers in the filtering extension community, and they described a constant cat-and-mouse game with YouTube. <a href="https://www.ghostery.com/" rel="external nofollow">Ghostery’s</a> director of product and engineering, Krzysztof Modras, said that YouTube is “adapting [its] methods more frequently than ever before. To counteract its changes to ad delivery and ad blocker detection, block lists have to be updated at minimum on a daily basis, and sometimes even more often. While all players in the space are innovating, some ad blockers are simply unable to keep up with these changes.”
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		uBlock Origin's <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/uBlockOrigin/comments/17tm9rp/youtube_antiadblock_and_ads_november_12_2023_mega/" rel="external nofollow">FAQ</a> on YouTube's ad blocker detection says, "YouTube changes their detection scripts regularly" and adds that ad block users might briefly be blocked for "brief periods of time after [YouTube changes] scripts and before we updated our filters."
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		When Manifest V3 becomes mandatory, those updates that need to arrive "at minimum on a daily basis" will no longer be an option. Limiting remotely hosted code sounds like a totally reasonable limitation until you realize that. like most Manifest V3 changes, it seems carefully crafted to cripple ad blockers more than other extensions. Is a filtering list update, which is essentially just a list of websites, <em>really</em> something that needs to be limited by the "no remotely hosted code" policy?
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		Firefox is basically being forced to support Manifest V3 extensions due to the popularity of Chrome, but it isn't shutting down Manifest V2 support any time soon. Firefox's Manifest V3 implementation doesn't come with the filtering limitations, and parent company Mozilla <a href="https://blog.mozilla.org/en/products/firefox/extensions-addons/heres-whats-going-on-in-the-world-of-extensions/" rel="external nofollow">promises</a> that users can "rest assured that in spite of these changes to Chrome’s new extensions architecture, Firefox’s implementation of Manifest V3 ensures users can access the most effective privacy tools available like uBlock Origin and other content-blocking and privacy-preserving extensions."
	</p>

	<div class="pullbox sidebar story-sidebar right">
		<div class="story-sidebar-part">
			<div class="story-sidebar-part-content">
				 
			</div>
		</div>
	</div>
	So since all filter list updates now need to go through the Chrome Web Store, how long does a review take? <a href="https://stackoverflow.com/questions/66302856/is-there-a-way-to-send-my-chrome-extension-to-testers-before-it-being-approved" rel="external nofollow">Multiple sources</a> on the web put it at anywhere from <a href="https://getsnapfont.com/posts/avoiding-lengthy-review-times-for-chrome-webstore-submissions" rel="external nofollow">a few hours to three weeks</a>, depending on the whims of Google's review system. Keep in mind these timelines are <em>before</em> Google will dramatically increase the workload of Chrome Web Store reviews by requiring absolutely all changes to go through the review process.

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		<em>That's </em>the other key weapon. In the future, YouTube will be able to roll out new ad blocking updates whenever it wants, and the ad blockers' response can be slow-rolled by the Chrome Web Store. Ghostery’s Modras thinks this is the future that is coming, telling Engadget, “Through Manifest V3, Google will close the door for innovation in the ad blocking landscape and introduce another layer of gatekeeping that will slow down how ad blockers can react to new ads and online tracking methods.”
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		Google <a href="https://developer.chrome.com/docs/extensions/mv3/intro/mv3-overview/" rel="external nofollow">claims </a>that Manifest V3 will improve browser "privacy, security, and performance," but every comment we can find from groups that aren't giant ad companies disputes this description. The Electronic Frontier Foundation has called Google's Manifest V3 communication "<a href="https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2021/12/chrome-users-beware-manifest-v3-deceitful-and-threatening" rel="external nofollow">deceitful and threatening</a>," and both the EFF and Mozilla have critiqued most of Google's user-focused justifications for the project. <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tpDFS-GUytg&amp;t=416s" rel="external nofollow">Both groups</a> agree that Manifest V3 <a href="https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2019/07/googles-plans-chrome-extensions-wont-really-help-security" rel="external nofollow">won't do much for security</a>, since it doesn't stop what extensions usually <a href="https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2019/07/dataspii-inside-the-debacle-that-dished-private-data-from-apple-tesla-blue-origin-and-4m-people/" rel="external nofollow">get caught doing</a>: spying on a user's browser history. Manifest V3 extensions have access to just as much data as before. Ghostery <a href="https://www.ghostery.com/blog/manifest-v3-the-ghostery-perspective" rel="external nofollow">has a page</a> on Manifest V3 warning that "nothing Manifest V3 introduces in its current state can help protect privacy" and calling the project "ultimately user hostile."
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		For now, Chrome still works like it always has, but Manifest V3 will start becoming mandatory in <a href="https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2023/11/google-chrome-will-limit-ad-blockers-starting-june-2024/" rel="external nofollow">June 2024</a>.
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>
</div>

<p>
	<a href="https://arstechnica.com/google/2023/12/chromes-next-weapon-in-the-war-on-ad-blockers-slower-extension-updates/" rel="external nofollow">Source</a>
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">20376</guid><pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2023 03:08:48 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>TrickBot malware dev pleads guilty, faces 35 years in prison</title><link>https://nsaneforums.com/news/security-privacy-news/trickbot-malware-dev-pleads-guilty-faces-35-years-in-prison-r20375/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	On Thursday, a Russian national pleaded guilty to charges related to his involvement in developing and deploying the Trickbot malware, which was used in attacks against hospitals, companies, and individuals in the United States and worldwide.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	According to <a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/21094966-vladimir-dunaev-trickbot-malware-dev-indictment" rel="external nofollow" target="_blank">court documents</a>, a 40-year-old individual, also known as FFX, oversaw the development of TrickBot's browser injection component as a malware developer.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Allegedly, Dunaev's association with the TrickBot malware syndicate started in June 2016 after being hired as a developer following a recruitment test requiring him to create an app simulating a SOCKS server and to alter the Firefox browser.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	In September 2021, he was <a href="https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/us-charges-latvian-for-helping-develop-the-trickbot-malware/" target="_blank" rel="external nofollow">arrested in South Korea</a> while attempting to depart. Due to COVID-19 travel restrictions and an expired passport, he had been forced to remain in South Korea for over a year. The extradition process was finalized on October 20, 2021.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	"As set forth in the plea agreement, Vladimir Dunaev misused his special skills as a computer programmer to develop the Trickbot suite of malware," said U.S. Attorney Rebecca C. Lutzko.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	"Dunaev and his codefendants hid behind their keyboards, first to create Trickbot, then using it to infect millions of computers worldwide — including those used by hospitals, schools, and businesses — invading privacy and causing untold disruption and financial damage."
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The TrickBot malware helped its operators harvest personal and sensitive information (including credentials, credit cards, emails, passwords, dates of birth, SSNs, and addresses) and steal funds from their victims' banking accounts.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Dunaev <a href="https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/russian-national-pleads-guilty-trickbot-malware-conspiracy" rel="external nofollow" target="_blank">entered a guilty plea</a> for charges related to conspiracy to commit computer fraud and identity theft, alongside conspiracy charges for wire and bank fraud. His sentencing is set for March 20, 2024, and he is facing a maximum sentence of 35 years in prison for both offenses.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The initial indictment charged Dunaev and eight codefendants for their alleged involvement in developing, deploying, administering, and profiting from the Trickbot operation.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<table align="center" border="1" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1" style="width:796px">
	<tbody>
		<tr>
			<td style="background-color:#eeeeee; text-align:center; vertical-align:middle; width:228px">
				<strong>Dates</strong>
			</td>
			<td style="background-color:#eeeeee; text-align:center; vertical-align:middle; width:551px">
				<strong>Code description</strong>
			</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td style="vertical-align:middle; width:228px">
				July 2016 - time of arrest
			</td>
			<td style="vertical-align:middle; width:551px">
				Modifying the Firefox web browser
			</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td style="vertical-align:middle; width:228px">
				December 2016
			</td>
			<td style="vertical-align:middle; width:551px">
				Machine Query that lets TrickBot determine the description, manufacturer, name, product, serial number, version, and content of the root file directory of an infected machine
			</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td style="vertical-align:middle; width:228px">
				August 2016 - December 2018
			</td>
			<td style="vertical-align:middle; width:551px">
				Code that grabs and saves from the web browser its name, ID, type, configuration files, cookies, history, local storage, Flash Local Shared Objects/LSO (Flash cookies)
			</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td style="vertical-align:middle; width:228px">
				October 2016 - time of arrest
			</td>
			<td style="vertical-align:middle; width:551px">
				Code that searches for, imports, and loads files in the web browser's 'profile' folders; these contain cookies, storage, history, Flash LSO cookies. It also connects to the browser databases to make queries and modify them
			</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td style="vertical-align:middle; width:228px">
				July 2016 - time of arrest
			</td>
			<td style="vertical-align:middle; width:551px">
				An executable app/utility to launch and manage a web browser
			</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td style="vertical-align:middle; width:228px">
				July 2016 - time of arrest
			</td>
			<td style="vertical-align:middle; width:551px">
				Code that collects and modifies data entries in Google Chrome LevelDB database, browsing history included
			</td>
		</tr>
	</tbody>
</table>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Dunaev is the second TrickBot gang malware developer arrested by the U.S. Department of Justice. In February 2021, <a href="https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/us-charges-latvian-for-helping-develop-the-trickbot-malware/" target="_blank" rel="external nofollow">Latvian national Alla Witte</a> (aka Max) was apprehended and charged with helping write the code used to control and deploy ransomware on victims' networks.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	In <a href="https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/us-and-uk-sanction-trickbot-and-conti-ransomware-operation-members/" target="_blank" rel="external nofollow">February</a> and <a href="https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/us-and-uk-sanction-11-trickbot-and-conti-cybercrime-gang-members/" target="_blank" rel="external nofollow">September</a>, the United States and the United Kingdom sanctioned a total of 18 Russian nationals associated with the TrickBot and Conti cybercrime gangs for their involvement in the extortion of at least $180 million from victims worldwide. Also, they warned that some Trickbot group members are associated with Russian intelligence services.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Initially focused on stealing banking credentials when it surfaced in 2015, the TrickBot malware evolved into a modular tool leveraged by cybercrime organizations such as <a href="https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/ryuk-ransomware-partners-with-trickbot-to-gain-access-to-infected-networks/" target="_blank" rel="external nofollow">Ryuk</a> and <a href="https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/conti-ransomware-shows-signs-of-being-ryuks-successor/" target="_blank" rel="external nofollow">Conti ransomware</a> for initial access into compromised corporate networks.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Following <a href="https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/trickbot-botnet-targeted-in-takedown-operations-little-impact-seen/" target="_blank" rel="external nofollow">several takedown attempts</a>, the Conti cybercrime gang gained control of TrickBot, harnessing it to develop more sophisticated and stealthy malware strains, including <a href="https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/lazarus-hackers-use-trickbot-to-infect-high-end-victims/" target="_blank" rel="external nofollow">Anchor</a> and <a href="https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/bazarbackdoor-trickbot-gang-s-new-stealthy-network-hacking-malware/" target="_blank" rel="external nofollow">BazarBackdoor</a>.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	However, following Russia's invasion of Ukraine, a Ukrainian researcher <a href="https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/conti-ransomwares-internal-chats-leaked-after-siding-with-russia/" target="_blank" rel="external nofollow">leaked Conti's internal communications</a> in what is now known as the "Conti Leaks."
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Shortly after, an anonymous figure using the <a href="http://www.wired.com/story/trickbot-trickleaks-bentley/" rel="external nofollow" target="_blank">TrickLeaks</a> moniker began leaking details about the TrickBot operation, further outlining its links with the Conti gang.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Ultimately, these leaks precipitated the <a href="https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/conti-ransomware-shuts-down-operation-rebrands-into-smaller-units/" target="_blank" rel="external nofollow">shutdown of the Conti ransomware operation</a>, resulting in its fragmentation into numerous other ransomware groups, such as Royal, Black Basta, and ZEON.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<a href="https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/trickbot-malware-dev-pleads-guilty-faces-35-years-in-prison/" rel="external nofollow">Source</a>
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">20375</guid><pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2023 03:07:11 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>The Week in Ransomware - December 1st 2023 - Police hits affiliates</title><link>https://nsaneforums.com/news/security-privacy-news/the-week-in-ransomware-december-1st-2023-police-hits-affiliates-r20374/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	An international law enforcement operation claims to have dismantled a ransomware affiliate operation in Ukraine, which was responsible for attacks on organizations in 71 countries.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The threat actors are said to be affiliates of numerous ransomware operations, including LockerGoga, MegaCortex, HIVE, and Dharma. This cybercriminal operation is said to have led to the loss of hundreds of millions of euros.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The <a href="https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/police-dismantle-ransomware-group-behind-attacks-in-71-countries/" target="_blank" rel="external nofollow">law enforcement operation</a> occurred on November 21st, with coordinated raids in 30 locations in Kyiv, Cherkasy, Rivne, and Vinnytsia. As a result of the operation, police arrested the group's alleged ringleader and four of his accomplices.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Of particular interest is that Norway was involved in the operation, making cybersecurity researchers believe that this affiliate group may have been behind the Norsk Hydro attack, which involved the LockerGoga ransomware.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	However, a <a href="http://twitter.com/3xp0rtblog/status/1730343524921389118" rel="external nofollow" target="_blank">threat actor disputed those rumors</a> on the Russian-speaking XSS hacking forum, claiming that the affiliate group had nothing to do with the attack. The threat actor further claims to be the one who gave a police drone the finger in the below video of the law enforcement operation.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<div class="ipsEmbeddedVideo" contenteditable="false">
	<div>
		<iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="113" src="https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/8yLtHCbnF44?feature=oembed" title="Поліція затримала хакерів, які атакували провідні світові компанії" width="200"></iframe>
	</div>
</div>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	In other news, ransomware attacks have been surging, with further information about attacks being disclosed this week.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	This includes attacks on the <a href="https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/ransomware-attack-on-indie-game-maker-wiped-all-player-accounts/" target="_blank" rel="external nofollow">Ethyrial: Echoes of Yore game developer</a>, <a href="https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/ardent-hospital-ers-disrupted-in-6-states-after-ransomware-attack/" target="_blank" rel="external nofollow">Ardent Health Services</a>, <a href="https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/slovenias-largest-power-provider-hse-hit-by-ransomware-attack/" target="_blank" rel="external nofollow">Slovenia's largest power provider HSE</a>, and a <a href="https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/healthcare-giant-henry-schein-hit-twice-by-blackcat-ransomware/" target="_blank" rel="external nofollow">re-encryption of healthcare giant Henry Schein</a> as punishment for allegedly not paying the ransom.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	We also learned that the <a href="https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/cactus-ransomware-exploiting-qlik-sense-flaws-to-breach-networks/" target="_blank" rel="external nofollow">attack on DP World did not involve encryption</a>. However, it could have been a ransomware attack that was stopped before encryptors were deployed.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Finally, researchers released some interesting information about ransomware, including Cactus ransomware <a href="https://bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/cactus-ransomware-exploiting-qlik-sense-flaws-to-breach-networks/" rel="external nofollow" target="_blank">exploiting Qlik Sense flaws</a> to breach networks, and Black Basta ransomware believed to have <a href="https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/black-basta-ransomware-made-over-100-million-from-extortion/" target="_blank" rel="external nofollow">made over $100 million</a>.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Contributors and those who provided new ransomware information and stories this week include: <a href="https://twitter.com/malwrhunterteam" rel="external nofollow" target="_blank">@malwrhunterteam</a>, <a href="https://twitter.com/Ionut_Ilascu" rel="external nofollow" target="_blank">@Ionut_Ilascu</a>, <a href="https://twitter.com/LawrenceAbrams" rel="external nofollow" target="_blank">@LawrenceAbrams</a>, <a href="https://twitter.com/billtoulas" rel="external nofollow" target="_blank">@billtoulas</a>, <a href="https://twitter.com/serghei" rel="external nofollow" target="_blank">@serghei</a>, <a href="https://twitter.com/Seifreed" rel="external nofollow" target="_blank">@Seifreed</a>, <a href="https://twitter.com/BleepinComputer" rel="external nofollow" target="_blank">@BleepinComputer</a>, <a href="https://twitter.com/demonslay335" rel="external nofollow" target="_blank">@demonslay335</a>, <a href="https://twitter.com/fwosar" rel="external nofollow" target="_blank">@fwosar</a>, <a href="https://twitter.com/pcrisk" rel="external nofollow" target="_blank">@pcrisk</a>, <a href="https://twitter.com/CorvusInsurance" rel="external nofollow" target="_blank">@CorvusInsurance</a>, <a href="https://twitter.com/elliptic" rel="external nofollow" target="_blank">@elliptic</a>, <a href="https://twitter.com/AWNetworks" rel="external nofollow" target="_blank">@AWNetworks</a>, <a href="https://twitter.com/ShadowStackRE" rel="external nofollow" target="_blank">@ShadowStackRE</a>, <a href="https://twitter.com/ddd1ms" rel="external nofollow" target="_blank">@ddd1ms</a>, <a href="https://twitter.com/3xp0rtblog" rel="external nofollow" role="link" tabindex="-1" target="_blank">@3xp0rtblog</a>, <a href="https://twitter.com/jgreigj" rel="external nofollow" target="_blank">@jgreigj</a>, and <a href="https://twitter.com/BrettCallow" rel="external nofollow" target="_blank">@BrettCallow</a>.
</p>

<h2>
	November 27th 2023
</h2>

<h3>
	<a href="https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/healthcare-giant-henry-schein-hit-twice-by-blackcat-ransomware/" target="_blank" rel="external nofollow">Healthcare giant Henry Schein hit twice by BlackCat ransomware</a>
</h3>

<p>
	American healthcare company Henry Schein has reported a second cyberattack this month by the BlackCat/ALPHV ransomware gang, who also breached their network in October.
</p>

<h3>
	<a href="https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/ransomware-attack-on-indie-game-maker-wiped-all-player-accounts/" target="_blank" rel="external nofollow">Ransomware attack on indie game maker wiped all player accounts</a>
</h3>

<p>
	A ransomware attack on the "Ethyrial: Echoes of Yore" MMORPG last Friday destroyed 17,000 player accounts, deleting their in-game items and progress in the game.
</p>

<h3>
	<a href="https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/ardent-hospital-ers-disrupted-in-6-states-after-ransomware-attack/" target="_blank" rel="external nofollow">Ardent hospital ERs disrupted in 6 states after ransomware attack</a>
</h3>

<p>
	Ardent Health Services, a healthcare provider operating 30 hospitals across six U.S. states, disclosed today that its systems were hit by a ransomware attack on Thursday.
</p>

<h3>
	<a href="https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/slovenias-largest-power-provider-hse-hit-by-ransomware-attack/" target="_blank" rel="external nofollow">Slovenia's largest power provider HSE hit by ransomware attack</a>
</h3>

<p>
	Slovenian power company Holding Slovenske Elektrarne (HSE) has suffered a ransomware attack that compromised its systems and encrypted files, yet the company says the incident did not disrupt electric power production.
</p>

<h3>
	<a href="https://www.shadowstackre.com/analysis/losttrust" rel="external nofollow" target="_blank">LostTrust Ransomware analysis</a>
</h3>

<p class="bc_quote">
	The LostTrust ransomware family has a fairly small victim pool and has compromised victims earlier this year. The encryptor has similar characteristcs to the MetaEncryptor ransomware family including code flow and strings which indicates that the encryptor is a variant from the original MetaEncryptor source.
</p>

<h3>
	<a href="https://twitter.com/pcrisk/status/1729027908520624401" rel="external nofollow" target="_blank">New "MuskOff" Chaos variant</a>
</h3>

<p>
	<a href="https://twitter.com/pcrisk" rel="external nofollow" target="_blank">PCrisk</a> found a new Chaos variant that appends the <strong>.MuskOff</strong> extension and drops a ransom note named <strong>read_it.txt</strong>.
</p>

<h2>
	November 28th 2023
</h2>

<h3>
	<a href="https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/police-dismantle-ransomware-group-behind-attacks-in-71-countries/" target="_blank" rel="external nofollow">Police dismantle ransomware group behind attacks in 71 countries</a>
</h3>

<p>
	In cooperation with Europol and Eurojust, law enforcement agencies from seven nations have arrested in Ukraine the core members of a ransomware group linked to attacks against organizations in 71 countries.
</p>

<h3>
	<a href="https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/qilin-ransomware-claims-attack-on-automotive-giant-yanfeng/" target="_blank" rel="external nofollow">Qilin ransomware claims attack on automotive giant Yanfeng</a>
</h3>

<p>
	The Qilin ransomware group has claimed responsibility for a cyber attack on Yanfeng Automotive Interiors (Yanfeng), one of the world's largest automotive parts suppliers.
</p>

<h3>
	<a href="https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/dp-world-confirms-data-stolen-in-cyberattack-no-ransomware-used/" target="_blank" rel="external nofollow">DP World confirms data stolen in cyberattack, no ransomware used</a>
</h3>

<p>
	International logistics giant DP World has confirmed that data was stolen during a cyber attack that disrupted its operations in Australia earlier this month. However, the company says no ransomware payloads or encryption was used in the attack.
</p>

<h2>
	November 29th 2023
</h2>

<h3>
	<a href="https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/black-basta-ransomware-made-over-100-million-from-extortion/" target="_blank" rel="external nofollow">Black Basta ransomware made over $100 million from extortion</a>
</h3>

<p>
	Russia-linked ransomware gang Black Basta has raked in at least $100 million in ransom payments from more than 90 victims since it first surfaced in April 2022, according to joint research from Corvus Insurance and Elliptic.
</p>

<h3>
	<a href="https://twitter.com/pcrisk/status/1729733252112330784" rel="external nofollow" target="_blank">New STOP ransomware variants</a>
</h3>

<p>
	PCrisk found new STOP ransomware variants that append the <strong>.jawr</strong> and <strong>.jazi</strong> extensions.
</p>

<h3>
	<a href="https://twitter.com/pcrisk/status/1729746789127860365" rel="external nofollow" target="_blank">New Phobos ransomware variant</a>
</h3>

<p>
	PCrisk found a new Phobos variant that appends the <strong>.LEAKDB</strong> extension and drops a ransom notes named <strong>info.txt</strong> and <strong>info.hta</strong>.
</p>

<h2>
	November 30th 2023
</h2>

<h3>
	<a href="https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/cactus-ransomware-exploiting-qlik-sense-flaws-to-breach-networks/" target="_blank" rel="external nofollow">Cactus ransomware exploiting Qlik Sense flaws to breach networks</a>
</h3>

<p>
	Cactus ransomware has been exploiting critical vulnerabilities in the Qlik Sense data analytics solution to get initial access on corporate networks.
</p>

<h2>
	December 1st 2023
</h2>

<h3>
	<a href="https://therecord.media/credit-unions-facing-outages-due-to-ransomware" rel="external nofollow" target="_blank">60 credit unions facing outages due to ransomware attack on popular tech provider</a>
</h3>

<p class="bc_quote">
	About 60 credit unions are dealing with outages due to a ransomware attack on a widely-used technology provider.
</p>

<h3>
	<a href="https://twitter.com/pcrisk/status/1730476283853717752" rel="external nofollow" target="_blank">New "DoctorHelp" MedusaLocker variant</a>
</h3>

<p>
	PCrisk found a new MedusaLocker variant that appends the <strong>.doctorhelp</strong> extension and drops a ransom note named <strong>How_to_back_files.html</strong>.
</p>

<h3>
	<a href="https://twitter.com/pcrisk/status/1730464822863552856" rel="external nofollow" target="_blank">New Dharma ransomware variant</a>
</h3>

<p>
	PCrisk found a new Darhma variant that appends the <strong>.intel </strong>extension.
</p>

<h3>
	That's it for this week! Hope everyone has a nice weekend!
</h3>

<p>
	<a href="https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/the-week-in-ransomware-december-1st-2023-police-hits-affiliates/" rel="external nofollow">Source</a>
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">20374</guid><pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2023 03:05:32 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Apple fixes two new iOS [and iPadOS and MacOS] zero-days in emergency updates</title><link>https://nsaneforums.com/news/security-privacy-news/apple-fixes-two-new-ios-and-ipados-and-macos-zero-days-in-emergency-updates-r20359/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	Apple released emergency security updates to fix two zero-day vulnerabilities exploited in attacks and impacting iPhone, iPad, and Mac devices, reaching 20 zero-days patched since the start of the year.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	"Apple is aware of a report that this issue may have been exploited against versions of iOS before iOS 16.7.1," <a href="https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT214031" rel="external nofollow" target="_blank">the company said</a> in an advisory issued on Wednesday.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The two bugs were found in the WebKit browser engine (CVE-2023-42916 and CVE-2023-42917), allowing attackers to gain access to sensitive information via an out-of-bounds read weakness and gain arbitrary code execution via a memory corruption bug on vulnerable devices via maliciously crafted webpages.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The company says it addressed the security flaws for devices running <a href="https://support.apple.com/kb/HT214031" rel="external nofollow" target="_blank">iOS 17.1.2, iPadOS 17.1.2</a>, <a href="https://support.apple.com/kb/HT214032" rel="external nofollow" target="_blank">macOS Sonoma 14.1.2</a>, and <a href="https://support.apple.com/kb/HT214033" rel="external nofollow" target="_blank">Safari 17.1.2</a> with improved input validation and locking.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The list of impacted Apple devices is quite extensive, and it includes:
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<ul>
	<li>
		iPhone XS and later
	</li>
	<li>
		iPad Pro 12.9-inch 2nd generation and later, iPad Pro 10.5-inch, iPad Pro 11-inch 1st generation and later, iPad Air 3rd generation and later, iPad 6th generation and later, and iPad mini 5th generation and later
	</li>
	<li>
		Macs running macOS Monterey, Ventura, Sonoma
	</li>
</ul>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Security researcher Clément Lecigne of Google's Threat Analysis Group (TAG) found and reported both zero-days.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	While Apple has not released information regarding ongoing exploitation in the wild, Google TAG researchers have often found and disclosed zero-days used in state-sponsored spyware attacks against high-risk individuals, such as journalists, opposition politicians, and dissidents.
</p>

<h2>
	20 zero-days exploited in the wild in 2023
</h2>

<p>
	CVE-2023-42916 and CVE-2023-42917 are the 19th and 20th zero-day vulnerabilities exploited in attacks that Apple fixed this year.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Google TAG disclosed another zero-day bug (<a href="https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/apple/apple-emergency-update-fixes-new-zero-day-used-to-hack-iphones/" target="_blank" rel="external nofollow">CVE-2023-42824</a>) in the XNU kernel, enabling attackers to escalate privileges on vulnerable iPhones and iPads.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Apple recently patched three more zero-day bugs (<a href="https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/apple/apple-emergency-updates-fix-3-new-zero-days-exploited-in-attacks/" target="_blank" rel="external nofollow">CVE-2023-41991, CVE-2023-41992, and CVE-2023-41993</a>) reported by Citizen Lab and Google TAG researchers and exploited by threat actors to deploy Predator spyware.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Citizen Lab disclosed <a href="https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/apple/apple-discloses-2-new-zero-days-exploited-to-attack-iphones-macs/" target="_blank" rel="external nofollow">two other zero-days</a> (CVE-2023-41061 and CVE-2023-41064), fixed by Apple in September and abused as part of a <a href="https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/apple-zero-click-imessage-exploit-used-to-infect-iphones-with-spyware/" target="_blank" rel="external nofollow">zero-click exploit chain (dubbed BLASTPASS)</a> to install NSO Group's Pegasus spyware.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Since the start of the year, Apple has also patched:
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<ul>
	<li>
		<a href="https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/apple/apple-fixes-new-zero-day-used-in-attacks-against-iphones-macs/" target="_blank" rel="external nofollow">two zero-days</a> (CVE-2023-37450 and CVE-2023-38606) in July
	</li>
	<li>
		<a href="https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/apple/apple-fixes-zero-days-used-to-deploy-triangulation-spyware-via-imessage/" target="_blank" rel="external nofollow">three zero-days</a> (CVE-2023-32434, CVE-2023-32435, and CVE-2023-32439) in June
	</li>
	<li>
		<a href="https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/apple/apple-fixes-three-new-zero-days-exploited-to-hack-iphones-macs/" target="_blank" rel="external nofollow">three more zero-days</a> (CVE-2023-32409, CVE-2023-28204, and CVE-2023-32373) in May
	</li>
	<li>
		<a href="https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/apple/apple-fixes-two-zero-days-exploited-to-hack-iphones-and-macs/" target="_blank" rel="external nofollow">two zero-days</a> (CVE-2023-28206 and CVE-2023-28205) in April
	</li>
	<li>
		and <a href="https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/apple-fixes-new-webkit-zero-day-exploited-to-hack-iphones-macs/" target="_blank" rel="external nofollow">another WebKit zero-day</a> (CVE-2023-23529) in February
	</li>
</ul>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<a href="https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/apple/apple-fixes-two-new-ios-zero-days-in-emergency-updates/" rel="external nofollow">Source</a>
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">20359</guid><pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2023 02:44:18 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>How to go incognito in Chrome, Edge, Firefox, and Safari</title><link>https://nsaneforums.com/news/security-privacy-news/how-to-go-incognito-in-chrome-edge-firefox-and-safari-r20329/</link><description><![CDATA[<header class="cat">
	<section class="deck viewability">
		<h3 itemprop="description">
			While incognito mode in any of the big four web browsers offers a measure of privacy, it doesn’t completely hide your tracks online. Here’s how the feature works in each browser, and how to use it.
		</h3>
	</section>
</header>

<section class="bodee">
	<div class="cat " id="drr-container" itemprop="articleBody">
		<p>
			Web browser functions like those trace their roots back more than a decade, and the feature — first found in a top browser in 2005 — spread quickly as one copied another, made tweaks and minor improvements.
		</p>

		<p>
			 
		</p>

		<p>
			But privacy-promising labels can be treacherous. Simply put, going "<a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/3292619/the-brave-browser-basics-what-it-does-how-it-differs-from-rivals.html" rel="external nofollow" title="incognito">incognito</a>" is as effective in guarding online privacy as witchcraft is in warding off a common cold.
		</p>

		<div class="fakesidebar fakesidebar-auto" id="editorialfakesidebardiv">
			 
		</div>

		<p>
			That's because private browsing is intended to wipe <i>local</i> traces of where you've been, what you've searched for, the contents of forms you've filled. It's meant to hide, and not always conclusively at that, your tracks from others with access to the personal computer. That's it.
		</p>

		<h2>
			How to keep web browsing private
		</h2>

		<ul>
			<li>
				<h3 class="body">
					Google Chrome's Incognito mode
				</h3>
			</li>
			<li>
				<h3 class="body">
					Microsoft Edge's private browsing
				</h3>
			</li>
			<li>
				<h3 class="body">
					Mozilla Firefox's Private Browsing mode
				</h3>
			</li>
			<li>
				<h3 class="body">
					Apple's Safari private windows
				</h3>
			</li>
		</ul>

		<p>
			At their most basic, these features promise that they won't record visited sites to the browsing history, save cookies that show you've been to and logged into sites, or remember credentials like passwords used during sessions. But your traipses through the web are still traceable by Internet providers – and the authorities who serve subpoenas to those entities – employers who control the company network and advertisers who follow your every footstep.
		</p>

		<p>
			 
		</p>

		<p>
			To end that cognitive dissonance, <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/3587752/online-privacy-best-browsers-settings-and-tips.html" rel="external nofollow">most browsers have added more advanced privacy tools</a>, generically known as "anti-trackers," which block various kinds of bite-sized chunks of code that advertisers and websites use to trace where people go in attempts to compile digital dossiers or serve targeted advertisements.
		</p>

		<aside class="nativo-promo nativo-promo-1 smartphone" id="">
			 
		</aside>

		<p>
			Although it might seem reasonable that a browser's end game would be to craft a system that blends incognito modes with anti-tracking, it's highly unlikely. Using either private browsing or anti-tracking carries a cost: site passwords aren't saved for the next visit or sites break under the tracker scrubbing. Nor are those costs equal. It's much easier to turn on some level of anti-tracking by default than it would be to do the same for private sessions, as evidenced by the number of browsers that do the former without complaint while <i>none</i> do the latter.
		</p>

		<p>
			 
		</p>

		<p>
			Private browsing will, by necessity, always be a niche, as long as sites rely on cookies for mundane things like log-ins and cart contents.
		</p>

		<aside class="nativo-promo nativo-promo-1 tablet desktop" id="">
			 
		</aside>

		<p>
			But the mode remains a useful tool whenever the browser -- and the computer it's on -- are shared. To prove that, we've assembled instructions and insights on using the incognito features -- and anti-tracking tools -- offered by the top four browsers: <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/3343066/a-mac-user-s-guide-to-the-google-chrome-browser.html" rel="external nofollow" title="Google Chrome">Google Chrome</a>, Microsoft's Chromium-based <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/3229068/how-to-replace-edge-as-the-default-browser-in-windows-10-and-why-you-shouldnt.html" rel="external nofollow" title="Edge">Edge</a>, Mozilla's Firefox and Apple's Safari.
		</p>

		<h2 class="toc" id="toc-1">
			How to go incognito in Google Chrome
		</h2>

		<p>
			Although <i>incognito</i> may be a synonym to some users for any browser's private mode, Google gets credit for grabbing the word as the feature's snappiest name when it launched the tool in late 2008, just months after Chrome debuted.
		</p>

		<p>
			 
		</p>

		<p>
			The easiest way to open an Incognito window is with the keyboard shortcut combination <strong>Ctrl-Shift-N</strong> (Windows) or <strong>Command-Shift-N</strong> (macOS).
		</p>

		<p>
			 
		</p>

		<p>
			Another way is to click on the menu on the upper right - it's the three vertical dots - and select <strong>New Incognito Window</strong> from the list.
		</p>

		<aside class="nativo-promo nativo-promo-2 tablet desktop smartphone" id="">
			 
		</aside>

		<figure class="large ">
			<p>
				<img alt="incognito-1-100843143-large.jpg?auto=web" class="ipsImage" data-ratio="75.10" height="496" width="720" src="https://images.idgesg.net/images/article/2020/05/incognito-1-100843143-large.jpg?auto=webp&amp;quality=85,70">
			</p>

			<p>
				<em><small class="credit">Google</small></em>
			</p>

			<figcaption>
				<p>
					<em>Open a new Incognito window in Chrome using keyboard shortcuts or from the menu (1) by choosing New Incognito window (2).</em>
				</p>
			</figcaption>
		</figure>

		<p>
			The new Incognito window can be recognized by the dark background and the stylized "spy" icon just to the left of the three-dots menu. Chrome also reminds users of just what Incognito does and doesn't do each time a new window is opened. The message may get tiresome for regular Incognito users, but it may also save a job or reputation; it's important that users remember Incognito doesn't prevent ISPs, businesses, schools and organizations from knowing where customers, workers, students, and others went on the web or what they searched for.
		</p>

		<figure class="large ">
			<p>
				<img alt="incognito-2-100843144-large.jpg?auto=web" class="ipsImage" data-ratio="75.10" height="496" width="720" src="https://images.idgesg.net/images/article/2020/05/incognito-2-100843144-large.jpg?auto=webp&amp;quality=85,70">
			</p>

			<p>
				<em><small class="credit">Google</small></em>
			</p>

			<figcaption>
				<p>
					<em>Each time a new Incognito window is opened, Chrome reminds users what Incognito doesn't save. As of </em>
				</p>

				<p>
					<em>Chrome 83, it also puts a toggle on the screen for blocking third-party cookies.</em>
				</p>
			</figcaption>
		</figure>

		<p>
			Incognito's introductory screen also displays a toggle -- it's on by default -- along with text that states third-party cookies will be blocked while in the privacy mode. Although cookies are never saved locally as long as the user stays in Incognito, websites have been able to track user movements from site to site <i>while within Incognito</i>. Such tracking might be used, for example, to display ads to a user visiting multiple sites in Incognito. This third-party cookie blocking, which halts such behavior, debuted in Chrome 83 in May 2020.
		</p>

		<p>
			 
		</p>

		<p>
			Google has been experimenting with new language on Chrome's Incognito introductory page, but it's yet to make it to the desktop browser. In the Canary build of Chrome on Android, however, the intro now outlines "What Incognito does" and "What Incognito doesn't do," to make the mode's capabilities somewhat clearer to the user. (Some have speculated that the changes were made in reaction to a still-ongoing class-action lawsuit file in 2020 that alleged Google continued to track users' online behavior and movements in Incognito.)
		</p>

		<p>
			 
		</p>

		<p>
			Once a tab in Incognito has been filled with a website, Chrome continues to remind users that they're in Incognito by the dark background of the address bar and window title.
		</p>

		<aside class="nativo-promo nativo-promo-3 tablet desktop smartphone" id="">
			 
		</aside>

		<p>
			A link on an existing page can be opened directly into Incognito by right-clicking the link, then choosing <strong>Open Link in Incognito Window</strong> from the resulting menu.
		</p>

		<figure class="large ">
			<img alt="incognito-3-100843145-large.jpg?auto=web" class="ipsImage" data-ratio="75.10" height="517" width="720" src="https://images.idgesg.net/images/article/2020/05/incognito-3-100843145-large.jpg?auto=webp&amp;quality=85,70">
			<div class="zoom-icon">
				<em><small class="credit">Google</small></em>
			</div>

			<figcaption>
				<p>
					<em>What Incognito looks like after pulling up a website. Note the "spy" icon at the right of the address bar.</em>
				</p>
			</figcaption>
		</figure>

		<p>
			To close an Incognito window, shutter it like any other Chrome window by clicking the X in the upper right corner (Windows) or the red dot in the upper left (macOS).
		</p>

		<p>
			 
		</p>

		<p>
			<strong>Pro tip:</strong> <i>Google has been working on locking Incognito mode tabs on mobile devices -- the tabs unlocked with built-in biometric features -- so that others can't get a look at the privacy mode's content simply by picking up another's phone or tablet. Google is currently rolling out this feature in Chrome 92 on iOS, and still testing it in preview builds of Chrome for Android. No word on whether desktop Chrome will get something similar.</i>
		</p>

		<h2 class="toc" id="toc-2">
			How to privately browse in Microsoft Edge
		</h2>

		<p>
			borrowed the name of its private browsing mode, InPrivate, from Internet Explorer (IE), the finally-being-retired legacy browser. InPrivate appeared in IE in March 2009, about three months after Chrome's Incognito and three months before Firefox's privacy mode. When Edge was first released in 2015 and then relaunched as a clone of Chrome in January 2020, InPrivate was part of the package, too.
		</p>

		<p>
			 
		</p>

		<p>
			At the keyboard, the combination of <strong>Ctrl-Shift-N</strong> (Windows) or <strong>Command-Shift-N</strong> (macOS) opens an InPrivate window.
		</p>

		<p>
			 
		</p>

		<p>
			A slower way to get there is to click on the menu at the upper right -- it's three dots arranged horizontally -- and choose <strong>New InPrivate Window</strong> from the menu.
		</p>

		<figure class="large ">
			<img alt="incognito-10-100843151-large.jpg?auto=we" class="ipsImage" data-ratio="75.10" height="479" width="720" src="https://images.idgesg.net/images/article/2020/05/incognito-10-100843151-large.jpg?auto=webp&amp;quality=85,70"> <small class="credit">Microsoft</small>

			<figcaption>
				<p>
					<em>Like other browser, Edge will take you incognito from the menu (1) when you pick New InPrivate window (2).</em>
				</p>
			</figcaption>
		</figure>

		<p>
			Edge does a more thorough job of explaining what its private browsing mode does and doesn't do than any of its rivals, with on-screen paragraphs dedicated to describing what data the browser collects in InPrivate and how the strictest additional anti-tracking setting can be called on from within the mode. In addition, Edge 92 -- the current version as of this writing -- uses the more informal "What Incognito does" and "What Incognito doesn't do" language on its InPrivate introductory screen, something desktop Chrome hasn't yet gotten to.
		</p>

		<p>
			 
		</p>

		<p>
			Microsoft's browser also well marks InPrivate when the mode is operating: a blue-coloured oval marked "In Private" to the right of the address bar combines with a full-black screen to make sure users know where they're at.
		</p>

		<figure class="large ">
			<img alt="incognito-11-100843152-large.jpg?auto=we" class="ipsImage" data-ratio="75.10" height="479" width="720" src="https://images.idgesg.net/images/article/2020/05/incognito-11-100843152-large.jpg?auto=webp&amp;quality=85,70"> <small class="credit">Microsoft</small>

			<figcaption>
				<p>
					<em>The white-on-blue oval at the upper right tells you Edge is in InPrivate mode.</em>
				</p>
			</figcaption>
		</figure>

		<p>
			It's also possible to launch an InPrivate session by right-clicking a link within Edge and selecting <strong>Open in InPrivate Window</strong>. That option is grayed out when already in a private browsing session but using <strong>Open Link in New Tab</strong> does just that within the current InPrivate frame.
		</p>

		<p>
			 
		</p>

		<p>
			To end InPrivate browsing, simply shut the window by clicking the X in the upper right corner (Windows) or click the red dot at the upper left (macOS).
		</p>

		<p>
			 
		</p>

		<p>
			Although Microsoft based the relaunched Edge on Chromium, the same open-source project that comes up with the code to power Chrome, the Redmond, Wash. company has integrated anti-tracking into its browser, something Chrome has yet to do. Dubbed "Tracking Prevention," it works both in Edge's standard and InPrivate modes.
		</p>

		<p>
			 
		</p>

		<p>
			To set Tracking Prevention, choose <strong>Settings</strong> from the three-ellipses menu at the right, then at the next page, pick <strong>Privacy, Search and Services</strong>. Choose one of the three options -- <strong>Basic, Balanced</strong> or <strong>Strict</strong> -- and make sure the toggle for <strong>Tracking prevention</strong> is in the "on" position.
		</p>

		<p>
			If you want InPrivate to always default to the harshest anti-tracking -- not a bad idea -- toggle <strong>Always use "Strict" tracking prevention when browsing InPrivate</strong> to "on."
		</p>

		<figure class="large ">
			<img alt="incognito-12-100843153-large.jpg?auto=we" class="ipsImage" data-ratio="75.10" height="480" width="720" src="https://images.idgesg.net/images/article/2020/05/incognito-12-100843153-large.jpg?auto=webp&amp;quality=85,70"> <small class="credit">Microsoft</small>

			<figcaption>
				<p>
					<em>Toggle Always use Strict to the 'on' position and InPrivate will apply the most stringent anti-tracking even </em>
				</p>

				<p>
					<em>though Edge's standard mode is set to, say, Balanced.</em>
				</p>
			</figcaption>
		</figure>

		<p>
			<strong>Pro tip:</strong> <i>To open Edge with InPrivate -- rather than first opening Edge in standard mode, then launching InPrivate -- right-click the Edge icon in the Windows taskbar and select <strong>New InPrivate Window</strong> from the list. There is no similar one-step way to do this in macOS.</i>
		</p>

		<h2 class="toc" id="toc-3">
			How to do private browsing in Mozilla Firefox
		</h2>

		<p>
			After Chrome trumpeted Incognito, browsers without something similar hustled to catch up. Mozilla added its take -- dubbed Private Browsing -- about six months after Google, in June 2009, with Firefox 3.5.
		</p>

		<p>
			 
		</p>

		<p>
			From the keyboard, a private browsing session can be called up using the combination <strong>Ctrl-Shift-P</strong> (Windows) or <strong>Command-Shift-P</strong> (macOS).
		</p>

		<p>
			 
		</p>

		<p>
			Alternately, a private window will open from the menu at the upper right of Firefox -- three short horizontal lines -- after selecting <strong>New private window</strong>.
		</p>

		<figure class="large ">
			<img alt="incognito-4-100843146-large.jpg?auto=web" class="ipsImage" data-ratio="75.10" height="492" width="720" src="https://images.idgesg.net/images/article/2020/05/incognito-4-100843146-large.jpg?auto=webp&amp;quality=85,70"> <small class="credit">Mozilla</small>

			<figcaption>
				<p>
					<em>Opening a private browsing window is as simple as choosing New Private Window (2) from the Firefox menu (1).</em>
				</p>
			</figcaption>
		</figure>

		<p>
			A private session window is marked by the purple "mask" icon in the title bar of the Firefox frame. In Windows, the icon is to the left of the minimize/maximize/close buttons; on a Mac, the mask squats at the far right of the title bar. Unlike Chrome and Edge, Firefox does not colour-code the top components of the browser window to signify the user is in privacy mode.
		</p>

		<p>
			 
		</p>

		<p>
			Like other browsers, Firefox warns users that private browsing is no cure-all for privacy ills but is limited in what it blocks from being saved during a session. "While this doesn't make you anonymous to websites or your internet service provider, it makes it easier to keep what you do online private from anyone else who uses this computer," the caution reads.
		</p>

		<figure class="large ">
			<img alt="screen-shot-2021-08-30-at-2.06.14-pm-100" class="ipsImage" data-ratio="75.10" height="540" width="708" src="https://images.idgesg.net/images/article/2021/08/screen-shot-2021-08-30-at-2.06.14-pm-100900955-large.jpg?auto=webp&amp;quality=85,70">
			<div class="zoom-icon">
				<em><small class="credit">Mozilla</small></em>
			</div>

			<figcaption>
				<p>
					<em>Firefox reminds users that while a private session doesn't save searches or browsing histories, it doesn't </em>
				</p>

				<p>
					<em>cloak them in complete anonymity.</em>
				</p>
			</figcaption>
		</figure>

		<p>
			(Firefox also uses the Private Browsing introductory screen to shill the Mozilla VPN service, a $5 to $10 per month virtual private network that can, like other VPNs, hide your actual IP address from destination servers.)
		</p>

		<p>
			 
		</p>

		<p>
			A link can be opened into a Firefox Private Window by right-clicking the link, then choosing <strong>Open Link in New Private Window</strong> from the menu.
		</p>

		<p>
			 
		</p>

		<p>
			To close a Private Window, shut it down just as one would any Firefox window by clicking the X in the upper right corner (Windows) or the red dot in the upper left (macOS).
		</p>

		<p>
			 
		</p>

		<p>
			Notable is that Firefox's private browsing mode is accompanied by the browser's superb "Enhanced Tracking Protection," a suite of tracker blocking tools that stymie all sorts of ad-and-site methods for identifying users, then watching and recording their online behavior. While the earliest version of this was offered only inside Private Windows, the expanded technologies also work within standard mode.
		</p>

		<p>
			 
		</p>

		<p>
			Because Enhanced Tracking Protection is enabled by default within Firefox, it doesn't matter which of its settings -- <strong>Standard, Strict</strong> or <strong>Custom</strong> -- is selected as far as private browsing goes; everything that can be blocked will be blocked.
		</p>

		<figure class="large ">
			<img alt="incognito-6-100843148-large.jpg?auto=web" class="ipsImage" data-ratio="75.10" height="480" width="720" src="https://images.idgesg.net/images/article/2020/05/incognito-6-100843148-large.jpg?auto=webp&amp;quality=85,70"> <small class="credit">Mozilla</small>

			<figcaption>
				<p>
					<em>The shield appears in the address bar to note what trackers were blocked by Firefox in a Private Window. </em>
				</p>

				<p>
					<em>Clicking on the icon brings up an accounting of what was barred.</em>
				</p>
			</figcaption>
		</figure>

		<p>
			<strong>Pro tip:</strong> <i>As of Firefox 91, Private Browsing sessions take place over the more secure HTTPS, not the once-standard HTTP protocol. Users don't need to do anything: The new HTTPS-only policy is on by default. (If the destination site doesn't support HTPPS, Firefox will recognize this and go into fallback mode, connecting via HTTP instead.)</i>
		</p>

		<h2 class="toc" id="toc-4">
			How to browse privately using Apple's Safari
		</h2>

		<p>
			Chrome may get far more attention for its Incognito than any other browser -- no surprise, since it's by far the most popular browser on the planet -- but Apple's Safari was actually the first to introduce private browsing. The term <i>private browsing</i> was first bandied in 2005 to describe Safari 2.0 features that limited what was saved by the browser.
		</p>

		<p>
			 
		</p>

		<p>
			Side note: Early in private browsing, the label <i>porn mode</i> was often used as a synonym to describe what many writers and reporters assumed was the primary application of the feature. The term has fallen out of favor.
		</p>

		<p>
			 
		</p>

		<p>
			To open what Safari calls a Private Window on a Mac, users can do a three-key combination of <strong>Command-Shift-N</strong>, the same shortcut Chrome adopted. Otherwise, a window can be called up by selecting the <strong>File</strong> menu and clicking on New Private Window.
		</p>

		<figure class="large ">
			<img alt="safari-incognito-1-100790462-large.jpg?a" class="ipsImage" data-ratio="75.10" height="540" width="704" src="https://images.idgesg.net/images/article/2019/03/safari-incognito-1-100790462-large.jpg?auto=webp&amp;quality=85,70"> <small class="credit">Apple</small>

			<figcaption>
				<p>
					<em>From the File menu (1), New Private Window (2) gets you started.</em>
				</p>
			</figcaption>
		</figure>

		<p>
			Safari tags each Private Window by darkening the address bar. It also issues a reminder of what it does -- or more accurately -- what it doesn't do. "Safari will keep your browsing history private for all tabs of this window. After you close this window, Safari won't remember the pages you visited, your search history or your AutoFill information," the top-of-the-page note reads. The warning is more terse than those of other browsers and omits cautions about still-visible online activity.
		</p>

		<figure class="large ">
			<img alt="incognito-8-100843149-large.jpg?auto=web" class="ipsImage" data-ratio="75.10" height="529" width="720" src="https://images.idgesg.net/images/article/2020/05/incognito-8-100843149-large.jpg?auto=webp&amp;quality=85,70">
			<div class="zoom-icon">
				<em><small class="credit">Apple</small></em>
			</div>

			<figcaption>
				<p>
					<em>The darkened address bar up at the top is the signal that this Safari window is for private browsing.</em>
				</p>
			</figcaption>
		</figure>

		<p>
			Like Firefox, Safari automatically engages additional privacy technologies, whether the user browses in standard or private mode. Safari's Intelligent Tracking Protection (ITP), which kicked off in 2017 and has been repeatedly upgraded since, now blocks all third-party cookies, among other components advertisers and services use to track people as they bounce from one site to another. ITP is controlled by a single on-off switch -- on is the default -- found in <strong>Preferences</strong> under the <strong>Privacy</strong> icon. If the <strong>Website tracking:</strong> box is checked to mark <strong>Prevent cross-site tracking</strong>, ITP is on.
		</p>

		<figure class="large ">
			<img alt="incognito-9-100843150-large.jpg?auto=web" class="ipsImage" data-ratio="72.78" height="314" width="720" src="https://images.idgesg.net/images/article/2020/05/incognito-9-100843150-large.jpg?auto=webp&amp;quality=85,70">
			<div class="zoom-icon">
				<em><small class="credit">Apple</small></em>
			</div>

			<figcaption>
				<p>
					<em>Switching on cross-site tracking enables Safari's Intelligent Tracking Protection, which blocks a wide variety of </em>
				</p>

				<p>
					<em>bits advertisers try to use to follow you around the web while you're using a Private Window</em>
				</p>
			</figcaption>
		</figure>

		<p>
			A link can be opened directly to a Private Window by right-clicking, then selecting <strong>Open Link in New Private Window</strong>. Close a Private Window just as any Safari window, by clicking the red dot in the upper left corner of the browser frame.
		</p>

		<p>
			 
		</p>

		<p>
			<strong>Pro tip:</strong> <i>Once in a Safari Private Window, opening a new tab -- either by clicking the + icon at the upper right or by using the Command-T key combo -- omits the Private Browsing Enabled notice. (The darkened address bar remains as the sole indicator of a private browsing session.) </i><i>Other browsers, such as Firefox, repeat their cautionary messages each time a tab is opened in an incognito session.</i>
		</p>

		<p>
			 
		</p>

		<p>
			<a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/3356840/how-to-go-incognito-in-chrome-firefox-safari-and-edge.html" rel="external nofollow">Source</a>
		</p>
	</div>
</section>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">20329</guid><pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2023 17:34:09 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Police dismantle ransomware group behind attacks in 71 countries</title><link>https://nsaneforums.com/news/security-privacy-news/police-dismantle-ransomware-group-behind-attacks-in-71-countries-r20313/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	In cooperation with Europol and Eurojust, law enforcement agencies from seven nations have arrested in Ukraine the core members of a ransomware group linked to attacks against organizations in 71 countries.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The cybercriminals paralyzed major corporations' operations in attacks using ransomware such as LockerGoga, MegaCortex, HIVE, and Dharma.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Roles within this criminal network varied significantly: some members breached IT networks, while others reportedly helped launder the cryptocurrency payments made by victims to decrypt their files.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The attackers gained access to their targets' networks by stealing user credentials in brute force and SQL injection attacks, as well as using phishing emails with malicious attachments.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Once in, they used tools like TrickBot malware, Cobalt Strike, and PowerShell Empire to move laterally and compromise other systems before triggering previously deployed ransomware payloads.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The investigation unveiled that this organized group of ransomware affiliates encrypted more than 250 servers of major corporations, leading to losses exceeding several hundred million euros.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<div class="ipsEmbeddedVideo" contenteditable="false">
	<div>
		<iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="113" src="https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/8yLtHCbnF44?feature=oembed" title="Поліція затримала хакерів, які атакували провідні світові компанії" width="200"></iframe>
	</div>
</div>

<h2>
	Ransomware gang arrests in Ukraine
</h2>

<p>
	On November 21st, coordinated raids at 30 locations in Kyiv, Cherkasy, Rivne, and Vinnytsia resulted in the arrest of the group's 32-year-old mastermind and the capture of four accomplices.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Over 20 investigators from Norway, France, Germany, and the United States helped the Ukrainian National Police with the investigation in Kyiv. Europol also set up a virtual command center in the Netherlands to process the data seized during the house searches.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	"With the support of the TOR special unit, law enforcement officers conducted more than 30 authorized searches in the premises and cars of the suspects in Kyiv region, as well as in Cherkasy, Rivne, and Vinnytsia regions," the National Police of Ukraine' Department of Cyber Police <a href="https://cyberpolice.gov.ua/news/ponad--milyardy-gryven-zbytkiv-kiberpolicziya-ta-slidchi-naczpolu-vykryly-xakeriv-yaki-atakuvaly-providni-svitovi-kompaniyi-1780/" rel="external nofollow" target="_blank">said</a> today [automated translation].
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	"Computer equipment, cars, bank and SIM cards, 'draft' records, as well as dozens of electronic media and other evidence of illegal activities were seized. In particular, almost 4 million hryvnias and cryptocurrency assets."
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	This operation <a href="https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/police-arrest-hackers-behind-over-1-800-ransomware-attacks/" target="_blank" rel="external nofollow">follows other arrests in 2021</a> as part of the same law enforcement action when police detained 12 more suspects part of the same ransomware group linked to attacks against 1,800 victims in 71 countries.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	As the investigation revealed two years ago, the attackers deployed LockerGoga, MegaCortex, and Dharma ransomware. They also used malware like Trickbot and post-exploitation tools such as Cobalt Strike in their attacks.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Subsequent efforts at Europol and in Norway focused on analyzing data on devices seized in Ukraine in 2021 and helped identify additional suspects arrested one week ago in Kyiv.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The forensic analysis also allowed Swiss authorities to develop decryption tools for the <a href="https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/bitdefender-releases-free-decryptor-for-lockergoga-ransomware/" target="_blank" rel="external nofollow">LockerGoga</a> and <a href="https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/bitdefender-releases-free-megacortex-ransomware-decryptor/" target="_blank" rel="external nofollow">MegaCortex</a> ransomware variants in collaboration with No More Ransom partners and Bitdefender.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	This international police action was initiated by French authorities in September 2019 and focuses on locating threat actors in Ukraine and bringing them to justice with the help of a joint investigation team (JIT) comprising Norway, France, the United Kingdom, and Ukraine, with financial support from Eurojust and collaborating with Dutch, German, Swiss, and U.S. authorities.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The list of participating law enforcement agencies includes:
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<ul>
	<li>
		<strong>Norway:</strong> National Criminal Investigation Service (Kripos)
	</li>
	<li>
		<strong>France:</strong> Public Prosecutor’s Office of Paris, National Police (Police Nationale - OCLCTIC)
	</li>
	<li>
		<strong>Netherlands:</strong> National Police (Politie), National Public Prosecution Service (Landelijk Parket, Openbaar Ministerie)
	</li>
	<li>
		<strong>Ukraine:</strong> Prosecutor General’s Office (Офіс Генерального прокурора), National Police of Ukraine (Національна поліція України)
	</li>
	<li>
		<strong>Germany: </strong>Public Prosecutor’s Office of Stuttgart, Police Headquarters Reutlingen (Polizeipräsidium Reutlingen) CID Esslingen
	</li>
	<li>
		<strong>Switzerland:</strong> Swiss Federal Office of Police (fedpol), Polizei Basel-Landschaft, Public Prosecutor's Office of the canton of Zurich, Zurich Cantonal Police
	</li>
	<li>
		<strong>United States: </strong>United States Secret Service (USSS), Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) 
	</li>
	<li>
		<strong>Europol: </strong>European Cybercrime Centre (EC3)
	</li>
	<li>
		<strong>Eurojust</strong>
	</li>
</ul>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<a href="https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/police-dismantle-ransomware-group-behind-attacks-in-71-countries/" rel="external nofollow">Source</a>
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">20313</guid><pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2023 16:09:45 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Hackers spent 2+ years looting secrets of chipmaker NXP before being detected</title><link>https://nsaneforums.com/news/security-privacy-news/hackers-spent-2-years-looting-secrets-of-chipmaker-nxp-before-being-detected-r20312/</link><description><![CDATA[<h3>
	Chipmaker claims breach had no "material adverse effect."
</h3>

<div class="article-content post-page" itemprop="articleBody">
	
	<p>
		A prolific espionage hacking group with ties to China spent over two years looting the corporate network of NXP, the Netherlands-based chipmaker whose silicon powers security-sensitive components found in smartphones, smartcards, and electric vehicles, a news outlet has reported.
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		The intrusion, by a group tracked under names including "Chimera" and "G0114," lasted from late 2017 to the beginning of 2020, <a href="https://www-nrc-nl.translate.goog/nieuws/2023/11/24/spionage-chinese-hackersgroep-zat-jarenlang-in-het-netwerk-van-de-nederlandse-chipfabrikant-nxp-a4182149?_x_tr_sl=auto&amp;_x_tr_tl=en&amp;_x_tr_hl=en-US" rel="external nofollow">according to</a> Netherlands national news outlet NRC Handelsblad, which cited “several sources” familiar with the incident. During that time, the threat actors periodically accessed employee mailboxes and network drives in search of chip designs and other NXP intellectual property. The breach wasn’t uncovered until Chimera intruders were detected in a separate company network that connected to compromised NXP systems on several occasions. Details of the breach remained a closely guarded secret until now.
	</p>

	<h2>
		No material damage
	</h2>

	<p>
		NRC cited a report published (and later deleted) by security firm Fox-IT, titled <a href="https://web-archive-org.translate.goog/web/20210620162513/https://blog.fox-it.com/2021/01/12/abusing-cloud-services-to-fly-under-the-radar/?_x_tr_sl=auto&amp;_x_tr_tl=en&amp;_x_tr_hl=en-US" rel="external nofollow"><em>Abusing Cloud Services to Fly Under the Radar</em></a>. It documented Chimera using cloud services from companies including Microsoft and Dropbox to receive data stolen from the networks of semiconductor makers, including one in Europe that was hit in “early Q4 2017.” Some of the intrusions lasted as long as three years before coming to light. NRC said the unidentified victim was NXP.
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		“Once nested on a first computer—patient zero—the spies gradually expand their access rights, erase their tracks in between and secretly sneak to the protected parts of the network,” NRC reporters wrote in an English translation. “They try to secrete the sensitive data they find there in encrypted archive files via cloud storage services such as Microsoft OneDrive. According to the log files that Fox-IT finds, the hackers come every few weeks to see whether interesting new data can be found at NXP and whether more user accounts and parts of the network can be hacked.”
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		NXP apparently did not alert customers or shareholders to the intrusion, other than a brief reference in a 2019 annual report. It read:
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<blockquote class="QuoteNewsStyle">
		<p>
			We have, from time to time, experienced cyber-attacks attempting to obtain access to our computer systems and networks. Such incidents, whether or not successful, could result in the misappropriation of our proprietary information and technology, the compromise of personal and confidential information of our employees, customers, or suppliers, or interrupt our business. For instance, in January 2020, we became aware of a compromise of certain of our systems. We are taking steps to identify the malicious activity and are implementing remedial measures to increase the security of our systems and networks to respond to evolving threats and new information. As of the date of this filing, we do not believe that this IT system compromise has resulted in a material adverse effect on our business or any material damage to us. However, the investigation is ongoing, and we are continuing to evaluate the amount and type of data compromised. There can be no assurance that this or any other breach or incident will not have a material impact on our operations and financial results in the future.
		</p>
	</blockquote>

	<h2>
		“A big deal”
	</h2>

	<p>
		NXP is Europe’s second-biggest semiconductor company behind ASML and the world’s 18th biggest chipmaker by market capitalization. Its chips are used in iPhones and Apple watches to support advanced near-field communications security mechanisms such as tag originality, tamper detection, and authentication for Apple Pay. NXP also provides chips for the MIFARE card used by transit companies, FIDO-compliant security keys, and tools for relaying data inside the networks of electric vehicles.
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		Some security researchers said it was surprising that NXP officials didn’t inform customers of the two-year intrusion by threat actors, often abbreviated as TAs.
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		“NXP chips are in a lot of products,” Jake Williams, a former hacker for the National Security Agency, <a href="https://infosec.exchange/@malwarejake/111477602993876340" rel="external nofollow">wrote</a> on Mastodon. “It's likely the TA knows of specific flaws reported to NXP that can be leveraged to exploit devices the chips are embedded in, and that's assuming they didn't implement backdoors themselves. Over 2.5 years (at least), that's not unrealistic.”
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<div class="centered-figure-container">
		<figure class="center" style="width:640px">
			<iframe frameborder="0" height="480" scrolling="no" src="https://infosec.exchange/@malwarejake/111477602993876340/embed" width="640"></iframe>

			<figcaption class="caption">
				<div class="caption-text">
					 
				</div>
			</figcaption>
		</figure>
	</div>

	<p>
		A separate researcher who has published research in the past documenting a successful hack on a widely used product containing NXP chips voiced similar surprise.
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		“If a Chinese threat actor group gets source code or hardware designs of a chip manufacturer, these kinds of groups can use the source code even if the source code isn’t very well commented and documented,” the researcher, who asked not to be identified, said in an interview. “For me, [the intrusion] is a big deal. I was surprised NXP didn’t communicate with its customers.”
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		In an email, an NXP representative said the NRC report “is very dated as it was addressed back in 2019. As stated in our 2019 Annual Report, we became aware of a compromise of certain IT systems, and after a thorough investigation we determined that this incident did not result in a material adverse effect on our business. At NXP, we take the security of data very seriously. We learned from this experience and prioritize continually strengthening our IT systems to protect against ever-evolving cybersecurity threats.”
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		Chimera has extensive experience stealing data from a wide range of companies. The threat actor uses a variety of means to compromise its victims. In the campaign that hit NXP, hackers often leveraged account information revealed in previous data breaches of sites such as LinkedIn or Facebook. The data allowed Chimera to guess the passwords that employees used to access VPN accounts. Team members were able to bypass multi-factor authentication by changing telephone numbers associated with the accounts.
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		Security firm Cycraft <a href="https://cycraft.com/download/CyCraft-Whitepaper-Chimera_V4.1.pdf" rel="external nofollow">documented </a> one two-year hacking spree that targeted semiconductor makers with operations in Taiwan, where NXP happens to have research and development facilities. An attack on one of the unnamed victims compromised 10 endpoints and another compromised 24 endpoints.
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		“The main objective of these attacks appeared to be stealing intelligence, specifically documents about IC chips, software development kits (SDKs), IC designs, source code, etc.,” Cycraft researchers wrote. “If such documents are successfully stolen, the impact can be devastating.”
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>
</div>

<p>
	<a href="https://arstechnica.com/security/2023/11/hackers-spent-2-years-looting-secrets-of-chipmaker-nxp-before-being-detected/" rel="external nofollow">Source</a>
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">20312</guid><pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2023 16:07:57 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Google Play keeps banning the same web browser due to vague DMCA notices</title><link>https://nsaneforums.com/news/security-privacy-news/google-play-keeps-banning-the-same-web-browser-due-to-vague-dmca-notices-r20307/</link><description><![CDATA[<h3>
	Downloader app suspended by DMCA notice that didn't list any copyrighted works.
</h3>

<p>
	 
</p>

<div class="article-content post-page" itemprop="articleBody">
	<p>
		<img alt="downloader-browser-800x450.png" class="ipsImage" data-ratio="62.50" height="405" width="720" src="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/downloader-browser-800x450.png">
	</p>

	<div>
		<em>The Downloader app that was suspended from Google Play.</em>
	</div>

	<div>
		<em>Elias Saba</em>
	</div>

	<p>
		 
	</p>
	

	<p>
		App developer Elias Saba has had some bad luck with Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) takedowns. His Android TV app Downloader, which combines a web browser with a file manager, was <a href="https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2023/05/google-bans-downloader-app-after-tv-firms-complain-it-can-load-a-pirate-website/" rel="external nofollow">suspended by Google Play in May</a> after several Israeli TV companies complained that the app could be used to load a pirate website.
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		Google <a href="https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2023/06/google-un-bans-downloader-app-but-developer-still-mad-about-broken-dmca/" rel="external nofollow">reversed that suspension</a> after three weeks. But Downloader has been suspended by Google Play again, and this time the reason is even harder to understand. Based on a vague DMCA notice, it appears that Downloader was suspended simply because it can load <a href="https://www.warnerbros.com/" rel="external nofollow">the Warner Bros. website</a>.
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		Downloader is similar to standard web browsers in that it lets users access both legal and illegally shared content. The app can be used for general web surfing and can download files from a website when a user inputs the desired URL. According to Saba, the app itself contains no infringing content, nor does it direct users to infringing content.
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		Google notified Saba that the app was suspended again last night, according to the notice that Saba shared with Ars. "Your app contains content that allegedly infringes upon the copyright of others, and violates applicable copyright laws in the relevant country/jurisdiction," the notice from Google said.
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		The notice includes a copy of the DMCA complaint, which came from <a href="https://markscan.co.in/" rel="external nofollow">MarkScan</a>, a "digital asset protection" firm that content owners hire to enforce copyrights. MarkScan said in its complaint that it represents Warner Bros. Discovery Inc.
	</p>

	<h2>
		“Properties of Warner Bros. Discovery”
	</h2>

	<p>
		A DMCA notice is supposed to identify and describe the copyrighted work that was infringed. But MarkScan's notice about Downloader identifies the copyrighted work only as "Properties of Warner Bros. Discovery Inc." It provides no detail on which Warner Bros. work was infringed by Downloader.
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		A DMCA notice is also supposed to provide an example of where someone can see "an authorized example of the work." In this field, MarkScan simply entered the main Warner Bros. URL: <a class="url" href="https://www.warnerbros.com/" rel="external nofollow" target="_blank">https://www.warnerbros.com/</a>.
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		"I have a good faith belief that use of the copyrighted materials described above as allegedly infringing is not authorized by the copyright owner, its agent, or the law," MarkScan's notice said.
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		Unsurprisingly, Saba is outraged. "You would think that Google would at least verify that the takedown request is actually making a plausible claim," he told Ars today. "The most important field in the takedown where the claimant has to specify where the copyright infringement exists is void of all detail. If this complete lack of information is all it takes to take an app down, then no app in the Google Play Store is safe from being suspended with just a few clicks and a frivolous takedown request."
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		The Downloader app had been installed over 10 million times, according to an <a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20230824170506/https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.esaba.downloader" rel="external nofollow">Internet Archive capture</a> taken before the latest suspension.
	</p>
</div>

<div class="article-content post-page" itemprop="articleBody">
	<h2>
		Developer appeals
	</h2>

	<p>
		Saba appealed the takedown today but he told us that the appeal was rejected by Google Play after 24 minutes. Saba said he also submitted a <a href="https://support.google.com/legal/contact/lr_counternotice?product=googleplay" rel="external nofollow">DMCA counter-notice</a>, which gives the complainant 10 business days from today to file a legal action. After his first takedown in May, his app was reinstated after the DMCA complainant didn't take any legal action.
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		Saba also wrote a <a href="https://www.aftvnews.com/my-downloader-app-has-again-been-absurdly-removed-from-google-play-due-to-a-frivolous-copyright-claim-from-warner-bros-discovery/" rel="external nofollow">blog post</a> today about the latest takedown. "Given that my app still does not contain any copyright-infringing content and never has, I've countered this new DMCA takedown which will, hopefully, mean the app will be restored sometime in the coming weeks," he wrote. "In the meantime, you can sideload the app onto your Google TV or Android TV devices by downloading the APK from <a class="url" href="https://www.aftvnews.com/downloader.apk" rel="external nofollow" target="_blank">https://www.aftvnews.com/downloader.apk</a>. Downloader remains available on Fire TV devices directly <a href="https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01N0BP507/?tag=arstech20-20" rel="external nofollow">from the Amazon Appstore</a>."
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		Saba's blog post called it "absurd that Google seems to make no effort at all to verify the copyright claims being made on my app which is just a web browser that can download files and has no content of any sort in it."
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		Saba made similar complaints about Google's DMCA system in May. "If loading a website with infringing content in a standard web browser is enough to violate DMCA, then every browser in the Google Play Store including @googlechrome should also be removed. It's a ridiculous claim and an abuse of the DMCA," he wrote at the time.
	</p>

	<h2>
		Google aware of DMCA abuse
	</h2>

	<p>
		Google is clearly aware that its system for handling DMCA complaints is routinely abused. On November 13, <a href="https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2023/11/google-sues-people-who-weaponized-dmca-to-remove-rivals-search-results/" rel="external nofollow">Google sued</a> a group of people accused of weaponizing the DMCA to get competitors' websites removed from search results.
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		Google said in its lawsuit that, under the DMCA, it is obligated to trust the assertions that copyright claimants make in takedown requests. The law "relies on the honesty and good faith of copyright claimants, requiring them to support their claims with a statement under penalty of perjury and relying on the accuracy of the information they submit," Google said.
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		Google also said in its lawsuit that it "reviews takedown requests related to Google Search results using a combination of human manual review and automation." Google said it uses the process to confirm "that a takedown request contains the elements required by the DMCA." But Google doesn't verify itself whether the allegedly infringing URLs actually contain infringing content.
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		We contacted Google today to ask why Downloader was suspended based on a DMCA notice that doesn't cite a specific infringing work, and whether Google is doing anything to prevent repeated suspensions of apps that are wrongly targeted. We also contacted Warner Bros. about the DMCA notice, and will update this article if we get any response from either company.
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>
</div>

<p>
	<a href="https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2023/11/weird-dmca-takedown-google-play-bans-app-because-it-can-load-warnerbros-com/" rel="external nofollow">Source</a>
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">20307</guid><pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2023 07:55:26 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Google is the master of fake Privacy features</title><link>https://nsaneforums.com/news/security-privacy-news/google-is-the-master-of-fake-privacy-features-r20283/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	Google started out with a "don't be evil" motto when it launched its first product, Google Search. Today, Google is a different company. It has created numerous products and abandoned a lot.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	For the past couple of years, Google pushed "privacy" features in its products, especially Google Chrome. The two main products that have come out of this is the Privacy Sandbox and IP Protection.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Privacy Sandbox is highly controversial. Google claims that it improves privacy for all users that use Google Chrome. The main idea behind it is to move tracking from the user level, using cookies for the most part, to the group level.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	To achieve this, Google baked technology into the Chrome browser that analyses the user's browsing history. The data is then used locally on the user's device to assign interest groups.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Browse lots of car, sports or knitting websites? Chrome will assign you to matching groups. These groups are then used by advertisers and publishers to display ads. Google, being the dominant advertising company in the world, benefits the most from it.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<div class="rvloader-container mb--10" id="td-incontent-818694361468">
	<script class="rvloader">!function(){var t="td-incontent-"+Math.floor(Math.random()*Date.now()),e=document.getElementsByClassName("rvloader"),n=e[e.length-1].parentNode;undefined==n.getAttribute("id")&&(n.setAttribute("id",t),revamp.displaySlots([t]))}();</script>
</div>

<figure aria-describedby="caption-attachment-201832" class="wp-caption alignnone" id="attachment_201832" style="width: 1200px">
	<img alt="Google-Privacy-Sandbox-work.jpg" class="ipsImage" data-ratio="67.22" height="291" width="720" src="https://www.ghacks.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Google-Privacy-Sandbox-work.jpg">
	<figcaption class="wp-caption-text" id="caption-attachment-201832">
		<em>Google Privacy Sandbox work</em>
	</figcaption>
</figure>

<p>
	Apart from keeping some form of tracking alive on the Internet, Google is also holding the key to the technology. It is in the browser and Google controls Chromium and Chrome. In other words, Google controls the entire feature.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Is the <a data-wpel-link="internal" href="https://www.ghacks.net/2023/05/18/googles-privacy-sandbox-is-ready-chrome-to-drop-third-party-cookies-in-2024/" rel="external nofollow">Privacy Sandbox</a> good for user privacy? It depends on your perspective. If you already block third-party cookies, then it won't have a positive effect. In fact, you will be tracked again when it launches, unless you turn it off.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Google's main argument for improved privacy is that Privacy Sandbox does away with third-party cookies. However, it replaces one form of tracking with another. It may not be as individual as before, but it is still tracking in the end.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Privacy Sandbox is available for all Chrome browsers, and also for <a data-wpel-link="internal" href="https://www.ghacks.net/2023/02/16/privacy-sandbox-beta-on-android-is-all-about-ads/" rel="external nofollow">Android</a>.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Chrome users who want better privacy, and not change to a privacy-friendly browser, may turn off the entire Privacy Sandbox feature to improve their privacy significantly. Kick third-party cookies to the curb as well, and you have improved privacy to a level that Google will never reach.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<div class="rvloader-container mb--10" id="td-incontent-1242189081932">
	<script class="rvloader">!function(){var t="td-incontent-"+Math.floor(Math.random()*Date.now()),e=document.getElementsByClassName("rvloader"),n=e[e.length-1].parentNode;undefined==n.getAttribute("id")&&(n.setAttribute("id",t),revamp.displaySlots([t]))}();</script>
</div>

<p>
	You can check out my guide on <a data-wpel-link="internal" href="https://www.ghacks.net/2023/08/26/how-to-disable-androids-new-ads-privacy-features/" rel="external nofollow">disabling Android's Ads Privacy feature here</a>. If you use desktop Chrome, check out my guide on <a data-wpel-link="internal" href="https://www.ghacks.net/2023/07/18/how-to-turn-off-google-chromes-built-in-advertising-features/" rel="external nofollow">turning off the advertising features in Chrome</a>.
</p>

<h2>
	IP Protection
</h2>

<p>
	<a data-wpel-link="internal" href="https://www.ghacks.net/2023/10/23/ip-protection-tests-start-in-google-chrome-to-improve-user-privacy/" rel="external nofollow">IP Protection</a> is another new feature that Google is rolling out in the Chrome web browser. It is designed to protect the IP address of user devices, so that websites don't get access to it anymore.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Google achieves this by tunneling all user requests through its own servers. What the company failed to mention during the announcement was that this feature gives it access to the entire activity of the user.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Proton calls the feature <a data-wpel-link="external" href="https://protonvpn.com/blog/google-ip-protection/" rel="external nofollow" target="_blank">Privacy Washing</a>, and it is. Google gets a "God’s-eye view of every website you visit at all times while using Chrome". Google gets another access point to user data, which is invaluable in the advertising world.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Chrome users may want to keep the feature disabled. There are better options to protect your IP address, including using a reputable VPN service, such as <a data-wpel-link="external" href="https://mullvad.net/en" rel="external nofollow" target="_blank">Mullvad's</a>. <a data-wpel-link="external" href="https://www.torproject.org/download/" rel="external nofollow" target="_blank">Tor Browser</a>, a free Firefox-based web browser with a focus on anonymity, may also be used to protect the IP address.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<div class="rvloader-container mb--10" id="td-incontent-528585713489">
	<script class="rvloader">!function(){var t="td-incontent-"+Math.floor(Math.random()*Date.now()),e=document.getElementsByClassName("rvloader"),n=e[e.length-1].parentNode;undefined==n.getAttribute("id")&&(n.setAttribute("id",t),revamp.displaySlots([t]))}();</script>
</div>

<p>
	<strong>Closing Words</strong>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Google uses words like privacy or protection deliberately to influence public opinion. This doesn't influence privacy-minded individuals and groups, but it may persuade the general use base that this feature is indeed beneficial to one's privacy and protection.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<strong>Now You:</strong> what is your take on this development?
</p>

<p>
	
</p>

<div id="div-gpt-ad-1524862513262-0">
	 
</div>

<p>
	<a href="https://www.ghacks.net/2023/11/26/google-is-the-master-of-fake-privacy-features/" rel="external nofollow">Source</a>
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">20283</guid><pubDate>Sun, 26 Nov 2023 07:30:31 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>My doctor diagnosed me with ADHD &#x2013; so how did my phone find out?</title><link>https://nsaneforums.com/news/security-privacy-news/my-doctor-diagnosed-me-with-adhd-%E2%80%93-so-how-did-my-phone-find-out-r20274/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	<span style="font-size:22px;"><span style="color:#c0392b;"><strong>At my most vulnerable</strong></span>, <span style="color:#c0392b;"><strong>targeted ads</strong></span> <span style="color:#c0392b;"><strong>started selling me services</strong></span> that could help manage my symptoms – for a price. The<span style="color:#c0392b;"><strong> law must offer more protection</strong></span></span>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	After I was diagnosed with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in 2022, I started following Instagram accounts that could help me understand the condition. Reels and memes about being neurodivergent started to fill my feed, along with tips on how to manage ADHD in a relationship and other helpful advice. But within days, something else happened: my phone found out about my diagnosis.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	All of a sudden, I was being served with ads for apps that claimed they could help me to manage my symptoms. There were quizzes to determine what type of ADHD I had: was I predominantly inattentive or impulsive, one asked. Did I definitely have it? Find out by taking this diagnostic test, another promised.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	I filled out an online quiz from one of these companies and got an ADHD score of 43 out of 63 – whatever that meant. If I wanted to find out, I needed to open the “personal management plan” that had arrived in my inbox and would apparently give me unique insights into my challenges and help me to better manage my symptoms. But I would need to pay 26p a day. I chose not to sign up, but over the following weeks I received a further 15 messages, each trying to lure me into purchasing the plan with growing discounts – 60% off at first, then 75%.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Companies can use social media to personalise their interactions with consumers like never before. In my case, I hadn’t even spent much time Googling ADHD, but suddenly nearly all my Instagram ads were about it. Freshly diagnosed, my phone seemed to know more about me at that stage than my friends and family.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The law around this kind of advertising is somewhat murky, according to Johann Laux, a postdoctoral fellow at the Oxford Internet Institute. In the UK, it is against the law to advertise prescription-only drugs to consumers. But there is no such restriction on advertising over-the-counter medical products.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Laux said there could be privacy concerns to this kind of targeted advertising, as health data is a special category and companies need explicit consent to access it. But no one was rummaging through my health records – the company had been able to infer my health status from my search terms.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Consumer law protects vulnerable consumers in their economic decision-making. But the characteristics that make a consumer vulnerable are rather vaguely defined. According to the Financial Conduct Authority, a vulnerable consumer is someone who is easily harmed because of their personal situation. But it is clear to me that people with ADHD do have a vulnerability – especially when grappling to come to terms with a new diagnosis.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Research shows that people with ADHD often have problems managing their finances and can have issues with impulsivity, which can lead to spending without thinking. I worry about adverts targeting a group of people who are also prone to impulse buying, potentially trapping them into costly subscriptions for health tips that may or may not help and are difficult to scrutinise before signing up for a payment plan.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Targeted adverts such as these feed into the issue of self-diagnosis. In 2022, NBC News wrote about TikTok allowing the mental health care startup, Cerebral, to sponsor ADHD advertisements that promoted “negative body images and contained misleading health claims”. The advert claimed that obesity was “five times more prevalent” among adults with ADHD and included the quote: “Those who live by impulse, eat by impulse.”
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Another advertisement by Cerebral encouraged female users who were “spacey, forgetful or chatty” to pursue an ADHD diagnosis and medication. Done, another company NBC noted was advertising ADHD treatment, explicitly encourages users to self-diagnose via a survey.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	In Europe, the law over using sensitive data for targeted advertising is changing. In July, the court of justice of the European Union said that using personal data for ads without consent breaks data protection rules. Meta will no longer be able to use the personal data of Facebook and Instagram users in Europe for targeted advertising. The restrictions focus on tracking users’ social media activity and creating profiles based on their interests, location and content preferences.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	According to Laux, the UK may be affected by developments in Europe. Companies operating in both markets must adhere to the European rules, so it may simply be cheaper for them to adopt more stringent practices across the board.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	This change in the law is undoubtedly a step in the right direction, but we need to be having these discussions in the UK, too. In the meantime, we are not completely powerless. If you want to stop the adverts, there are things you can do, Laux tells me. Turning off personalised ads in your settings, or hiding ads in your feed if you don’t want to see them again, are some options.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	In an ideal world, social media companies would have areas that are off-limits in terms of advertisement, such as health or sexual orientation. I did not like seeing <span style="color:#c0392b;"><strong>deeply personal information about my life staring back at me on social media</strong></span> interfaces. By <span style="color:#c0392b;"><strong>allowing advertisers access to our most intimate data</strong></span>, <span style="color:#c0392b;"><strong>we are essentially letting them into our minds</strong></span> – and the law does not seem to have caught up yet to protect us against what this means.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<strong><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/nov/25/doctor-diagnosed-adhd-phone-targeted-ads" rel="external nofollow">Source</a></strong>
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">20274</guid><pubDate>Sat, 25 Nov 2023 16:07:44 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Researchers have successfully bypassed Microsoft's Windows Hello fingerprint authentication</title><link>https://nsaneforums.com/news/security-privacy-news/researchers-have-successfully-bypassed-microsofts-windows-hello-fingerprint-authentication-r20237/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	A security group hired by Microsoft to test its Windows Hello fingerprint authentication hardware and software has posted word they were able to bypass that technology on a number of laptops, including a Microsoft Surface product.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The Blackwing Intelligence group revealed their findings in October as part of Microsoft's BlueHat security conference but only posted their results on their own site this week (via <a href="https://www.theverge.com/2023/11/22/23972220/microsoft-windows-hello-fingerprint-authentication-bypass-security-vulnerability" rel="external nofollow">The Verge</a>). The blog post, which has the catchy title "<a href="https://blackwinghq.com/blog/posts/a-touch-of-pwn-part-i/" rel="external nofollow">A Touch of Pwn</a>", stated the group used the fingerprint sensors inside the Dell Inspiron 15 and the Lenovo ThinkPad T14 laptops, along with the Microsoft Surface Pro Type Cover with Fingerprint ID made for the Surface Pro 8 and X tablets. The specific fingerprint sensors were made by Goodix, Synaptics, and ELAN.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<div class="ipsEmbeddedVideo" contenteditable="false">
	<div>
		<iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="113" src="https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/gjvu-l6vKFE?feature=oembed" title="BlueHat Oct 23. S02: A Touch of Pwn: Attacking Windows Hello Fingerprint Authentication" width="200"></iframe>
	</div>
</div>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	All of the Windows Hello-supported fingerprint sensors that were tested used “match on chip” hardware, which means that the authentication is handled on the sensor itself which has its own microprocessor and storage. Blackwing stated:
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<blockquote class="QuoteNewsStyle">
	<p>
		A database of “fingerprint templates” (the biometric data obtained by the fingerprint sensor) is stored on-chip, and enrollment and matching is performed directly within the chip. Since fingerprint templates never leave the chip, this eliminates privacy concerns of biometric material being stored, and potentially exfiltrated, from the host — even if the host is compromised. This approach also prevents attacks that involve simply sending images of valid fingerprints to the host for matching.
	</p>
</blockquote>

<p>
	Blackwing used reverse engineering to find flaws in the fingerprint sensors and then created their own USB device that could perform a man-in-the-middle (MitM) attack. This device allowed them to bypass the fingerprint authentication hardware in those devices.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The blog also pointed out that while Microsoft uses the Secure Device Connection Protocol (SDCP) "to provide a secure channel between the host and biometric devices" two of the three fingerprint sensors that were tested didn't even have SDCP enabled. Blackwell recommended that all fingerprint sensor companies not only enable SDCP on their products but also get a third-party company to make sure it works.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	It should be pointed out that bypassing these fingerprint hardware products took "approximately three months" of work by Blackwing, with a lot of effort, but the point is they were successful. It remains to be seen if Microsoft, or the fingerprint sensor companies, can use this research to fix these issues.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<a href="https://www.neowin.net/news/researchers-have-successfully-bypassed-microsofts-windows-hello-fingerprint-authentication/" rel="external nofollow">Source</a>
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">20237</guid><pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2023 17:15:51 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Malware dev says they can revive expired Google auth cookies</title><link>https://nsaneforums.com/news/security-privacy-news/malware-dev-says-they-can-revive-expired-google-auth-cookies-r20236/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	The Lumma information-stealer malware (aka 'LummaC2') is promoting a new feature that allegedly allows cybercriminals to restore expired Google cookies, which can be used to hijack Google accounts.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Session cookies are specific web cookies used to allow a browsing session to log in to a website's services automatically. As these cookies allow anyone possessing them to log in to the owner's account, they commonly have a limited lifespan for security reasons to prevent misuse if stolen.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Restoring these cookies would allow Lumma operators to gain unauthorized access to any Google account even after the legitimate owner has logged out of their account or their session has expired.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Hudson Rock's Alon Gal <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/posts/alon-gal-utb_an-upcoming-update-to-lumma-infostealer-is-activity-7128433924380213248-hcEG/" rel="external nofollow" target="_blank">first spotted</a> a forum post by the info-stealer's developers highlighting an update released on November 14, claiming the "ability to restore dead cookies using a key from restore files (applies only to Google cookies)."
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<div style="text-align:center">
	<p style="text-align: left;">
		<img alt="lumma-cookies.png" class="ipsImage" data-ratio="75.10" height="540" width="644" src="https://www.bleepstatic.com/images/news/u/1220909/2023/Malware/67/lumma-cookies.png">
	</p>

	<div style="text-align: left;">
		<em>Lumma announcing new, powerful featureSource: BleepingComputer</em>
	</div>

	<p>
		 
	</p>
</div>

<p>
	This new feature was only made available to subscribers of the highest-tier "Corporate" plan, which costs cybercriminals <a href="https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/lumma-stealer-malware-now-uses-trigonometry-to-evade-detection/" target="_blank" rel="external nofollow">$1,000/month</a>.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The forum post also clarifies that each key can be used twice so that cookie restoration can work only one time. That would still be enough to launch catastrophic attacks on organizations that otherwise follow good security practices.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	This new feature allegedly introduced in recent Lumma releases is yet to be verified by security researchers or Google, so whether or not it works as advertised remains uncertain.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	However, it is worth mentioning that another stealer, Rhadamanthys, announced a similar capability in a recent update, increasing the likelihood that malware authors discovered an exploitable security gap.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<div style="text-align:center">
	<p style="text-align: left;">
		<img alt="rhada.jpg" class="ipsImage" data-ratio="75.10" height="450" width="720" src="https://www.bleepstatic.com/images/news/u/1220909/2023/Malware/67/rhada.jpg">
	</p>

	<div style="text-align: left;">
		<em>Rhadamanthys Stealer also claiming to offer Google cookie restorationSource: @g0njxa</em>
	</div>

	<p>
		 
	</p>
</div>

<p>
	BleepingComputer has contacted Google multiple times requesting a comment on the possibility of malware authors having discovered a vulnerability in session cookies, but we have yet to receive a response.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	A few days after contacting Google, Lumma's developers released an update that claims to be an additional fix to bypass newly introduced restrictions imposed by Google to prevent cookie restoration.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<div style="text-align:center">
	<p style="text-align: left;">
		<img alt="lumma-fix.png" class="ipsImage" data-ratio="75.10" height="277" width="720" src="https://www.bleepstatic.com/images/news/u/1220909/2023/Malware/67/lumma-fix.png">
	</p>

	<div style="text-align: left;">
		<em>Lumma update to address restrictionsSource: BleepingComputer</em>
	</div>

	<p>
		 
	</p>
</div>

<p>
	BleepingComputer has also attempted to learn more about how the feature works and what weakness it exploits directly from Lumma. However, a "support agent" of the malware operation declined to share anything about it.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	When asked about the similar feature Rhadamantis added recently, Lumma's agent told us their competitors had carelessly copied the feature from their stealer.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	If information-stealers can indeed restore expired Google cookies as promoted, there's nothing that users can do to protect their accounts until Google pushes out a fix besides preventing the malware infection that leads to the theft of those cookies.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Precautions include avoiding downloads of torrent files and executables from dubious websites and skipping promoted results in Google Search.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<a href="https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/malware-dev-says-they-can-revive-expired-google-auth-cookies/" rel="external nofollow">Source</a>
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">20236</guid><pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2023 17:13:53 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Atomic Stealer Malware is tricking Mac users with fake browser updates</title><link>https://nsaneforums.com/news/security-privacy-news/atomic-stealer-malware-is-tricking-mac-users-with-fake-browser-updates-r20234/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	Atomic Stealer is a malware that has been plaguing Mac users for a while now. This time, attackers are tricking users in a more sophisticated manner, by pretending to offer browser updates.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<a data-wpel-link="internal" href="https://www.ghacks.net/2023/05/03/atomic-macos-malware-amos/" rel="external nofollow" target="_blank">Atomic Stealer</a>, aka AMOS, is a stealer, which can harvest passwords from your Apple iCloud Keychain, crypto assets, files, and other personal data. It was first discovered by security researchers in April 2023, though it has since evolved. Criminals who have access to AMOS have been using it to phish victims using various techniques, including via cracked software.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	AMOS is being delivered to users through a fake browser update chain that is being called Clearfake campaign, which was discovered by Security Researcher Randy McEoin in August 2023. On November 17, security researcher Ankit Anubhav discovered that the Clearfake campaign was being used to target Mac users.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	An article that has been published by <a data-wpel-link="external" href="https://www.malwarebytes.com/blog/threat-intelligence/2023/11/atomic-stealer-distributed-to-mac-users-via-fake-browser-updates" rel="external nofollow" target="_blank">Malwarebytes</a> (spotted by <a data-wpel-link="external" href="https://9to5mac.com/2023/11/21/fake-safari-chrome-updates-infecting-macs-amos/" rel="external nofollow" target="_blank">9to5Mac</a>) reveals the details about how the Atomic Stealer targets users. The attackers are using malicious ads to deliver the stealer to users, they do so by purchasing legitimate ad space on Google and other services. It infects compromised website servers, which are then used to serve as a means to distribute the malware.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	When a user looks up an app that they want to download, they may see the fake ad, and click on it. This initiates the download of the file ( a DMG file) with the malware in it. The unsuspecting user may run the file to update their browser. But this is when things take a turn, it begins executing some commands after prompting for the administrative password. Once the user gives the password, AMOS steals their iCloud data and files, and sends them to a remote server. This form of attack is referred to as malvertising, which is actually quite commonly used to trick Windows users.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<div class="rvloader-container mb--10" id="td-incontent-179300282898">
	<script class="rvloader">!function(){var t="td-incontent-"+Math.floor(Math.random()*Date.now()),e=document.getElementsByClassName("rvloader"),n=e[e.length-1].parentNode;undefined==n.getAttribute("id")&&(n.setAttribute("id",t),revamp.displaySlots([t]))}();</script>
</div>

<p>
	The Clearfake campaign is smart, it detects the user's browser (user agent) and offers an update specific to it. So Chrome users will see a fake update that looks like an update prompt from Chrome, refer to the screenshot below.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<img alt="Atomic-Stealer-Malware-Clearfake-campaig" class="ipsImage" data-ratio="75.10" height="487" width="720" src="https://www.ghacks.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Atomic-Stealer-Malware-Clearfake-campaign-fake-Google-Chrome-update.jpg">
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Here is what the fake update for Apple Safari looks like. It has an outdated icon for Safari and iCloud, which is pretty easy to spot if you're familiar with the modern ones.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<img alt="Atomic-Stealer-Malware-Clearfake-campaig" class="ipsImage" data-ratio="75.10" height="538" width="720" src="https://www.ghacks.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Atomic-Stealer-Malware-Clearfake-campaign-fake-Apple-Safari-update.jpg">
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Malwarebytes says that AMOS could be the first instance of a socially engineered attack, similar to those that affect Windows, to target macOS. The fact that attackers are viewing Mac users as potential victims is also a sign that Apple's computers are getting popular. This way they can breach more victims to phish them, or to use the data for future attacks.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<div class="rvloader-container mb--10" id="td-incontent-88812171126">
	<script class="rvloader">!function(){var t="td-incontent-"+Math.floor(Math.random()*Date.now()),e=document.getElementsByClassName("rvloader"),n=e[e.length-1].parentNode;undefined==n.getAttribute("id")&&(n.setAttribute("id",t),revamp.displaySlots([t]))}();</script>
</div>

<p>
	We recommend paying close attention to where you download files from. Avoid sketchy sites, don't download pirated software. If you want to update your apps, go to the official website to get the latest update. Or, you can update your browser directly from its menu. Apple Safari is an exception to this, as updates are delivered via a macOS Update from the System Settings (System Preferences). And as always, use an ad blocker such as uBlock Origin for Firefox / Chrome, or AdGuard to protect your computer from ads and malware.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	If you are worried that you might have a malware on your machine, you could download the free version of Malwarebytes to run a scan and remove the malware. Remember, most apps will not ask for your administrator password to install an update, so treat this as a red flag, as it may use it to bypass macOS Gatekeeper, the built-in security tool in the operating system.
</p>

<p>
	
</p>

<div id="div-gpt-ad-1524862513262-0">
	 
</div>

<p>
	<a href="https://www.ghacks.net/2023/11/22/atomic-stealer-malware-is-tricking-mac-users-with-fake-browser-updates/" rel="external nofollow">Source</a>
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">20234</guid><pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2023 08:13:22 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Google Chrome will limit ad blockers starting June 2024</title><link>https://nsaneforums.com/news/security-privacy-news/google-chrome-will-limit-ad-blockers-starting-june-2024-r20222/</link><description><![CDATA[<h3>
	The "Manifest V3" rollout is back after letting tensions cool for a year.
</h3>

<div class="article-content post-page" itemprop="articleBody">
	
	<p>
		Chrome's new adblock-limiting extension plan is still on. The company <a href="https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2022/12/chrome-delays-plan-to-limit-ad-blockers-new-timeline-coming-in-march/" rel="external nofollow">paused the rollout</a> of the new "Manifest V3" extension format a year ago after an outcry over how much it would damage some of Chrome's most popular extensions. A year later, Google is restarting the phase-out schedule, and while it has changed some things, Chrome will eventually be home to inferior filtering extensions.
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		Google's <a href="https://developer.chrome.com/blog/resuming-the-transition-to-mv3/" rel="external nofollow">blog post</a> says the plan to kill Manifest V2, the current format for Chrome extensions, is back on starting June 2024. On that date (we'll be on "Chrome 127" by then), Google will turn off Manifest V2 for the pre-stable versions of Chrome—that's the Beta, Dev, and Canary channels. Google says, "Manifest V2 extensions [will be] automatically disabled in their browser and will no longer be able to install Manifest V2 extensions from the Chrome Web Store."
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		The timeline around a stable channel rollout is worded kind of strangely. The company says: "We expect it will take at least a month to observe and stabilize the changes in pre-stable before expanding the rollout to stable channel Chrome, where it will also gradually roll out over time. The exact timing may vary depending on the data collected, and during this time, we will keep you informed about our progress." It's unclear what "data" Google is concerned with. It's not the end of the world if an extension crashes—it turns off and stops working until the user reboots the extension. Maybe the company is concerned about how many people Google "Firefox" once their ad-blocker stops working.
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		Enterprise users with the "ExtensionManifestV2Availability" policy turned on will get an extra year of Manifest V2 compatibility.
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>
	Google's sales pitch for Manifest V3 is that, by limiting extensions, the browser can be lighter on resources, and Google can protect your privacy from extension developers. With more limited tools, you'll be more exposed to the rest of the Internet, though, and a big part of the privacy-invasive Internet is Google. The Electronic Frontier Foundation called Google's description of Manifest V3 "<a href="https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2021/12/chrome-users-beware-manifest-v3-deceitful-and-threatening" rel="external nofollow">Deceitful and Threatening</a>" and said that it's "doubtful Mv3 will do much for security."

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		Firefox’s Add-On Operations Manager also didn't agree with any claims of privacy benefits, saying that, while malicious add-ons "are mostly interested in grabbing bad data, they can still do that with the current webRequest API." In a later article, the EFF <a href="https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2021/12/googles-manifest-v3-still-hurts-privacy-security-innovation" rel="external nofollow">also points out</a> that Google's "lighter on resources" argument also doesn't really hold water. Anyone can open the Chrome Task Manager and see that a single website can take up a huge amount of memory, often in the 200MB-plus range. On the high end now for me, Slack is drinking 500MB, while a single Google Chat tab, created by this company that is <em>so</em> <em>concerned</em> about performance, is at 1.5GB of memory usage. Something like uBlock Origin, across all your tabs, is in the 80MB range.
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		The one part of Manifest V3 that everyone can agree on is that it will hurt ad blockers. Google is adding a completely arbitrary limit on how many "rules" content filtering add-ons can include, which are needed to keep up with the nearly infinite ad-serving sites that are out there (by the way, <a href="https://arstechnica.com/store/product/subscriptions/" rel="external nofollow">Ars Technica subscriptions</a> give you an ad-free reading experience and make a great holiday gift!). Google originally went with a completely crippling limit of 5,000 rules, and after the widespread outrage during its first attempt to push Manifest V3, the company upgraded filtering to a "more generous" limit of 30,000 rules. uBlock Origin comes with about 300,000-plus filtering rules you can enable, <em>and</em> you can also import additional blocking lists and have that number skyrocket.
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		As far as we can tell, there's no justification for arbitrarily limiting the list of filter rules. Manifest V2 does not have a limit and works great. Firefox is also implementing Manifest V3—it basically has to because Chrome is so much more popular—but it's doing so <a href="https://blog.mozilla.org/en/products/firefox/extensions-addons/heres-whats-going-on-in-the-world-of-extensions/" rel="external nofollow">without limits to filtering</a> and other capabilities. Mozilla's blog post on the subject promises "Firefox’s implementation of Manifest V3 ensures users can access the most effective privacy tools available like <a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/ublock-origin/" rel="external nofollow">uBlock Origin</a> and other content-blocking and privacy-preserving extensions."
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>

	<p>
		Once Manifest V3 happens, Chrome users will be limited to "uBlock Origin Lite," while users will need to switch to Firefox or some other non-limited browser to get the full extension. <a href="https://github.com/uBlockOrigin/uBOL-home/wiki/Frequently-asked-questions-(FAQ)" rel="external nofollow">An FAQ</a> on the project details just how many feature regressions there will be—in addition to the hard limits on filtering rule sets, there are a host of other limits on filtering now. Items can't be filtered based on the response headers or according to the URL in the address bar. Developers are <a href="https://github.com/w3c/webextensions/issues/344#issuecomment-1429271719" rel="external nofollow">more limited</a> in what regular expressions they can use, along with a host of other technical limitations.
	</p>

	<p>
		 
	</p>
</div>

<p>
	<a href="https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2023/11/google-chrome-will-limit-ad-blockers-starting-june-2024/" rel="external nofollow">Source</a>
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">20222</guid><pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2023 02:33:10 +0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
